Published: 4 Aug 09 16:02 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/21098/20090804/
Swedish men’s enlightened attitudes toward equality and gender roles make them among the best potential husbands in the developed world, a recent study shows.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
With international media swooping on the Stockholm riots from every angle, The Local's Oliver Gee explains why Stockholm is not burning, and how the story has been blown out of proportion. READ () »
After five nights of rioting throughout the outskirts of Stockholm, many in Sweden and elsewhere are trying to make sense of it all. The Local spoke to a mix of commentators and local politicians to get their views. READ () »
As white-collar union Saco slammed Sweden for not helping well-educated foreigners into the labour market, The Local spoke to researcher Josefin Edström about the disconnect between foreign professionals and Swedish employers. READ () »
The UK Foreign Office has issued a travel warning for Sweden after arsonists tore through several Stockholm suburbs, while Americans have been warned to stay out of the affected areas by their embassy. READ () »
With Swedish police set to call in reinforcements in an attempt to get the now five-day-old wave of arson and vandalism under control, Sweden's image abroad may have been tarnished. READ () »
For this week's secret location picture gallery quiz, we head to a city that's among the top 20 in terms of population size. Can you guess which one it is in nine clues? READ () »
Sweden's Princess Madeleine is "less nervous than she thought" about her impending walk down the aisle at Stockholm's Storkyrkan church to wed US financier Chris O'Neill. READ () »
Swedes are having less sex than ever before, a new survey has revealed, and their libidos appear to have waned too, prompting researchers to warn that "desire disorders" may be keeping Swedes from getting intimate. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
REFLECTIONS OF A TWITTER VIRGIN…. »
"I confess to having been reluctant to embrace Twitter. But I confess myself a bit of a convert. The great TV critic Clive James once said about “Dallas”, “I came to mock but I stayed to pray”. I wouldn’t go that far, but I have found my first two weeks on Twitter (@hmapauljohnston) both fun and informative. It’s been..." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
(link seems to be broken at the moment, so: http://www.tjejmilen.se/start/content.cfm?...9&Lan_ID=1)
Women in Sweden are less financially dependent than women in other countries on their husbands or partners. This means there are fewer obstacles to ending a failing marriage.
This is why I am marrying a Swede, Aussie men make the worst husbands / partners apparently. I'd agree to that.
:-)
Italy = Catholic
Spain = Catholic
Portugal = Catholic
Greece = Very traditional
Neatherlands = 50% Catholic
Poland = Catholic
USA = Social structure still in the 1800s
Ireland...
the list goes on...
That leaves the the Scandinavian countries.
Any country in Europe or the West permits a divorce petition from either party.
Cattle? Pull the udder one..
What have you been drinking today?
We have many friends wife swedish wifes and Australian Husbands but not the reverse. All these friends meet outside both countries and live in both Australia and Sweden. All couples are very differnt in there ways, but one common factor stated from the Swedish women is that they only live in Sweden for there family and not the country and would and do preffer to live elswhere.
I have been in sweden for 3 years and know alot of people here. i can tell you that in sweden women rule and men hold their tail between their legs. Because if they don't they will be accused of being anti-female.
I have found overall sweden as a whole are very weak. They don't really like to give a strong opinion as that is against the rules here
Just because things may be a bit more equal in Sweden doesn't mean that Swedish men are weak. Surely, if a man needs to be in control of his woman all the time, be better than her, earn more money than her, to show his "masculinity" all the time that means HE is weak and has issues. A man who is sure of himself does not need to control anybody to feel good about himself. Thank God for good men, of which there are many like my Englishman and my Swedish dad.
Swedish men are weak not because they don't control their wife but because they allow their wife to control them. So what I have said is that in sweden the women take the lead role and men sit back and take it.
If we were talking about a contry where men role and women sit back and don't fight for the position I would have the same opinion about women.
Equal means each has the same amount of power but as we know that will never happen.
So are you on Saudi Arabian forums compalining about how Saudi women are weak?
Sorry but it is true, no person should let someone else rule them. Plain and simple. Everyone must have their own brain and use it. Again controlling a person is not good, allowing someone to control you is also not good.
Who are you to call my father weak!!!!!!!!!!! I demand an apology. What an insult!
A marriage is a contract like many others they sign in their life, so they certaily don't make too much of a problem of their high divorce rate.
At least it's now clear that a marriage needs a little more than equality to have any meaning.
Sorry just the mere mention of Italian makes me think of lovely food hehe.
donaswe, you know everytime a man feels threatened by equality it's because they are so weak and know that now the fact that they are male does not mean they can have special controlling powers over others. They feel they will lose their power to control and it's because in fact they are weak people.
Normal men are not threatened because they are sure of themselves already as persons.
I'm not sure you would like my pasta though hmmm. I'm not as bad at cooking as I have led you to believe but it just isn't as fun as it used to be. My grandmother once told me I'd make an excellent housewife even. lol She meant it as a compliment!
You seem to have a screw loose. Again just for you, NO ONE SHOULD CONTROL THE OTHER AND SHOW RESPECT TO EACH OTHER. Now where you got I was talking bad about your farther I have no idea. Maybe you should read what you wrote because you said your self if one needs to control thats is WEAK.
I was once a victim of a sexual assault in London, does that mean all men are like that man?
Dwb555, you said Swedish men are weak. My father is Swedish.
It's really funny how a lot of men on this forum have become all annoyed by it though.If they are such great men then fine, but don't insult Swedish men just because you have an axe to grind.
How does a harmless article like this turn into something so horrible on here! It always happens.
Now let's look at the same article from the aussies point of view..
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25883589-401,00.html
AUSTRALIAN men make the worst husbands in the world because they loathe helping out with the housework, a British study claims.
No news to many women in AU but you don't hear us bitching about it! No, instead the men are having a moan.. like some of you blokes on this forum bagging out Swedish men.
Now stop being a typical moaning male that we all hate and get back into the kitchen where you belong!!
I think The Local has an agenda!
I agree. I'm not annoyed at all, but amused. So does this mean that Canadian men are the most enlightened.:-)
This thread is getting a bit silly. This study shouldn't be much of a surprise to folks whos actually familiar with Swedish culture. Like Magirus stated, Swedes are primarily concerned with personal freedom and I think it's a more realistic approach since it's fairly clear that life is long enough for people to force their growing differences on each other in a relationship.
I better hope my swedish girlfriend dont read this or im screwed, i better get back into the kitchen..before i get fired
I say don't generalise. it all depends on the man, regardless of nationality, religion, race etc...as it does the woman...
Of course history shows us that many women, have/had it much harder and that men the world over - timbuktu to kathmandu - have been real a-holes towards them...which makes it easy to understand why women (i.e swedish and many more) want to hold on to their individuality/independant/free selves...Swedish men I suppose give their women freedom "to be all they can be" (even do the dishes etc.) and I suppose cool with that.
I treat my swede as equal (and she me, or at least pretends to :-)), but I always make sure she remembers who's the boss ;-)
If never answering back and doing as told makes them good husbands then so be it.
