Published: 3 Jun 10 17:45 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/27026/20100603/
The Swedish organizer of the Ship to Gaza has accused Israel of using disproportionate military force against a peaceful aid operation. Mattias Gardell said the Israelis had committed “premeditated murder” and were guilty of piracy.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Two Swedish teenage girls were officially charged with slander on Tuesday for their involvement in the "slut-shaming" Instagram account that saw enraged teens in Gothenburg lay siege to two high schools last year. READ () »
After a caricature of a topless woman on a tourist map in western Sweden left some residents seething, a local official has promised to have the offending image removed. READ () »
Jan Åke Jonsson, the former CEO of Saab Automobile, and two top-level colleagues have been detained by police on suspicion of tax crimes. READ () »
Swedish telecom equipment maker Ericsson is suspected of having bribed ministers in Romania in connection with being awarded a contract for the country's emergency number and is now under investigation in the United States. READ () »
Sweden's largest business confederation has gone out guns blazing, criticizing politicians for not facing up to the challenges of "a lost year for Swedish exports" in 2012. READ () »
Cars were engulfed in flames on Monday night and youths clashed with police in the north-western Stockholm district of Husby for a second night in a row. READ () »
Police officers on hand during the Husby riot in northern Stockholm stand accused of using racist language towards people on the ground, with one youth worker in the area claiming it is "not the last time" such scenes will occur. READ () »
A town in western Sweden has agreed to pay damages to a man who was told he wouldn't be hired if he refused to shake a woman's hand for religious reasons. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
"BANG!!!! BANG!!!! BANG!!! In the midst of the Stanley Cup’s Eastern Conference semifinals series, every Bostonian knows it is all about Bruins ice hockey. Oh right. I am in Sweden, home of the 2013 International Ice Hockey Federation GOLD Champions. And there is certainly no doubt ice hockey fever has taken over Sweden. A lot of Swedes,..." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
The time has come to make this country understand that it is not above international law.
They were on international waters and were attacked. What Israel did was illegal, period.
And the Israelis are lying through their teeth as usual. Using paintball guns, yeah right. Then saying that they were surprised at the violence from the activists, another lie as you can clearly see them spraying water and throwing stuff on a Israeli boat below. Footage they themselves released.
Then they steal footage shot on the boat and edit it out and publish it without permission.
So not only are they terrorists but pirates who has no respect for international law nor copyright.
(let me repeat)
According the the UN conventions, it's only piracy when commited by private entities. State actors are not included NO MATTER IF ITS 10 OR 100 MILES FROM THEIR STATE..
But another fact you will throw out of your numskulls of course, but worth mentioning nonetheless.
"Gardell, a professor of religious history at Uppsala University and the ******* brains behind the expedition*******..."
Do we really have to read any more after that?
This is one of the main instigators who planned the whole thing, what's he gonna say?
"Oh yes, we were wrong, we had plenty of warnings but decided it would be better to play Israel like puppets and were asking for martyrdom so we can meet Muhammad sooner and see if Aishea is still 9 years old or he has allowed her to grow up"
Regarding this susposed "professor"......You need to reset your values as to who can be considered a Professor of any disipline....This man is obviously mental disturbed.
He admits he didn't witness the events, and yet he confidently asserts that "there were no weapons on board", and that the Israelis committed "premeditated murder", an "incomprehensible bloodbath", no less! So how does he know all that if he wasn't there? Oh, of course, he asked the hooligans, oops, I mean, activists! Screw the video we all saw - he asked the activists! None of whom, heaven forbid, could be considered in any way biased... Now here's proof positive for you. Way to go, Sherlock.
Funniest of all, he refers to the casualties "civilian humanists". Well maybe there's something I'm missing here, since I don't know of too many "civilian humanists" who use clubs, bat, knives, shock grenades and iron chains in an attempt to lynch a soldier who seeks to avoid contact with them, and armed merely with paint gun. I also don't know of too many "civilian humanists" who chant "We will slaughter you Jews like Muhammad did". I also don't know of too many "civilian humanists" who specifically express their will to die as "shahids" (martyrs) in a Jihad war against Israel, as exposed in the Turkish media today. How can anyone with a healthy mind, most certainly a university professor - call such people "civilian humanists", without bursting in wild laughter? Or perhaps I'm simply not up-to-date with the new-world-order, neo-liberal, radical-leftist/anarchist terminology. Violent hooligan = "civilian humanist", inspecting cargo for weapons = "piracy", protecting oneself from certain death by a lynch mob = "massacre", etc, etc. Uppsala U, save me a place at his class, will you? I really want to learn what else this fascinating nutty professor teaches...
