Published: 17 Dec 10 10:41 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/30916/20101217/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange called attempts to extradite him to Sweden part of a "smear campaign" after he was granted bail in London.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Parents and volunteers have been patrolling the streets of Stockholm's immigrant-heavy suburbs to help quell riots that have raged for almost a week, serving as a successful deterrent to troublemakers and winning praise from police. READ () »
Police are hunting a 40-year-old man after a woman was found dead in a suburb of Stockholm on Saturday. READ () »
Two cars collided on a road between Trollhättan and Vänersborg in western Sweden on Friday afternoon due to an elk having chosen the unusual spot to give birth to a calf. READ () »
Express delivery firm DHL has been criticised for having handed over a load of alcohol ordered from Germany to a 10-year-old boy in southern Sweden who was home alone at the time. READ () »
A sixth straight night of unrest blighted several Stockholm suburbs on Friday night, spreading briefly to the city of Örebro, 160 kilometres to the west. READ () »
With international media swooping on the Stockholm riots from every angle, The Local's Oliver Gee explains why Stockholm is not burning, and how the story has been blown out of proportion. READ () »
After five nights of rioting throughout the outskirts of Stockholm, many in Sweden and elsewhere are trying to make sense of it all. The Local spoke to a mix of commentators and local politicians to get their views. READ () »
As white-collar union Saco slammed Sweden for not helping well-educated foreigners into the labour market, The Local spoke to researcher Josefin Edström about the disconnect between foreign professionals and Swedish employers. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
REFLECTIONS OF A TWITTER VIRGIN…. »
"I confess to having been reluctant to embrace Twitter. But I confess myself a bit of a convert. The great TV critic Clive James once said about “Dallas”, “I came to mock but I stayed to pray”. I wouldn’t go that far, but I have found my first two weeks on Twitter (@hmapauljohnston) both fun and informative. It’s been..." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
You are right and I am sorry to say that most governments in the world are like that. Sweden is not unique. They care MORE about taking money and power from you than giving you what you need when you need it. However in this case this smear campaign (whatever you want to term it) is tarnishing Sweden's reputation for fairness and equal treatments. Most of us believe that Assange has done nothing wrong in Sweden but even if he did (i.e. unintentionally broke the condom which is called 'rape' by some i... f...) it is still super nonsense that SO MUCH money and huge resources have been wasted just to "question" him. Worse, no Swedish-language media report this fiasco to us.
To give a perspective on how our government has been wasting our assets and resources for this case (I am not saying that JA is guilty in any case): imagine that the Swedish government order the Swedish Air Force to send two JAS Gripen to chase a taxi speeding at say 120 km/h on the E4 motorway with 110 km/h as a maximum speed limit. There is NO way the Air Force would take such an irrational and stupid order. A taxi speeding at 10 km/h over the speed limit (sure this is illegal according to the traffic law) is not worth any attention by the Air Force to use its fighter jet like the Gripen. Just to start up a Gripen and fly it for 30 minutes costs more than a monthly salary of a police officer. Hence we should really question the authorities involved in trying to just "question" Assange how much of our tax money they have wasted to date.
Given all the irrational waste of resources together with unproportional actions/reactions from the Swedish authorities for just "questioning" an innocent person, the world has come to realize that this is nothing more than a smear campaign.
I think it is time Swedes stand up and hold their Leaders accountable for wasting tax-payers resources .
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/dear-government-of-sweden_b_798061.html
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-friends-blog/dear-government-of-sweden
Only someone truly naive would truly believe that Sweden has done this (pursue Assange via Interpol for an allegation) on their own voalition when the facts show that as a rule, rape is rarely prosecuted at all here (see Michael Moore's letter).
By the way, apologies to procustes; I did not see you had posted the link to Moore's letter until after I had posted it.
This.