Sound more to me like lapdogs that fetch the paper and slippers when ordered...except that lapdogs probably get a lot better treatment and respect.
What sort of husbands stand by while their wife gets a good seeing to from another guy under the hubbies own roof?
Only ever come across it in Sweden and more than once.
Then bacon and eggs on the table next morning,...unbelievable.
Why is it that to a Swedish woman a guy from another Western country is such a big status symbol,...seemingly even better than a Ferrari in the drive way?
Its all a mystery to me,....but one hell of a culture shock in the nicest possible way.
what kind of parties do you go to...i've been to some nasty ass parties and have never heard of that going on
Usually by special private invitation with special privileges,...say no more,...
A nods as good as a wink to a blind horse....
Swedish males think they have lost their superior position and Australian men think that women are demanding too much equality.
As far as divorce is concerned, the more easier you make for people to get divorce, more people would get divorced. So higher divorce rate isn't necessarily something bad, it might even indicate that they have much more freedom.
A man that is controlling and forces his wife to do things and then buys her flowers once a month to be "romantic", generally is a very small man inside, pathetic male genus. That is not a man! A real man is calm, collected and listens to his partner, helps out at home and protects his family. A real man has enough self confidence not to act "macho" at home thinking that a real man beats his wife, pee's in the sink, forces her to stay home.
That´s how it usually is in Swedish relationships or marriages. If they are both Swedish then. And I know because I´ve lived here my whole life...
My boyfriend and I have an incredible relationship, based on mutual respect and compromise. When we live together, we take turns cooking, we share the housework, and if we should decide to have children in the future, we will share those responsibilities as well. We have our own friends and our own interests, and have our separate lives in addition to the one we share together. I would never presume to believe that I could control him in any way, and neither would he attempt to control me.
That's what it sounds to me like this article is suggesting. Not that any one party rules the other in a relationship, but that the concept of gender equality is more advanced in Sweden, so a more equal partnership, like mine, is possible.
Better watch out,the gap is even narrower than you think!...
I try to refrain from doing this in public, saving my artwork to be admired by woodland creatures.
Inlet
PS. With my experience of Swedish men, he is the most kind hearted, funny, loving, compassionate, and by far the most experienced, captivating, breathtaking lovers. With every man there is an upside and a downside. I will not mention the other side of the coin in this case.
Sorry, only joking...
Also Swedish marriages have among the highest divorce rates in the world and a recent study showed that swedish couples have a 50% infidelity rate. So keep that in mind when considering a relationship with a swedish person.
What does amuse me about the Swedish men is the lack of any practical skills, ie they struggle to change even a light bulb or put up a curtain rail :D
I renovated my own apartment, and people were like, omg your doing it yourself, how is that possible?
er ok...
If women want a 'man' that sits back doesnt talk or have an opinion or wears more makeup than they do and takes longer to get ready in a morning, then hey who are we to judge :)
Never expected to find parents accepting less responsibility for their kids behaviour, than in the UK.
I've been proved wrong there also.
Not only my opinion, as I know quite a few Swedish school-teachers.
I wouldnt have their jobs for all the tea in China.
This country is so up.
Us poor guys need all the support we can get in this evil feminist dominated society....
As far as peeing standing up, having said this I will tell how this came about. I grew up in Alaska, out in the bush. Closest neighbors might hear my mom shooting off three slugs in the air. Home study, no TV or radio but for the 'bushline' that played on thursdays and saturdays at seven, giving us messages from our friends in town. LOTS of down time between the hunting, fishing, gathering of forest treats and wood for winter. My trick was born of a dare from my brother. I think it was one of the double dog dare 'yas. I have never let him live it down. I won that one.
IW
I don't mind the idea of cutting the grass, although I don't own a lawnmower and the caretaker comes round and does it anyway, so there's no point in me doing it. If you're trying to get me to come round and do yours, bear in mind I do not work for free. Incidentally, why are you banging on about kids the whole time? You do realise not everyone has them, yes?
I'm all for being able to bash the crap out of a screaming brat, and not just your own either, but in all honesty I admire parents who can discipline their kids without beating them very much more.
In the olden days women worked in the fields. It was heavy work and noone told them to go home and stay indoors.
Nope, single parent household. Nightmare.
Perhaps you had a firm, loving hand applied to your buttocks on occasion as well.
Oh yes I have had to pick my own switch off the tree, there was a razor strop at the door as well.
Just one more stupid question...can you pee standing up and out of a window? I can.
Does an incident with a squirt gun out a broken peep hole count? Not that I did, I'm just saying.
Although I have been known at times to wish I could do the guy dance in front of a full length mirror, am a woman.
I'm all for being able to bash the crap out of a screaming brat, and not just your own either, but in all honesty I admire parents who can discipline their kids without beating them very much more.
So I agree on dicipline, but there has to be a cooling off period before giving a spanking. I literally had the crap beat out of me as a child. I also horribley messed up this quote thingys...so forgive for this messy post.
IW
Yep.
Question: In addition, do Swedish wives also demand that their husbands breast-feed the babies?
.
Women need to learn to ask us to do just one chore around the house and only when we have completed it, then give us the next one
I prefer women, not women with dicks.
Boys today are brought up like girls and when they are adults they are under domination by the women here, that's how sick this country has become.
Everything is so lame in Sweden, people stand in queue etc etc, no one stands out as everything is so "lagom" here.
Mostly the government has under many years conducted brainwashing of the Swedes into a certain thinking, the man/woman aspect has been more in focus than anything else on the political agenda and media hasn't done much to improve things either.
If you rule a country with a certain type of vision and idea of how you want people to live and act among each others it will eventually happen, it might be strong call it brainwashing, but taken 20-30 years of taking one small step in the direction will eventually turn people in their thinking without them knowing they have been changed.
Just look at North Korea, of course you can't compare but it's the same on going manupulation of the people in Sweden that is going on, those few like me and some others who can see this development are leaving the country.
It's not a very attractive country to live in when you sum up everything, being a entrepenuer in this country is like going nowhere as you all them time hit the wall by people which work against you, the so called socialist spirit where Jantelagen rule all peoples minds.
What this country needs is a total reformation, but that will never happen and i am too old to wait, the system is too complex in Sweden.
Sweden used to be a really good country, but it went downhill slowly in the early 90's and then it really accelerated in the beginning of the millenium.
Funny thing is how expat people love ABBA and such, that is so yesterday, the Sweden that existed during that period is gone since long time, it's just a memory of the good old times.
My experience of Swedish women has been negative, more negative than simply negative on occasions, and I have no idea why you are so worked up about them.
Are you confused bewteen "beauty" and "best"? I know both words start with the letter, b, but... And even then, I find Latvian girls much more attractive and beautiful than Swedish girls, and even Norwegiean and Danish girls are better looking than Swedish counterpart! Only finnish girls in Nordic countries are less attractive physically than Swedish girls, although they have way better personality than Swedish women!
I have met absolutely amazing girls in every part of the world, but Swedish girls in general are "the best" does not strike to me as a correct statement.
