February 12, 2012
Published: 17 May 10 18:08 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/26694/20100517/
There is no increased risk of brain tumours in people who have used a mobile phone regularly for 10 years, according to an international study including researchers at Stockholm's Karolinska Institutet.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A man has been arrested in Gävle in northern Sweden on suspicion of having stolen a 20-year-old's wallet while doling out an impromptu hug in an apparent copycat attack of a gang operating in Stockholm. READ »
Medicinal cannabis is now available as a prescription medicine in Sweden after the Medical Products agency approved a cannabis-based mouth spray for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. READ »
A new line of snow showers is expected to powder Sweden during Saturday, with the snowfall expected to continue all through the night into Sunday. An area of low pressure north of Sweden is the culprit behind the large area of snowfall. READ (5 COMMENTS) »
Two-thirds of newly appointed bosses in 2011 were men, according to a survey of Sweden's eight largest management recruitment companies presented in Swedish media. READ (7 COMMENTS) »
A Stockholm-based psychiatrist had sex with one of his patients during a therapy session. The man has now been charged with sexually exploiting a person dependent of him. READ (10 COMMENTS) »
A Swedish man was keeping 73 cats and two dogs in one small apartment, animal protection officers discovered to their horror. Urine, faeces and fur balls covered the apartment's floors, and several of the animals were inbred. READ (4 COMMENTS) »
A rocket carrying newly drawn blood is to be sent into space from the Esrange space centre in Kiruna, in the far north of Sweden. READ (8 COMMENTS) »
Police in Stockholm are looking to beef up efforts to put the brakes on a “vodka-mobile” that delivers hard liquor to school children in the Swedish capital who place their orders via text message. READ (6 COMMENTS) »

As diverse as Sweden is, there are a few societal norms that are distinctly Swedish. Understanding a handful of them will hopefully prepare you culturally before you relocate. When you're invited home to a Swede, you better be on time and take your shoes off, writes expat Lola Akinmade-Åkerström. Read more »
Sweden is a country where almost everyone can speak English. So why bother to learn Swedish? Edina Varnagy from Hungary managed with English for a whole year but then found that Swedish could open doors – to a job, a social life and greater understanding. Read more »
"Hej! We all know that Swedes like to have a “fika”. Take the quiz and find out if you have a good “fika vocabulary”. http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/story.php?title=fika-quiz Good luck! " READ »
|
|

fin
adjective
Fin means anyhting from sweet to proper. When someone says, Du är så fin it's quite a compliment.
Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth is a book about Sweden today. A country of natural beauty and open space, and a society focused on equality, human rights and sustainability. Meet regular and astonishing Swedes, supercars and indie rock bands, vampires and royalties.
Buy your copy of Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth from Sweden Bookshop
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
522 jobs available
236 new jobs this week
2 new jobs today
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
IF this is true then I would be very interested in a study from an independant source which hasnt been funded by a vested interested.
The incidence of brain cancer in the USA is approximately 6 cancers per 100,000 people. Let's say, hypothetically, cell phones increase the incidence of brain cancer by 50%. That would be a HUGE increase in cancer rates, and the overall rate of brain cancer would increase from 6/100,000 to 9/100,000. Needless to say, a big jump in cancer rates, but still an extraordinarily small number of people develop cancer.
What is the point of all of this? In order to determine whether or not cell phones cause cancer with scientific certainty would require epidemiologists to study millions of people over many years. And, in order to do the study with scientific certainty, there would have to be a large group of people in the study who never used cell phones so there would be a control group. Obviously, this kind of study is impossible to do.
As an alternative, scientists look at people who developed brain cancer and compare them to a similar group of people who did not develop brain cancer. The scientific assumption is simply this: if a person who develops brain cancer does not use a cell phone more than a similar person who does not develop brain cancer, than the cell phones cannot be blamed for the cancer.
Is it a valid approach? Not perfect, but the best possible approach under the circumstances.
I agree that biased reporting is suspect but I really do not think the medical establishments of these 3 countries can be bought.
Every scientist recognizes this. The scientific community goes to extraordinary lengths to design study that eliminate bias. Double blind studies - crossover studies etc etc. It costs over 400 million US to get a drug approved because the study process is so extensive and difficult. Was this study designed NOT to find cancer because it was funded by the industry? I am not sophisticated enough to know one way or the other. I do know just how difficult the entire process is.
Epidemiologic studies are the most difficult of all to perform because there are so many uncontrolled variables. Did I get my brain cancer because of my cell phone or because of the polluted ground water? Maybe I got my brain tumor because I spent more time in the mountains where I am exposed to more radiation? Or because my mother smoked cigarettes when she was pregnant? How is it possible to control all of these variables and match groups? This study is no different. Not perfect. Not the last word. But a solid step.
ALTHOUGH - I like the data problem with the different frequencies used in different places; the amount of power produced by the different models; power required to transmit depending on location and the fact that it was an ANALOG signal for many of those years and now it is digital.
I like the idea of restricting young peoples usage because of the developing brain BUT ---
Has anyone actually seen a kid actually talking on a Cell? It seems to be all about the texting.
My daughter saw a Cell with VERY large keypad and she said it was for children. I told her that it was more likely for people with dexterity and vision problems such as older people - her fingers then started flying over the keyboard and she ABSOLUTELY FREAKED OUT because it was SO easy to type on the keyboard - she went from "it's for children" to wanting to buy it on the spot!
Have you seen the BioInitiative Report? It goes into quite a lot of detail regarding the problem and the consensus is the the current standards are inadequate to protect public health.
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/207253-The-BioInitiative-Report-The-Dangerous-Health-Impacts-of-Microwave-Radiation