what a buffoon
There was a premeditated set-up, by "The Ship of Fools." The whole world can see with it's eyes, this press-lynching by the "Alice in Wonderland" press. The trouble with most people is that they have no concept of what Israel has to put up with on a daily basis. This returning to 1967 borders is as absurd as Uddevalla being returned to Norway. Have you forgotten how just a few years ago Israel gave back Gaza (including the thriving greenhouse horticulture, which was totally trashed) and all she got in return were thousands of rockets fired at her.
This 10,000 ton supply ploy is a drop in bucket anyway, because 15,000 tons of supplies are entering Gaza each week. If Israel did not exist (the anti-Semites dream) then the rest of you will be next. Then you will need armed guards for your nuclear plants (see the story below).
"They were on international waters and were attacked. What Israel did was illegal, period. "
I'm glad you agree that it would have been ok if it happened a few kilometers closer to shore. Maybe next time, they will wait another hour or two.
The organizers announced well in advance that they intended to run the blockade. Why exactly is anybody surprised that the Israeli military intercepted them?
nah. he feels like the man of the hour
The Somali pirates stormed the ship gunning down many of the aid workers killing tens of civilians and wounding many more. A Somali spokesman said the Somalians were defending themselves against pre-meditated Norwagian violence from sticks, bars and knives. They said the Somalian fighters have towed the ship into a Somali port and will deliver the aid to Ethiopia themselves after sorting what is allowed and what isn't.
The Norwagians on board the ship have been taken illegally from International waters by the Somalian pirates to Somalia and will only be allowed to leave after signing a document confirming that they entered illegally and accept being deported.
William Hague the Foreign Minister for UK has expressed 'concern', and the US president Barak Obama says he 'regrets' the loss of life." Can anyone else see what is wrong with this picture?
Body armour was found, perhaps to save the activists who were NOT in the plan to be killed. The ones who DID plan on martyring themselves, all piled onto the same ship, armed themselves with pipes and axes and provoked Israel to attack. Flushing the flotilla with famous "thinkers" etc would back the claim that the flotilla was peaceful not to mention render credibility to the "first hand accounts" shared like the one this chump is spouting off, when really the whole idea was to frame Israel and turn the world against it.
And if that is the case, how devastatingly brilliant. Evil, wicked, and hopefully the truth will come out one day, but to frame Israel this way was an ingeniously crippling war tactic to use against the nation.
I am no lover of Israel but it seems like Gardell is the one guilty of premeditated murder by running a boat load of amateur "activists" and Turkish martyrs into the teeth of a well known Naval Blocade.
"The brains behind the expedition" is talking through his hat, imagining what he claims, "that the Israelis knew the ships' cargo was harmless". What else to expect from the all-knowing professor??
Commonsense: Let us take a look at the facts: There is a BLOCKADE - and the Israeli authorities have made their intentions clear: the blockade is going to be maintained against possible Nazi Hitlerites and not going to be broken no matter how saintly they may claim to be.
That any ship that intends to offload in Gaza, will not be allowed to do so, as that would endanger Israel's security. (I met the mayor of Gaza at the Institute of International Affairs at Gamla Stan in 1987. He shed not blood but real tears and beseeched the Swedish Government to build them a harbour, so that Gazans could export their tomatoes)
You could assert without any contradiction from me: the ships' cargoes (whatever ships and from wherever) must first be inspected to ascertain that there are no weapons and no materials hidden in the cargo - materials that could be used to advance Terrorist Hamas' Military capability to carry on with their well known terrorist activities.
The whole world knows that it is reasonable demands that Israel makes (and so would you): Those who think that the Iran-supported terrorist Hamas wants to make peace with Israel had better read this again and tell us whether Hamas wants peace, now or any time in the future:
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q=The+Hamas+Charter
As for those who may not have understood the seriousness of what they read, I recommend Y. Harkabi's "The Palestinian Covenant and its Meaning"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Y.+Harkabi+%3B+The+Palestinian+Covenant+and+its+Meaning
The so called peace people on the Flotilla, hell-bent on navigating to Gaza no matter what the Israeli navy was saying about escorting their ships to Ashdod for inspection, decided to disregard the demands and even the warnings of Little Israel ( if it were a USA embargo they would not sail to California in the same way - and forgetting that " discretion is the better part of wisdom" thought that they would sail past the Israeli Navy as if that navy did not exist, dock their boats at whatever Gaza can boast as a harbour and to hell with Israel inspecting the cargo or any future cargoes for weapons.