Let's see how many of you agree with my views on (Swedish) girls! :-))
Wrong. Nice conspiracy theory, though. The state cannot force a change in public opinion without limiting freedom of expression, speech and opportunity. Sweden is hardly a theocracy and Swedes are aware of what's going on in the outside world. It's only convenient for you to see Swedes as "brainwashed" since you disagree with their views.
...
I see you've found the non-existent matrix. Perhaps the fact that "few" are noticing this "fact" should tell you something.
Jantelagen has existed since before the viking times. It's hardly a new development. It's a social norm that has existed and will presumably continue to exist in northern culture. If you disagree with this view it's no problem - the problem I have with you is that you believe your opinion is the only right one.
Heh. That's what I like to call an active imagination.
"Study: American Men Make the Best Husbands"
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,536601,00.html
I wonder what the actual study says?
Survery was conducted in 13 developed countries and the author of the article created what she calls "Egalitarian Index", which she says reflect the perceived role of women in households. The emphasis on "household" is meant also to emphasis the notion that female-male relationship is made or broken in the process of "household formation" (i.e. the idea about how household responsibilities are to be distributed between the man and the woman and how such idea is acted upon in practice), while the emphasis on "women" in survey was meant to indicate the notion that it is not social contraints on men at all, but on women alone, which dictates the distribution of household responsibilities between men and women and thus whether a partnership between them could be formed and sustained (my understanding and emphasis).
Looking at the table of "egalitarian index", 5 countries are listed as having a "positive" egalitarian index figures: Sweden (0.43), Norway (0.24), Great Britain (0.08), US (0.08), and the Northern Irland (0.02). The Netherland has "0.0" index figure (neutral), while 7 countries were found to have "negative" egalitarian index - worst of all being Australia with the index figure of -0.16.
The fact that these figures do not consider the social constraints on men as a factor in forming a successful or failed relationship, I think the study needs to be much improved and its findings cannot be taken at face value.
Thus, what I called Egalitarian Index is referred to only as a "coefficient" in the discussion paper, while I did give the index itself in my post above.
Dammit, I'm moving back to Sweden!
I would take you seriously if you was born here, but you are not, so your view on things are totally wrong except the first part above but you are getting there slowly.
Sweden's high divorce rates doesn't mean that Swedish marriages are worse. It can mean that women are more fit to make it on their own if the marriage sucks; that divorce has high acceptance in Swedish culture; that men are more willing to share post-divorce responsibilites etc.
Anyway, from having read this article, I find it difficult to agree with the assertion "Swedish men make the best husbands". Words like "best" and "good" and relative to values and preferences in marriage. making nearly impossible to prove that "husbands from country X make the best husbands"
The last post is funny. If western mena re becoming more feminine and women are becoming more masculine then surely the result would be the same?
I think the fact is that as time goes on, people are getting more in touch with what they feel like, rather than what society/religion/politics think they should feel like... hence the ridiculousness of that statement... people aren't losing/gaining their masculinity/femininity; rather they are gaining their individuality and are more likely to call their significant other out on their bullshit, especially if said bullshit is based on historically unequal social relations.
As they say outside Sweden, Die Dumme Schweden....
Best comment ever!
Well I think it's all individual anyway who make the best husbands.
Clearly.
You still don't get it...
And first you claim all Swedes are brainwashed and have no clue and now you're blaming my ignorance on my perceived lack of Swedishness. Who made you the source of all knowledge?
By the way, I'm married to a Swede. I would not dare say Swedish men make the best husbands, but MY Swede does (FOR ME). :) And, in comparison with other dates I had before meeting him, he made the best boyfriend.
Thank Odin for the Swedish guys. They are so considerate, so respectful towards the lady. They do take up some of the double burden of a modern life which entails both work and family. The beta male rules! Guys like that will always be loved and appreciated by us, modern women.
Damn i hate Swedes and their self-righteous attitude.
What country could be worse? even Ukraina is better to live in.
From what I have witnessed these past 7 years they seem to have been morphed into weak, spineless and totally dominated little servants.
Yep! sorry Swedish women but you are all completely ott when it comes to this "equality, independance, we can do just as much as men can" attitude.
Don't get me wrong, being a woman I am all for equality etc, but not at the expense of others. I watched a man bless him, stand up and offer this woman a seat on the very crowded bus the other morning and she gave him a look of complete disgust for doing so. She remarked, "If I wanted to sit down I would have asked you to move" and promptly turned her back on the guy!!
It is no wonder that men here are seen to be so wonderful as they get up in the mornings, get the children ready for dagis, either make breakfast or take the children direct to dagis for breakfast (God forbid you have to spend more time with your children than necessary eh working women..) rush to work, spend a busy day and then rush home to pick up the children from dagis, cook their dinner and no doubt get them ready for bed as well.
Taking the micky?? Nope. This is how one of my friends lives and he says that he is not the only one, only most keep schtum about it!
What does his wife do? Oh, well, because she is a woman and supposed to fight for equality at every turn she has to strive to have a) job husband c) kids, d)social life so she couldn't possibly be required or expected to do the most basic of things like running a household or God forbid, putting her husband, children or familys needs before hers.
Swedish men make the best husbands - they wouldn't dare do anything else!
Not all women are for equality. Some women like being treated as if they're special. Wouldn't you say, "lady"?
Makes perfect sense. I would have done the same (albeit in a less rude manner). Was she pregnant? Disabled? Why would she need the seat more than him? Are women weak and in need of special treatment?
The same can be said for working men...
Most men strive for the same thing you know (job, lovelife, kids, social life). Why are men capable of having everything whilst women aren't?
So you agree that they make the best husbands, but you're against it. So presumably you believe child-rearing and house-hold chores should be a woman's work. But guess what? The men aren't being forced.
And I thought this had some interesting comments:
http://ozconservative.blogspot.com/2009/07...women-want.html
If some women like the old school guy, that's their choice. But other women will have other choices. I prefer the New man everyday to a guy who gives me special treatment once in a while but still expects me to do all the 'women's' work all by myself on a daily basis.
So, why don't you start fixing cars, lift heavy things when moving houses, and stop complaining about periods pains and any mood swing that comes with it, and do as much housework as men does when you are pregnant!
If you do that, then I will consider doing more "women's work" when they say they want men to do them!
In fact, what kind of "men's work" are you saying you are willing to share with men, balty???
Nothing at all??
*probably be worth the wait!*
Don't women have jobs, a century ago men were supposed to provide all money. There are few physical differences which can't be overcome but women don't have any special ability that makes them more suited to do house work (cooking, laundry, cleaning, etc). Men can do it equally well.
No one is saying men have to do half of the house work, what most people are saying is that they should be willing to participate. The person (whether male or female) with less demanding job should do more house work. Do you think that demanding this is unreasonable ?
@UKLady
The incidence that you mentioned, if woman replied so harshly then she was extremely rude, she should have refused his offer politely. Interesting question would be why did he offer her his seat ? if she looked tired, was old, etc then it is acceptable but if she is a healthy young woman then it was wrong of him to offer his seat.
See, the way you put it, women only GAINS!!
NO wounder women want "equality" because they have NOTHING TO LOSE!!!
