February 13, 2012
Published: 26 Jul 10 15:20 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/28000/20100726/
A 13-year-old female student has submitted a complaint to the Discrimination Ombudsman (Diskrimineringsombudsmannen, DO), charging that a school refused to enroll her because of her Arabic-sounding name.
For more pics, tips and news from Stockholm - visit The Local's new Stockholm section.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Since the new Social Democrat party leader Stefan Löfven took up the post, the party is gaining strength in the polls, causing political experts to speak of a ”Löfven-effect”. READ »
Families of children in Sweden suffering from narcolepsy caused by vaccination for the swine flu can expect some form of compensation, Swedish health minister Göran Hägglund said on Sunday in response to new calls for help from parents. READ »
The new leader of the Social Democrats Stefan Löfven has indicated he's ready to negotiate with the government over the future of nuclear power despite a previous party decision to phase out nuclear energy in Sweden. READ (1 COMMENT) »
One in five Swedes believes that people rise from the grave after they've died, a new survey has shown. READ (5 COMMENTS) »
Several of the recent killings in Malmö have been linked to financial fraud and fake companies trading online, according to sources close to the ongoing murder investigations. READ (5 COMMENTS) »
Finnish driver Jari-Matti Latvala claimed the Rally of Sweden title near Hagfors in western Sweden on Sunday, the sixth win of his career. READ »
A 24-year-old teacher has been remanded into custody on suspicion of child rape after admitting that he had sexual relations with a number of teenage pupils. READ (4 COMMENTS) »
Medicinal cannabis is now available as a prescription medicine in Sweden after the Medical Products agency approved a cannabis-based mouth spray for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. READ (17 COMMENTS) »

As diverse as Sweden is, there are a few societal norms that are distinctly Swedish. Understanding a handful of them will hopefully prepare you culturally before you relocate. When you're invited home to a Swede, you better be on time and take your shoes off, writes expat Lola Akinmade-Åkerström. Read more »
Sweden is a country where almost everyone can speak English. So why bother to learn Swedish? Edina Varnagy from Hungary managed with English for a whole year but then found that Swedish could open doors – to a job, a social life and greater understanding. Read more »
| 13/02 | Methods Engineer Bombardier Transportation |
Västerås |
| 13/02 | Store Manager Nike Randstad AB |
Stockholm |
| 13/02 | Web Designer with good knowledge of usability alaTest.com |
Stockholm |
| 13/02 | Test Designer Node Ericsson |
Katrineholm |
| 13/02 | Field Service Engineer Bio-Rad Laboratories |
Oslo |
| 13/02 | R&D Chemists Jotun AS |
Sandefjord |
"The ice dripped in the winter sun. It was the first day when the light had been intense enough to cause dripping in the sunlight. To hear it was an extraordinary wakeup call. The cycle was happening again as it always does, always will (or so we think). I imagined that on my summer island, the bees..." READ »
|
|

fin
adjective
Fin means anyhting from sweet to proper. When someone says, Du är så fin it's quite a compliment.
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth is a book about Sweden today. A country of natural beauty and open space, and a society focused on equality, human rights and sustainability. Meet regular and astonishing Swedes, supercars and indie rock bands, vampires and royalties.
Buy your copy of Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth from Sweden Bookshop
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
506 jobs available
216 new jobs this week
17 new jobs today
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
I usually avoid commenting on articles like these, but this was pretty disgraceful on the school's part and I hope they get reprimanded for this.
In a perfect world, you should be sued for making such a moronic generalization about "swedes". But for now, shame on you!
@Elias06: "arabs should start considering giving names like johan and anelie, think a lit bit about the secretaries who have to write your long and weird names understand the poor secretary johan is short cool and cute "
First of all, this has nothing to do with how hard it is for the "poor secretary" to write a name. A name, however complicated it may be, can be spelled out, and if the secretary can't put up a bunch of letters together, she is failing at one of her most basic duties as a professional.
Rather, this story is about ethnically discriminating against a child. It's against the law, and I sincerely hope that - if found guilty - the secretary gets slammed as hard as possible to send a clear signal.
It may be besides the point, but know that plenty of non-Arabs have Arabic name.
To me, that sounds like blaming the victim. You're basing your logic on the premise that the xenophobia (some might say racism) in this case, is rational and that one can talk it out of people. I disagree with that. I think it's deeply engrained in a tiny fringe (luckily!) of society and it is the role of justice system to stomp it out of them. These people don't belong in the global world we are moving towards. They are relics of the past and should not be tolerated.
That there are people who will conclude from this story that "people with arabic sounding names are associated with some kind of trouble" is a minor issue because anyone who draws that conclusion from this story is stupid and shows signs of xenophobia. We can't possibly go around trying to accomodate stupid people! Anything less than the secretary losing her job is unacceptable! We can't let racists get in the way of children fullfilling their potential! I hope that was clear.
