May 26, 2012
Published: 17 May 10 18:08 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/26694/20100517/
There is no increased risk of brain tumours in people who have used a mobile phone regularly for 10 years, according to an international study including researchers at Stockholm's Karolinska Institutet.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A jealous Swedish woman who murdered her ex-boyfriend’s new partner in September has been sentenced to 14 years in prison. READ (13 COMMENTS) »
A doll billed as a "real retard" found its way into stores in Gothenburg in western Sweden on Thursday, prompting strong reactions about a campaign meant to draw attention to the treatment of people with disabilities. READ (10 COMMENTS) »
After having lived in Sweden for a certain number of years, many ex-pats start asking, “Am I going native or what?” Check out The Local's guide to tell-tale signs that you may be more integrated into Swedish society than you first realized. READ (13 COMMENTS) »
The Paradise Wildlife Park in the UK has pledged their allegiance to Sweden in the Eurovision song contest by making their own film version of Loreen’s “Euphoria” – complete with dancing animals. READ »
The "om" chant featured in yoga lessons at a Stockholm school has prompted a complaint calling for them to be banned because of the term's ties to the Hindu religion. READ (20 COMMENTS) »
Swedish police are the worst in Scandinavia when it comes to clearing up home break-ins, a crime which has increased dramatically in Sweden in recent years. READ (14 COMMENTS) »
Thousands of Stockholm-area residents had their morning commutes disrupted on Friday after a power outage left trains at a standstill. By midday, however, trains were back in operation. READ (3 COMMENTS) »
Three fire engines trying to get to a fire in central Gothenburg on Wednesday were delayed after large flower pots placed in the street proved to be immovable. READ (3 COMMENTS) »

Sanna is one of 2 million people in Sweden under the age of 18. Sweden is seen as a good place to grow up. The law makes sure children are well-protected and defends their rights and any organizations work with children's well-being. Read more »
August Strindberg's plays shocked society, dazzled audiences and revolutionized drama. A century after his death, Strindberg, with his powerful, timeless themes, is celebrated around the world. Read more »
Prime Minister Reinfeldt chats with The Local »
"If you missed it yesterday, here’s The Local’s editor David Landes snagging Prime Minister Reinfeldt for a chat before Princess Estelle’s baptism. Always nice to know the PM has time for TL!" READ »
|
|

lång
adjective
Lång means long, tall and can be used for height, distance or time.
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth is a book about Sweden today. A country of natural beauty and open space, and a society focused on equality, human rights and sustainability. Meet regular and astonishing Swedes, supercars and indie rock bands, vampires and royalties.
Buy your copy of Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth from Sweden Bookshop
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
IF this is true then I would be very interested in a study from an independant source which hasnt been funded by a vested interested.
The incidence of brain cancer in the USA is approximately 6 cancers per 100,000 people. Let's say, hypothetically, cell phones increase the incidence of brain cancer by 50%. That would be a HUGE increase in cancer rates, and the overall rate of brain cancer would increase from 6/100,000 to 9/100,000. Needless to say, a big jump in cancer rates, but still an extraordinarily small number of people develop cancer.
What is the point of all of this? In order to determine whether or not cell phones cause cancer with scientific certainty would require epidemiologists to study millions of people over many years. And, in order to do the study with scientific certainty, there would have to be a large group of people in the study who never used cell phones so there would be a control group. Obviously, this kind of study is impossible to do.
As an alternative, scientists look at people who developed brain cancer and compare them to a similar group of people who did not develop brain cancer. The scientific assumption is simply this: if a person who develops brain cancer does not use a cell phone more than a similar person who does not develop brain cancer, than the cell phones cannot be blamed for the cancer.
Is it a valid approach? Not perfect, but the best possible approach under the circumstances.
I agree that biased reporting is suspect but I really do not think the medical establishments of these 3 countries can be bought.
Every scientist recognizes this. The scientific community goes to extraordinary lengths to design study that eliminate bias. Double blind studies - crossover studies etc etc. It costs over 400 million US to get a drug approved because the study process is so extensive and difficult. Was this study designed NOT to find cancer because it was funded by the industry? I am not sophisticated enough to know one way or the other. I do know just how difficult the entire process is.
Epidemiologic studies are the most difficult of all to perform because there are so many uncontrolled variables. Did I get my brain cancer because of my cell phone or because of the polluted ground water? Maybe I got my brain tumor because I spent more time in the mountains where I am exposed to more radiation? Or because my mother smoked cigarettes when she was pregnant? How is it possible to control all of these variables and match groups? This study is no different. Not perfect. Not the last word. But a solid step.
ALTHOUGH - I like the data problem with the different frequencies used in different places; the amount of power produced by the different models; power required to transmit depending on location and the fact that it was an ANALOG signal for many of those years and now it is digital.
I like the idea of restricting young peoples usage because of the developing brain BUT ---
Has anyone actually seen a kid actually talking on a Cell? It seems to be all about the texting.
My daughter saw a Cell with VERY large keypad and she said it was for children. I told her that it was more likely for people with dexterity and vision problems such as older people - her fingers then started flying over the keyboard and she ABSOLUTELY FREAKED OUT because it was SO easy to type on the keyboard - she went from "it's for children" to wanting to buy it on the spot!
Have you seen the BioInitiative Report? It goes into quite a lot of detail regarding the problem and the consensus is the the current standards are inadequate to protect public health.
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/207253-The-BioInitiative-Report-The-Dangerous-Health-Impacts-of-Microwave-Radiation