WikiLeaks chief Julian Assange was refused bail Tuesday by a British judge over claims of sex crimes in Sweden, dealing afresh blow to the website which vowed to stay online and reveal more US secrets.
The elusive 39-year-old Australian said he would fight an extradition request by Swedish authorities as he appeared in court in London just hours after he emerged from a month in hiding and surrendered to police.
Filmmaker Ken Loach, socialite Jemima Khan, and campaigning journalist John Pilger each offered to put up part of his bail but a judge in London refused, saying a court would review the situation at a hearing on December 14th.
"I am satisfied that there are substantial grounds to believe that if granted bail he would fail to surrender," district judge Howard Riddle said at City of Westminster magistrates court.
The judge said the Swedish arrest warrant contains "extremely serious allegations" of molestation, unlawful coercion and rape involving two women with whom Assange had sex in Stockholm in August.
Assange had the "means and ability to abscond if he wants to," Riddle added.
The court heard Assange is accused of unlawfully coercing and sexually molesting a woman on August 14th, and of deliberately molesting her on August 18th.
A fourth allegation claims Assange had sex with a second woman on August 17th while she was asleep at her Stockholm home, and without using a condom.
The WikiLeaks boss, who has denied the charges, appeared calm and collected in court, an AFP reporter said. Wearing a navy blue suit and a white shirt without a tie, he spoke to confirm his name and address in Australia.
Speaking in Stockholm after Assange’s court appearance, the prosecutor in charge of the rape case against the WikiLeaks founder said on Tuesday she had no intention of extraditing him to the United States if he is brought to Sweden to face justice.
"I did not execute a European arrest warrant against him for him to be extradited to the United States," Marianne Ny told Swedish reporters in the western city of Gothenburg, according to the TT news agency.
"The investigation has nothing to do with WikiLeaks. This concerns him (Assange) personally," the prosecutor was also quoted as saying by the website of the Aftonbladet daily.
Britain's Metropolitan Police said earlier in a statement that officers from its extradition unit had arrested Assange on a European arrest warrant "by appointment at a London police station" at 0930 GMT.
WikiLeaks criticised the court ruling as "bizarre" and said it would release more documents later Tuesday from the cache of 250,000 confidential US diplomatic cables that it started to publish on November 28th.
"Let down by the UK justice system's bizarre decision to refuse bail to Julian Assange. But Cablegate releases continue as planned," the whistleblowing website said on its Twitter page.
Assange's Lawyer Mark Stephens told journalists outside court the allegations were "politically motivated", adding that he expected a "viral campaign" on the Internet on his client's behalf.
"We have heard the judge say he wishes to see the evidence himself. I think he was impressed by the fact that a number of people were prepared to stand up on behalf of Mr Assange and declare his innocence," he said.
Loach, Khan -- former wife of Pakistan cricket great Imran Khan and one-time girlfriend of film star Hugh Grant -- and Pilger each offered £20,000 ($31,400). Another three donors also offered a total of £120,000 between them.
Pilger told the court the case was "a travesty" and "absurd". After the hearing, he said: "This is a man who has made some very serious enemies for the best reasons."
WikiLeaks is battling to stay afloat after infuriating Washington with the release of the cables, which have revealed a string of diplomatic embarrassments from all corners of the globe.
In one of the latest leaks, US cables released Tuesday showed that NATO had extended an existing defence plan covering Poland to include Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania after they lobbied for extra protection.
The website has been forced to hop from server to server as various countries tried to close it down and hackers attacked it, though its supporters have responded by setting up hundreds of "mirror" sites to keep it online.
In a sign of Washington's satisfaction at the arrest, US Defence Secretary Robert Gates, who was visiting Afghanistan on Tuesday, said it "sounds like good news."
WikiLeaks is also coming under increased financial pressure, with Visa following in the footsteps of MasterCard and PayPal Tuesday by announcing that it was suspending all payments to WikiLeaks.
Swiss authorities shut down one of Assange's bank accounts on Monday, while a major WikiLeaks donor in Germany is in trouble for not filing its accounts on time.
WikiLeaks has already been expelled from the United States where Attorney General Eric Holder has said authorities were pursuing an "active, ongoing investigation that is criminal in nature" into the leaks.
