May 25, 2012
Published: 5 Jan 10 16:49 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/24222/20100105/
Sweden’s childcare allowance is proving ever-more popular in heavily immigrant neighbourhoods, resulting in the closure of some preschools and prompting fears about the measure’s unintended consequences.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A jealous Swedish woman who murdered her ex-boyfriend’s new partner in September has been sentenced to 14 years in prison. READ (8 COMMENTS) »
A doll billed as a "real retard" found its way into stores in Gothenburg in western Sweden on Thursday, prompting strong reactions about a campaign meant to draw attention to the treatment of people with disabilities. READ (6 COMMENTS) »
After having lived in Sweden for a certain number of years, many ex-pats start asking, “Am I going native or what?” Check out The Local's guide to tell-tale signs that you may be more integrated into Swedish society than you first realized. READ (10 COMMENTS) »
The Paradise Wildlife Park in the UK has pledged their allegiance to Sweden in the Eurovision song contest by making their own film version of Loreen’s “Euphoria” – complete with dancing animals. READ »
The "om" chant featured in yoga lessons at a Stockholm school has prompted a complaint calling for them to be banned because of the term's ties to the Hindu religion. READ (20 COMMENTS) »
Swedish police are the worst in Scandinavia when it comes to clearing up home break-ins, a crime which has increased dramatically in Sweden in recent years. READ (13 COMMENTS) »
Thousands of Stockholm-area residents had their morning commutes disrupted on Friday after a power outage left trains at a standstill. By midday, however, trains were back in operation. READ (3 COMMENTS) »
Three fire engines trying to get to a fire in central Gothenburg on Wednesday were delayed after large flower pots placed in the street proved to be immovable. READ (3 COMMENTS) »

Sanna is one of 2 million people in Sweden under the age of 18. Sweden is seen as a good place to grow up. The law makes sure children are well-protected and defends their rights and any organizations work with children's well-being. Read more »
August Strindberg's plays shocked society, dazzled audiences and revolutionized drama. A century after his death, Strindberg, with his powerful, timeless themes, is celebrated around the world. Read more »
The story of K Composite Magazine »
"I’m working on a couple long articles which will be posted here soon. While those are in the works, I thought I’d share this article and interview about my magazine, K Composite, which was recently published on the site Design-Milk.com. Enjoy! Scott Ritcher launched his now digitally glossy mag, K Composite, back when Macs were used..." READ »
|
|

lång
adjective
Lång means long, tall and can be used for height, distance or time.
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth is a book about Sweden today. A country of natural beauty and open space, and a society focused on equality, human rights and sustainability. Meet regular and astonishing Swedes, supercars and indie rock bands, vampires and royalties.
Buy your copy of Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth from Sweden Bookshop
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
Personally I support day care, not because I think its healthy for a child as such but simply because its the only way a child can have interaction over here since the majority of families have to have 2 full time workers to support this great consumer lifestyle.
Actually I'm not sure how big a deal this is - certainly previous research has shown that parents who can afford to use this welfare payment have often never had a daycare place anyway - just gladly taking the extra money for being eith SAH parents or part time workers.
It seems that most people are just using it to delay dagis start - although smart parents would ensure that their kids are mastering the language so as not to be left behind
1. Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child parents have the right to raise their children in the language and traditions of the parents. Children have the right to be raised in the presence of their parents wherever possible. So allowing home childcare subsidies is actually part of respecting human rights
2. The institutions that argue children need formal 3rd party care and who claim it is good for socialization and language etc. are actually arguing with a vested interest- their own jobs. Children at home also are socialized with siblings and playmates and they also learn very important skills of multi-age mentoring, which daycares often don't offer. Children at home are much more likely to be taught to read and do math than are children in large institutional care simply because one on one patient instruction 5-10 minutes a day is possible at home and not possible in large groups. It is a myth and very misleading to assume daycares and nursery schools are the only educational settings. Homes of caring parents are often at least as educational and often much more flexible to respond to the learning skills, pace, and interests of that particular child.