@leroy: "You stink you swedes."
Well...I'm actually one of those with an Arabic name. And I've been in Sweden for less than a year...so don't embarrass yourself. I wish Sweden acknowledged more its dark past...but I will never, ever blame a "swede" for what his or her grand parents might have done. Besides, there were plenty of anti-Nazis back then in Sweden. Your generalizations are shameful and needs to be denounced.
Shame on you!
From all swedes with due respect
I will say from my personal expereince and as well as from other known people to me...that those swedes who are above 35 or 40 years of age are mostly racist, they are full of rasism and they potray the bad picture of Sweden to the rest of world. The youngsters are good as compared to this age group.
And believe me I have also observed majority of Swedes people with telling lie...yes believe me. Then I thought if this is the case then what is the difference between these highly qualified, well mannered people and the people from those who belong to the third world countries?
I understand that you think stomping may solve the problem. But actually education will yield better results. I have seen how much better people react to one another if they are forgiving open minded. I have also seen how retaliation work and the mess it brings about. I am definitely against racism but think that the harm here could be rectified towards the Arabic sounding people: in this case without causing more hate and misery for people who merely need to see that not everyone are like them.
A number of great leaders have shown that this is a much better way to handle these things. While others have gone for the stomping approach.
I'm an American and I have lived in Sweden for 15 years. When I first came here I had a Spanish last name and could not figure out why employers weren't hiring me. I would get asked strange questions like how many brothers and sisters I had. I was unemployed for two years. Then my mom came to visit me in Sweden and I had an idea to use her more English/Germanic maiden name. The officials even had my own mother sign the papers to use my own mother's maiden name (strange). My mom is American.
At the time I was also attending Kraftkällan in Danderyd to attempt to learn Swedish. A woman there lunged over me while I was eating lunch and said "your just here to take advantage of the system" I was so angry by this comment I stood up and told this middle aged woman that I was an American and that I did not need to be here since I had came here for love.
Anyway, I have reported things to the Ombudsman several times and nothing has ever been taken to court. Unless you have hard evidence it is forgotten. I think I will start to use recording devices myself because that is the only way to prove an act of racism or maybe even film.
Things have improved in the last 10 years as far as racism goes but there is still a long road ahead. One thing I don't understand is why Swedes let in foreigners and immigrants into Sweden in the first place if they don't want to integrate them into society.
I was at the airport recently after coming back from England on vacation. The guy at the booth said "how long will you stay in Sweden" I angrily said I have lived here for 15 years, can't you see that in my records?". He let me go by and I was fuming. Here I am with a good job paying high taxes and after 15 years I still don't get an ounce of respect.
Typical, I don't expect much more. I just hope Sweden will improve in the future in this respect.
I hate to tell you, but Sweden is a democracy. This is not an apartheid state. Individuals are protected against such things as ethnic discrimination.
And I repeat: Some highly educated well-to-do people are racist. So don't go telling me that this is a matter of education.
@Marko2010S: "Swedes are very very very racists, clear headed people know that very well."
Grow up! Swedes aren't any more racist than Greeks or Algerians. In this case, this secretary appears to be racist. Nothing more, nothing less.
Stop generalizing!
@superhero: "It's not strange that people become racists considering how many of youths from the middle east are behaving themselves in this country."
I would argue that racists didn't wait for middle-easterners to show up in Sweden before becoming racists. But I can see that the different norms and values exacerbate the situation.
Stop justifying racism!
The spirit of Xenophobia is all around here, that is why it is better school fees is charged so that people will leave sweden for the swedes and we would see what the ratings would be. In some university it is even a problem to get supervision for master thesis talkless of Ph.D. I wish Sweden well. They bnefitted from me more than I benefit from them
Used to this, I only want to go back home and get my life back, but unfortunatly here I am stucked here with a husband that I love and that can't leave.
If you don't believe you'll make it you never will. It's basic psychology. People love making up excuses for their own shortcomings and playing the role of the eternal victim. There are enough immigrant CEO's, businessmen, and politicians in Sweden to prove that immigrants can very well make it big in Sweden. To what extent racism exists here is irrelevant. The people who truly work hard will overcome the odds.
But, I have to admit that my experience of being with a Swedish international company is this:
a) your job is at a higher risk of being cut if it's not in Sweden.
b) If it's not happening in Sweden then it's not particularly important or interesting.
c) Talk about 'Diversity' is just that i.e. 'talk', which means that the company will still be headquartered in Sweden and the board members will remain predominantly Swedish. At the local level, especially internationally, managers will be forced to show extra diversity but back in Sweden the status quo remains more or less intact.
