May 26, 2012
Published: 3 Nov 10 13:46 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/29998/20101103/
WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange has said that he intends to sue the Swedish state over the handling of rape allegations against him by the Swedish Prosecution Authority (Åklagarmyndigheten).
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A warrant has been issued for the arrest of a man in connection with the shooting of an Uzbek imam in northern Sweden in February. READ »
Sweden is set to host US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in early June and discussions will concern green energy, internet freedom, Afghanistan and the Middle East READ (2 COMMENTS) »
Swedish striker Zlatan Ibrahimovic has stated that he is happy at AC Milan and will honour his contract, while bemoaning the club's lack of financial muscle. READ »
A doll billed as a "real retard" found its way into stores in Gothenburg in western Sweden on Thursday, prompting strong reactions about a campaign meant to draw attention to the treatment of people with disabilities. READ (14 COMMENTS) »
A jealous Swedish woman who murdered her ex-boyfriend’s new partner in September has been sentenced to 14 years in prison. READ (13 COMMENTS) »
After having lived in Sweden for a certain number of years, many ex-pats start asking, “Am I going native or what?” Check out The Local's guide to tell-tale signs that you may be more integrated into Swedish society than you first realized. READ (16 COMMENTS) »
The Paradise Wildlife Park in the UK has pledged their allegiance to Sweden in the Eurovision song contest by making their own film version of Loreen’s “Euphoria” – complete with dancing animals. READ »
The "om" chant featured in yoga lessons at a Stockholm school has prompted a complaint calling for them to be banned because of the term's ties to the Hindu religion. READ (25 COMMENTS) »

Sanna is one of 2 million people in Sweden under the age of 18. Sweden is seen as a good place to grow up. The law makes sure children are well-protected and defends their rights and any organizations work with children's well-being. Read more »
August Strindberg's plays shocked society, dazzled audiences and revolutionized drama. A century after his death, Strindberg, with his powerful, timeless themes, is celebrated around the world. Read more »
| 26/05 | Data architecture and delivery managerKlarna | Stockholm |
| 26/05 | Experienced SAP ConsultantIBM | Göteborg |
| 26/05 | Healthcare & Life SciencesIBM | Göteborg |
| 26/05 | Manager, SMB Sales (Nordics)Google | Stockholm |
| 26/05 | Nordic Inside Sales SpecialistIBM | Göteborg |
| 26/05 | SAP ConsultantsIBM | Göteborg |
Prime Minister Reinfeldt chats with The Local »
"If you missed it yesterday, here’s The Local’s editor David Landes snagging Prime Minister Reinfeldt for a chat before Princess Estelle’s baptism. Always nice to know the PM has time for TL!" READ »
|
|

lång
adjective
Lång means long, tall and can be used for height, distance or time.
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth is a book about Sweden today. A country of natural beauty and open space, and a society focused on equality, human rights and sustainability. Meet regular and astonishing Swedes, supercars and indie rock bands, vampires and royalties.
Buy your copy of Sweden – Up North, Down to Earth from Sweden Bookshop
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
what d u think @byke and @bollard ?
this is why i say "hitha honda geni hemadama badin"
In that sense Sweden is the perfect country for this to happen. A fairly reasonable justice system, criticized by all the political spectrum for being too much on the other side of the spectrum (which I believe it's always a good thing). And Sweden is used to pioneering different aspects of political and social life in a reasonable manner, so it is the perfect place for Assange to be protected and tried.
Also, come on... the guy as never been convicted or accused of any such crimes, and all of a sudden, just as the US is looking for him, he commits rape??? Of course you have to look into all the claims, but anyone can see the resemblance between these and historical political repression tactics...
There is something distasteful about someone who has a cavalier attitude to the lives of others worrying about his own reputation.
The most idiotic comment in this comments section so far belongs to the person who said "there's no fire without smoke,"
Then that's good that there are no idiotic comments here.
"no fire without smoke," Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm never heard of that one before, must be something new.
"no fire without smoke," Hmmmmmmmmmmmm full stop before the close quotation.