3. Funding that goes only to 3rd party care has an agenda usually of getting parents out of the home to earn, pay tax and be 'productive' in the economy. The agenda is very much based on the traditional economics paradigm that ignores the value of raising children and only counts as work activity that generates cash. That has been a flaw of traditional economics and it has been identified as such at Beijing in 1997 when all member UN nations vowed to start to include unpaid labor as part of their official tally and stop ignoring it. Sadly it is taking a long time to turn around that ship and get male-run governments to realize that roles in the home have all along anchored the economy but just been taken for granted. To fund only care away from home sadly still devalues one key role women have historically had and we must change that.
http://workisee.tripod.com
Nice copy and paste.
In the USA at least this home school option is used mostly by right wing christians to isolate their children from the permissive society although it can also be of more legitimate use when the kids are in a bad school district. In Sweden i am not sure what to say except that forming isolated culturally areas and groups is the essence of a ghetto.
The children should be taught in school and allowed to socialise with other children.
We don't need children to be socially isolated and turned into basketcases.
In the USA those coming from South America (most incorrectly assume Mexicans) want to live with like minded, same colored and cultured people as them. Don't you? They are no different (except their new found country).
If I was middle eastern and moved to Sweden, I would want to live with others like me. Hispanic, African American, same thing. That's why there's Chinatown and Little Italy from NYC to San Francisco.
As for those of us moving through the western world...Australia, Canada, UK, Ireland, Germany, USA, we are much more like-minded and would naturally have an easier time.
As far as I am concerned. From a monetary issue, the point is moot. Whether they get money and stay at home or go to a pre-school. However, they will choose to stay at home. So for those who embrace it or not, a lot of these immigrants are here to stay, and from a very early age, helps ensure that Swedes will keep the status-quo (just have to throw a bone once in a while)
There are all sorts of unintended consequences associated with have such an open mind that your brains fall out. Some are worse than others of course and this ranks one is pretty minor, but the response to it will be another in a series of steps out further onto the slippery slope of government mandating behavior to correct its errors, omission, oversights, and unintended consequences. Its a mess that's only going to get worse.
This was the brainchild of the Christian Democrats who assumed that middle class women would choose to be housewives - which was seen as a positive thing. However now that middle class women chose not to be housewives and it is immigrant families that as using the benefits - suddenly it's a problem LOL
I see very little that is problematic given that it ONLY affects children UNDER AGE 3 - however immigrant families would be wise to make sure that their stay at home children get some exposure to the Swedish language so that they do not need special ed when they start school.
The adults need to learn the language as fast as possible in order to understand and be understood.
Kids learn the language in the wink of an eye.
Do you mean that english speaking parents in Sweden should not stay at home with their kids until they are fluent in Swedish
Since you don't like Sweden and its culture, here is some suggestions for you.
Goto Hemnet.se and sell your home.
Goto flysas.com and book a flight out of Sweden and don't come back.
Not fluent..just able to cope.
As an English speaking parent I found that when I started to understand and speak the language my kids were more motivated to learn it.
I was able to help them if they had problems.
I don't care if the people are foreign, or national, black, white, pink. whatever. Point is simple. We bring kiddies into the world and we should be allowed to raise them. I think it is great that families are given (for whatever reason) the choice.
These kids will learn swedish, no doubt. Children pick things up extremely fast. Kids start school in NZ at age 5 they are much more advanced than swedish kids by age 7, but somewhere along the lines they catch up....always do
NO way is the right way to raise a family, there are just different ways and as long as the child is happy, and healthy then it is absolutely none of our business and we should respect other families decisions and go about raising our own kids our way!
As for immigrant parents, if language acquisition is the true concern, wouldn't centers that teach the parents while proveding childcare during a one hour class make more sense than removing the child from the home. After all the key to educating children is educating the mother. Sorry gentleman your wife's education level is actually more important than yours. In other words if mothers are taught the language of their new country their children will learn it more quickly than any other method. I used to live in Southern California and found this to be so true for the young hispanic children coming into school. If their mother had taken advantage of the free language classes at the schools they usually spoke at least rudimentary english. If the mother had no english skills then neither did the children even if they had been in day cares.
Finally what a colossal waste of money for the government to be paying parents to stay home with their own children. Remember whenever the government pays for something like this its really coming out of the tax payers pocket. So as you drop your child off at daycare and head to work you are paying for another Mom to make the personal choice to stay home.Wrong.