In an opinion piece for The Australian newspaper after his arrest, Assange said the website was "fearlessly" pursuing facts in the public interest.
Meanwhile, the United States said Tuesday that the arrest of Assange is an issue between Britain and
Sweden, as Washington pursues its own investigation.
"Our investigation is ongoing. As for his arrest, it is, at this point, an issue between Britain and Sweden," State Department spokesman Philip Crowley told reporters.
"I cannot say that the United States has been drawn into this issue this morning. This is an issue where British authorities have arrested him based on a warrant for his extradition from Sweden," Crowley said.
"What we're investigating is a crime under US law. The provision of 250,000 classified documents from someone in the government to someone outside the government is a crime," Crowley said.
"We're investigating and we will hold those responsible accountable. That investigation is still ongoing," he added.
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
In UK law, the full list of allegations and surrounding circumstances, will be read out in court.
Should be interesting to see what a UK judge makes of the Swedish charges.
- drugs and criminal organisation
- financial and high tech crime
- tracing fugitives who threaten public safety
- public safety and terrorism
- human trafficking
- corruption
Just saying.
The fact that the case was closed by the Stockholm prosecutors office and subsequently reopened at the behest of a Göteborg politician is highly questionable.
Mr. Assange's lawyers have most likely decided that the UK is the best place to hear the extradition case due to the more open nature of the courts and presumably the right to a trial by jury.
Similarly, the constitutionally protected "freedom of speech" does not cover foreigners who indiscriminately publish stolen government documents. It really does journalism a disservice to call wikileaks journalism. There's not theme...there's no reporting...it's just a vomiting of data without any analysis. The release of the Iraq War Logs at least, arguably, had a theme to it...here, we just have a random grab bag of diplomatic gossip with zero attention paid as to whether there's a story or not. Almost as if it were purposefully antagonistic. The release IS the story, not anything pertaining to the content of the messages (i.e., no "smoking gun").
Anyway, we're still waiting for wikileaks/Assange to release their sources of funding. Transparency for all, except the morally superior wikileaks it seems.
And publishing the sources of funding for Wikileaks? Are you a moron? With governments pursuing this man like he's responsible for every bad thing that's ever gone on, why wouldn't they try and protect their funding sources for fear of "legal" pursuit on mass scale against individuals who are just damn sick of government bulls#it and just want a bit of truth?! As I said, there's a difference between "transparency" and "stupidity".
Try and read this article, if you will:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/assange-rape-accuser-cia-ties/
This is clearly a set-up, my friend (Interpol, CIA, Scotland Yard, Swedish Police and who know who else work in synergy for a man wanted over a flimsy rape charge at best?!) and in the event that your useless arguments continue, I bid you go back to sleep, brother, let your government maintain your life comfortably, and I'll meet you on the other side. Peace.
all countries specially Europe and in Asia Pakistan,Afghanistan,India are the
puppets of America .
I think the Leaks are very much good and benificial in exposing the real face of
USA and there followers.
If it will continue i hope the drama of World Trade center (as the american did by themselves),Baseless attack on Iraq and Afghanistan will also exposed in front of the world,and hopefully the people will insist to draw back security forces from Afghanistan,as there is no OSAMA, He was the family friend of Bush and hope in Amirica not in Afghanistan.
The people will come to know that Amirca is doing crimes on the name of peace and killing Innocents all over the world .
For all common nationals from all over the world this is good to know the true faces of their leaders.
Wikileakes should continue to leak.......................................
is it just that the US is controlling Sweden like they are used to control any country in order to do whatever they want?
sooo disappointed at Sweden for letting themselves be an instrument (once more) of the US.
bloody circus just to keep the world ignorant!
http://ardin.se/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1336291/Wikileaks-Julian-Assanges-2-night-stands-spark-worldwide-hunt.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
so we all can blame Muslims for all the chaos that happen in this world today, not those govts that full with liars and corrupted leaders...
simple example.. WMD? hahahhahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa (reaction from FBI and CIA agents)
Again..
Hail USA.. Hail the Yanks.. Hail the New World Order... To hell freedom of speech!