I am sick and tired of this conspiracy theory - especially the Sweden bashing that comes with it. OF COURSE Assange is going to say it's a smear campaign because it works in his favor. The same thing happened during the rapes in Bjästa. Most people sided with the alleged rapist and the girl was bullied and called a whore/liar. They whole town tried to discredit her. The boy was eventually convicted of double rape but the girl and her family had to move anyway - the emotional damage had already been done. :(
I hope Assange is extradited soon to Sweden so the whole world can see Sweden won't extradite him to the US. Of course, if they actually do Sweden deserves to be bashed. But as it is now Sweden is being bashed anyway so Sweden's got nothing to loose really. Plus it's still 10 times were already - because all this bashing and negativity is based on nothing but SPECULATION.
Sweden has a legacy of horrible treatment of rape victims and dismal protection of women who are real victims of rape. It is very telling that the Swedish government used false rape charges against Assange as a political tactic.
The saddest part about this entire scandal is that real victims of rape are the ones who stand to lose the most from driven smear campaigns that use rape as a sword for political advantage.
www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/dear-government-of-sweden_b_798061.html
Dear Swedish Government:
Hi there -- or as you all say, Hallå! You know, all of us here in the U.S. love your country. Your Volvos, your meatballs, your hard-to-put-together furniture -- we can't get enough!
There's just one thing that bothers me -- why has Amnesty International, in a special report, declared that Sweden refuses to deal with the very real tragedy of rape? In fact, they say that all over Scandinavia, including in your country, rapists "enjoy impunity." And the United Nations, the EU and Swedish human rights groups have come to the same conclusion: Sweden just doesn't take sexual assault against women seriously. How else do you explain these statistics from Katrin Axelsson of Women Against Rape:
- Sweden has the HIGHEST per capita number of reported rapes in Europe.
- This number of rapes has quadrupled in the last 20 years.
- The conviction rates? They have steadily DECREASED.
Axelsson says: "On April 23rd of this year, Carina Hägg and Nalin Pekgul (respectively MP and chairwoman of Social Democratic Women in Sweden) wrote in the Göteborgs [newspaper] that 'up to 90% of all reported rapes [in Sweden] never get to court.'"
Let me say that again: nine out of ten times, when women report they have been raped, you never even bother to start legal proceedings. No wonder that, according to the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, it is now statistically more likely that someone in Sweden will be sexually assaulted than that they will be robbed.
Message to rapists? Sweden loves you!
So imagine our surprise when all of a sudden you decided to go after one Julian Assange on sexual assault charges. Well, sort of: first you charged him. Then after investigating it, you dropped the most serious charges and rescinded the arrest warrant.
What anti-rape crusaders you've become, Swedish government! Women in Sweden must suddenly feel safer?
Well, not really. Actually, many see right through you. They know what these "non-charge charges" are really about. And they know that you are cynically and disgustingly using the real and everyday threat that exists against women everywhere to help further the American government's interest in silencing the work of WikiLeaks.
I don't pretend to know what happened between Mr. Assange and the two women complainants (all I know is what I've heard in the media, so I'm as confused as the next person). And I'm sorry if I've jumped to any unnecessary or wrong-headed conclusions in my efforts to state a very core American value: All people are absolutely innocent until proven otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. I strongly believe every accusation of sexual assault must be investigated vigorously. There is nothing wrong with your police wanting to question Mr. Assange about these allegations, and while I understand why he seemed to go into hiding (people tend to do that when threatened with assassination), he nonetheless should answer the police's questions. He should also submit to the STD testing the alleged victims have requested. I believe Sweden and the UK have a treaty and a means for you to send your investigators to London so they can question Mr. Assange where he is under house arrest while out on bail.
But that really wouldn't be like you would it, to go all the way to another country to pursue a suspect for sexual assault when you can't even bring yourselves to make it down to the street to your own courthouse to go after the scores of reported rapists in your country. That you, Sweden, have chosen to rarely do that in the past, is why this whole thing stinks to the high heavens.
And let's not forget this one final point from Women Against Rape's Katrin Axelsson:
I don't believe Michael Moore was commenting on the success rate of prosecutions for rape; that is an entirely different subject (apples and oranges).
He was commenting on the fact that so very few are prosecuted at all, period. In other words, they never make it into a court of law.