On the +ve side at least Sweden as a country has laws and systems in place to encourage non-rascist behaviour and it's trying to do the 'right thing' even though the actions of some individuals is far from perfect.
Just to be clear; I really like Sweden, the country and the people.
I know three persons who changed their names from arabic sounded names in Sweden to some kind of stupid western names. you would look funny if you are dark arab and you cant speak perfect swedish and your name would be Gustavsson .
In the Arabic countries these whites gets the best jobs. because they respect them. Shame on these NAZIi racists!
Why did they even check your records? Haven't you managed the swedish passport in 15 years ?
Thank god there is a Discrimination Ombudsman and victims may ask for help and justice.
Funny!
a.) Why do the Swedes give them a way out of their violence-ridden, war torn, dictator-having, 3rd world countries and then give them a free place to live, a monthly salary for nothing, protection in the media, Islamic schools, mosques, etc etc?
b.) Why the heck don't the Muslims find another country to go to? Egypt? Saudi Arabia? Syria? You know, one where they won't find any "racism."
c.) How, on God's green Earth, can a Muslim ever complain about someone else being a racist when you see how non-Muslims are treated in Muslim countries? They even treat their own women as property rather than people!
Funny how they don't like it when a little "racism" is done upon them, huh? Think they'll reflect on this and change their ways? LOL. Sure.
At any rate, if this story is correct then naturally what this secretary did was blatant and wrong. She got caught red-handed too. People can feel how they want about others but education is a basic human right, imo.
Swedes need to start taking a hard look at how they are perceived at home rather than seeking to understand how they are perceived abroad. The rift between immigrants and Swedes seems to be widening and we need to bridge the gap if anything.
So far we only have the arab womans version, and there is no documentation if she didnt record the conversation. She most definetily left some non-favorable part out of the story.
On the face of it, if the story is true in all detail(which i sincerely doubt), the secretary act seems dispicable.
On the other hand, schools have a reputation to see to, and want their schools to be renowned for a high level of education. At all costs, they want their schools to attract the best pupils, and not become a magnet for children endowed with a low learning potential. And lets be honest, filling up a school with arab children, is usually a bad sign. Indicating that the level of academic achievement is low, that the school is troubled with disciplinary student problems, and that non-muslim children are harassed on a daily basis.
Ethnic swedes would shun schools like this like the plague.
Very few people would admit this openly, but its more or less a fact.
.Do you people know that the student' mother is not lying? You don't.
I would like to hear the school version of events.
If you do not like Sweden and Swedish hospitality.....go somewhere else or simply go home....and fight for "Justice", economical or political, there.
If you are so smart you should stay in your country and be "appreciated" there. If you do not want or you are not able to do that than stop blame Swedish people and others who try to help you.
Victim is a victim always....nobody can help you if you do not have self-respect. If you feel unwelcome and suppressed anywhere, do something to deserve respect, do not fight for it......, specially not in your host home.
Please stop complain ...nobody keeps you here.... go find your luck somewhere else if you do not like here.
> "If Swedes are as "racist" as the Muslims on this board say they are then...."
Who's Muslim on this board? Leroy?
> "a.) Why do the Swedes give them a way out "
Good question. I guess it's the same reason the Swedish government sends loads of money to "help" 3rd world countries. If Sweden was a direct democracy, I really doubt things would be the way they are today. Decisions made by elected representatives don't necessarily reflect the will of the people.
> "b.) Why the heck don't the Muslims find another country to go to? Egypt? "
You seem to have a bone to pick with Muslims. Nothing in this story alludes to the little girl being Muslim. In fact, Arab Christians are disproportionally represented in Sweden compared to the rest of the world.
And besides, who cares? It's a child. If it were up to me, it should be illegal to tag young kids with labels such as "Muslim", "Jew" or "Catholic". It's silly and only creates problems.
> "c.) How, on God's green Earth, can a Muslim ever complain about someone else being a racist"
Don't conflate Arabs, Muslims and Arab Muslims. And don't confuse ideology with race.
Arab Muslim countries are generally open about their discrimination. It's codified. There is no hypocrisy.
As for women, it's not like they have been emancipated in the West for a long time. It's very recent (Switzerland...the people so scared of minarets that they had to have a constitutional amendments banning them, gave women the right to vote somewhere in the 60s). The third world hasn't caught up yet. And women are de facto second class citizens in poor countries...be it Congo, Peru or Tunisia.
> "Funny how they don't like it when a little "racism" is done upon them, huh? Think they'll reflect on this and change their ways? LOL. Sure."
The story is about a K-I-D!!! Shame on you for speculating about how she'd discriminate against others given the opportunity.