* freedom of speech only valid for the Yanks to insult Muslim and Islam all over the world!
Hail USA.. Hail the Yanks.. Hail the New World Order... To hell freedom of speech!
What's with the name "wikileaks" anyway? It sounds like a STD.
I think you're missing the point. No one denies that everyone at Wikileaks could be guilty of the first three points. What we are referring to is the full force of Interpol being used to corral an individual on an alleged rape charge.
"When the charges were first leveled in August, Gawker raised doubts that Ardin was working for the CIA.
"If anything, Ardin's outing tends to undercut Assange's conspiracy theory that one of his accusers is a major figure on Sweden's left fringe, freewheelingly indiscreet on her personal blog and, until her charges, an enthusiastic promoter of Assange's visit to the country," Gawker wrote."
That article you found so convincing of a conspiracy theory is pretty weak my friend. You also say it's obviously a "setup" by the US government; yet, you provide no evidence other than a link to someone's blog where they undercut your own claim. What's next, a link to someone's myspace page who claims 9-11 was an inside job?
"Your argument, sir, belies any intelligence whatsoever. And yes, this "private" information you've been harping on about does concern citizens of the rest of the world, who would probably like to know what these crooks in government are up to"
Ok, my argument is devoid of intelligence...yet, you fail to say why. Further, by your logic then all documents by all governments should be made public. Funny enough though, this doesn't seem to be in wikileaks' charter.
I'm not an american apologist, I want nothing more than to see Cheney/Bush tried before a world court for war crimes. But I don't see the need for dressing up anti-americanism and calling it "wikileaks"...just call it what it is. Assange clearly has a chip on his shoulder and is targeting one country, not others. As do you. Personal attacks aside, perhaps you should spend more time in the real world and less of it outside the spy novels you're clearly addicted to. You may not like the law, and personally I find it ridiculous, but it is a swedish law that he is accused of violating. Please provide us evidence of how these two, native swedish women, have been working lockstep with the US CIA in order to trap a glorified blogger on perhaps the flimsiest of charges anyone could ever be held on...where, even if found guilty, he would be facing a slap on the wrist. Please bring out your Glenn Beck chalkboard and diagram it for us and then illustrate how the big evil US empire is controlling everything in the world in order to make you look dumb in thelocal.se message board.
If the U.S. wanted to do anything to him he already would have been found dead, hanging in a closet with his pants around his ankles. An apparent victim of auto-erotic asphyxiation gone wrong.
Yes, Interpol's involvement is puzzling, and of course, tagging him is pointless. Wikileaks will go on. They should take care as they go though; Assange could easily become a martyr.
First of all, governments have no expectations of privacy. Information gathered with taxpayer money is NOT private. That's the whole reason it's called public affairs.
Secondly, Wikileaks did nothing wrong. The major European newspapers published the leaked documents before they were put up on Wikileaks website. Yet, these are evidently protected. Imagine the outrage if the bank accounts of Le Monde or El Pais were frozen.
This is exposing flaws in the system, in the most transparent way. There's nothing healthier than that. Security through obscurity is a pathetic attempt to hide certain things instead of building foolproof systems.
Finally, this is a milestone in human civilization. The future of the internet is at stake, right here. This is the exact same battle EFF and Pirate Parties around the world are fighting. The right to say what you damn please on the internet. I like the way the individuals are empowered by this technology, and evidently, crooks with totalitarian leanings don't. If it was up to governments, we'd live in an Orwellian world. Sadly, the sheeple doesn't engage in highly intellectual debates, and they will readily trade their inalienable freedoms for a fleeting sense of safety.
When Amazon, PayPal, Visa, Mastercard, Swiss banks (since when these bloody hypocrites start caring where the money came from? They have genocidal tyrant money in their coffers and they dare go after Assange) and the Swedish judicial system go after a person like this, it stinks conspiracy from miles around. Mike Huckabee called for Assange's execution. Palin called him a terrorist. Sweden is calling him a rapist. But this is not about the man himself. This is bigger than him, and we will fight this every way we can. Donate money to I2P, Tor and such projects to keep the internet flourishing. Information wants to be free, and the more you try to suppress it, the harder it fights back!
Peace.