Prosecuting rape is difficult in almost any democratic country that has any semblence of due process, simply because most defense attorneys will attack the victim. Standard defense strategy.
That more than anything is why a lot of women never even report rape; they don't want to have to relive the act over and over in court and have themselves labeled as sluts, tramps, or "asking for it in the first place".
Please "look" into the extreme irregularities (twists and turns, ...) of this case from the very beginning, and you will come to the same conclusion like the rest of the free world do.
Luckily for us, many people out there are friends of Sweden and they have been trying their best to be polite and indirect to us. If there weren't friends with us they would have criticized us much more strongly. Do not just listen to the Swedish media at home.
I'm sure if a woman shows up traumatized claiming rape the police would pursue the case at full speed. I do not believe that Sweden is in the midst of world worst rape epidemic. I do believe the statistics that can be interpreted to claim Sweden is in a horrific rape epidemic. So...how do I reconcile the two opposing facts? I think there may be too many Swedish women abusing the law.
Maybe someone should look into this. Maybe, if the case that women are abusing the laws is true, new laws need to passed putting false claimants in jail.
Insult Sweden's "integrity"? Well...that's a new low for the folks rationalizing this witch-hunt.
Sweden is not special. It has a government that is inclined to grow in power, and talented crusaders for Freedom makes it nervous. Hence, the big guns were drawn out to smear Assange and take down Wikileaks.
The internet and the power it gives individuals is scarring the hell out of The Establishment. Be they governments hell-bent on social engineering, or corporations that can't adapt to this paradigm-shifting technology.
In the same Olof Palme Centre which houses the offices of the Social Democrat Party, one also finds nearby the offices of the National Endowment for Democracy. (The N.E.D. just happens to be funded by the US government, and was set up by President Reagan in 1983 as a civilian extension to covert activities overseas.)
Regrettably, the British tax payer is paying the costs of prosecuting (or should that be persecuting) Julian Assange in the UK. Frankly I think the Brits should be sending Swedish Prosecutor Marianne Ny the bill with a surcharge for 'wasting tax payers money'.
A message to the Local If we cannot comment on it, DO NOT PRINT IT.
By the way assange is a clown and for those against peace and the truth, just follow him and be fools as well. Are you so stupid that he is making millions out you and you are so naive that you cannot see it FOOLS?
@Great Scott - If Assange is a clown, as you say, then he is a clown that is very much appreciated by governments around the world that are setting up enquiries into scandals that have come to light thanks to Wikileaks. So that's a contribution to transparency and accountability.
Interesting that the Swedish press seems not to be reporting this story at the moment. From my reading of big Swedish cases in the past, I suspect that the authorities will be leaking like sieves to Swedish journalists - to keep them 'in the know'. In exchange, the relatively docile Swedish press corps will toe the line. Who are the well known investigative reporters in Sweden at the moment? Does anybody know?
An interesting legal point. Senior US legal officers are saying that it would be more difficult to extradite Assange from Sweden since breaking US law is not necessarily sufficient grounds for an extradition. It needs to be shown that he's broken both US and Swedish laws. In a case as serious as this - making use of classified information supplied by a member of the US military.
However, Sweden is able to extradite Assange from the UK without having to present any evidence that he has broken Swedish laws, and on allegations that would be laughed out of a British court. There is a glaring inconsistency in process, entirely dependent on which country Sweden is dealing with. (I'm not saying this wouldn't be the case across many other EU countries - it is.)
It might be easier if Assange could be shown responsible for sex without a condom in the USA at some point in the past. Then Sweden could hand him over in an instant, and with a good conscience.
After all the huffing and puffing, it'll be interesting to see how this compares with the US case against Ellsberg, who released the Pentagon Papers re the Vietnam War. People did die as a result of that release. But the Supreme Court vindicated Ellsberg in the end. Freedom to know ultimately trumped the govt's need to hide. We shall see if it does this time.
one more reason to love him
and to close the mouth of the ennemies of the truth
Very nice post.