There's little about religion that I like. And Islam is certainly the religion I hate most. But your speech is out-of-place and just despicable here. If the story was about veils, mosques or even remotely related to religion, I'd propably support you. But this is about discriminating against a Swedish little girl based upon her "ethnic" background.
> "At any rate, if this story is correct then naturally what this secretary did was blatant and wrong."
Why wouldn't the story be correct? Frankly, do you think the audio recordings were made up? Do you think anyone would fake the whole story and make the little girl go through this trauma just for the sake of it? This is not a court case where you can make money. Best you can do is get the secretary fired and the child enrolled in the program.
It's truly sickening that some people would question the veracity of this story in an attempt to whitewash the alleged hideous actions...
you go somewhere else and stopping talking Swedish rubbish
I do not talk Swedish rubbish or any other like you do... ,I am not Swedish and I have 3 passports, all of them deserved with respect.
I tried to"'Open your eyes". Not yours particular, since you obviously know what you do,....The girl in subject has to be grateful to get a chance to go out from "ghetto" and enroll in a school with mix students in order to learn better Swedish language and habits.
And the schoolmaster probably was suppressed and happy to get a chance to diversified students with native speaker, could be the only one in the school.
Try to look a glass halve full rather then halve empty.
That was indeed the typical Swedish bullshit any immigrant have had thrown on their face.
I am an immigrant myself. I didn't choose to live in this country. My parents got hired as engineers working for a big company here. And I came along from the Asian country where I was born. Even though people wont mistake me for an Arab, I still feel unwelcomed from time to time. What the immigrants ask is not just social benefit and money from the government, but more human interaction and being respected as fellow human-beings. Hell if I can get more of these at the expense of paying more tax, I'd even do that. The sense of belonging doesn't come from money or other materialistic factors for that matter. How about treating people equally? For example like saying hi when walking past each other on streets instead of exclaiming "you steal our jobs"; or NOT rejecting a job applicant for being Asian/Mideast/African/Slavic? I don't need a 200 sqm mansion with an equally big backyard to feel good. The sense of respect stems from the small gestures of people, the way they greet you and wants to know you as a person. Then again I can't blame the Swedes cos they don't even show much intimacy towards each other. I plan to move to another country in a few years time. So for any of you who advocate the "take it or leave it" attitude, I can tell you im taking your advice to the heart.
"For example like saying hi when walking past each other on streets instead of exclaiming "you steal our jobs"; or NOT rejecting a job applicant for being Asian/Mideast/African/Slavic?"
People in northern Europe in general dont say "hi" to strangers they meet on the street, its a custom. This is regardless of race, creed or sex.
It seems like you simply have misunderstood a custom of this country.
Swedes will not necessarily reject a arab or african job application. Instead they will prefer to hire members of their own ethnic group. This is called "ethnic nepotism", and is largely practiced by all peoples of this world.
This is a fact of life, and one of the main reasons why multiculturalism doesnt work very well.
"So for any of you who advocate the "take it or leave it" attitude, I can tell you im taking your advice to the heart. "
Good for you. This is probably the best thing to do if you feel alienated in this country. I would do they same thing too.
One cant expect the indigenous population of a country to change their deeply ingrained culture and traditions.
It is always the responsible of the newcomer to adapt to the ways of the new country.
It is basically as you say; "take it or leave it".
"People in northern Europe in general dont say "hi" to strangers they meet on the street, its a custom. This is regardless of race, creed or sex."
I did cover this point when saying "the Swedes don't even show much intimacy towards each other". And I also said for this reason, "I can't blame them". I have lived here for many years and I do know what is Swedish custom. Then again, how often do you see a Swede insulting another random Swedish stranger on the street?
"Swedes will not necessarily reject a arab or african job application. Instead they will prefer to hire members of their own ethnic group. This is called "ethnic nepotism", and is largely practiced by all peoples of this world."
Unfortunately, I know people who have been rejected for being foreigners. If you want to find yourself one example, read comment #28. Besides, multiculturalism works in many places. It works in Canada, and some states in US such as CA, NY or MA. I've lived in NY for some time so I know. Altho I'm not saying it works in entire America.
"Good for you. This is probably the best thing to do if you feel alienated in this country. I would do they same thing too. One cant expect the indigenous population of a country to change their deeply ingrained culture and traditions."
If you want to leave it's generally advisable to take your time and secure a job in your next country first. While I'm doing this in Sweden, I'd fight for my right whenever needed. And if there is a slightest chance that what I say can be heard by anyone of the indigenous population, I'll keep using my freedom of speech.
"It is always the responsible of the newcomer to adapt to the ways of the new country. "
It's true. The question is the opportunity cost. When I visited US half a year was enough for adaptation before I felt I owned my space. Here, many years and still struggling.
I could not say it better and agree more with you.
