Published: 7 Mar 10 10:13 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/25392/20100307/
The government is reportedly opposed to a plan from the Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten) to reduce defense spending by 800 million kronor ($112 million).
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Parents and volunteers have been patrolling the streets of Stockholm's immigrant-heavy suburbs to help quell riots that have raged for almost a week, serving as a successful deterrent to troublemakers and winning praise from police. READ () »
Police are hunting a 40-year-old man after a woman was found dead in a suburb of Stockholm on Saturday. READ () »
Two cars collided on a road between Trollhättan and Vänersborg in western Sweden on Friday afternoon due to an elk having chosen the unusual spot to give birth to a calf. READ () »
Express delivery firm DHL has been criticised for having handed over a load of alcohol ordered from Germany to a 10-year-old boy in southern Sweden who was home alone at the time. READ () »
A sixth straight night of unrest blighted several Stockholm suburbs on Friday night, spreading briefly to the city of Örebro, 160 kilometres to the west. READ () »
With international media swooping on the Stockholm riots from every angle, The Local's Oliver Gee explains why Stockholm is not burning, and how the story has been blown out of proportion. READ () »
After five nights of rioting throughout the outskirts of Stockholm, many in Sweden and elsewhere are trying to make sense of it all. The Local spoke to a mix of commentators and local politicians to get their views. READ () »
As white-collar union Saco slammed Sweden for not helping well-educated foreigners into the labour market, The Local spoke to researcher Josefin Edström about the disconnect between foreign professionals and Swedish employers. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
" I have recently become addicted to a website called Stockholms Källan. The site is an amazing treasure trove of historical images of Stockholm. You can search by names or locations to find old photos and documents relating to whatever you’re interested in. This image is from a 1960’s short film called “Ditt Stockholm” (“Your Stockholm”). It..." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
However, are they really serious in considering Russia a threaten to Sweden? Why should Russians invade us? To take over IKEA? And lets say that Russians will do it... does really Sweden think to have any chance to stop them? With a population of 9 million people? With Gripen (only Thailand bought it! not evan Norway did!)? Ah ah! We can try to fight back with snowballs!
Go to Youtube and search "Reagan Bear Commercial". Explains it perfectly, better to have an Army and not need it, than need an Army and not have it, like the US in 1941.
I liked your qoute: 'better to have an Army and not need it, than need an Army and not have it'. I can't recall having seen that one before. Another 'food for thoughts' qoute relevant for this topic is: "All countries has armed forces, either it's own or someone's else".
Swedish Veteran's need to find their voice politically, as I am not sure everybody who has ideas for Sweden loves the country as much.
You have a lot to defend, in a dangerous neighborhood; Look how long it took for the US to come to the aid of the Philipines and France in World War II. Swedens freedom may one day depend on a small group of determined patriots ability to hold on, like Finland in the war with the Soviet Union.
Yes, I realise what happened in Finland all those years ago, but surely it would be more logistically convenient and make more strategic sense to invade and repossess the Baltic states than Sweden?? The russian military couldn't sustain a presence in Sweden for very long and, in any case, I think the Swedes are a very patriotic people and a guerilla/sabotage movement would quickly make life unbearable for any occupying forces. The 19-year-old russian conscripts would soon become very demoralised and their rusting tanks would make easy targets.
It's simply not going to happen. Leave your old army kit in the basement of your sommarstugas for the moment.
Russia military is a 1/10 of its cold war strength. Besides, if communist USSR did not invade Sweden in the cold war why should Russia (a capitalist country) invade a fellow capitalist country. Russia's population is shrinking and because of it it might eventually lose some of its territory in the far east. Unless Sweden is planning to send its army to United States future war, increasing expenditure on its military is wasteful.
The only real guarantor for Swedish independence now or ever can be nuclear bombs. The US or China would not attempt to invade North Korea ever because it is armed with nuclear bombs and has the technology to launch them all the way to Japan or the US. If this is a bad idea, then spending more money on convential arms is more stupid.
We shall also remember, that Russia still has potent army, remember what happened in Georgia? They first provoked Georgians, then they came as "liberators" of Southern Ossetia. The puppet Ossetian government told they want to unite with Northern Ossetia, which is a part of Russia. Russia is still an imperialistic country. Have you seen photos from the anniversary of Stalin's death? They still miss him!
Like mentioned above, you only need to understand the Finnish mindset to see what Sweden needs to do. No harm in protecting yourself. I would expect in the next 15-20 years, Nato being disbanded and western military influence waning in the area.... and guess what will fill that vaccuum.
Then again, generationally, Sweden now is mostly populated with a bunch of pantywasters who never experienced any kind of armed conflict on thier doorstep, so it may be in vain, till it's too late.
The argument that using Nord Stream Russia will hold Europe as a hostage is simply ridiculous. In fact, this is just another line of supply complementing already existing network. Actually, its purpose is just opposite - to provide Europe with reliable line of support bypassing troublesome Ukraine and Belorus. It's in Russia's best interest that Europe receive natural gas uninterruptably.
We don't want to repeat situation when Ukraine being unable to pay steal transit gas from Europe damaging our reputation.
They should continue with mandatory service for the youth, there are far too many juveniles with no sense of survival other than what they see on MTV.
I stare in disbelief at the amount of fear you have.
'Germany needs protection from Russia'. C'mon, look at the map.
Actually, wasn't Germany invading Russia twice over the course of the 20th century?
I don't know how your history books read, but the ones on my shelf have Germany attacking France in an attack to knock her out before RUSSIA mobilizes, starting World War I.
World War II ends with a Russian Army in Berlin as I recall. In the end it's not who invades who, it's who beats the other in the end. Russia has a long history of military dominance/Imperialism in the region.
Germany would do well to take a more serious attitude towards her own defence; Modern Germany is not the Wehrmact of 1940 or the Kaiser's Army of 1914.
In my book Germany FIRST declared war on Russia (not vice versa) on August 1st, 1914 and then IMMEDIATELY attacked on the western front hoping to knock out France, before Russian mobilisation.