Of course that would not be their attitude to a Russian or Chinese or Iranian or North Korean or a Swedish embargo - no inspections - in which case they would only have themselves to blame when their ass got shot to pieces, perhaps not by the really peaceful Swedes, but most certainly by the Russians, the Chinese, the North Koreans, and of course the Americans who are currently still busy kicking ass in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and they will most certainly soon be kicking ass in Iran whether Obama wants a second term or not.
Other than badmouthing mjennin with hollow slogans, can you give solid proof and analytical arguments (in the same fashion he did) to support your claim that his observations are indeed "crap"?
No? I thought so... Of course, empty slogans and curse words are much easier to bring, than a solid and convincing proof. He who curses the most, does so because he has no other effective arguments.
This fool has blood on his hands.
Was Israel right to board the Gaza flotilla?:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/haveyoursay/2010/05/was_israel_right_to_board_the.html
Hamas having been stamped " a terrorist organisation", are there any visa requirements for prospective sympathisers to visit Gaza, by sea??
Would the peaceful travellers on board the Flottilla have been permitted to go on shore once their ships arrived on the beaches of Gaza?
Would they be permitted to stay?
It's a sick world:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/06/we-con-the-world.html
But when the only arguments you provide are lowly curses and hollow slogans, and nothing solid - then you lose all credibility. In a courtroom, will your case be based on you cursing and badmouthing your adversary - "what he says is crap", "he is stupid", "he must be smoking something weird", or will you bring a more solid evidence? Will you ask the judge to google the information that proves your case, or will you want a good lawyer to articulate and present it nicely it for you? Well, same concept here. Have a great day too.
Search Youtube
Peaceful activism? Marmara ship "aid" for Gaza
and
"Peace Activists" Lynch Israeli Soldiers
it was imposed by the british over the arabs who lived there in the first place at the end of the otoman empire in WWI
See wikipedia: "The Balfour Declaration encouraged the international Zionist movement to push for a Jewish homeland in the Palestine region, which was the site of the ancient Kingdom of Israel and at the time had a significant Jewish minority population with respect to a majority of Arab-Muslim population".
this is the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partitioning_of_the_Ottoman_Empire
The above comment came from a Scot in the newspaper "The Scotsman" and seems to fit this particular blog quite well. His message most likely fell on deaf ears in Scotland, and most likely will meet the same fate here.
You must have been to Gardells history lessons, you're very selective in your era, you'll have to go back a lot longer than that to find Judea & Kingdom of Isreal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Judah
On the first part of your post:
Thank you for your comments on blockades, I was considering posting something similar, but I think I can instead simply agree with you on that point. At least as near as to make little difference.
By the very nature of a blockade, regardless of legitimacy: if you try to break it, you should expect to be boarded or worse.
On your comment "The Israelis involved were idiots.":
As an outside observer, I'd like to slightly modify that to the effect that idiots seem plentiful and even infectious in matters regarding Israel, Palestine and many middle eastern issues (nor, for that matter, limited to these topics). I'd like to clarify that it seems that these idiots don't show a clear bias for any particular side, except possibly for people removed from actual conflict (I do hope that I haven't been infected myself).
I will not comment (at least for now) on the origin of Israel, or the validity of Israeli or Palestinian claims, as this is possibly the most infectious topic in the world today, as shown by even a brief glance through the posts here.
Not really a suitable comparision! This man's on an ego trip, & you are either a student, family or another history teacher.
The Israeli leaders and soldiers are freak-animals who enjoy their sick "cannibalism". FULL STOP
The comment has completely dismantled and demolished Gardell, whose platform is made of water, and his accusation is as false as water.
( an interesting genesis of the phrase " False as water"
http://www.shaksper.net/archives/1999/1606.html
Whatever argument Gardell makes standing on his platform of water sinks with him, to the bottom of tha ocean:
The only way that it would have been techinically feasible to break the blockade would have been if Gardell's " peace" flotilla had overwhelmed the Israeli navy and stayed on course, finally arriving in Gaza with the Isreali navy in hot poursuit or with the Isreali navy in tatters and complete disarray.
