Published: 17 May 10 18:08 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/26694/20100517/
There is no increased risk of brain tumours in people who have used a mobile phone regularly for 10 years, according to an international study including researchers at Stockholm's Karolinska Institutet.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Gas pipeline firm Nord Stream will hold an information meeting on the Baltic island of Gotland on Monday to introduce a proposal to extend its controversial gas pipeline project. READ () »
The Swedish royal family gathered in the Royal Chapel in Stockholm on Sunday for the publication of the banns of marriage ahead of the wedding of Princess Madeleine and her fiancé Christopher O'Neill. READ () »
Sweden's Green Party is on the rise while support for the Christian Democrats is at the lowest in nearly a decade, according to the latest voter poll. READ () »
A man was detained Sunday morning on suspicion of involvement in a violent jewellery store heist which left three people with gunshot wounds. READ () »
A fire that started on Friday afternoon in a peat bog in southern Sweden has closed down highway traffic and could take weeks to put out, according to local rescue services. READ () »
Emmelie De Forest of Denmark takes over from Sweden's Loreen as the Eurovision Song Contest champion, capping a spectacle that kept Malmö and the rest of Europe cheering on Saturday night. READ () »
The 2013 Eurovision Song Contest Final is live in Malmö, southern Sweden. The Local brings you all the latest news, reactions, and details surrounding Europe's biggest pop music spectacle. READ () »
Sweden will be playing for gold in the ice hockey World Championships after dispatching longstanding rivals and co-hosts Finland with a 3-0 win on Saturday. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Be British, be sincere and be bold »
"Sweden is a veritable smorgåsbord for UK business. I see our work as a bit like a kind of dragon’s den for both for larger and smaller British companies. It is about matching the UK companies, not with cash, but with Swedish market opportunities." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
IF this is true then I would be very interested in a study from an independant source which hasnt been funded by a vested interested.
The incidence of brain cancer in the USA is approximately 6 cancers per 100,000 people. Let's say, hypothetically, cell phones increase the incidence of brain cancer by 50%. That would be a HUGE increase in cancer rates, and the overall rate of brain cancer would increase from 6/100,000 to 9/100,000. Needless to say, a big jump in cancer rates, but still an extraordinarily small number of people develop cancer.
What is the point of all of this? In order to determine whether or not cell phones cause cancer with scientific certainty would require epidemiologists to study millions of people over many years. And, in order to do the study with scientific certainty, there would have to be a large group of people in the study who never used cell phones so there would be a control group. Obviously, this kind of study is impossible to do.
As an alternative, scientists look at people who developed brain cancer and compare them to a similar group of people who did not develop brain cancer. The scientific assumption is simply this: if a person who develops brain cancer does not use a cell phone more than a similar person who does not develop brain cancer, than the cell phones cannot be blamed for the cancer.
Is it a valid approach? Not perfect, but the best possible approach under the circumstances.
I agree that biased reporting is suspect but I really do not think the medical establishments of these 3 countries can be bought.
Every scientist recognizes this. The scientific community goes to extraordinary lengths to design study that eliminate bias. Double blind studies - crossover studies etc etc. It costs over 400 million US to get a drug approved because the study process is so extensive and difficult. Was this study designed NOT to find cancer because it was funded by the industry? I am not sophisticated enough to know one way or the other. I do know just how difficult the entire process is.
Epidemiologic studies are the most difficult of all to perform because there are so many uncontrolled variables. Did I get my brain cancer because of my cell phone or because of the polluted ground water? Maybe I got my brain tumor because I spent more time in the mountains where I am exposed to more radiation? Or because my mother smoked cigarettes when she was pregnant? How is it possible to control all of these variables and match groups? This study is no different. Not perfect. Not the last word. But a solid step.
ALTHOUGH - I like the data problem with the different frequencies used in different places; the amount of power produced by the different models; power required to transmit depending on location and the fact that it was an ANALOG signal for many of those years and now it is digital.
I like the idea of restricting young peoples usage because of the developing brain BUT ---
Has anyone actually seen a kid actually talking on a Cell? It seems to be all about the texting.
My daughter saw a Cell with VERY large keypad and she said it was for children. I told her that it was more likely for people with dexterity and vision problems such as older people - her fingers then started flying over the keyboard and she ABSOLUTELY FREAKED OUT because it was SO easy to type on the keyboard - she went from "it's for children" to wanting to buy it on the spot!
Have you seen the BioInitiative Report? It goes into quite a lot of detail regarding the problem and the consensus is the the current standards are inadequate to protect public health.
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/207253-The-BioInitiative-Report-The-Dangerous-Health-Impacts-of-Microwave-Radiation