February 9, 2010
Published: 18 Nov 09 13:15 CET
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/23336/20091118/
Dictionary tool Double click on a word to get a translation
Swedish hospitals are increasingly turning to electroshock therapy to treat depression, but have failed to adequately warn patients about the risk for memory loss associated with the treatment, a Sveriges Television (SVT) report reveals.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Three men have been arrested in Afghanistan on suspicion of being connected to the the death of Swedish soldiers Johan Palmlöv and Gunnar Andersson near Mazar-e Sharif on Sunday. READ (6 COMMENTS) »
Each February, Swedish parents take an estimated 600,000 paid leave days to take care of sick children, according to new Social Insurance Agency statistics. READ »
Swedish author and anti-war activist Jan Myrdal has sparked outrage following a public lecture in which he appeared to welcome the killing of Swedish, US and other soldiers. READ »
The number of asylum seekers deported from Sweden rose by 1,300 during 2009, according to new figures from the Swedish Migration Agency. READ »
The Swedish Welfare Board is set to investigate the Swedish Public Dental Service after a nine-year-old girl died following repeated visits to the dentist complaining of toothache and an abscess. READ »
79-year-old Ingrid Ståhl of Malmö in southern Sweden found out to her surprise that she had been registered as dead after a mistake by the Swedish Tax Agency. READ (8 COMMENTS) »
Swedish tennis star Robin Söderling showed no signs of the elbow complaint which knocked him out of the Australian Open, firing 26 aces to earn a 4-6, 6-4, 6-1 win over Frenchman Florent Serra on Monday in the Rotterdam Open. READ »
A 29-year-old man was shot on Södermalm in Stockholm on Monday night. He was hit in the leg and in the shoulder, but was able to call an ambulance. No one has been arrested as the man refuses to talk to the police. READ (1 COMMENT) »
Stockholm Fashion Week. Part Två. »
"Sorry for the late Stockholm fashion week update but I am in the north of Sweden and internet is not working very well. Anyway, I think Minimarket presented as usual the most interesting collection at fashion week. I am obviously not the only one who loves the clean and comic-like style of Minimarket as the..." READ »
Are you interested in subletting your apartment in Sweden within the next two years?
Jobs - in Sweden, in English
Get your career on track with our job listings from Sweden's top employers.
Property - renting or buying in Sweden
Navigating the minefield of renting or buying an apartment or house in Sweden.
Weather
"There is no bad weather, just bad clothes," say the Swedes. Here's the forecast for everyone else.
Introducing...
Every week The Local serves up a spicy helping of Swedish celebrity for your delectation.
Stockholm Syndrome
Tales of crazy Swedish classes, hamfisted attempts to understand - and explain - real Swedes, and varied experiences of fellow foreigners gathered for your amusement.
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
124 jobs in Sweden, in English
53 new jobs this week
20 new jobs today
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
Torture is illegal in Europe. Sweden is in Europe.
If the police do not intervene, patients should take legal action.
No doubt the Swedish authorities would find in favour of the psychiatrists as usual. However upoin exhausting all legal options in Sweden a patient can take there case to the European Court of Justice, at which they will recieve compentsation of at least half a million krona, plus all costs and possibly more.
ECT is assault. The psychiatrists who practice it, know it is assault.
For decades now, human rights campaigners have been trying to get it labelled as torture.
A lot of clinicians consider it torture.
Most people undergoing ECT are not aware of the full facts, exactly as the article states.
It is only a matter of time before ECT is banned Europe wide. There is cases in the pipeline for the ECJ and ECHR on that very subject.
Is ECT Worth the Risks? | Psychology Today
"ECT is usually done in a series of 10-15 separate treatments over several weeks. The electrical current has a disorganizing effect on the chemical/electrical makeup of the brain. It is believed that as the brain reorganizes, its chemical balance is restored. However, some brain cells are likely damaged in the process. Patients commonly complain of short-term memory loss. ECT patients may feel they have traded some recent memories for depression relief. But most say it's a fair trade. The treatment also carries the risk that attends any use of anesthesia. ECT is an extreme treatment, no doubt about it. Some doctors are more casual about it than others, but you shouldn't be. You may want to consult with some other psychiatrists for additional opinions to help you make a comfortable decision."
