Published: 1 Dec 10 08:13 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/30532/20101201/
The global police agency Interpol said Wednesday it had alerted member states to arrest WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange on suspicion of rape on the basis of a Swedish arrest warrant.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A Swedish man became the first person in the country to be convicted of genocide, as he was sentenced to life in prison on Thursday for participating in the 1994 massacre of Tutsis in Rwanda. READ () »
Pirate Bay founder Gottfrid Svartholm Warg was sentenced on Thursday to two years in prison for data breaches, aggravated fraud, and attempted aggravated fraud, in what was Sweden's biggest ever hacking trial. READ () »
As one of Sweden's most talented up-and-coming photojournalists, Alexander Mahmoud, 22, faces his toughest challenge yet. Not only losing weight, but photographing himself along the way. Our Swede of the Week tells us about the warts-and-all project 73 Percent Fat. READ () »
Swedish veteran Henrik Larsson pulled on his boots and rekindled past glories in a fleeting appearance on Wednesday for local Helsingborg side Högaborg, the division two outfit where his glittering career began. READ () »
After the birth of his two bonny baby girls, former Londoner Paul Connolly swoons over Swedish healthcare's 'just the right side of hands off' approach that left him feeling safe despite his wife's swollen elephant trotters and high blood pressure. READ () »
Midsummer Eve is the most dangerous day to be out on the roads in Sweden, with 60 traffic accidents last year. To make sure everyone reaches the maypole in one piece, the Transport Administration has issued traffic advice. READ () »
A local Moderate Party politician has called for the installation of undercover spies to patrol retirement homes to ensure that staff do their jobs, in the wake of a slew of recent scandals. READ () »
Men are twice as likely as women to drown, according to a new study, with middle-aged men with alcohol in their bodies posing the greatest risk. READ () »
| 20/06 | Senior DevelopersCapus AS | Oslo, OSLO |
| 19/06 | Application ManagerEuropean Spallation Source ESS AB | SKÅ |
| 19/06 | C# Developer | Lund |
| 19/06 | Commercial DirectorsAviator | Stockholm |
| 19/06 | Customer Service Representative - DistrupolDistrupol | Malmo |
| 19/06 | GE Money Bank söker en senior riskanalytikerGE Money Bank | Danderyd, STHM |
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Kentucky’s Bourbon Royalty Visits Sweden »
"He's not a celebrity in Sweden, but everyone in Kentucky knows the name Fred Noe. Even more people know the name of his great-grandfather, Jim Beam." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
A bit of a tough one for the prosecution this. Make it stick, or face international humiliation. No conflict of interest there then.
Oh what a tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive.
For crissake, don't soil yourself by doing somebody else's dirty work, Sweden. Drop the ridiculous charge and leave the man be. Better yet: Set an example to the world and offer this messenger the protection he deserves. Or can you only muster courage to face up to little guys? Shame on you.
I have asked for this evidence but usually I just get personal abuse or a link to someone's blog.
What you missed was a basic understanding of law.
It's always for the prosecution to prove it's case against the defendant with evidence, not for JA, or the posters on this forum to prove his innocence.
Might the personal abuse you receive so often here, and you do seem to attract a large amount, be something to do with your over inflated ego, and casual attitude to the facts?
So?
Swedisch-prosecution must present the evidence they have against Assange!
Interpol is a highly political & corrupt organisation. They protect war-criminals who work for the International Criminal Court in The Hague NL.
I'am a victim within ICC, with a lawcase against NL.
I prove ICC operates like a terrorist!
Interpol only can draw away attention from 'crimes against humanity' they commit. And thats what they do... when they support the Sweden-prosecution...
Evidence on www.desireestokkel.nl
@RobinHood: that's correct. You're innocent unless there's evidence of your crime, not the opposite.
"What you missed was a basic understanding of law. "
Correct me if I've confused swedish law with that of the rest of the modern world, but if an arrest warrant is issued then that, logically, entails an arrest. No? Issuing an INTERPOL alert is standard procedure when a suspect is wanted in connection with a crime and that suspect is known to be in hiding outside your nation's borders.