@LeoKinmann
This is exactly what I call self respect. Good for you. I did it myself 25 years ago,
I traveled around the world and had been living/working in several countries with different cultures.. And when I think in which country I feel the best, it is Sweden. Off course nothing is perfect, but compared with other countries Sweden is the most tolerable than any other. Specially if your ethnicity does not fit in local environment.
Good luck to you and you will remember me once in the future.
This is a bullshit argument, if there ever was one. The prevalence of a practice has nothing to do with its morality.
It's wrong to discriminate based on ethnicity. If you disagree, it means that you have shaky ethical standards.
look at the fact that how many non-fee-paying students from the third world in Sweden?
How generous the Swedish women are, can you see how many of these perfect blondes are hanging out with these "victims"?
Sweden went as far as it can to support some of the most "pain in the ASS" people. Will your own nation even dare to do so for you???
Don't try to let others feel sorry for you. Try your best to make it here.
"I did cover this point when saying "the Swedes don't even show much intimacy towards each other". And I also said for this reason, "I can't blame them". I have lived here for many years and I do know what is Swedish custom. Then again, how often do you see a Swede insulting another random Swedish stranger on the street? "
Fair enough, you did actually cover this point.
While the scandinavian, and this goes to some degree for all germanic people, do seem to have a cold aditude towards strangers, it also has its advantages. Scandinavian people are on average not very confrontational, and only rarely resort to violence when personal conflict arises.
"Unfortunately, I know people who have been rejected for being foreigners. If you want to find yourself one example, read comment #28."
if a company is desperat enough, they will hire most anobody avaliable. But you are right to some degree, some businesses are very picky. But again, this goes for other ethnicitys as well.
Some family enterprises are very closed towards outsiders, i experienced this with for instance, chinese people.
"Besides, multiculturalism works in many places. It works in Canada, and some states in US such as CA, NY or MA. I've lived in NY for some time so I know."
It probably works better in some places than others. But the decisive factor is which groups of people are mixed together. Some groups(ethnicitys, cultures, religions), are more compatible than others.
Big cosmopolitan citys can probably accomodate more diverse populations. Unfortunately this comes with a cost. These citys suffer from lower levels of trust and less social cohesion. This effect is mitigated when diversity rises.
"While I'm doing this in Sweden, I'd fight for my right whenever needed. And if there is a slightest chance that what I say can be heard by anyone of the indigenous population, I'll keep using my freedom of speech. "
Its your right to exercise freedom of expression.
Im just advising people not to be to naive when dealing with this type of subject. Culture usually changes very slowly, and often with lots of opposition to change.
@locaxy
"This is a bullshit argument, if there ever was one. The prevalence of a practice has nothing to do with its morality. "
I was actually more stating a fact than defending the practice morally. So there is not much BS about it. All the empirics on the subject, confirm that its a very pervasive phenomenon globally.
"It's wrong to discriminate based on ethnicity. If you disagree, it means that you have shaky ethical standards. "
In some circumstances i think most definetily its ok. I rather regret to say, that my sexual preferences are very discriminatory. I simply have a strong sexual preference for my own ethnicity. And i know lots of people who feel the same way.
Personally i think this is perfectly morally acceptable.
"I would argue that racists didn't wait for middle-easterners to show up in Sweden before becoming racists."
Of course not, but when you see people from a certain group of people constantly behaving badly, or when being badly treated by these, even the most open minded person can turn into a racist. This is true for all people of all races all over the world so there is nothing strange or unnormal about it.
Some ideas that came to mind from evil America...
This just calls for vouchers so that each parent can use the free market to choose their school. Instead of insiders controlling the situation which exists in every culture where social funds are controlled in a beauractratic fasion, freedom should rule.
Or should we start busing in Sweden to make sure that we have proper integration of schools. Everyone should fill in a 100 question survey and based on statistical correllation and social demacratic intentions we'll place each child. Harvard does this with the freshman incoming class for dorm placement. Why can't Swedish children do the same.
@Jannik. There is no use arguing with some of these people. Some of these people who are complaining about the racism in Sweden do not realise their own racism.
>"I was actually more stating a fact than defending the practice morally."
Forgive me for not buying that explanation. You tried to downplay the event, by giving the practice a fancy name coined by van den Berghe to justify the oppression of black Africans.
Here's what wikipedia has to say about ethnic nepotism: "Current proponents and users of the term are regularly associated with white nationalist, separatist and supremacist movements, and with pseudoscientific racism and scientific racism ideologies that have been disqualified as hard science in the 20th century by the American school of cultural anthropology (Franz Boas, etc.), the British school of social anthropology (Bronisław Malinowski, Alfred Radcliffe-Brown, etc.), the French school of ethnology (Claude Lévi-Strauss, etc.), as well as by the discovery of the neo-Darwinian synthesis."