Gardell, his comrades and the various crews knew that this was an unlikely scenario.
So what did they hope for?
I think that some of them ( the trouble makers in the big ship) at least hoped that with every kind of weapon avialable to them ( including their knives and forks, baseball batons and perhaps with their razor blades if need be, they would resist the Israeli attempt to thwart their intentions.
And that's what they did.
I also think that they hoped that there would be a fracas on board - perhaps some gunfire - at worst a boat or two would be sunk - by confrontation they'd provoke "a sitaution", they'd make the necessary sacrifice and then the world reaction and sympathy would be with them - that if Isreal kicked their ass hard enough, smpthay would be with them, escpecially in the aftermath of that Gaza incusion. AS we can see, some of that hope has been fulfilled, because there is a mentality that always sympathises with the one percieved as the underdog. However in my view in this uneven match between the flotilla and the IDF it is still the IDF that is David and Gardell , Mankell, the Paletinians, the Terrorists & Co who are Goliath
I have no sympathy for the devils.
Maybe the pro-isreal lobby here can explain why UN resolutions are not followed, and in the light of that why they would expect support from nations of the UN ?
Whilst the blockade is understandable, the level of the restrictions is not. Its one thing to stop goods to ensure that weapons are not transferred, but do you feel that the level of goods crossing into Gaza is justifiable.
How do you think the best way to a resolution would be. I think many many people support Israel when suffering at terrorism, but also feel that many of Israelis actions lead to a suspension of basic human rights for mass populations. They then support those who fight for better conditions.
If Israel was blockaded in such a manner, would they react militarily (see St Davids Hotel bombing as an example).
How could the aims of the Palestinians be realized peacefully. One suggestion is to follow UN resolutions. If Israel disagrees with them, raise enough support and pass a new one.
If I was Hammas now I would declare a unilateral cease fire of armed conflict. Israel has an excuse to continue with its behavior when threatened. GIve them a year, 2 years, if they don't move towards resolution, ask the world to boycott.
That said I suspect many in Hammas thrive and benefit from the conflict. It provides them with wealth and power, unites a population grateful for any form of organisation.
ask norway to act as arbitrator, or ask the UN for a judgement of who gets what.
But one must wonder who is worse, the Gardell types or the fools that actually buy into his BS.
There's very good reason for Israel and Egypt blocking the flow of weapons into Gaza. Israel pulled out of Gaza as they agreed to do, but the Palestinians turned it into a a rocket launch pad.
It's perfectly clear that Hamas and Hezbollah only want war - nothing else.
The 'humanitarian activists' are either abject liars or abject fools, there's little room for anything else.
That's the... reason Netanyahu's aim is self-defeating.
In trying to save his nation from imagined danger (the foolish notion that ships bringing humanitarian goods to Gaza could threaten Israel's existence, for example) he is exposing Israel to very real dangers.
If the Israelis meet the MV Rachel Corrie with any kind of violence, they take another big step toward alienating their nation from the rest of the world, and especially from the European community, which is of critical importance to Israel. The Israelis are acutely aware that the Corrie is an Irish ship, and the head of Ireland's government has warned them of "the most serious consequences" if any harm comes Irish citizens.
On the other hand, if Netanyahu allows the Corrie to dock at Gaza unimpeded, he can expect a stormy reaction and very possibly rejection from Israel's powerful political right. They'll say that he's weak and shameful, because he lets Israel be pushed around by the gentiles. That charge could stick and move the nation much closer to political chaos.
Either choice will make it harder for Israel to gain the one thing it needs most to escape from danger: a peace settlement with Palestine. As long as there is no settlement, Israel remains caught in a cycle of conflict and insecurity that makes the Jewish state its own worst enemy." -- Ira Chernus
"Blockades are not illegal. Stopping a vessel in international waters when the stated purpose of the vessel is an illegal act is not illegal. According to MARITIME LAW, ships under flag of another nation may be boarded in international waters if there is reason to believe the boarded vessel is involved in:
A. A crime that extends to the shore of the country in question
B. Smuggling contraband or drugs
The organizers of the flotilla specifically stated that they were intending to engage in civil disobedience (ie., an illegal act) to break the blockade by two other countries (e.g., Egypt and Israel) against a third (well, legally only a part of a pseudo third - or has everyone forgotten that Gaza and the West Bank are each only a part of ONE country?).
They were asked to provide proof that they were not carrying contraband with the assurance that humanitarian aid would proceed. This was refused. By doing so the flotilla organizers provided sufficient cause for boarding under both A and B.
