February 13, 2012
Published: 15 Aug 10 12:33 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/28380/20100815/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has revealed that he will submit a formal application this week for a Swedish publishing licence (utgivningsbevis) in order to guarantee that the website is covered by Swedish whistleblower protection laws.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A Stockholm woman fed up with male passengers on public transport taking up the space of women sitting next to them, has started a blog snapping secret pics of straddle-legged commuters and posting them on the internet. READ (14 COMMENTS) »
A suburb of Mjällby, southern Sweden, known by locals as ‘Negro Village’ for forty years, will be changing its name after a storm of recent attention. READ (4 COMMENTS) »
A 27-year-old German man has been living at the Gothenburg Landvetter airport for two months having no wish to return to Germany and nowhere to go in Sweden. READ (5 COMMENTS) »
Every second Swede is at risk of developing dementia, according to a new study from Umeå University, which concentrated on the 85+ population in northern Sweden. READ »
After a 28-year-old woman was pulled off her bicycle and raped by an unidentified assailant in Malmö over the weekend, and police are fearing it could be the work of a budding serial rapist. READ (9 COMMENTS) »
Families of children in Sweden suffering from narcolepsy caused by vaccination for the swine flu can expect some form of compensation, Swedish health minister Göran Hägglund said on Sunday in response to new calls for help from parents. READ (1 COMMENT) »
The new leader of the Social Democrats Stefan Löfven has indicated he's ready to negotiate with the government over the future of nuclear power despite a previous party decision to phase out nuclear energy in Sweden. READ (1 COMMENT) »
One in five Swedes believes that people rise from the grave after they've died, a new survey has shown. READ (9 COMMENTS) »

As diverse as Sweden is, there are a few societal norms that are distinctly Swedish. Understanding a handful of them will hopefully prepare you culturally before you relocate. When you're invited home to a Swede, you better be on time and take your shoes off, writes expat Lola Akinmade-Åkerström. Read more »
Sweden is a country where almost everyone can speak English. So why bother to learn Swedish? Edina Varnagy from Hungary managed with English for a whole year but then found that Swedish could open doors – to a job, a social life and greater understanding. Read more »
"The ice dripped in the winter sun. It was the first day when the light had been intense enough to cause dripping in the sunlight. To hear it was an extraordinary wakeup call. The cycle was happening again as it always does, always will (or so we think). I imagined that on my summer island, the bees..." READ »
|
|

fin
adjective
Fin means anyhting from sweet to proper. When someone says, Du är så fin it's quite a compliment.
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth is a book about Sweden today. A country of natural beauty and open space, and a society focused on equality, human rights and sustainability. Meet regular and astonishing Swedes, supercars and indie rock bands, vampires and royalties.
Buy your copy of Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth from Sweden Bookshop
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
518 jobs available
247 new jobs this week
56 new jobs today
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
I think Wikileaks is highly constructive. It ushers a new era of transparency.
Governments have a monopoly on violence and operate by using the taxpayers' money. It stands to reason that such an entity should not be able to hide facts from its population.
The recently leaked documents about Afghanistan are not recent at all. Assange has been sitting on them for ages and repeatidely contacted the Pentagon and begged them to help with editing the documents to protect the identities of Afghan collaborators. The Pentagon categorically refused and took a stand on principle. Any deaths are therefore on them and not on Wikileaks.
The people who still argue for secrecy in government are backwards and out-of-touch with reality. Nothing will stand in the way of disseminating information. The Streisand effect is something governments don't acknowledge yet.
That Wikileaks is demonized and persecuted only emphasizes the need for the existence of such an organization.
If you don't want to read the gory details, nobody is forcing you. Some of us want to know the uncut raw facts to make an informed decision comes election day.
And you're narrating Assegne's correspondence with the White House as if you were Assegne's personal scribe, or as if you edited his letters to Obama. And is there anything at all adducible in your narrative?
And coming out of your philosophy you appear to have taken a pretty radical tone, it's unsustainable, you always need an opponent in your life who'll offset your actions, like WikiLeaks to NATO. I do not unconditionally criticise Assegne, he did present NATO with a puzzle of sorts, so the ball is in NATO's court and hope they'll come out from this all the more pliable. And I do really hope that this will decrease the number of casualties in Afghanistan, otherwise this bustle and hustle will lose all its effect. I do want NATO to put this down to its experience not to allow Assegne and sundry to take advantage of it and play silly-beggars brandishing those documents.
Come on are you going to just quote wikileaks story about how they say they contact pentagon. If you dig a little deeper or see the transparency you will see that Assange was saying before that they did all the proof reading them self and they didn't want any goverment to do this work. Then after the press pushed them about this they change there story and started to say they ask for help. So you see your wikileaks is like goverment and lie.
And just to reminded you that these are the same guys who release a manual on how airline security works. Which I am sure make us all feel safe that every crazy now know how airline security works.
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/US_Transportation_Security_Administration:_Screening_Procedures_Standard_Operating_Procedures,_1_May_2008
So please stop being blind and see this site is not all they say they are.
Seems like there tide has turned now: Apparently now transparency is a bad thing and what Wikileaks is doing is criminal in the eyes of the US all over sudden.
Oh, sweet sweet smell of hypocracy!
Hold this man at ARMS LENGTH!.
Even if the facts are true, and desired, is he responsible in his approach?
More lives will be lost.
And do you trust him really?. His motives?
@dwb5555: I don't see where wikileaks has lied. Everytime it did something wrong, it outright admitted it. And no, I don't hold both the government and wikileaks to the same standard. The government has a monopoly on violence and is financed by the taxpayer.
For the "airline security" rubbish, I don't believe in security through obscurity one bit. So I'm very much in favor of revealing the way governments wants to "protect" planes. If it can't stand scrutiny, then it shouldn't be there in the first place.
@Typical Whitey: Assange has no blood on his hands. You must be thinking of people in the military. I'm sorry that you have not been able to provide your son with a brighter future than as a grunt in Afghanistan, but it's not Assange's fault. The fools are really the ones who think governments should keep secrets from the people.
@All: The mainstream media is held on a tight leech by politicians. The stories that make it to us are mostly the ones playing one party against another. Wikileaks plays a fantastic role in revealing to the public what we would normally not have heard of.
This for one will have made them strain their minds about how to make even more impermeable their secret services, and hopefully, will contribute to the reduction in numbers of civil casualties.
Let's just hope that there's someone in the White House or NATO who thinks along the same lines and can call a spade a spade and launch into action not to leave any resources for Assegne and the lot to feast on in the future.
And don't say that it is unjustifiable that people are kept in dark over the majority of goings-on in politics. How can you be sure that everyone will get them right? Can you be sure that everyone will have good motives at heart and will not exploit them for their own good?
I don't completely disagree with you, you comments have made me see many other things that I hadn't realised before.
"Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
----- Hermann Göring
Someone there talked about caring for the people. What thoughts come to mind if its shown with badges:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2007/12/most-awesomel-4/
And here is a nice nod towrads the Nordics:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/08/chain-mail-meets-killer-drone-in-military-patch-mayhem/