Published: 21 Oct 09 07:38 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/22778/20091021/
A Swedish teenage boy who sent naked pictures of his ex-girlfriend to his friends has had his conviction overturned upon appeal.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Gas pipeline firm Nord Stream will hold an information meeting on the Baltic island of Gotland on Monday to introduce a proposal to extend its controversial gas pipeline project. READ () »
The Swedish royal family gathered in the Royal Chapel in Stockholm on Sunday for the publication of the banns of marriage ahead of the wedding of Princess Madeleine and her fiancé Christopher O'Neill. READ () »
Sweden's Green Party is on the rise while support for the Christian Democrats is at the lowest in nearly a decade, according to the latest voter poll. READ () »
A man was detained Sunday morning on suspicion of involvement in a violent jewellery store heist which left three people with gunshot wounds. READ () »
A fire that started on Friday afternoon in a peat bog in southern Sweden has closed down highway traffic and could take weeks to put out, according to local rescue services. READ () »
Emmelie De Forest of Denmark takes over from Sweden's Loreen as the Eurovision Song Contest champion, capping a spectacle that kept Malmö and the rest of Europe cheering on Saturday night. READ () »
The 2013 Eurovision Song Contest Final is live in Malmö, southern Sweden. The Local brings you all the latest news, reactions, and details surrounding Europe's biggest pop music spectacle. READ () »
Sweden will be playing for gold in the ice hockey World Championships after dispatching longstanding rivals and co-hosts Finland with a 3-0 win on Saturday. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Be British, be sincere and be bold »
"Sweden is a veritable smorgåsbord for UK business. I see our work as a bit like a kind of dragon’s den for both for larger and smaller British companies. It is about matching the UK companies, not with cash, but with Swedish market opportunities." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
With phonecameras, mini-digi cameras, pc cameras - either the girl and/or the mother are somewhat naive. Not exactly the gentlemanly thing to do on the boys part. Not exactly the ladylike thing to do on the girls part.
It's pathetic! All this court time and she had consented in the first place! In the search for 'equality of the sexes' is she to blame for allowing the photos in the first place, or he to blame for taking the photos. It seems it was a mutually agreeable
scenario.
Lack of proper decency, morals and values you could say
No Model release was signed, so the owner of the photos, the boy, has the right to use them how he pleases.
Simple
And I'll add "start the way you want to continue, and continue the way you want to end.
The girl never learnt the proper lesson of upholding her dignity as a lady. I bet the mother did the same thing at her age as well because she didn't do a good job of teaching the daughter.
However, what I have a serious problem with is the fact that she's a minor and was a minor when the photos were taken. Why isn't this considered child pornography if she is still a 'child' under the eyes of the law? Could this open the door for others to say - 'Ahh, well I asked the little girl if I could take a picture of her naked - and she said yes, so I can now distribute the photos as I see fit.' This seems like a slippery slope ruling if you ask me.
Teenagers make reckless and irresponsible choices sometimes. And I definitely think she's compromised herself in the worst way. But, I also definitely don't think the boy should have been allowed to distribute the photos. For one reason and one reason only - she's a minor!
Good Comment! I was about to point out the exact same thing. Seems like most people here have missed the most important point.
Most probably for the same reason of, I (or you) have sex with a 15 year old and its a crime, but if another 15 year old has consensual sex with that 15 year old.... its not a crime.
exactly!
If canuckle can not see the difference, then that is quite sad for you.
If a 13 year old boy was to take a naked photograph of a 15 year old girl, would you want the boy to be locked up as child porn producing pedofile? After all the 15 year old girl is a minor.
Perhaps even add him to a sex offenders list to prevent him from working with children.
Obviously I'm not suggesting that he be locked up as a deviant sexual predator. What I AM saying is that sexually explicit photos of minors should not be permitted to be released, regardless if the photos are consensual or not and regardless of the age of the photographer.
Isn't that just logical?
I agree with Canuckle. She was a minor and in the US that would be a crime. Even if both were minors, the key point is he sent out the private images to others outside of their relationship and he sent sexual images of a minor over the Internet. . .which in the US is a crime.
Yes, she consented. . .yes, something he has learned the hard way, but to a person she trusted at the time of her life and then that person broke her trust. I guess he wouldn't do this if the shoes were on the other foot and it was she who showed sexual images of him to every person who was an adult or minor. She thought, she consented with the guy promising he won't let anyone see it, just them. Come on, do you see the scenario, a couple in a intimate moment of their lives, they're in love, they trust each other and they wouldn't hurt anyone and mislead them. Then bam! Relationship turns bad, and to get back at her, he decides to post the images out to the public for everyone to see. Come on, do you really think she agreed to have the images taken of her and her knowing he will post them out later? Come on, he wanted to hurt her in a way that would damage her so badly in public because their relation fell apart.
Yes, both minors having sex is not a crime, but I have read, recently, a minor sending out sexual images of another minor. . .sexual images of a minor over the internet and that is a crime. And that minor boy has to register as a Sex Offender because HE sent out sexual images of a minor!
@Renfeh Hguh
It's happened!!! . . ..it has happen recently. . .a minor had to register as a sex offender for such acts like you mentioned above.
sadly I am not surprised to hear that.
Please dont mention US laws, most of them have been made into laws as knee jerk effect or influenced by some big industry, plus a lot of them are downright ridiculous, besides, this is Sweden.
While i do agree that it was scummy of the guy, and he should not be allowed to 'distribute' it anymore, i fear its too late, once its out there... its out there, just like music and movies.
Was it foolish of her, absolutely. Giving a large bunch of teen cellphones and not expecting something like this is like giving a baby a rattle and hoping you wont hear a sound from the rattle.
"And that minor boy has to register as a Sex Offender because HE sent out sexual images of a minor! "
Way to harsh a punishment and a perfect example of a knee jerk reaction as well as a political gimmick.
Imagine the boy grows up,becomes a stand up citizen but still has that in his police records, a mistake that the girl first made... then he followed up with.
The blame if anywhere lies with the parents, talk to your damn kids, tell them to consider their actions. She was 15 and naked with a boy.., good upbringing eh?
The boy's behaviour is not exactly noble - however it must be observed that 'the modern trend towards sexual impressionism' lacks many of the moral/ethical nuances of earlier generations. Maybe we as a society can accept some responsibility for allowing 'Freudian' motivations to dominate advertising,media and entertainment.
I think the court has maintained a sensible and realistic balance in this scenario. If his 'being freed' sends any signal at all, it is that you enter the nude diigital world at your peril. It is for you to have sufficient 'care and self respect'.
But then, this is the same old problem - it was around a lot in the 'swingin sixties' as well.
If you leave him make sure you have everything
I don't think she is compromised at all. There just happens to be some nude pictures of her somewhere.
Ah, but what if it shows up again when she is older? Maybe trying to get a job, or running for public office?
I predict it will be no big deal. When I was her age, tattoos were frowned upon. "A tattoo is forever - what if someday you are trying to get a job, and somebody finds out you have a tattoo???" A teenager getting a tattoo was potentially ruining their life.
But in 15 years, this girl will be in her 30's, and she will be living in a world that is FULL of 30 year olds who were photographed nude with a cell phone. And those other adults are not going to hold it against her because they did the same thing when they were kids.