Published: 24 Sep 10 11:22 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/29230/20100924/
Sweden's Armed Forces personnel have been presented an ultimatum - accept the requirement of foreign duty or face redundancy.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Parents and volunteers have been patrolling the streets of Stockholm's immigrant-heavy suburbs to help quell riots that have raged for almost a week, serving as a successful deterrent to troublemakers and winning praise from police. READ () »
Police are hunting a 40-year-old man after a woman was found dead in a suburb of Stockholm on Saturday. READ () »
Two cars collided on a road between Trollhättan and Vänersborg in western Sweden on Friday afternoon due to an elk having chosen the unusual spot to give birth to a calf. READ () »
Express delivery firm DHL has been criticised for having handed over a load of alcohol ordered from Germany to a 10-year-old boy in southern Sweden who was home alone at the time. READ () »
A sixth straight night of unrest blighted several Stockholm suburbs on Friday night, spreading briefly to the city of Örebro, 160 kilometres to the west. READ () »
With international media swooping on the Stockholm riots from every angle, The Local's Oliver Gee explains why Stockholm is not burning, and how the story has been blown out of proportion. READ () »
After five nights of rioting throughout the outskirts of Stockholm, many in Sweden and elsewhere are trying to make sense of it all. The Local spoke to a mix of commentators and local politicians to get their views. READ () »
As white-collar union Saco slammed Sweden for not helping well-educated foreigners into the labour market, The Local spoke to researcher Josefin Edström about the disconnect between foreign professionals and Swedish employers. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
"BANG!!!! BANG!!!! BANG!!! In the midst of the Stanley Cup’s Eastern Conference semifinals series, every Bostonian knows it is all about Bruins ice hockey. Oh right. I am in Sweden, home of the 2013 International Ice Hockey Federation GOLD Champions. And there is certainly no doubt ice hockey fever has taken over Sweden. A lot of Swedes,..." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
I don't know your nationalities but today US for example only fight at places where they can gain money (oil, raw materials, etc).
Please step down form your high horses or join the army and do service in a foreign country.
The serving members of the armed forces, signed a contract I believe that did not cover going on these tours, so as in any other business if you want to expand the "scope of work" then that means the existing contract needs up dating through negotiation...not intimidation.
Swedekk: It is true that the US fights in places considered strategic for resources, but remember that when US did not want to go to the Balkins, Europe pressured them into it. There were no resources the U.S. wanted when it deployed to East Timor, Somalia, Sierre Leone, Zaire, Central African Republic...
It's pretty clear that you worship the US, good for you (No one cares though!).
1) It is called "Balkans" you bloody-goon.
2) US and Europe thought about after tens of thousands of muslims were killed. Shame on them all.
3) As for the african countries you've mention, go and get some basic education about the diamond sources. Then, open your mouth.
@swedekk #4
I agree with your second paragraph about the US. But if we put your first paragraph into action, then, it will turn out that you are such an ignorant jester because you showed that you know nothing about Sweden.
I mean they were probably expecting staying close to home in a nice warm cosy barrack with all mod cons till it was time for their pension.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,827058-2,00.html
But the missions they'll undertake won't resemble UN missions like Haiti or the Balkans. More likely to be like stabilization missions with high combat and an insurgency like Afghanistan and more and more likely to be Somalia.
You'd think they would see thier military as a tool of enforcing thier moral superiority complex....guess that's all talk....
In military terms , "defence" is not always the opposite of "attack". There other elements in between . The army is an armed force , which has various assignments , combat being one of them .
Since its no sectret that Sweden exports weapons , it follows that the same nation subscribes to the notion of war .
it is also naive to accuse USA of fighting wars for Arab oil or African diamonds . Sweden has an industrial oreinted economy . How can Sweden hope to be player in the global market if it does not participate in securing peace for its potential consumers ?
What is an army for if it cannot "defend" those things that make a modern nation economically and idiologically survive ?
Anybody who has no stomach for tough situations should not join the army , period !
I say this not knowing much about the swedish military,but in the end it is up to the employers (the state) to give the terms of service, so long as they fulfill any existing contracts as are. imho.
@Marko. Have you any other way of debating with someone other than personal abuse?
Since when has any frontline or even administrative member of the armed forces, in any country, ever owned a part of "their" country?
The owners own the country, and the owners sure aint the soldiers.
Perhaps the owners should fight for the land, I sure won't be fighting to preserve somebody else's land.
If it was as simple as you present it , any "ultimatum" after the contract would be illegal , in whic case , this would cease to be a military operations question but a legal one .