To say that women and men are equal and then say that they can't do NOTHING men can do is a piss taking - evil power seeking attitude masked as argument for "equality".
Women must accept that men can contribute consistently more than women is the first step to seeking truly "equal" society based on "merit" not on some random and nonsensical argument.
And it is on this basis that what LadyUK says makes sense! Because men contribute more to the society that when men offer a seat to a woman, she MUST be first try to be understanding and say THANK YOU FIRST, and then say that they don't feel like sitting down to turn down the offer.
TO say that women should decline the offer BECAUSE men is wrong to offer a seat is absoplutely PATHETIC argument come only from women bent on doing evil.
I see. So when you do this it's fine but if Swedes do it it's because of militant feminism.
P.S. I am attracted physically to a man and to his individual characteristics. The thought of a man who'll fix the car, paint the house, and take me out to dinner does nothing for me. Some women like it, but some don't.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fz5FJkqWhbQ
You must be very naive to think that women demand everything to be exactly same for both sexes.
How do a man contribute more than a woman, especially when both work same hours and woman has to do most house chores (as in a world of your liking) ?
Can you explain how following general statement is giving women too much power and why do you disagree with it.
"The person (whether male or female) with less demanding job should do more house work."
What Lady said reminded me of an incident when I was at college. All of the boys at the college (this was in the UK) were very polite and always opened doors for all of the female students. We all thought it was very charming and nice of them. Except one new student came along one day, a girl from Sweden. A poor young lad held a door open for her and she hit him in the face and started screaming at him about how she's capable of opening doors for herself! Women like that are ruining men for the rest of us.
I often wonder if the way women are becoming more masculine and men more feminine has something to do with the increasing levels of hormones in our water and food that get there from birth control, animal supplementation, etc.
Have you ever offered your seat to a young, healthy male ?
if your answer is "NO" then don't men deserve to be treated nicely ?
I said it was wrong (i agree it was a nice gesture but reasons behind it were most likely wrong) if he offered his seat only because she was a woman.
Aren't women who expect similar gestures brain washed into thinking that this should be a norm. In a neutral world it would be nice surprise gesture not something that you would be expecting.
Therefore, man, being physically stronger feels that WEAK women should be helped out by offering a seat.
Now, what's WRONG with that?
Your stupidity arises from your incapacity to admit that men and women are physically built differently and that women are INFERIOR than men physically!
If you can't admit that, then go around tell all your women friends to INSIST that they do equal amount of housework even when she is in period pain or in a period-induced emotional swing or during PREGNANCY!
And yes, you MUST offer a seat to man if he does look tired.
Just remember that we do not live in a "NEUTRAL world!!! Men are at least PHYSICALLY SUPERIOR TO WOMEN!
What kind of DREAMLAND are you living in? WAKE UP!!!
see i come from a land where we ....apparently treat women like cattle(NOT), so my opinions may be completely outrageous to you girls out there, so forgive my ignorance...but here goes. ...it would apear to me that swedish men need to drop the shopping bags,...tear off the guggi belts ...rip down their proud bijon borg undies ....and give you women folk a good seeing to....i mean an earth shattering session. And when your done doing that....take 5 and then do it again and roar while yee or at it...in fact do a good bit of roaring cos for the love of god yee swedish guys can be fierce quiet.....make sure it's so good she knows your the man ...Not the boy shes comfortable with.
when you do this your woman knows shes everthing ....she is assured in herself as a woman/mother....but a man does't need a mother....so make babies with your beautiful woman...and be a MAN, fix a car, get your hands dirty it's ok sometimes...jee i wonder what gay men think when they come to sweden it must be slightly difficult to weed the straight from the adventurous on a night out?
there that's my stupid man opinion ....everything a couple do after this will be perfectly equal..and we won't need a study to tells us.
Manners? When do you ever see people playing musical chairs on the underground anywhere in the world? If a train is crowded some people have to stand, as simple as that.
First, this story does not sound believable (because of the hitting and screaming). But, that aside, what we have here is a culture clash. You think she was rude and she thought they were rude. That's it.
It's definitely preferred if he does not.
What exactly does that mean? Showed he "appreciated your femininity?"
On a different route - what's your view of homosexuals? Gay men have friends and boyfriends. They distinguish between them somehow, surely? How does your view of femininity and masculinity fit into this?
Because some people don't want to be "appreciated as women" but want to be appreciated as individuals who happen to be women? There's a reason why there's a cliche in movies of friends falling in love. A friend truly is the perfect match. You seem to be under the impression that weak gender rules deprive a person of their womanhood or manhood? I couldn't disagree more. All natural differences are still there. It's the socially constructed differences which are muddled.
Heh. Wrong. Men are not "physically superior" to women. But it's a popular myth to be sure. Because of greater testosterone men are on average physically stronger than women whilst women have on average greater muscle endurance than men. So it pretty much evens out.
>> Then move to Saudi Arabia, where they will treat you like a bitch and you will appriciate their ill treatment of women.
>> Even amongst gay men separate themselves to "bitch" role and more "male" role! You seems to have no idea!
>> But here you did admit that you are a WOMAN!!! You cannot change that and so GET OVER IT!! You are a WEAK women with pathetic PERIOD mood swing that makes everyone unhappy!!
Yes, because you're biased. You're judging from your own cultural norms.
And being forced to stay in a marriage because you have no other options is romantic?
The Vikings set the precedent for modern Scandinavians. Unlike their Anglo counter-parts the Vikings kept very good hygiene and were reportedly very popular among the local women. Some things never change.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8188868.stm
How could she be allowed escaping from EXECUTION just because she can get pregnant and men can't?? TERRIBLE INJUSTICE!
Men and women should be equal right?, so you must think she should be executed!!
Goodbye troll.
Your argument above is so WEAK!!!! If it is for the baby's sake, then you MUST argue that the woman in question must be EXECUTED AFTER the baby is born!!!! This is such an easy argument to have spotted if Kaether believes TRULY in EQUALITY among men and women. The truth is that whenever things SUIT WOMEN, pathetic women like Kaether argue that the entire LAW OF THE LAND is "wrong" and that solves EVERYTHING about INEQUALITY between men and women!!
Women get away from hedious crime such as drug (HEROIN!!!) smuggling just by virtue of them being women! They are having it SO EASY!!! Admit that men's life are so much tougher than women's and that men cannot be considered being treated "EQUAL" in the current society compared with women and that treatment of women must now be more strict. This is because what the above answer from Kaethar highlight is that women such as Kaether are EXPLOITING current INEQAULITY between men and women, and build a society where EVERYTHING suits only women WHILE KEEPING ALL DISADVANTAGEOUS SITUATIONS FACED BY MEN LEFT UNRESOLVED!!!!
Ultimately, the above post by Kaethar highlights why "pro-equality" arguements from women such as Keathar must be laughed at and ignored by men who truly believe in making current society a more fairer and equal society.
Good bye, weak and frail minded Kaether! But I don't blaim you for that, though, because you ARE a woman and you are NAURALLY frail and WEAK!!
can you describe the role of males and females in a "more fairer and equal society" ?
