Published: 19 Dec 10 16:12 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/30950/20101219/
Swedes were coping with yet another round of fierce winter weather on Sunday as a band of snow showers moved north across the country, sending cars off the roads and dumping up to 20 centimetres of fresh snow in its wake.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Politicians in the small Swedish town of Falköping want to give alcoholics and drug users a glass-encased zone in the middle of a central square, saying it would lessen public disturbances and allow "the down and out" to socialize. READ () »
The European Commission opened an in-depth probe on Wednesday to see if state aid given to Scandinavian Airlines by Sweden and Denmark conformed to EU rules. READ () »
In The Local's new Fashion Fix column on Swedish trends, Englishwoman Victoria Hussey gets up close and personal with shoes - namely "brothel creepers" from WWII that have been making a steady return to Stockholm pavements. READ () »
Imported frozen raspberries should be boiled before eaten according to new advice from Sweden's National Food Agency, which warns that the berries may carry the novo virus that is more known for causing winter vomiting disease. READ () »
A deceased patient who had no relatives was left in a room for five days at the Örebro University Hospital before staff realized the body was still there. READ () »
Stockholm bus traffic was at a standstill Wednesday as drivers launched a major strike at midnight, but a group of Conservative youths disrupted the action by replacing a bus route between two of the city's major hospitals. READ () »
Sweden Democrat MP Kent Ekeroth has to pay tax for money sent to his bank account as donations to two far-right websites that he claims to have nothing to do with editorially. READ () »
For some foreigners living in Sweden, a natural "inner Swede" can develop that often doesn't show its face until you're back home again. The Local's Patrick Reilly lists the top ten ways this inner-Swede can change your life. READ () »
| 19/06 | GE Money Bank söker en senior riskanalytikerGE Money Bank | Danderyd, STHM |
| 19/06 | Lighting Category DirectorSchneider Electric | Malmö, SKÅ |
| 19/06 | Senior Electrical EngineerEuropean Spallation Source ESS AB | SKÅ |
| 19/06 | Senior Manager/Manager with Finance, Risk & Regulatory experience within Banking and Capital MarketsBearingPoint SE | Stockholm, STHM |
| 19/06 | Solution Architect to Teracom GroupTeracom Group | Stockholm, STHM |
| 19/06 | Staff EngineerPoolia AB | Lund, SKÅ |
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Kentucky’s Bourbon Royalty Visits Sweden »
"He's not a celebrity in Sweden, but everyone in Kentucky knows the name Fred Noe. Even more people know the name of his great-grandfather, Jim Beam." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
The "change of language" is not suspicious. This has more to do with people misunderstanding the term "global warming". The global warming is causing climate shifts. And this is going on since day 1 of the planet, where the temperature also rose, but then only due to natural causes. Now we have on top of the natural causes, also manmade causes, which accelerates the global warming effect a bit. It will all stabilise again. It's what mother earth has been doing for thousands of years, and will continue to do so long after you and I are dust.
its called the Climate Change and it will cause more extreme weather events not necessarily warmer weather,, global warming is part of the dilemma
Re change in language: the words 'climate change' have been in official use since at least the mid 1980s. The IPCC was set up in 1988; the UNFCCC (the UN climate treaty) was agreed in 1992. I leave it to you to google the acronyms. The academic journal Climatic Change was launched in the early 1970s. The words 'global warming' have been in wider use in North America, and not only is the term scientifically problematic, it also leads to misunderstandings as shown above.
Re hoax (i.e. it isn't getting warmer): have a look at this graph, or any other graph published by official monitoring programmes and institutes: http://www.wissenslogs.de/wblogs/gallery/16/2010_giss_noaa.jpg
If you're really curious and/or confused about the science of climate change then there are several good sources I can refer you to. But if you prefer to have strong opinions about things you have no knowledge about, then feel free to keep polarising the debate, insulting people and appearing stupid.
If you really think that there aren't thousands of scientists all over the world studying every minute aspect of the sun, then that exposes your ignorance in this area. I can assure you that there is no conspiracy among climate scientists to "micromanage and dictate other people's lifestyles". It's the political agenda of conservatives, who live in mortal fear that their irresponsible behaviors might be curtailed for the good of everyone, that is driving their opposition to what good climate science is reporting and predicting. You should be ashamed to place your descendants at such mortal risk for your selfish agenda!
....or you will be brought before the inquisition for your heresy!
Funny how the more things change, the more things stay the same.
Some pertinent points:
*) The work of Henrik Svensmark.
*) The work of probably the first climatologist, before such a thing existed, is a Canadian scientist with phds from both the UK and Canada with over thirty years experience.
*) historical evidence of temperatures prior to the hallowed 1800 chart. i.e. during the middle ages sub-tropical temperatures in the very north of Europe. Documented in agricultural historical documentation.
*) The elephant in the room above C02 loved by trees and the fact that the oceans produce more C02 than anything; unnecessary proliferation of chemical toxins unleashed upon the earth.
*) Government funded agencies, NGOs and other organisations hosted, financed and run by an assorted bunch of very interesting individuals have been proven time and time again to be as reliable as an Alzheimer sufferer.
The 'climate agenda' has the hallmarks as a side tracking exercise for big wealth transfer and control spinner. Then again, just when you think you have things figured out, the players change the game and the rules.
I didn't say scientists, I said 'Climate change fans'. Pay attention! I was not talking about serious scientists at all. It's Climate change fans that are ignoring what the scientists are learning about solar cycles and their impact on our climate.
*slow clap*
Bwavo folks. Bwavo.
If you're at all interested, lux.veritas, svenskamerikansk and others, then have a look at what science says about 131 well-rehearsed skeptical arguments, including the ones you've raised here: http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php .
If you are indeed interested in scientific progress, then please don't continue to sow doubt by repeating claims that have been invalidated by now. The claims may well have been based on valid questions once, but climate science has done its job of falsifying hypotheses and moved on to other questions.
Yes, other questions remain, but none of these undermine the theory outlined by physicists in the 19th century that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leads to warming. Without any value judgements, without any economic interests, without any computer models. Just plain physics.
One of these scientists was the Swede Svante Arrhenius, who published a paper entitled 'On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground' back in 1896 (http://www.rsc.org/images/Arrhenius1896_tcm18-173546.pdf). It's fascinating reading!
If it's really cold somwhere, it's global warming/cimate change and people are responsible.
If it's really dry somewhere, it's global warming/climate change and people are responsible.
If it's really wet somewhere, it global warming/climate change and people are responsible.
Apparently none of the above ever happened until people started burning fossil fuels.
Hey, this is real science, right?