Moreover , I not talking of how it should be ; I am talking of how it is . This is not Sweden during the 3rd W.war ; it is Sweden that has no option but to adapt to new global realities .
Today , there is almost zero posibility that Sweden could be invaded by another state . So , what is such a large expensive army for if its not going to send its troops beyond Swedish boarders if it is necessary ?
Would you support the idea of having a police force with some of its officers not willing to work at night ?
The legal issue is the issue for a lot of people. A lot of military personell have "fullmakt", a contract that states that they cannot be let go, only moved around the country. And of course people get cranky if their life time contracts get cancelled if they dont agree to extend the possible workplaces to the entire world.
I agree that the armed forces must go through changes and adapt to the new world. But the way to do that is not to ignore all earlier contracts and without warning just force an incomplete biased contract in its place and fire anyone who objects.
the point is that is is stupid to have to ask a soldier if they will be willing to do this or unwilling to do that .
An army is an institution based on giving and taking orders . You don´t join the army and later think about what will happen to your small children should you be sent on the frontline for a long time .
Like the Director Of Human relations says , one should be prepared to go anywhere they are deployed . It simply has to come with the job or else you have no army .
And the trouble is that in the army , there is a legal window that permits the command to terminate the services of any soldier who refuses to carry out a reasonable order.
If they signed a contract that said "we will not force you to go abroad", then you cant force them to sign one later and say "well, what did you expect?" Sweden do NOT have that history with a president as supreme commander. That position is a military job. They had one purpose, to stop an invasion and support the society in cases of emergency. And they dont get ordered around by politicians who are the ones conducting international talks and treaties of who started a war or not and what we should do about it.
you are taught how to fight an enemy, be it defending swedish soil or not but by virtue of joining ANY military you should be prepared to follow what is said in the constitution
it clear that you are in a very tiny minority on this one .
Those old ones who joined in the 70 and 80s and signed that silly contract are now being asked by their "employer " if they are ready to adapt to new operational developments .
Should they exercise their right to say NO , then the employer has the option to say that he does not need their services anyomore .
The rest is up to their Trade Union to handle .
I am quite sure that the employer will be able to explain that he is not asking the old ones to quit , but offering them the chance to choose if they want to stay on and serve in a modern and REAL army .
May be all these days you were cheering to the Viet adventures or that Rambo was fighting alongside taliban. The USA isn't the only country involved in this captive resource exploitation. The French and the British (not as much as they wish they did) seem to have a hand in every African coup or unrest.
Swedes have a right to be someones private army, when they sign up to protect their country. I wonder where the world has come to, if accept the belief that it is necessary to carry out full scale wars in two countries displacing millions for the sake of capturing 'some' terrorist with no reasonable evidence. How fantastic are these, the new world mind control machine called the media. They just need to keep repeating something until people start accepting it without any trouble.
But I am not arguing that this change is something bad. It is an adaptation of new needs and challenges. Im saying that the way they handled this is flawed. You dont force people to sign a contract that is so one sided. The american army way is not the "right" way or the only way (as proved before when we did have a Defence, and not an expeditionary force) so dont be surprised when people dont share your view of what an army is supposed to do or dont.
Just because someone said "i will follow your orders to the death in case of war" do not mean that you can throw them out or treat them as scum if they dont sign away their rights to you in time of peace.
Sweden has found yet another way where a man can be a coward.
Just amazing history.
These kind of troops are not needed anywhere and the boys should stay home.
you have used the word "volunteering " so many times , it is like you are talking about Scout boys and not an army .
True , no one should be forced to sign away there rights . Unfortunately , an employer has rights too . These men and women are not fools . They know what an army is , what it does etc . It absurd , therefore for anyone to join the army and just choose to "move around " Sweden . When you wear than green Uniform , you have , in principal , signed away some of your civilians rights . You essentailly surrender part of your ownself to the state .
Let me also state that I agree that cowards should not be forced to sign anything . That is why I think that they should be left to go into other lives that are less risky , because the army is not supposed to be an allout glamorous business .
A foreigner can join the US military and fight all he wants. If he survives he can gain US citizenship and be allowed a lot of benefits. Free 4 year university education. Lifetime medical etc. These wars are nothing like Vietnam.
Let those Swedes with this high level of testosterone join the US forces and let the others form a joint scandinavian league.
Let Sweden do what it does best.