Like nomark pointed out though, nothing will satisfy the conspiracy theorists except diplomatic immunity for Mr. Assange to continue raping any woman he chooses. Just because someone does something you might agree with doesn't mean they're a good person.
You are indeed confused. My post at #9 dealt exclusively with Nomark's demand for evidence that JA was innocent and the well founded legal principal that it is for the prosecution to produce evidence that it he is guilty.
Your post at #13 has nothing to do with that, and so I will not respond to it. Save to recommend you refrain from further calling JA a rapist until after he is convicted. If he is innocent, a man with his resources will have no problem establishing your identity and holding you to well-deserved legal account. I believe defamation is punishable by imprisonment in Sweden. Sleep well.
Don't twist what I've written here to make a strawman argument - its an intellectually dishonest way to debate anything. Nowhere have I written that JA is not entitled to a formal presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Similarly, I have never demanded that he has to show he is innocent. Don't twist things. I have asked for evidence that this is a set-up, something which has been stated many, many times by posters. The formal presumption of innocence has nothing to do with supporting an allegation of a conspiracy. There are many explanations for what is happening without going into lala land.
To use your own logic, though this time put in its proper context, just as the onus rests upon the authorities to prove a case so it also rests upon the posters here to provide the evidence supporting their allegation that is a conspiracy.
I'm quite sure I'm not the only one puzzled by the disparity between number of irate posters convinced this is a set-up and the lack of evidence to support this claim.
Regarding my casual attitude to the facts. If I've somehow missed some important facts which show this is a conspiracy please restate them here. However, the only "facts" I've come across seem to be suppositions and, sorry, but they really don't count. Indeed, it seems to irk many that I actually request facts i.e. the details which allow one to discriminate between different hypotheses when explaining a chain of events. The casual relationship that you allege that I have with facts is, in fact, held by others.
If you wish to respond then please stick to what I've written not what you would have liked me to have written.
#14 "…. I have never demanded that he has to show he is innocent"
# 7 "…two women who believe they were sexually assaulted making a complaint. I have asked for this evidence …"
And where did I suggest you had deprived JA of his presumption of innocence?
"Don't twist what I've written here …. stick to what I've written not what you would have liked me to have written."
What a hypocrite.
Wow - you do like to twist things..
First off, I'd like to remind you of your recent post :
My post at #9 dealt exclusively with Nomark's demand for evidence that JA was innocent and the well founded legal principal that it is for the prosecution to produce evidence that it he is guilty.
Please show me anything I have written which demands that JA shows that he is innocent. Do you seriously believe that the clipped comment below (which I made in an earlier post) shows this demand ?
# 7 "…two women who believe they were sexually assaulted making a complaint. I have asked for this evidence …"
The complete quote is:
"I must have missed the bit where the forum warriors provided evidence that this whole thing is a set-up/conspiracy and not the result of two women who believe they were sexually assaulted making a complaint. I have asked for this evidence but usually I just get personal abuse or a link to someone's blog."
The above quote states that a perfectly valid hypothesis is that the legal action is a result of two women who believe they were sexually assaulted making a formal complaint. Why does this imply that I believe JA has to show his innocence ? Nowhere do I make a judgement that he is guilty nor that the prosecution is not obliged to produce evidence in any trial. I simply point out that the whole thing may well be explicable by the fact that some people think they are his victims and believe he is guilty of breaking the law and that a legal process has started accordingly. I would imagine that this is, in fact, the mainstream view.
Permit me to ask again:
Please show me anything I have written which demands that JA shows that he is innocent.
You are fast to slur - I apparently lack a basic understanding of the law, I'm a hypocrite, I play fast and loose with facts etc. etc. However, you seem rather slow to to justify any of this.
A general theme of this discussion has been that those who make allegations have a responsibility to demonstrate that they are true. Please justify the nonsense you posted.
Where do I have a casual attitude to facts ? Specifically, to which facts are you referring ?
Given my earlier post (#18) in which I provided a full quote (and not the end of one sentence and the beginning of another one, as you did), how can you possibly draw the conclusion that I think JA's innocence must be proven ?
How am I hypocrite ?