@Janie
"A woman is a vehicle by nature. She is waiting for a man’s call. She wants to be used by the man she loves for a higher purpose. One such purpose is to create a healthy happy family. A man, therefore, should have a clear idea of what he wants, and the role he wants a woman to play. Then he finds a wife who meets HIS criteria."
Do you really agree with above statement quoted from link you posted ? If you are really waiting for a man to come and impregnate you, good for you, just don't expect others to wait with you. You can also not report domestic violence if it is just a power struggle (as mentioned in the link) in which your leader (husband) is trying to show you that he is in control.
This thread is getting more hilarious by the day, let it never die. Firstly for all the non-Swedish, non-gay men who you'd think aren't bothered whether Swedish men make good husbands or not on account of them not being in the market for husbands anyway, and secondly because when you're not looking desperately insecure by Swede-abusing, you're claiming your greatest offering to a woman is your capability to hold the bloody door open. Well, great, it's nice when someone (male or female) does that, but I still think a lifetime of cleaning up after yourself is worth a bit more.
The motive behind it is obviously, "this person might like a seat. I'd like to make them happy, so I'll offer mine." What's wrong with that?
Manners? When do you ever see people playing musical chairs on the underground anywhere in the world? If a train is crowded some people have to stand, as simple as that.
Men have offered me their seats on the LOndon underground and busses. I was very grateful. Yes if there aren't enough seats some people have to stand, but why does that make it wrong for a man to be chivalrous? In general, women are physically weaker than men, I'm sorry if that thinking doesn't fit into the new feminist world order but it's a fact. I've offered my seat to old people, both male and female, and someone on crutches, because it was polite and they needed it more than me. For most men, it's less effort to stand for a long time and some of them, thankfully, still like to be polite. If someone offers you a seat and you don't want it you can always politely decline but the current trend for becoming hysterical about such matters is ruining men for the rest of us.
First, this story does not sound believable (because of the hitting and screaming). But, that aside, what we have here is a culture clash. You think she was rude and she thought they were rude. That's it.
Well, it's true and she thought a polite gesture was rude because she had been brought up in a crazy, hysterical country. Also, she was in the UK so should have made some effort to adapt to UK norms.
What exactly does that mean? Showed he "appreciated your femininity?"
On a different route - what's your view of homosexuals? Gay men have friends and boyfriends. They distinguish between them somehow, surely? How does your view of femininity and masculinity fit into this?
Since I am not gay, I do not know the homosexual mindset and have absolutely no idea what they are thinking or how they run their relationships.
Because some people don't want to be "appreciated as women" but want to be appreciated as individuals who happen to be women? There's a reason why there's a cliche in movies of friends falling in love. A friend truly is the perfect match. You seem to be under the impression that weak gender rules deprive a person of their womanhood or manhood? I couldn't disagree more. All natural differences are still there. It's the socially constructed differences which are muddled.
But if you fall for someone and they just "happen" to be of the opposite sex, how can you call yourself straight? You must be bisexual, so why don't you ever fall for someone who just "happens" to be a woman?
Heh. Wrong. Men are not "physically superior" to women. But it's a popular myth to be sure. Because of greater testosterone men are on average physically stronger than women whilst women have on average greater muscle endurance than men. So it pretty much evens out.
Where do you get this idea from? I used to be a personal trainer, training both male and female bodybuilders, and women are both physically weaker and have nowhere near the muscular endurance of men.
Feminists not only fall for the myth of having it all, but they want everything right now and to hell with everyone else. It really is a very selfish mindset and is obviously causing alot of confusion and misery amongst the kids.
I'm sure the feminists will start trying to refute this but it's all borne out by statistics and evident in people's behaviour. I'm not going to say anything more in this thread because there's nothing more to say.
And I just want to say that for a record that femenists, like the one fighting for equality for opressed women in countries like Sudan, are heroes. But the femenists in Sweden is a whole different kind of animals. They have a warped sense of reality and make up so to hunger their own sick need for hate mongering of men.
Shawn, most anti-feminist rants on this thread have been about how women are weaker by nature, so if feminists say that thy are worth just as much as men that means they are saying women are superior? Your reasoning is flawed.
Kaethar has bee spot on in this thread.
I don't have a Swedish husband, but I think I know more about them than you do as I have grown up here. A lot of them actually don't share the chores 50-50, but I'd say most younger guys re better at it than older men. The same is probably true in the UK.
Feminism is about equality and in comparison to Janie, who thinks wanting equality right now is a bad thing, I don't really think it's fair that I should have to wait till after I'm dead to be treated as an individual. My femininiy has nothing to do with what a man does on a date, which is very American by the way, we don't have dates in the same way in Sweden, it is about my inner self. I'm a woman, atleast I was last time I checked. I would still be a woman even if I was on a desert island. Janie, on the other hand would turn male apparently as there would be no men around. She would have no purpose on the island and would not be able to do anything as she would be waiting for a man to turn up.
I would be very lonely though and would sart working on a boat straight away.
Gay women are not all butch by the way. They can be feminine. If they assign themselves old gender roles it's only because they live in society too.
However, being physically stronger does in no way imply how much "worth" you have. The two concepts are completely unrelated. Specially in humans where it is our mind and social abilities that puts us above animals and not physical strength which many animals are superior to us in.
Janie, I think men are also responsible if a marriage or relationship ends, not just the "feminist" woman.
Men are often responsible for marriage breakdown. But it seems in Sweden many marriages end for no good reason, to the detriment of the children, just because the woman doesn't want to do it any more, due to boredom or whatever. (she should have thought of that before making a lifetime commitment to both marriage and child.) And sweden makes it too easy for women to just flit in and out of the responsibilities they have taken on.
Shawn, most anti-feminist rants on this thread have been about how women are weaker by nature, so if feminists say that thy are worth just as much as men that means they are saying women are superior? Your reasoning is flawed.
The posts have been about how women are generally physically weaker than men, no-one has said women are intrinsically less valuable than men.
Feminism is about equality and in comparison to Janie, who thinks wanting equality right now is a bad thing, I don't really think it's fair that I should have to wait till after I'm dead to be treated as an individual.
I didn't say it's wrong for a woman to want to be treated as an equal. I very clearly said it's wrong for a woman to want to have her own way all the time when it is adversely affecting others who have no say in the situation.
My femininiy has nothing to do with what a man does on a date, which is very American by the way, we don't have dates in the same way in Sweden, it is about my inner self. I'm a woman, atleast I was last time I checked. I would still be a woman even if I was on a desert island. Janie, on the other hand would turn male apparently as there would be no men around. She would have no purpose on the island and would not be able to do anything as she would be waiting for a man to turn up.
You and I have a different idea of what makes a man or woman. You seem to imply that it's just one's genitals that make a difference whereas I think it's more than that (which it is since it's scientifically proven that men and women's very brains work in different ways.) You misunderstand what I say. I feel female whether there's a man around or not. I feel so female that I can completely notice and appreciate the difference in males. I do feel equal to men, but unlike you I do not feel the same as a man. There's a big difference.