The american (and many other countries) may think this is normal army business to go abroad. But the swedish army did not do those thing. The swedish army did not go abroad. The swedish army do not have its own laws and judges. Why do you keep insisting that these people should expect anything else than what was required of them? And as you probably know, unions in sweden do have great power and influence, especially over government employees since LO (the largest union) is in symbiosis with the social democrats.
And please do not call anyone a coward. Anyone who signed up (old "only sweden" contracts or new "real army" ones) have done more than their share to protect the country.
The persons in the swedish army are not own by the government, do not have any special laws, requirements or rights. (unless they are conscripts, which is another story) They are just normal citizens who trained for a situation when the society might not be so organized and civil.
Volunteering here in the USA consists of those who have failed at most other activities. Left school, no job etc. So there goes your point.
Coward is too strong a word but it does describe Swedens government eg. WW2. That has been an interest of mine for 40 years.
Does Sweden still ban Boxing. You had a world champ, heavyweight who was treated like shiet by the Swedish elite, drank himself to death in Fla. If you can not stand boxing--what is the point to all of this?
I quote from "Viking Weapons and Combat Tactics" , Ketill Ormsson said The ways of young people aren't what they were when I was young. Back then, young men where eager todo some notable deed either taking part in a raid, or gaining wealth and honor in expedidions that called for manliness. But nowadays, yong people prefer to be stay-at-homes, sitting at the kitchen fire and filling their bellies with mead and small beer. That comes from Vatnsdala Saga.
My boys did well in school and thus went to University.
"Multiple professional athletics" are now serving--shiet are you drunk.? If they are professional, they are playing sports and are not in the Army. One famous player, Pat Tillman was killed by his own troops and that cover up is still going on.
"Fighting for others freedom"--do you really believe that. That's why we are in Iraq.? Just like Vietnam? Even little children here do not believe that.
In short, it is just like Vietnam. If you are smart, like I was, you go to University. If your genetics are poor, you fight and die. Darwinism all over again.
I like the saga, have read and took a class in it at UCLA.
Thanks for the reply. What I said about the Army is a fact, the rest are my opinions. I voted for Obama--dosen't make me a leftist though I have great admiration for Palme. I think Palme was one of the greatest leaders of any country, ever.
your comment is twisted and does not make sense . You would probably use the word "screening" in place of volunteering .
I mean -how can volunteering stop stupid school drop-outs from joining ?
And - -it seems to me that you have already forgotten that you wrote that it is better to look at how things ARE , and now what they WERE . " the Swedish army DID not go abroad " is a too outdated line to rely on .
The government of Sweden today , which also happens to employ all civil servants , including the army , has the constitutional power ( not to mention the obligation) to use the national army for national interest purposes .
I don`t need to repeat that it is a smart strategy for a modern state to be engaged in international affairs , even when they are not the easy ones.
Yes , I use the word "coward " deliberately , because that is what you are called when you chicken out. The opposite of that is to join the army , put your mind , your heart , and your body in it ,while hoping that you will never have to go to war anywhere .
If your idea of a tough job is to move around Sweden , eating and sleeping rough as you go , you should become a truck driver or work for a circus .
Lycka till !
Hundratusentals soldater som varit i krig är förstörda för resten av livet.Fysiskt eller psykiskt.
Krig är organiserat mord och våra organiserade gäng uppstod till stor del i USA,när förstörda människor kom hem från krig och inte tyckte samhället var något för dem längre.
Ska mänskligheten fortsätta med sådana dumheter tills inte jorden existerar längre.
USA utvecklar hela tiden nya kärnvapen och hotar alla länder som inte gör som de vill.Redan Churchill ville släppa en atombomb på Sovjet.
De 1000 atombombstester som gjorts har säkerligen på verkat klimatet till det sämre.Ska människan aldrig bli vettig.Sluta kriga!
-They can be longer in wars that in the case of being done with replacement soldiers no one would accept the damage, those armies also isolate people of realizing that also the enemy is dying and the real value of how a war is worth for the people (not elites), they are soldiers and they get paid so they can go, no citizen would go to war if it doesn´t feel it strictly necessary.
-They can act against their own people, if you have an foreigner army and they are ordered to attack the people of your land they can do it, a replacement army would never attack the people from who they come from.
-The people is not having access to weapons if their leaders are tyrants, back in the days of the swords maybe it wasn´t that important, now how people fight the leaders if necessary? they have tanks an weapons and you kitchen knifes (hence the American right to have weapons).
-Having private armies in all western countries is not done because we are more modern and better than our ancients, we are the most submissive people of all times.
"Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state." Thomas Jefferson.