By their own words this was intentional. They wished to have a confrontation."
There it is. International and maritime law states that in blockade conditions, any ships, be they civilian or that of the enemy, which attempt to purposefully run the blockade may be attacked or boarded in international waters.
Comparisons to Somali pirates are completely off the mark. There is no naval blockade in Somalia. Somali pirates are not a state that is at war with anyone. The ships they target for piracy are not trying to reach Somalia in the purpose of smuggling contraband or violating Somali laws. They are trade vessels that try to get past Somalia.
This Mattias Gardell is an evil, egotistical fool with a "cause" which enables him to sit on a high horse and look down on others.
It's clear from the reports that the peaceful protestors attacked the troops with knives on one ship responded with live amo . Lesson don't go on a boat with this guy don't bring jihadists to a peaceful protest ..
seriously, I blame the israel government, at this late stage of the game, they still don't seem to have a clue about what propagandists can do, the jews are supposed to be smart, I don't see any smartness on that front.
only God knows how they survived all these years. if that is not a miracle, I don't know what is.
I have heard a number of people mention they wish to boycott unethical companies, may I suggest Com-Hem which is now unfortunately a part of the Carlyle group.
Peace to every one and I hope you all remember to have a wonderful weekend with your children:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/headline9637e7.jpg
And the Nazi looked at the Zionist and the Zionist looked at the Nazi.........
http://palestinianvoice.files.wordpress.co...ad_children.jpg
Reports have just arrived MV Rachel Corrie has been illegally boarded by IDF fascists, may I invite all my brothers to recite a short prayer for our Martyred Sister Rachel Corrie and the 111 children poisoned while gold mining in Nigeria.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Vr8Xl0cbUZA/SXDV...Dead_Son_sm.jpg
You're quite right that the anti-terrorist crowd is in place and crowing for Israel right here.
Here's a serious piece of newz about legality and that ship :
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/23678
I would encourage that the European activists that want to bring peace to the Gaza/Israeli border should take a six month vacation in the cities of Sderot and surrounding farming communities. Having them there will clearly demonstrate to the activists how difficult or easy is to live in that part of the world. If rockets continue coming in, the activists will have first hand experience on how difficult life can be for Israeli civilians. If the rocket stop being fired from Gaza, for fear that it might kill or harm activists, then the Peace process might begin to gel.
Any volunteers..???
Jed Nightingale
NYC
I would IF do it you would be prepared to do something similar and take a a six month vacation in Gaza?
Would you do it? If not why not?
I think a 6 month holiday in Sderot would be luxury in comparison to one in Gaza for the same period. What do YOU think?
And another thing, are you aware of the history behind Sderot?
Read what wiki has to say:
"Sderot was founded in 1951... on the land of the former Palestinian village of Najd. On 13 May 1948, Najd was occupied by Jewish soldiers from the Negev Brigade as part of Operation Barak. The inhabitants were EXPELLED and fled to Gaza, and the village was then completely destroyed and levelled to the ground. In 1951, the town of Sderot was built over the village lands."
Land theft and ethnic cleansing. Now, ask yourself how you would feel if that happened to you and your family?
The problem is as I see it that so many decent people have been deceived.
"By way of deception, shall you wage war," Do you know which organisation according to its own ex-members allegedly had that as its former motto?
I.e. we have been fed propaganda lies and myths for so long. We ALL have to do some more discriminating research if we really want to get to the bottom of this problem.
"When people who are honestly mistaken learn the truth, they either cease being mistaken or they cease being honest"
The truth is that Mr Gardel, the revisionist History Professor, is himself guilty of promoting a suicide mission for the flotilla participants. Note that none of the other ships reacted to Israeli Coast Guard inspections with steel pipes and clubs or hammers. I wonder if Gardell has ever been hit in the head with a steel pipe or a large hammer? What kind of idiot would call that attack peaceful?
”Go and live in Gaza for a few weeks under the same conditions that Palestinians live under and I am quite sure you would feel a bit differently” .
Of course I could. I have friends from Gaza and Hamas and from the so called “West Bank” known to us as Judea and Samaria. I also have friends in Hezbollah. I understand them.
