Published: 9 Aug 10 19:16 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/28274/20100809/
Prosecutors are to consider whether Crown Princess Victoria and her husband Prince Daniel accepted bribes after a tycoon paid for the couple’s luxury honeymoon.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Gas pipeline firm Nord Stream will hold an information meeting on the Baltic island of Gotland on Monday to introduce a proposal to extend its controversial gas pipeline project. READ () »
The Swedish royal family gathered in the Royal Chapel in Stockholm on Sunday for the publication of the banns of marriage ahead of the wedding of Princess Madeleine and her fiancé Christopher O'Neill. READ () »
Sweden's Green Party is on the rise while support for the Christian Democrats is at the lowest in nearly a decade, according to the latest voter poll. READ () »
A man was detained Sunday morning on suspicion of involvement in a violent jewellery store heist which left three people with gunshot wounds. READ () »
A fire that started on Friday afternoon in a peat bog in southern Sweden has closed down highway traffic and could take weeks to put out, according to local rescue services. READ () »
Emmelie De Forest of Denmark takes over from Sweden's Loreen as the Eurovision Song Contest champion, capping a spectacle that kept Malmö and the rest of Europe cheering on Saturday night. READ () »
The 2013 Eurovision Song Contest Final is live in Malmö, southern Sweden. The Local brings you all the latest news, reactions, and details surrounding Europe's biggest pop music spectacle. READ () »
Sweden will be playing for gold in the ice hockey World Championships after dispatching longstanding rivals and co-hosts Finland with a 3-0 win on Saturday. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
"Div5 v IF Olympia Farsta: 2-2 Having come back from 1-0 down then 2-1 down, 10-men Stripes earned a worthy point from todays fixture. Lascelles took charge in goal after the keeper was red-carded and made some vital saves and interceptions. Robbie G scored from a low over head kick and then a penalty goal by..." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
i thought must countries have an anti-corruption unit within the police force or in some instances, as a separate unit enshrined in law. I'm shocked your country does not have one. are you from Switzerland?
For the love of God. Anyone with even one SHRED of mental capacity would have known that, if they really wanted to claim that this was a bribe and go after the royal family, they needed to have waited for a crime to have been COMMITTED first. So either we have a malcontented anti-monarchy Sthlm tax payer who fell upon this information and wanted to cash in via tabloid payoffs, or else we have someone (possibly an EF competitor?) who learned of this information and was so eager in his anger to bust the royal couple (or, more likely, the tycoon) for [potential] foul play, that he didn't wait for an actual crime to be committed before trying to stick it to them.
How can it be a bribe if no bribery activity has yet taken place??? Wait for the Tycoon to win a bid over his competitors and THEN cry foul. And, if it was a retroactive gift in exchage for a bid previously given to the tycoon by the royal family, so long as they kept their paper trail discreet, there is no way to prove that this was an "improper reward" and not -- wait for it! -- a WEDDING GIFT. Shocking to think someone whould give a wedding gift to a newly wedded couple, I know. Besides, it's not like the guy bought them a plane, house and yacht; he just let them BORROW it.
Republicans, be thankful the state didn't pay for this.
From my understanding this was a gift. Married couples should not be persecuted for getting gifts..
Princess of Vicotria their are some bunch of peoples always complaint and never satisfied with anything even sometimes they say gift as a bribe.
What she probably should have been thinking is, "There's always some useless government bureaucrat looking to get a promotion."
A billionaire can afford to give a gift like this because to him this amounts to pocket change.
He is already a billionaire, so he does not need the good graces of Victoria or anyone else.
Let the poor girl alone to enjoy her new life.
The quicker Gunnar Stetler from the National Anti-Corruption Unit rejects this stupid allegation the better.
If my best friend from Malaysia get marry, I would definately willing to buy him a ticket to SWeden and lend the married couple my apartment for amonth for their honeymoon. (mind you, I am just an ordinary working class) Does that means that it will come with a baggage.?
Just give the newly weds a break and stop all these slandering and dumb comments!!!!!
Maybe engagebrain should engage waffen's brain before commenting( Logical comments by waffen#17)
I wonder what could be the problem with the three miserable whingers. Maybe they are jealous types becuase they, themselves are ignored.
Clearly, nobody loves them; but who would want them anyway?
The 'Prosecutors' leap into action because they have permission to proceed from comments made by just three whingers.
So, now public money is being used to investigate a complete worthless case. It's a disgrace that anyone should even think the comments are worth investigating. It should be stopped immediately by someone who has common sense and in authority - oh dear, now that is a problem (in authority and common sense).
In the final analysis maybe we are doomed to having to bow down to the lowest forms of life i.e. jealous,miserable whingers; the ones who gossip, living the life of their neighbours as they peek through the windows (I have two next door!)
My suggestion is that the state should refund the rich man and the lift the cloud of doubt that this interaction might compromise their future roles. In the meanwhile a law should be passed that the royal family should not accept any favor from any section of the society so that they would serve the interest of all Swedish people without prejudice. As long as royalty exists it should be made sure that they are not short of money. If they had enough money this would not have needed to borrow a house. They would probably have had a lot of choices for their honeymoon destination.
Precisely. To have taken a bribe, you must be a public official who has a position of power and influence with which to "pay back" the bribe. She's royalty, but has no power over anything or anyone. Therefore this was a wedding gift, not a bribe.
I spent $30,000 on just Bar-B-Que, so I could marry off my little sister. Don't even start on alcohol, bands, a hall, a gown like a princess, limosines, airline tickets, engraved champagne glasses, match books with their names on it. I would gladly have given them $40,000 to elope and tell me about it later.
If she can get it paid for by influence peddling, I say good girl, you are smarter than my idiot relatives.
exactly, I agree.
Unfortunately I think you are 100% correct in that it is 'important to sell newspapers' - at least that is the view of the newspapers!
A newspaper (or any media) is simply a commercial entity publishing whatever it thinks people will buy. Alongside that is that the media is also irritatingly a self-important organisation.
From what I understand about Swedish culture it is frowned on to to be self-important (I agree with this philosophy) but the newspapers never aspire to rise to this way of thinking, I guess it's because it means less money to them. So they prefer to remain closer to lower forms of life the murky sediment!
There's a saying in UK "where there's muck there's brass" (brass= money). A good saying for the newspapers and media don't you think?