PS Even NATO have confirmed that there have been no reprisals in Afghanistan after the first WikiLeaks leak.
The US has never been "looking" for him to my knowledge, and there's no warrant for him. Can you cite something specific? If not, then you're just making something up out of thin air to support a paranoid conspiracy theory.
Also, you mention that NATO have confirmed that there have been no reprisals after the first wikileak. This is another weak argument. How does NATO know that there have been no reprisals ? Afghanistan has long been in a state of chaos (long before the US involvement) and little is known about what really is going on there. Also, the leaks were recent and the documentation dense. It takes a long time to read through the leaked reports. The fact that NATO hasn't heard of any reprisals doesn't mean that there weren't any or that future reprisals won't take place. Also, why do you even believe that NATO is telling the truth. After all, were it to admit that reprisals had taken place it would act as a huge deterrent to the local populace engaging with them. Do you regard NATO as an organisation which always tells the truth ?
same people should advice you to go away already and disappear immediately
where is JES please one of the reasonable contributor here .
Afghans definitely should not, because there's no war that would be more legal than the Western intervention in Afghanistan. It is a rare case in the category of wars, covered by UN resolutions and international law (like http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/708/55/PDF/N0170855.pdf?OpenElement and many others since)
Of course, the whole concept of "launching" a war in Afghanistan is a pretty moot point considering that the country has been in an constant state of (civil) war for the past 30 years.
Calling the UN-backed intervention "illegal" is not a statement of juridical facts, it is a statement for your preference to support bronze-age barbarism that the Taleban represents.
It is equally folly to say that if Western armed forces withdraw from the country, it would somehow "end" the war. No, the war might just take some other targets (for instance, people whose names were exposed by Julian Assange).
The idea that a war in Afghanistan or Iraq would end when the US forces leave is in my opinion very, very wrong, and perhaps "colonialist" would be a good characterization.
It is another matter whether the intervention in Afghanistan will achieve its long-term goals; some short-term goals have been achieved (after all, there are now probably tens or hundreds of thousands of girls who have been allowed to go to school and learn to read, for instance).
NATO however may have reasonable confidence that the informants have not or will not be harmed (I think the number is approximately 300), if (and only if) all of these informants and their families have already been whisked away under a witness protection program (expensive, but not insanely expensive in light of the countless billions of dollars poured into the wars). Having said that, the extended families (cousins, uncles, etc..) would presumably remain at risk.
As for the trial, a lawsuit over legal bureaucracy errors would be uninteresting, but fascinating if US covert action was exposed. If the rape part of the story becomes the focus of this trial then I would welcome a publication ban (if these exist for trials involving adults in Sweden, which not even wikileaks would violate, for the simple reason that its founder would presumably continue to choose keep the intimate information private), so that the women involved feel that they can speak freely about all the assault or rape charges to the judge.
Now the resolution actually passed the security council after political armtwisting from the U.S. but the basic facts remain. U.S. currently has the most powerful military the world has ever seen. They do not need the help of UN to protect their territory from bearded men living in caves. Period.
False allegations are soon to be cleared, and the shame remains for irresponsible authorities.
Also, how do you know the allegations against JA are false ?
It seems to be the case that JA's supporters are the wrong people to talk about the necessity of free information since they prefer to ignore evidence which may contradict their viewpoints.
Good point - invasion of Afghanistan was not illegal under international law (unlike Iraq) - but it was immoral. If you remember, in 2001, the US invaded Afghanistan not because it wanted to rid it of the Taliban, but because Afghans refused to hand over Bin Laden because it said the US had no evidence. Aid agencies such as Red Cross said Afghanistan had 5 million on the verge of starvation and that a US led bombing campaign would make the situation a humanitarian catastrophe and add potentially another 2 million to the list. The Americans went ahead regardless and fortunately, the bombing didn't push as many into starvation as feared. But on those grounds, I'd argue it was immoral as I'm sure many starving Afghans would. PS I don't support the Taliban (that the US supported and created along with Bin Laden in the 1970s) as you suggest.