In June 1991 – after four months in Egypt (Alexandria, Cairo, University of Cairo, al- Azhar etc) I was finally on my way to Gaza, through the Rafah crossing - it was all planned – I had a few names and addresses to visit but at the last minute when I rehearsed with my tutor, who asked me “And what are you going to tell the border guards when they ask you, “What is the purpose of your visit?”,
I answered, “I will tell them that the Messiah is here and I have come to liberate my oppressed Palestinian brothers and sisters and to resurrect the Holy Temple in Jerusalem!”
I was joking of course, but my Jewish Californian brother who had been teaching English to Bedouin Arabs in the Negev was so angry!!!
On the following morning my notebook and diary was gone and so was he, from our hotel, he had disappeared as mysteriously as he had first appeared at breakfast in our hotel in Alexandria.and that was the end of that….
Yes mysticbumwipe, I agree with you “the IDF commandos are NOT cops.” - it was only an analogy – you know that when they board the ship that you may be travelling on in the near future, with the intention of breaking the blockade – they then have the power and authority of a cop - I know that at this point you are mentally now screaming BUT NOT IN INTERNATIONAL WATERS!!! Ok well what about when you are 61 miles from the coast of Gaza – are you going to change course or have your direction changed for you? Or do you then decide to start another chapter of “Gunfight at the OK Coral “: mysticbumwipe vs. IDF Commando
You know the song:
Freedom came my way one day
And I started out of town, yeah!
All of a sudden I saw sheriff John Brown
Aiming to shoot me down,
So I shot - I shot - I shot him down and I say:
If I am guilty I will pay.
Reflexes had got the better of me
And what is to be must be:
Every day the bucket a-go a well,
One day the bottom a-go drop out,
One day the bottom a-go drop out.
The way I see it, there could be a “Gaza first” solution…. It’s just that it seems that Egypt would not like to annex Gaza, would not like to have Palestinians on their hands……
Perhaps, something for you if not this
http://www.momentmag.com/moment/issues/201...ion-Breger.html
Then this?
http://www.shaykhabdalqadir.com/content/articles.html
See the video:
http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/Hebrew/heb_n/video/ipc_097v.htm
Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan stood behind the IHH - the terror organization that was behind the violence on the Mavi Marmara at the end of last month. But in general, the media has been behaving as if Erdogan´s support for the IHH and his government´s anti-Jewish attitudes are ´only´ anti-Israel or are new. For Erdogan, Israel-bashing is a way of bolstering his status with Islamic and Middle Eastern states, which Turkey would like to lead, and against the Turkish opposition.
http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/Hebrew/heb_n/video/ipc_094v.htm
Israel is our first line of defence in a turbulent region that is constantly at risk of descending into chaos; a region vital to our energy security owing to our overdependence on Middle Eastern oil; a region that forms the front line in the fight against extremism. If Israel goes down, we all go down
http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_mul...deo/shahada.wmv[b]
statements from passengers, information found in files on laptops seized from the ship and
statements made by passengers to the media after their release, all prove that the
violence employed against the IDF on board the ship was not spontaneous but
rather a premeditated operation. The operation was organized beforehand by IHH
and implemented by a hard core of 40 violent operatives who were taken on board
specifically for the purpose. This bulletin provides an updated picture based on recently
acquired information.
2. The hard core of 40 IHH operatives boarded the ship in Istanbul. They remained on the
upper deck while the other passengers (of whom there were about 500 on board) received
orders to remain below decks (The IHH leader ordered “Turks, upper deck, Arabs, below
decks.”).
3. The 40 IHH operatives joined the ship in Istanbul without a security check. Most of
them wore stickers reading “Security Protection” (khares amni). They also prepared in
advance designated equipment and cold weapons for a possible IDF takeover of the boat (for
example, they brought metal cutting disks to cut the ship’s railings). The IHH operatives were
commanded by organization’s leader, Bülent Yildirim, who organized the fighters, briefed
them before the confrontation with the IDF forces and instructed them to use violence.
The media reported that some operatives specifically stated that they wanted or were willing
to die as martyrs (shaheeds).
4. According to the minutes of a meeting of the flotilla leadership which took place
on May 16, in which IHH played a major role, the possible scenarios in which the flotilla
passengers participated did not include a violent confrontation with the IDF (an
analysis of the minutes will be published separately). Moreover, other organizations
participating in the flotilla, such as Free Gaza, had their activists sign pledges that
they would not engage in physical or verbal violence against IDF soldiers. All of
the above create the impression that IHH fooled some of the other organizations,
hiding its true intentions to employ severe violence.
http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_mul...deo/shahada.wmv