How would it look if this thread was about rape and you jumped in saying that men don't necessarily rape women, but that it sometimes happens because of Man's drive to fecundate as many females as possible? Called it "survival of the fittest" and finished by saying that it happens all over the world? Are we to believe you're trying to "state facts"? I, for one, don't think it's unfair to assume you were trying to rationalize the behavior.
> "I rather regret to say, that my sexual preferences are very discriminatory. I simply have a strong sexual preference for my own ethnicity."
That's very much your own personal business. I don't care if you practice incest. What goes on between two consenting adults is their own business. Discrimination is when somebody in a position of power abuses it to further the cause of people closer to them. Be it their nephews (textbook nepotism) or people of the same ethnicity. Do not confuse private matters with public issues. Now, please...don't embarrass yourself further. Your attempt to rationalize the secretary's discriminatory behavior is becoming increasingly transparent.
If you met me you never say that to my face.....because I would hit you..and thats the only way many of you swedes change is through violence sadly. There is plenty on the way. England had Brixton and Paris too has had riots you lot are next and I predict you will run to the Germans for help..lol
"Forgive me for not buying that explanation. You tried to downplay the event, by giving the practice a fancy name coined by van den Berghe to justify the oppression of black Africans. "
I wasnt necessarily trying to either downplay the event, or morally defend it. I dont agree with your assesment that Van den berghe was trying to justify oppression against blacks. Its the exact opposite.
"Ethnic nepotism is a concept in sociobiology to explain why people prefer other people of the (perceived) same ethnicity or race. Influenced by W.D. Hamilton's theory of kin selection, ethnic nepotism describes a human tendency for in-group bias or in-group favouritism applied on the ethnic level. It was coined by sociologist Pierre L. van den Berghe in response to Belgian oppression of Africans he witnessed as a Congolese-born European in the Belgian Congo."
As its states, the development of the theory is an attempt to base social science on a foundation of evolutionary biology.
""Current proponents and users of the term are regularly associated with white nationalist, separatist and supremacist movements, and with pseudoscientific racism and scientific racism ideologies that have been disqualified as hard science in the 20th century by the American school of cultural anthropology (Franz Boas, etc.), ...."
Im sorry to say so, but cultural maxism (Boasian cultural anthropology, Frankfurt school) does not qualify as science, and is in itself an example of pseudoscience.
They simply dont have any scientific authority on the subject matter.
That nazis or other rightwing groups use the term to justify their political ends, does not disqualify the theory as such. You are commiting a fallacy, analog to "guilt by association".
"Are we to believe you're trying to "state facts"? I, for one, don't think it's unfair to assume you were trying to rationalize the behavior. "
I was actually trying to rationalize the behaviour, trying to make sense of why it happens so often.
Rationalizing behaviour, does not entail that i find it morally acceptable. I would do the same in the case of rape, despite the fact that i dont find this behaviour morally acceptable either.
"That's very much your own personal business. I don't care if you practice incest. What goes on between two consenting adults is their own business."
There is a thin line between the private and the public. If i decide to hire people of my own ethnicity exclusively in my private firm, am i then practicing "racism", or attending to my own personal business?
"Now, please...don't embarrass yourself further. Your attempt to rationalize the secretary's discriminatory behavior is becoming increasingly transparent. "
I dont find it embaressing to admit that i was rationalizing the behaviour.
But a suspect that you are embarresed, since you have demonstrated that you arent capable of reading a wiki-article.
> "I wasnt necessarily trying to either downplay the event, or morally defend it."
Oh, dear...let's say that your posts are sufficient to objectively deduce you were trying to 1) downplay the event (see your characterization of the story as "hearsay"), 2) justify and rationalize it ("ethnic nepotism"), and 3) argue that it's not morally reprehensible (by equating a school's decision to enroll a student to your pick of sex partners).
> "I dont agree with your assesment that Van den berghe was trying to justify oppression against blacks."
Read the paper. It's pretty clear what his motives were.
> "Im sorry to say so, but cultural maxism (Boasian cultural anthropology, Frankfurt school) does not qualify as science, and is in itself an example of pseudoscience."
Don't feel sorry. To me, all "soft science" is pseudoscience.
But I am certainly not a cultural Marxist (if that's what you meant by "maxism"). You, on the other hand, with your rationalizations, show profound ignorance. Sociology as a discipline, emerged to counter rationalization.
> "I was actually trying to rationalize the behaviour, trying to make sense of why it happens so often."
No. You were making excuses for it. Classic example of the Naturalistic fallacy.
I'm beginning to wonder if you even know what rationalization means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_%28psychology%29
> "I would do the same in the case of rape"
I am not buying that. I sincerely doubt that in the context of a news forum, you would try to rationalize the rape of a woman.