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/20...worth-the-risks
Postpartum Disorder (Treatments) | Psychology Today
"Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is useful, particularly for individuals whose depression is severe or life threatening or who cannot take antidepressant medication. ECT often is effective in cases where antidepressants do not provide sufficient relief. In recent years, ECT has been improved. A muscle relaxant is given before treatment, which is done under brief anesthesia. Electrodes are placed at precise locations on the head to deliver electrical impulses. The stimulation causes a brief (around 30 seconds) seizure within the brain. The person receiving ECT does not consciously experience the electrical stimulus. For full therapeutic benefit, at least several sessions, typically at the rate of three per week, are required."
http://www.psychologytoday.com/conditions/...?tab=Treatments
What's next, a comeback of the lobotomy? (or however you spell it)
Are we regressing?
I have known people who have been given ECT for not following religeous dogma, for being gay, for being a single mother in Ireland. Don't say it wasn't nbecause as a subscriber to psychology today you will know that.
If you think it is so great, let me perform ECT on you.
Then you can give an honest opinion.
ECT is torture. It is nothing else. It belongs wiht the diagnosis of hysteria in women.
ECT is purely to abuse, nothing else.
ECT has no place in modern society.
Psychology, psychiatry and sociology are nothing more than modern day religeons. They are social control mechanisms in which those not approved of are dealt with by drugs, threat of being drugged, ECT or removal from society without trial.
I have watched the drama around the DSM V revision unfold. I have seen those professions for what they are.
* We see things differently.
* I'm sorry you're upset.
* I'm sure that's how it looks to you.
* Take a deep breath
I certainly do not know if your claim "I have known people who have been given ECT for not following religeous dogma, for being gay, for being a single mother in Ireland. " is real or part of some kind of delusion and nowhere in any of my posts did I suggest otherwise, as you implied.
* I know how upset/angry/_ _ _ _/disappointed you are, but that is the way it is.
Yes, in the past, I am aware that there were forced psychiatric ECT treatments, but I do not think you should personally demonstrate the traits that medical staff used as justification for forced ECT treatments to make a point.
Dress up ECT whatever way you want. It is torture and abuse, plain and simple.
You are obviously a psychologist or in a related disipline.
You are defending the indefensible.
There is no place for ECT in modern society.
Yes, when ECT was first introduced, its use and application were far too arbitary and ill-applied. I cannot speak to how and when it is applied in Sweden, but in the UK and USA, an "informed consent," as established by the WHO is required.
Thus, I disagree with you on your position that it is "torture." I believe that torture is something that is done against one's wishes; which is not the situation described by this woman and her husband.
The treatment remains controversial, but has been demonstrated to be efficacious. Here are two articles you might find interesting:
-Ross, C.A. (2006). "The sham ECT literature: implications for consent to ECT.". Ethical Human Psychiatry and Psychology 8 (1): 17-28.
-Lisanby, S.H., Maddox, J.H., Prudic, J., Devanand, D.P., Sackeim, H.A. (June 2000). "The effects of electroconvulsive therapy on memory of autobiographical and public events". Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 57 (6): 581-90.
As long as there is *informed consent* as described by WHO, then ECT can be a useful treatment -- has has sufficient documentation to support this. Here are the WHO guidelines:
http://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/resource_book_MHLeg.pdf
Finally, your position of, "There is no place for ECT in modern society," is a perfectly okay OPINION to hold, but you do not support it with any references or documentation.
You can get help or more likely torture with your friend Dr. Dillner.
I have to admit to having believed it went out of fashion years ago and was now consigned to the realms of quackery. Apparently I was wrong.
Putting being wrong aside, I wouldn't have it done to me or anyone in my family. The benefits appear to be very short lived and the dangers of memory loss appear to be understated to patients.
These kinds of poorly understood medical practises should surely be the focus of more research. This case in particular tends to support that hypothesis.
That's my two'pennorth anyways......
They had all spent several years in mental hospitals. After one treatment, they improved enough to be released. However, all three admitted they were not cured and they simply said and did whatever the doctors wanted, in order to avoid another ECT treatment. They considered it torture, whatever the medical profession thought. My suggestion is that MDs should not be allowed to order ECT without having gone through it themselves.
An interesting side note is that in order to avoid a 2nd ECT, all three patients were able to fake sanity well enough to deceive the doctors. The implication is that insanity is to some extent a matter of choice. They were willing to put up with being confined to in a hospital, but ECT was too high a price to pay for whatever they got out of being institutionalized.
Please make your voice heard - tell the FDA they must conduct a safety investigation before calling any device safe!
Lauren Tenney
www.theopalproject.org