Hats of for you
It is a fact that there exist many situations in which WOMEN are PRIVILEGED OVER MEN. I gave such a situation with regard to female Heroin smuggler facing EXECUTION in Lagos, where if you are women then you will not be executed if they impregnate themselves (which is EXACTLY what the female smuggler did!!), while male cannot be pregnant, so they MUST face the death penalty. Women (and ESPECIALLY feminist like Streja) are therefore quite EXPLOITATIVE of anything they have advantaged over men, while they say very little, if at all, about how MEN ARE DISADVANTAGED because of THEIR gender.
Thus, overtly ONE-SIDED argument in favour always to POLITICISE women's supposedly "weak" and "inferior" gender does nothing but to DEPOLITICISE problems that are faced by the male gender.
Such political strategy are nothing but a EVIL, POWER-SEEING ACTIONS OF WOMEN, such as Kaether and Steja, and they must be explosed as EVIL feminist bent on creating unequal, unfair and injust society.
WHat you are missing, again typical of brainwashed feminists, is that we are NOT living in a gender equal society NOW!!!!! It's no good pretending that the world should be perfect, where it is clearly NOT! and to say that, just because you have a certain idea about how the society SHOULD BE, all events PRESENT must be judged according to such FANTACY!! - such an answer will not yield useful strategy to face gender inequality that exist in the world TODAY!!!
WAKE UP!!
You're probably playing devil's advocate here but if you're not it's rather a naive world view. Why not call all blacks negros? Because of how it will come across. If you study ethics you learn the difference between motive-led-ethics and consequence-ethics. Even if you do have perfectly fine motives an action can still be inappropriate according to consequence ethics. According to consequence ethics an action is only morally good if it has a good consequence. And if people take offense to your action it is not a morally good action. Keep in mind that when it comes to motive most people are not being purposefully patronising - it's something subconscious.
So have I...
Odd then how women have on average greater muscle endurance than men. A man should theoretically be able to lift more whilst a woman should be able to stand longer on a train. But male-female socially constructed roles have little to do with science.
Who says I get hysterical? o.o
It's so great when people can accept cultural differences and norms.
I thought she was a student?
Well, obviously they do not have male and female gender roles. Like everyone they have masculine and feminine traits and one partner usually shows more masculine traits than the other. In some heterosexual couples the woman shows more masculine traits and the men the more feminine. And what's the problem with this if they're a happy couple? Gender-roles are outdated because not everyone fits into them. It was more of an ideal idea of how a couple should be.
Scientists believe pheromones play a part. I can tell a man from a woman, thanks. I also don't have good "chemistry" with all men and some men aren't suited to be romantic partners but instead only friends.
Since when do body builders need muscular endurance? You need to look at long-distance runners and people who use their muscles under a long period of activity. Bodybuilding only requires spurts of brute strength. It's a different kind of physical strength and it's wrong to say women are physically inferior to men.
I have no problem with women wanting to live under sharia but equality has nothing to do with it. Like I've said, this study assumes equality makes the best marriage.
It is ridiculous to attack Swedish men because you think they are not 'masculine' enough. Or Swedish women because they aren't 'feminine' enough. If you don't like them, don't date them or better still move to another country and stop your whinging.
To mbe- Who has been here for 13 years, has only 7 male friends of which all are American. Try spending time with more Swedes and you will how they really are, not just your impression of them as an outsider.
I think that you give much more priority to your family than an average woman which is your choice and you might work harder to save a marriage when you don't like or get bored of your partner. But to say that women should sacrifice some of their aspirations and compromise for family isn't right (if anyone wants to, she can). If you have any relevant statistics that mention that women are more likely to end marriage than men, i would like to know.
The brain of males and females differ slightly (maybe due to evolution, hormones, environment, etc). There are some areas in which male brain is better (mathematics, visualize objects in 3D) and some areas in which female brain is better (language, artistic expressiveness, carrying out detailed tasks) but difference isn't so big or UNIVERSAL that would justify restricting or encouraging what they can do. Keep in mind that there are significant differences in brains of people of different race and region. Most of the restrictions that are put on sexes (both men and women) have more to do with culture than anything else.
Janie can speak for herself but all I am saying is that males and females are different (generally speaking). Beside physical differences such as difference in body mass there are also mental differences. Such as views on relationsship. For example it is said that females fall in love based on several criterias where their eyes is not the big one (i.e. the males looks) where as in males the looks of a female is far more important.
That may be because of culture, evolution, who knows. But there are statistical proven facts that males and females are different. However it is YOU who are insinuating that the difference automatically leads to inequality and as such we must refuse to acknowledge that there are differences. Which is complete nonsense and you bringing up Sharia law, as some kind of straw man argument, will not fool anyone.
Men and women are different but that does not mean they cannot be seen as equal members of society with equal rights.
So it's rude for a man to offer his seat just because the woman in question may turn out to be one who thinks it's rude? And if they are not being purposefully patronising as you say, why do the women react so rudely and aggressively in some situations?
Odd then how women have on average greater muscle endurance than men. A man should theoretically be able to lift more whilst a woman should be able to stand longer on a train. But male-female socially constructed roles have little to do with science.
Again, I'd like to know where you get the info that women have greater muscular endurance than men.
Who says I get hysterical? o.o
Your responses to inoffensive behaviour.
I thought she was a student?
Yes a Swedish student studying in the UK.
In some heterosexual couples the woman shows more masculine traits and the men the more feminine. And what's the problem with this if they're a happy couple? Gender-roles are outdated because not everyone fits into them. It was more of an ideal idea of how a couple should be.
Nothing is wrong in the scenario you describe here. The problem in Sweden seems to be that the women want to do everything the same as a man, while wanting everything else as well - eg - wantes the kids but doesn't want to sacrifice a year or 2 of her career to take care of them while they are very young. And sure, no problem if the man wants to do that instead. But when neither want to, it's just plain selfish.
Scientists believe pheromones play a part. I can tell a man from a woman, thanks. I also don't have good "chemistry" with all men and some men aren't suited to be romantic partners but instead only friends.
So nature obviously intends there to be differences. And if men and women look different, smell different, what makes you think nature doesn't want them to act differently? Just look around the animal kingdom, males and females are not supposed to be the same.
Since when do body builders need muscular endurance? You need to look at long-distance runners and people who use their muscles under a long period of activity. Bodybuilding only requires spurts of brute strength. It's a different kind of physical strength and it's wrong to say women are physically inferior to men.[/quote]You don't seem to know much about bodybuilding. There are many difefrent types, eg power building which concentrates only on the size of the muscles, strength training which obviously concentrates on how strong the muscles are and not the size, and endurance training, which is another form that not surprisingly concentrates on the muscles endurance abilities. When you say women have more muscular endurance than men, where do you get this information from? Do they maybe mean that women have more endurance relative to their size? If so, men still have more endurance since they tend to be bigger. I also don't recall saying women are physically inferior to men, just physically not as strong, which in general is patently true.
I agree, both sexes are equally responsible for the commitment they make and I never said women take their responsibilities more lightly. I have been talking about women, not men, because the latter part of this thread has been talking about women. Obviously men are still responsible for the commitments they make and just as likely not to live up to their responsibilities.