> "There is a thin line between the private and the public."
Not even remotely in this case. This is a school, and it is only permitted to operate on the premise that it will not ethnically discriminate.
> "If i decide to hire people of my own ethnicity exclusively in my private firm"
Why would any modern human being want to do such a thing? That would be both immoral and illegal. You are stuck in a tribal mindset. Wake up! Globalization is here.
That said, I oppose the laws that make such behavior illegal.
> "I dont find it embaressing to admit that i was rationalizing the behaviour."
That settles it then. If you can't even perceive how blatant your bias is in this case, then there's no point arguing further with you.
Well if the story is true, i wouldnt downplay the event. Im just trying to avoid jumping to conclusions.
I wasnt justifying it either. When i used the term "rationalizing", i was using it in a more simple sense, trying to make scientifically sense of a phenomenon. Labelling a social behaviour as "ethnic nepotism", does not amount to "making excuses", or some other sort of psychological "defense mechanism".
Its actually a preferable term to "racism", which is a very morally loaded term, bandied around on all sorts of occasions where it is not very appropriate or precise.
There is nothing wrong with explaining controversial behaviour logically. This does not entail that the explanation is false as the article suggests.
Your confusing rational explanations with psychological motivation. You actually dont have a clue as to what my true intentions are, but instantly assume that i was trying to defend the secretarys behaviour morally.
"Read the paper. It's pretty clear what his motives were."
Well the article says the following;
"It was coined by sociologist Pierre L. van den Berghe in response to Belgian oppression of Africans he witnessed as a Congolese-born European in the Belgian Congo."
Its the opposite of what you stated according to the article. I have also read his paper by he way, and there is nothing in it which would suggest that he was morally justifying the oppression of blacks.
"You, on the other hand, with your rationalizations, show profound ignorance. Sociology as a discipline, emerged to counter rationalization. "
No im afraid that you are not very well aquainted with sociology as a discipline. "Rationalization" actually has a distinct sense in sociology, diiferent from the sense employed in psychology.
"No. You were making excuses for it. Classic example of the Naturalistic fallacy."
No a was doing the exact opposite. I wasnt saying that because some statement is true it is actually morally defensible. You on the other hand, have commited the "moralistic fallacy". Because you think ethnic nepotism is morally bad, it can not be true.
"Not even remotely in this case. This is a school, and it is only permitted to operate on the premise that it will not ethnically discriminate."
Probably not. But in the example i put forth, the case is not clearly cut. I was arguing that discrimination is morally defensible in certain cases.
"Why would any modern human being want to do such a thing? That would be both immoral and illegal. You are stuck in a tribal mindset. Wake up! Globalization is here."
Well im a stating a fact, it happens all over the world all of the time. Sad but true. You are once again commiting the moralistic fallacy. Reality isnt always cosy and politically correct. Globalization or not.
"That said, I oppose the laws that make such behavior illegal."
Well at last there is somthing we agree on.
I am not saying Sweden is not racist but i think its naive to think that there IS one single non-racist country. Issues like this happen all the time in all countries. So lets stop blaming the swedes as the worse, they are not, they are just like anyone else in the world.
Dont worry there is plenty of white trash still left in Sweden, yet
If you take that logic to it's conclusion then the woman in this article would be right to refuse entry to an arab, because of course they are all suicide bombers!
You english only fight when your in groups or in the army or drunk or all three....sweden suits people like you because many of you left the UK complaining that there was too many immigrants there...lol..well there here now too. And the swedes are violent just look at the street fights on a Saturday night. Its as bad as ingerland
That's not entirely true. I read what you write around here. You strike me as someone who would go to great lengths to play down any such story, but who would make a big fuss about it if the roles where inversed (i.e: switch Arab for Swede and vice-versa).
If I'm mistaken, please forgive me for having jumped to such conclusions. But be aware that I based it on nothing but your comments on other topics.
"Swede haters", "Hitler lovers" etc. I thought the Worlds problems stemmed from differing religious beliefs! Time to think again?
You know, if you don't discriminate then you don't make decisions. Irrespective of whether your a "National", and all of us are whether we admit it or not, is another matter but everyone of the same ilk, culture, religion usually sticks together. So what?
In a way i think its sad that the secretary would want to discriminate. Apart from her action also being illegal.(if she actually did discriminate, so far we only have the arab girls word for it).
On the other hand, i am not surprised that something like this would occur in a country which is becoming multicultural at an alarming high rate.
The secretary probably had her reasons for it, and you and I might find them despicable. But i would never just assume that she did it because she is an evil "racist". She might be under pressure from the staff or from parents whose children are already enrolled in the school.