I am writing from Spain and I always put Swedish as the example of a good Europa. Not anymore. You (your system) are as bad as we are. So in the end somebody invented some crap about this guy Julian and you believe it. Didn't you have any other better charge against him? What did EEUU promise to you? Buying more Saabs? What was your price?
Unbelievable.
Another mith down. Swedish justice system is as bad or crap as ours here in Spain.
If you need people to teach you how to become corrupt we can export them. At least here, we are a bit more elegant. Lies here aren't that obvious.. like up there my friends.
Have good day.
FULL FORCE? Why is it that EVERYBODY wants to put a slant on this.
99% of people who back America and the UK war on terrorism have already decided Assange is guilty of rape.
99% of people who dont America and the UK war on terrorism have already decided Assange is not guilty of rape.
People, bloggers, politicians are letting their own agenda sway their view and choose their words to support their beliefs.
It is NOT the full force of Interpol..... he walked into a police station and said "nick me": That is not how full force of Interpol works. Full force of interpol would have seen the SAS absailing down his hideout, smoke bombs through the window and drag him out by the short and curlys.
As I already knew all the details of this case from flashback and posted them here on 2 september I can see the translation mistakes made in Britain today..... The charges were never dropped.
If Wikileaks did not have a politcal agenda of their own then this would not be so bad. As it is they only tell you what they want you to believe and they have made the world a more dangerous place.
The first thing to consider is the dangers which are systematically piling up as the direct, albeit unthought-of, result of the free play of means 'liberated' from goals. These dangers threaten the lives and the welfare of countless other people, distant both in space and in time, and cast in a situation which more often than not precludes all response; the danger-producing actions are as a rule uni-directional. They are not exchanges; they cannot be, therefore, limited or regulated or otherwise kept in the frame by contracts, by a mutual show of force, by negotiations or the search for consensus. (…) [T]he unwitting targets of action match Lévinas's description of the Other as weak, vulnerable, without power; they are indeed without power since they cannot repay what has been done to them (nor for that matter reward our deeds), and vulnerable since they cannot prevent us from doing whatever we think worth doing; once for all, with no hope of reversing the roles, they are stuck on the receiving side of the action in which we are the only acting subjects. (…)
The extension of responsibility which the 'risk society' needs and cannot do without except with catastrophic results cannot be argued or promoted in terms that are the most familiar and approved of in our type of society - those of fair exchange and reciprocity of benefits. Whatever else the sought morality is to be, it must be first and foremost an ethics of self-limitation (as the morality of proximity always was and had to be), [in this case the self-limitation of a superpower which reductively treats murdered civilians as "collateral damage"1 or the toxic side effects of a "just"2 war (ibid., 219-220). Current American military policy is one of the ugliest conceivable forms of the discredited philosophy of utilitarianism.
1. This is the ugliest word of the last 38 years, the first known use of which was recorded in 1972.
2. This is a word which is a sign and a signifier without an unambiguous signified.
"One of the charges is that he had unprotected sex with a woman, identified only as Miss A, when she insisted he use a condom.
Another is that he had unprotected sex with another woman, Miss W, while she was asleep."
I look forward to a rash of court cases in Sweden (or indeed all around the world) against Swedes, both male and female, involving serious charges involving 'unprotected' sex. Degrees of sleepiness during sex may also become contentious.
As to the view that Wikileaks is making private information public : there is another view. That the information is public (it's paid for by taxpayers) but is often put to use by essentially private and undeclared interests operating within governments. (The revelations of US and Spanish govt views on the relations between Putin and Berlusconi were important to know. Not for headbangers, but for democrats everywhere.) The so-called evidence used to justify the Iraq war would be another good example, but there are thousands more.
The interesting thing is that Wikileaks isn't really telling us anything we don't know about the US. That's already out there. You don't need conspiracy theories - you just need to read the serious press attentively. And that's thanks to freedom of the press in many countries. But it is telling us new stuff about those countries that hate freedom of expression and the press. It's going to be an epic struggle.
Thanks for the Daily Mail link. You're right that's a very informative article, far more so than anything I've read in the Swedish press. Whatever people may say about the Daily Mail, they know how to get the story. Absolutely superb investigative journalism from the a London based paper.