I think that you give much more priority to your family than an average woman which is your choice and you might work harder to save a marriage when you don't like or get bored of your partner. But to say that women should sacrifice some of their aspirations and compromise for family isn't right (if anyone wants to, she can). If you have any relevant statistics that mention that women are more likely to end marriage than men, i would like to know.
I an unmarried and have no kids. Right now I am a "career girl" and having a husband and kids isn't my aspiration at this moment in time. My point is that if women, or men, make the commitment to get married and bring kids into the world they should be prepared to make sacrifices for it, and not be so selfish as to think they can continue living as if they are single. If I ever marry and/or have kids, I will alter my lifestyle accordingly. If I don't want to change my lifestyle then I won't bring kids into this world only to dump them at daycare when they are 6 months old. Also, I never said women are more likely to end marriage than men.
The brain of males and females differ slightly (maybe due to evolution, hormones, environment, etc). There are some areas in which male brain is better (mathematics, visualize objects in 3D) and some areas in which female brain is better (language, artistic expressiveness, carrying out detailed tasks) but difference isn't so big or UNIVERSAL that would justify restricting or encouraging what they can do. Keep in mind that there are significant differences in brains of people of different race and region. Most of the restrictions that are put on sexes (both men and women) have more to do with culture than anything else.
No-one is saying there should be restrictions on what people can do. Women already have every opportunity, as do men. Both can work, determine their own lifestyles. Why are so feminists obsessed with driving it to extremes?
She accepted gratefully.
What category am I in at the moment? Sexist? Would I have done the same for a large sweaty male?
Discuss.
Swedish women don't just dump children in dagis. They work part time for years after their children are born. Men don't do it enough in my opinion. Perhaps you don't have enough experience of knowing a lot of Swedish mothers.I do, and none of them match your description. What's wrong Janie? Why have you got this warped view? Did you work with some Swedish women who were mean or dumped kids in dagis?
Why aren't you asking why men aren't taking 50% of their time with the children? I thougt you said men are responsible as well? I hope you know that it's women who mostly take care of their children and not men.
A lot of younger fathers are much better at taking care of their children which is lovely! I adore seeing fathers pushing prams, in any country. I love the fact that some fathers who have lost their kids in a custody battle in the UK have started a group to fight for their rights.
Why are you so mad at women?
Could it just be that you don't actually know how many women end a marriage and are just basing your facts on the perhaps few Swedish women you know?
Why do you NEVER PUSH FOR MORE WOMEN TO DO TRADITIONALLY MEN's WORK???
Because you are biased, EVIL feminst BENT ON MARGINALISING MEN!!
What you want is NOT GENDER EQUALITY, BUT FEMALE SUPERIORITY!!
SHAME ON YOU!!
You should move to any 3rd world country, you might have more luck with women there. You will also have more chances of using your strength (lifting stuff, fixing cars, etc). In all developed countries most males and females you encounter will want "FEMALE SUPERIORITY" because they have been brain washed or ordered by their female masters, so hurry and move to any under developed country where people demanding "female superiority" haven't reached yet.
Swedish women don't just dump children in dagis. They work part time for years after their children are born. Men don't do it enough in my opinion. Perhaps you don't have enough experience of knowing a lot of Swedish mothers.I do, and none of them match your description. What's wrong Janie? Why have you got this warped view? Did you work with some Swedish women who were mean or dumped kids in dagis?
As I said earlier, it doesn't matter whether it's the man or the woman who looks after the kids. I am basing my view on what the people on this forum describe of their lives, their experiences of Sweden, and their thoughts on life. It is some of those views that I am critisising. And if none of the mothers you know match my description, then either you don't know those mothers very well, or the people on this forum are making alot of stuff up.
Why aren't you asking why men aren't taking 50% of their time with the children? I thougt you said men are responsible as well? I hope you know that it's women who mostly take care of their children and not men.
As I said earlier, it doesn't matter which parent is looking after the kids, but since the discussion at the time was about women, that's what I was talking about.
Why are you so mad at women?
I'm not mad at women in the slightest, quite the opposite. I'm annoyed by extreme feminists who insist on going way too far and being selfish, and forcing their views onto others. IMO it is you and a few others on here who seem mad at women for wanting to be themselves. I remember a comment you made quite a while back in a discussion on this website. Someone asked you what you would do if one of your female students said her dream in life was to be a housewife. You were appalled at the idea and ranted about how you would do everything you could to try to make her see the light and make more of herself and do something worthwhile. But the way you were writing it, you came across very bigoted. You sounded just as bigoted as a man who thinks women should be forced to stay in the kitchen. This is the thing I'm mad about, how extreme feminists often think less of others' life choices if they are not the same choices that they themselves would make. It is just as oppressive to women as expecting them to stay home against their wills. I personally enjoy being a woman, I love my female friends and am not mad at women in the slightest. But I am annoyed at how narrow-minded and oppressive towards women some extreme feminists are, and it is those feminists who seem mad at women, not me. I don't care whether a woman wants to be a soldier, a scientist or a stay-at-home mum, as long as she is happy and any kids she brings into this world are too. You're the one who seems to think that women should behave just like men, and men just like women or that there shouldn't be any difference between the two. It's an insult to women, you're basically saying we're not good enough as we are, we're only good enough if we emulate men as much as possible. Although you think of yourself as a feminist, your viewpoint seems to me actually anti-feminist.
Could it just be that you don't actually know how many women end a marriage and are just basing your facts on the perhaps few Swedish women you know?
How many women end a marriage is not the point. The point is that in Sweden it is made too easy for both men and women to make a big commitment and then just walk away when they can't be bothered any more.
And Iamunique does make a valid point about how Swedish women seem more interested in female superiority than genuine equality.
Feminists of your kind, who aim to advance female superiority by EXPLOITING disadvantages men face and offer little about how such disadvantages can be overcome by men AND women working together, are truly SHAMEFUL and DISGRACEFUL .
You make me sick!
And, as a matter of fact, I have visited and talked a lot with folks in Africa, from government officals to NGO workers to slam dwellers, so I do know quite a lot about them. Women there face many disadvantages, which need to be tackled now.
But such needs of women cannot be solved by ORDERING African men just to change their attitude. You must tell them the reasons why they should change their attitude and, in particular, how removing disadvantages faced by women ULTIMATELY HELP MEN AT THE SAME TIME in their own tough, struggles for survival in Africa.
There is nothing that I say which stands in the way of those women striving for more equal society, like many genuine feminists want. But those "militant" feminists, such as someoneonthenet, will not find any sympathy from me at all.
These militant feminists, and therefore someoneonthenet included, are part of the PROBLEM, and CANNOT be a part of solution to figuring out truly fair and just society towards which all reasonable men and women should do their utmost to contribute.
From a Swedish man who believes in equality.
I'd like to comment on some common assertions in this thread.
"Swedish men have poor self-confidence"
Heh. It's just that Swedes doesn't cover up low self-confidence like Americans or South-Europeans.