This is of course just speculation, we dont know what her reasons are.
Fair enough, you actually might have a clue.
On a general level i am against creating multicultural states, and therefore i will view all the negative effects of multiculturalism with a critical lens.
I dont know if i would wallow in anger and resenment if it happened to a swede, i cant exclude the possibility that i would.
On a practical level, i dont think something like this would happen with switched roles. Not many swedes, would for instance, like to put their child in a koran school.
But i am pretty sure that stories like this, where ethnic nepotism or the dark side of it, racism, is involved, will become plentiful in the years to come.
Jannik, another neo nazi in all but name. Plenty of countries in the middle and far east prefer to hire whites than their own race. So that throws your racist ideal out the window.
Ad respect to Leo, all non-whites are asking for is equality and common respect. If you can't do that, then you are lesser beings than the ones you belittle every day.
"Jannik, another neo nazi in all but name. Plenty of countries in the middle and far east prefer to hire whites than their own race. So that throws your racist ideal out the window."
Well if they do prefer to hire white people, then the white people most definetily have skills and experince which the locals dont have.
The chinese also want to hire westerners, as it gives the impression that their company is well connected.
In these cases, the foreigners need to bring something to the table which the locals are lacking.
When this is not the case, lots of empirics confirm that ethnic nepotism is pervasive all over the world. Even in the so called "land of the free", there is a significantly higher probability that a company owned or run by ethnic group X, will hire a person belonging to ethnic group X.
Pointing out this fact does not make me a neo-nazi. I really cant see what it is that I have written, that would make me a neo-nazi?
I think you need to expand your vocabulary a bit.
Your train of thought is so ignorant, yet so intrinsic to white supremacists that it's hard to make a start on changing your views. You may not be the typical "skinhead, sig heil thug" type chanting white supremacy literature on the street... but your type is far worse in a way, because it isn't obvious - tied to normal society, and accepting of the norm (where equality does not exist), with no wishes to change it because it suits the white race absolutely fine.
For example, have you ever wondered that non-whites and foreigners have the expertise that Swedes just don't have? Nope, probably didn't - in their inferior "educational" institutions, right?
I have no doubt that there are plenty of similar racist people, of all races, out there who happen to own businesses/are in positions of power who blindly reject anyone not of their "clan". But your blunt statement of it earlier sounds like you are almost proud of that fact, and that it should continue to happen - a dangerous belief, and following that logic the same as thatto the Germans during Nazi Germany who watched and aided their Jewish neighbours and former friends to their deaths.
http://www.husbygardsskolan.stockholm.se/husbygard/teknikmodell.html
It might be possible that the secretary actually tried to affirmative action to have more ethnic swedes going there.
Its plausible that the very same secretary admitted many students with foreign background. Either that or the secretary was racist summer substitute :P
"Your train of thought is so ignorant, yet so intrinsic to white supremacists that it's hard to make a start on changing your views. "
What is it in my train of thought that makes me so ignorant? Is it possible that you are actually the ignorant one, who doesnt have first hand knowledge of the social statistics?
You know very little about me, but already you have concluded that i am a "white-supremacist". You are totally caught up with your own preconceptions, and display the most striking instance of ignorance.
"For example, have you ever wondered that non-whites and foreigners have the expertise that Swedes just don't have? Nope, probably didn't - in their inferior "educational" institutions, right?"
Well offcourse i have. But immigrants are a very diverse group, which come from all over the world.
In general, most immigrants with valuable skills, which are in scarce supply, usually are able to find jobs very quickly.
But the sad fact is, that a very large proportion of immigrants and descendents of immigrants have low qualifications.
"But your blunt statement of it earlier sounds like you are almost proud of that fact, and that it should continue to happen - a dangerous belief, and following that logic the same as thatto the Germans during Nazi Germany who watched and aided their Jewish neighbours and former friends to their deaths. "
Your frothing nazi accusations do not work on me. They are totally ludicrous, and a remnant of irrational leftist thinking.
If you actually read what i wrote earlier, you would conclude, that i wasnt necessarily endorsing it. Ethnic nepotism is more or less an empirical fact, especially in multicultural countries.
It does not in any way logically follow, that recognizing ethnic nepotism as a fact, will lead to genocide or anything similar.
Your way of reasoning is absurd, and makes it impossible to have a rational debate with you.
Besides there are always more than one side to every story. For instance, what says she weren't late sending in her application?
Another note: suing for discrimination, no matter what cause, means that the other party has to prove they did NOT discriminate. Reversed burden of truth is the fact in discrimination cases. Maybe a quick class in common Swedish laws and practices would be a useful hobby for some of you?
Last: do any of you really believe anyone with a Swedish name or heritage would ever be able to claim discrimination or racism if they lived in an arabic country?