Assange is held in Sweden for the next two years, and then in 2013 the US says, 'hand him over - he's a terrorist mastermind', and when Sweden refuses the B-52's are airborne. Sounds crazy until you make the substitutions: 2001, Afghanistan, and Osama Bin Laden. ;)
Unfortunately for all of us the scenario sounds a little less crazy if this were President Sarah Palin's first act in Office ... well okay maybe not the B-52's, but economic sanctions etc...
the leaks are the best think to happen because now the yanks can be seen for the terrorist that they are !!!
"Quick question: Does Sweden go to such lengths to find all of their accused rapists?
one answer: I dunno ... ask Roman Polanski"
Quote #2
(from JA's article that went alive on TheAustralian)
But our publications have been far from unimportant. The US diplomatic cables reveal some startling facts:
► The US asked its diplomats to steal personal human material and information from UN officials and human rights groups, including DNA, fingerprints, iris scans, credit card numbers, internet passwords and ID photos, in violation of international treaties. Presumably Australian UN diplomats may be targeted, too.
► King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia asked the US to attack Iran.
► Officials in Jordan and Bahrain want Iran's nuclear program stopped by any means available.
► Britain's Iraq inquiry was fixed to protect "US interests".
► Sweden is a covert member of NATO and US intelligence sharing is kept from parliament.
► The US is playing hardball to get other countries to take freed detainees from Guantanamo Bay. Barack Obama agreed to meet the Slovenian President only if Slovenia took a prisoner. Our Pacific neighbour Kiribati was offered millions of dollars to accept detainees.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/dont-shoot-messenger-for-revealing-uncomfortable-truths/story-fn775xjq-1225967241332
"First of all, governments have no expectations of privacy. Information gathered with taxpayer money is NOT private. That's the whole reason it's called public affairs."
Wow...breathtakingly dumb. You're so completely wrong that I'm almost embarrassed for you that you're making such statements in public. "Public affairs" is something wholly different from State Department communications. Further the government has a common-law right to keep state secrets secret. The modern articulation of the privilege is a 1952 Supreme Court case, The United States v Reynolds, and has been clarified by The Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA). Everything else is available via a Freedom of Information Act request.
Assuming your mom let's you stay up past your bedtime, you may find this educational...maybe save it for later so you can learn all the big words: http://www.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/lookup/Secrets1.pdf/$file/Secrets1.pdf
Now, quit playing on the grownup message boards and get your sleep for school tomorrow.
That is my point exactly. Is the "swedish" law on the books silly? I think so. Are these charges against Assange sensationalistic? Probably...I'm not the judge or jury, but speaking as a single male I would hate to think how many of these "sex by surprise" changes I could be brought up on. However, this in and of itself does not mean there's a US conspiracy. If there's a conspiracy to get Assange then why not look at the Swedish government since this is where he has been charged? Mind you, I do not think there's a conspiracy at all since I've personally known women vindictive enough to pull something like this without government support. People are far too quick to see the US as the evil empire...you're just as bad as the black/white narrow minded fools in the US (Republicans) who do the same damn thing with their bogeyman du jour.
The US has plenty of things to be ashamed about, but there isn't anything that points to this being one of them.
And for all the conspiracy theorists, why is it you're so unconcerned with wikileaks' source of funding? I suppose this is irrelevant? Please...I can think of a number of groups that would benefit from having a shadow organization like this operating on their behalf. Maybe it's the People's Liberation Army? Maybe somebody else...point is, nobody is holding wikileaks to this supposedly high ethical standard they're proclaiming to have. There isn't a "news" organization in the democratically governed world that I cannot find the source of their operating funds...wikileaks is quite alone in this regard.
what a crap, have u lost ur mind or something? what fre*kin girl u're talking about?
the whole fre*kin world is freaked out!!! governments, the UN, NATO and nations, & you just keep bitching about some arab girl???? maaaan!!! you really got me confused...
don't get me started for real u idiot........
The world is watching you. This is your moment of international infamy. You are on the wrong side of history.
Citizens of Sweden you should be out in the streets protesting.
Only you can make it right now.
This could devolove into a world wide conflict.
