February 14, 2012
Published: 12 Aug 09 13:32 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/21266/20090812/
The baby which died in an alleged mercy killing at Astrid Lindgren's Children's Hospital in Stockholm was given a massive overdose of pain killers, a new report by the National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen) has concluded.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A 28-year-old man suspected of stabbing a young girl in the throat at the beginning of February has been apprehended and is being held in another country pending Sweden's extradition demand. READ (1 COMMENT) »
A man in Lund, southern Sweden, lay dead in his house for weeks before his body was discovered, as visiting care staff had left after the man failed to answer his door. READ (2 COMMENTS) »
The Swedish government said on Tuesday it has expelled a foreign diplomat, but spokespeople were unwilling to confirm international reports that it was a high level official from Rwanda. READ »
On Valentine's Day, The Local invites you on a journey of seduction through Sweden, a country which may be worth probing further when it comes to matters of love. READ (3 COMMENTS) »
With Valentine's day upon us again, The Local called for messages from the star-crossed lovers of Sweden, who sent us their loving letters and sweet tweets in a celebration of love in Sweden. READ (2 COMMENTS) »
A Swedish man set to take off on his "dream holiday" to Mexico was turned away before boarding, as flight officials claimed he shared the name of a wanted terrorist. READ (19 COMMENTS) »
A 29-year-old man in northern Sweden has been remanded into custody together with an accomplice after trying to extort money from his parents by pretending he had been kidnapped. READ (5 COMMENTS) »
The Swedish Government has penned a new terror strategy, upgrading Sweden’s risk status since the last plan four years ago, calling for an ‘inter-agency cooperation’ in the fight to counter terror in Sweden. READ (11 COMMENTS) »

As diverse as Sweden is, there are a few societal norms that are distinctly Swedish. Understanding a handful of them will hopefully prepare you culturally before you relocate. When you're invited home to a Swede, you better be on time and take your shoes off, writes expat Lola Akinmade-Åkerström. Read more »
Sweden is a country where almost everyone can speak English. So why bother to learn Swedish? Edina Varnagy from Hungary managed with English for a whole year but then found that Swedish could open doors – to a job, a social life and greater understanding. Read more »
"The ice dripped in the winter sun. It was the first day when the light had been intense enough to cause dripping in the sunlight. To hear it was an extraordinary wakeup call. The cycle was happening again as it always does, always will (or so we think). I imagined that on my summer island, the bees..." READ »
|
|

fin
adjective
Fin means anyhting from sweet to proper. When someone says, Du är så fin it's quite a compliment.
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth is a book about Sweden today. A country of natural beauty and open space, and a society focused on equality, human rights and sustainability. Meet regular and astonishing Swedes, supercars and indie rock bands, vampires and royalties.
Buy your copy of Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth from Sweden Bookshop
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
522 jobs available
250 new jobs this week
45 new jobs today
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
massive overdose: why massive? massive is a undefinable word. Overdose would suffice, lethal amount would be exceptable. Why mention it in the title if you mention later that is was an apparent mercy killing, but then stress the point that there was wrong doing in administering the "massive" overdose and not the actual act of "mercy killing". If it was a mercy killing than how do you suggest one perform it, and also why not give us a little more information regards the environment of the apparent mercy killing...
It appears very confusing language designed to dramatize.
The baby recieved the "overdose" in conjuction with being removed from a respirator to be allowed to die that day as she had no chance of survival with devstatting brain damage.
People taken off respirators are given painkillers/sedatives to ease the stress of dying by suffocation - the baby girl was due to be given this
The allegation is that instead of waiting for nature to take its course - the doctor gave an overdose of sedative so that the baby died a little before she would have done by natural causes - to the prosecutors are calling this slight hastening of death as a mercy killing
It's a very strange case
I find the commentators much more confused than the article. 'Why would you prosecute?' Because when someone is administered a deadly dose of sedatives there should be a process to make sure that it is legal.
In Sweden the consensus is that whatever a MD does must be right, the people have a blind trust on the presumed medical ethics. My experience is that of all the countries where I have lived, Sweden is the only one where I would not trust a MD. I have learned it the hard way.
I was pleasantly surprised to find that a MD in Sweden can be prosecuted, now remains to be seen if ever a Swedish MD can actually be sentenced.
Here is the most appalling example of the things a Swedish doctor DOES get away with http://sismicro.wordpress.com/2009/06/16/a-swedish-rapist-doc-goes-free/
A common Swedish problem is that presumed consensus is above the law, and medical professionals are often both judge and executor of that consensus. If a MD does something, s/he must have a good reason which is not to be questioned
In this case, I do think the Doctor is innocent. However, I also believe, that the cause of the infants brain damage has been overlook.
- the statement about a "massive dose" is the statement of just one doctor
- the other doctor is still wanting more information - for example he doesn't understand why only 3ml of blood was analysed - the whole "massive overdose" theory is based on this very tiny sample
This appears to be going to end up in court as a battle of the experts - some of the experts that the defence has hired say that the results are unreliable because:
- they are not based on research relating to babies but adults
- they do not take account of the fact that the baby had liver failure at the time of death which may lead to a different pattern of metabolisation of medication
- they have not taken the extent of the catestrphic brain damage into account.
One thing that this focussing on the final hours when she was taken off life support is doing is that it has totally obscured the details around who REALLY killed this baby - the staff at the other hospital that administered the incorrect dosage of drugs that cause the devasting brain damage which put the baby on life support in the first place
I think people are absolutely ridiculous coming up with sentiments about quilt and innocence based on reporting on various tabloids and chitchatting around the watercoolers.
Also, our criminal justice system requires that the issues of initial cause of brain injury and the OD of sedatives must be kept separate
The act of turning off a respirator upon which the patient depends to sustain life is not murder, but injecting them with drugs is? Why would the second action be any different from the first?
Is dogma another one buzzword ppl are using w/o understanding what it means? I have been seeing it a lot lately in strangest of contexts.