Americans with low self-confidence is the most annoying thing out there. They brag about stuff they never accomplished, talk down on women, lie about their past:, brag about getting laid and compare penis-sizes.
Swedish men have low self-confidence? Guys...
"Swedish men are oppressed" I.e. They are forced to do more housework than their female-counter parts.
Equality is not about splitting everything 50/50. The amount of housework should be distributed according to circumstances. I just don't think that gender is a relevant circumstance and thus shouldn't be taken into consideration when distributing household work.
Finally, a question: So then, if Swedish men are opressed by women, does that mean that America, England, Italy (or whereever you come from) are the ultimate places for gender-equality? Sweden is the one and only country where gender-inequality exists?
Differences don't automatically lead to inequality. But it's what you are suggesting. You are suggesting social rules based on differences, just like people who propose sharia law. The problem with your kind, and sharia law defenders, is that you try to put it forth as equality. Be honest instead. Equality does not mean that men and women are the same but what you are proposing is not equality.
Yes, in a culture where such acts are not the norm. Cultural differences do exist and it's a bit arrogant to assume your way is the only correct way.
I don't know? Anger issues?
Read it in a magazine (Science Daily I think)
Expatriate students need to assimilate into the host culture?
So if neither want to do it the mother should automatically do it? If neither wants to they really shouldn't be having children... just saying...
Anyway, the problem here is that you have a stereotypical view of what a man "should" do. Masculinity and femininity affects social interaction, not lifestyle. There is absolutely no reason why a man should be main breadwinner in the family, even arguing using masculinity as a theory. :/
Are you attracted to every man you meet? Are you the kind who doesn't believe men and women can be friends? :/ Or else your analysis really doesn't make any sense...
Then how do you explain matriarchal societies today and in the past? Humans are all of the same species and should, according to you, be biologically inclined to follow patriarchal systems. That gender roles vary between different populations shows these are social differences and not something that is in our genes.
Would it matter? Women weigh less on average too and only have to carry their body weight. Ask anyone in the army who trains both men and women who has the best muscle endurance. When it comes to body building STRENGTH plays a huge part and you can't compare these scenarios.
Are you seriously suggesting pregnant women should start lifting heavy things?
Women do plenty of things that have been traditionally men's work in the past. Actually having a job and earning money is the first one... Driving places is another. What else? Painting? Most couples I know do it together. Gardening? Varies between men and women I know. Fixing the car? Most will send the car to a station or the person who knows the most about cars will fix it (often men). My mother changed tires on our car plenty of times though. The stereotype of the "handyman" isn't really that common in Sweden either. Most men and women I know would be clueless about what to do if the plumbing breaks or something.
1) children
2) women
3) dogs (and possibly cats and other cute pets)
4) men
Sweden is one of the few places in the world where any man can experience being the lowest form of life.
The only reason children are No 1 is beause putting women at No 1 would have been a bit too obvious.
It also allows us to wallow in the illusion that society is doing everything for our kids - who, it seems, are far from happiest (according to a comparison study between 11 European countries).
Aussies are a bit awful as husbands I am afraid....
My cousin has a Swedish fiancee and is very romantic and loving (he often send her lovely notes or call when he´s not arround). I admire the person in him and hoping to meet a Swedish guy in near future. But i wonder if there are possible ways where to meet these men, like a website or any kind of links. Do you know any? Im sincerely looking for a lifetime partner. I have been lonely for 5 yrs already, Im 28yo...hope for any possitive reply guys..thank you for your time, Ana http://profiles.friendster.com/78086588
I can say that this equalitarian outlook is the same for all my ozzy mates (girls and guys). They respect their girlfriends/wives/boyfriends/husbands/partners, they help out with the house chores, they are all great cooks, they are inter-dependent, and they are pretty easy going.
I also think that there is a new generation of ozzys (starting around the age of early thirties and below) who are very different from their more traditional parents and who would not tolerate a lazy, sexist partners. I hope the figures in the report accounted for age in the married households, becasue ozzy's tend to get married in their early thirties, which means that most of the new generation (the equalitatrian ozzy's) would not be married and would not be considered here.
One last thing, love comes in so many forms, and what's good for some people isn't good for others. So respect all humans, wehter they seem "week" or not, love each other, and chill out...
Cheers
I love the fact the he helps around the house, don't mind doing the laundry and cook occasionally, when and as he wants. There is no such thing as forcing each other to do anything and that is the part that I love most. Unlike most men here in Asia (or Malaysia) I can be myself and he can be him. We have good conversation, exchange point of views and respect each other.
However, once in a while, despite all those things done, I still don't feel like I'm being appreciated as a woman. I don't feel being admired, I hardly get any praises..and I don't feel like he appreciates me as his woman. I have to put in so much effort to get him to express his feelings, how he feels. He doesn't have any problem talking about Obama, trust me. He can go on about China's economy for hours but when it comes to us, he shuts and closes his mind. I get frustrated-confessed to him. This is how I feel..bla bla bla..and I need more..from him...to be more attentive, to listen to me more, to show how he loves and cares for me. Being a working woman, I have everything that I need except a companion who is understanding and can be my best friends as we grow old.
It's not that easy. He wants me to accept him the way he is. That is fine. But the nagging about how people do not Q in 7eleven, one time is OK but everytime people here (uncivilised Asians) cut Q, I get to hear about it. When people drive like maniac, he complains and get annoyed and try to give the finger sign-for what? To me, if you want a perfect place to stay, like your country, go back there. No need to come to people's house and complain how unorganised or bad it is. I don't think so I'd be complaining about the toilets in India. If I leave my house to go to India, I will be prepared.
The different priorities are the main problems for us now. We still stay together, trying to see how this is going to end. It is no doubt a sad thing but, what can i do when all I want is for him to understand my needs. He is like a robot, not much emotion, doesn't show his feelings that much and I am sooo full of everything-facial expression and talk non stop, as compared to him. He expects me to be a strong woman, able to do everything independently and not relying on him that much. I can. But in terms of romance and love, I can't be seeking that from another man, can I? and the reason why we are together is definitely because we both need our someone. A companion to share our lives with.
The question is not whether they make a good husbands, it is really depending on an individual. My fella is a bit cold but he is going to make a good life partner. A matter of compromising what is the main thing that I want and he wants.
compared to aussie girls swedish birds are pretty lazy ..theres no interest in playing a womens role at home theres always a excuse they demand a male to do everything for them..the cooking the cleaning the planning the finance you name it they want it..the male in the home gets Jack!! as for in Oz the women are more involved and in return the man chipps in..
In my case the misses has finally accepted im no Swedish softy who spends hours cleaning the house and cooking dinner before she comes home.
my advice to swedish males be A MAN !!!!
say NO.
:P
I've lived in Spain many years as an Englishman and I can tell you for sure that most Spanish guys would be too macho for Swedish women. Unfortunately for them, Swedish men look drippy and ineffective. It's up to Swedish guys to come forward and try to look stronger, if that's what they want. Maybe they're too suppressed!
Vampires... Children of the Night. Pale, black-haired, green-eyed fragile & strong at once... They can give you the best nightmare in your life. Swedish men are not like that.