Time will tell, but I fear all free nations could become targets. Funny, you never know who could become a terrorist. Assange joins a strange club!!!
after the operation, don´t surprise if his face will look like bin laden face! LOL.....
You hit the nail on the head regarding the law. This has long been my own view of the case i.e. that it has to be understood in the climate of feminism and gender equality in Sweden. Over the past decade there has been a wave of, in my opinion, sometimes sensible and sometimes misguided attempts to address gender inequality (far more so than in most other western countries). As a part of this, there is an effort to increase the number of convictions for sexual assault. JA may well simply be caught up in that. I rather suspect that, given the complaints against him, he has attracted the attention of a prosecutor wishing to pursue a very public zero-tolerance line. Whether he's innocent or guilty, time will tell but I've never seen the need to look beyond Swedish society and the legal machinery of Sweden to understand this case.
The charges against Julian Assange appear to be part of a counter campaign to discredit him using honey traps handled by intelligence operatives. While the ability to prosecute them are doubtful, more serious espionage charges could be pending. Even more interesting than the content of the disclosures have been the anti-free speech actions used by our government to stop them. These tactics, including seizing his bank accounts and denying his organization access to merchant credit card processing are just two of many attempts to stifle important free speech.
Regardless of the political careers placed in jeopardy, I hope the disclosures continue. The public deserves to know, even the uncomfortable or unseemly parts. While some of those in power might have their future reelection prospects dimmed, most will be better for it in the long run. The truth elevates us all.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/12/assange-rape-accuser-cia-ties/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/interpol-the-worlds-datin_b_793033.html
Your ilk is nothing more serious than sad dis-affected sheep who will sacrifice themselves to some vague distorted and archaic ideology that will never be embraced by an intelligent human. You simply are displaying the tantrum like behavior of a petulant child. Dangerous you may be but respected... certainly not! Please stop disgracing and sullying the reputation of an ancient and respected religion.
a la Britain
This could be a plot to discredit the web thereby establishing a reason to edit it. Certainly the case for the "safety of the troops" has been trotted out; sort of with the fervor of the WMD. Indeed this mantra has been used ever since the WMD farce was exposed to galvanize the American public. However I have not seen anywhere near this elaborate a subterfuge employed by any of the Yankee government of late. Their methods have been much more brazen and guile than this.
Having said that I can't imagine this being about much more than tabloid fare in the long run. Interesting reading for sure but it seems that the government who protests the loudest is the one who is embarrassed by what the rest of the world sees as nothing too significant.
Remember politicians are people just like you and I who are not immune to the frailties of human behavior but who we have given the power of immense retribution to if they are shamed.
Bravo to JA and Wikileaks for having the courage to expose these people for what they really are.
American prosecutors, if they take a case to trial, must convince a jury composed of citizens that the defendant is guilty.
Many of us in the U.S. think that a defendant is more likely to get a fair decision from such a jury than from a judge. Whether we are right in this belief is hard to say, but there is at least one widely-known example that seems to support it.
This example is the trial of the Lockerbie bomber, Mr al-Megrahi. The trial was held before a three-judge panel of Scottish jurists, who found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.. Many of us think that Mr al-Megrahi is innocent and that a Scottish jury would probably have found him so.
Given that Mr Assange, via Wikileaks, has issued a grave challenge to state authority, can any state authority, on its own, be trusted to give him a fair trial?
- The Australian, featuring the headline, "Assange Poised to be Labor's David Hicks" (David Hicks is the Australian who plea-bargained his way out of Guantanamo), and links to Assange's article: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/
so he basically turns himself in and is civil enough to make an appointment! :
"Britain's Metropolitan Police said earlier in a statement that officers from its extradition unit had arrested Assange on a European arrest warrant " by appointment at a London police station" at 0930 GMT."
and then the judge says he's a risk to jump bail and denies him release.
and what I can't help but wonder is what does it take for the sheep of society to realize a government set up when it's staring at them in the face?
wikileaks is a publisher (albeit online) same as all the other 'free press' agencies/newspapers. i feel sorry for all the suffering he's going to go thru now and hail the US's new euro-puppet marianne ny. perhaps all this attention for herself and career will earn her at least a guest judge appearance on 'Idol'