Published: 26 Jan 11 12:24 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/31650/20110126/
Ikea founder Ingvar Kamprad, considered one of the wealthiest people in the world, controls the company through a secret foundation worth 100 billion kronor ($15.34 billion), according to a Sveriges Television (SVT) report.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Criticism of the government's foreign aid policy is mounting as Swedish ambassadors, aid organizations and politicians slam Development Aid Minister Gunilla Carlsson's announcements that development assistance to several countries may be slashed. READ () »
Forestry giant Stora Enso plans to let another 2,500 employees go, of whom 750 work in Sweden, citing weak markets and deflating profits. READ () »
Sweden is second in line to benefit the most from an EU free-trade deal with the US, for which negotiations were finally given the all-clear in a move welcomed by pro-business groups in Sweden. READ () »
TeliaSonera's new head Johan Dennelind believes he is the right man to restore the Swedish telecom giant's reputation after the company's Uzbek bribery scandal. READ () »
Swiss-Swedish engineering giant ABB has appointed a new CEO, who has a background in oil and gas, utilities, telecoms and automotive industries and who was a key player in the acquisition of Baldor. READ () »
Sweden's state-run liquor store monopoly has sent back 6,000 bottles of a Spanish wine because it tasted better than expected, according to a Swedish alcohol supplier. READ () »
Development aid minister Gunilla Carlsson has said that the Swedish government may reduce development assistance for the Palestinians since they have failed to reach a peace agreement with Israel. READ () »
A hierarchical "Gothenburg Spirit" among politicians and civil servants contributed to a culture of corruption in the past decade, concluded a report on Sweden's second largest city. READ () »
The Swedish government has given up its efforts to force the European Union to scrap its ban on the export of snus, choosing instead to focus on protecting the popular moist tobacco product's use in Sweden. READ () »
Since 2008, migrants to Sweden can swap course from seeking asylum to seeking a work visa with the help of an employer. The Local speaks to one migrant who praises the system, while saying it could be improved. READ () »
| 18/06 | Accounting SpecialistHays | Katowice, SLA |
| 18/06 | Agency General Manager ? Scandinavia | Göteborg |
| 18/06 | C++ Developer | Stockholm |
| 18/06 | Chemical Plant ManagerThe Valspar | Hendrik Ido Ambacht (NL) |
| 18/06 | Cloud ArchitectCapgemini Sverige AB | Malmö, SKÅ |
| 18/06 | Compliance Manager - NordicsAce European Group Ltd | Stockholm |
| 18/06 | CPL Ireland - Swedish or DanishCPL Ireland | Malmö |
| 18/06 | Development Engineer Polymer MaterialsTetra Pak International | Lund |
| 18/06 | Enterprise Services Solution Architect | Sverige |
| 18/06 | Financial Reporting Product Manager | Sverige |
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
Close the down the tax havens.
These people should be arrested and made to pay tax in every European country they have avoided paying tax in.
The rest of us have to pay tax, so should the owners of IKEA.
No big surprise here.!
You complaining are just bitter because you didn't do it yourself.
He has employed so many people all over the world and as such ought to be admired. Let's face it, most of us are minions and a few have much more.But if the wealthy did not exist then the minions would not eat. We would also not be able to fund the public sector. The circle is clear.
The fact is, Kamprad used the infrastructure of Sweden--its schools, bridges, roads, ports, and electric and gas utilities, among other things--to build his fortune. There's a reason IKEA didn't get started in Malawi or Tunisia. There are many employees of IKEA whose talents in organization, manufacturing, distribution, and design, have made IKEA the success that it is. It's an insult to those thousands of people who have worked for IKEA over the years to say or imply that Kamprad built this all by himself and has sustained its success all by himself.
The fact is that Kamprad wants to keep all this money for himself and feels no apparent obligation to support the society that was the cradle of his business. It's ok for the workers of IKEA to pay their fair share of taxes, but Kamprad uses a complicated scheme of shell companies to avoid taxes, as many rich people do.
If this scheme is legal, then it ought not to be. Kamprad is no better than anybody else; he should have to pay as the rest of us do. Anyone who cries "jealousy" is really saying "Kamprad is so rich he is relieved of his social obligations". Good roads, schools, bridges, ports, and utilities don't come from thin air; they are paid for by our taxes.
I pay my share. Kamprad and others like him need to pay theirs.
Money recycles in economies until these theives smuggle it out and call it "their own".
Disgusting.
Yet Ikea generates how much revenue for Sweden in employment tax and VAT? 10 Euro (approx 100m sek) is nothing but a drop in the ocean of taxes that Ikea pays. The holding company referred to has a specifc purpose to both ensure the financial security of the Ikea brand and also charity. What is the problem here?? He is ensuring that no element of Ikea is at risk of going bust and owing creditors and the indeed the tax man any money? This is responsible business practice and should be applauded.
He has been able to maintain the image of IKEA being a Swedish company and himself being practicaly poor whilst managing to remove IKEA's rights to own its products and copyrites. In the meantime, what was implied in the programme is that he has amassed a major fortune through "tax free grants to architects" rather than salary. It would appear that the charitable and tax deductable "tax free grants to architects" are actually paid to Ingvar himself. but the TV programme stopped short of saying this so I am second-guessing this.
Would he had stayed in Sweden and paid in accordence with the rules if the taxes had been more humane? Possibly. Maybe it was Sweden's inhumane tax system that created this. Or maybe he would have done it anyway. It would be interesting to see the history of this prior to him moving to Denmak in 1973. Did he willingly pay all taxes until a "straw" broke him and he decided to never pay another penny (öre) in tax that he didn't have to.
The deal with "Preem" and the deal with "City Stormarknad" were simply ways of not paying tax. This type of deal should be outlawed.
But above all I feel he should have been more honest in the earlier interviews where he has lied about the set up. It was also ground-breaking TV for Sweden that has not had a history of this type of brilliant investigative tv reporting, more of the same please.
panorama.reply@bbc.co.uk
and link to this story. In theory the more requests they receive - the more likely they'll go with it.
Tax evasion = illegal
Presumably he is practising tax avoidance - there's no law anywhere that states that you have to pay more than is due.
Do you expect IKEA or any other company to pay income taxes to two countries on income that is earned in only one? If every country imposes income taxes in this manner, then no company would have any income left - in fact companies would owe more in taxes than they make.
His foundation is no mystery, but it begs a few questions for all parties. It is clear that Kamprad knows how to build a successful company; is it possible that the laws in Sweden make it impossible to accumulate the capital? As for the royalties, that income is properly sourced to where it is earned and should subject to tax by those jurisdictions.
I do not work for IKEA or any other company. I love Sweden and invest in Sweden. I pay taxes on the money I make doing this. I do not want to be an adversary , only an advocate for the best for all. Perhaps it may be good to look beyond the old stereotypes of business and government and find a vision of the future that simply seeks to achieve propsperity. If both the people and the businesses are propsperous, then neither can fail.
Does the Swedish state have some moral, legal or practical claim to the wealth that IKEA creates greater than IKEA's or its owners'? If so, what is it, and how is it fashioned?
All in all, this story makes me more favorably disposed towards IKEA and Ingvar Kamprad than I was before I read it.
The petty envy displayed by the journalists makes me slightly dyspepsic. We need more large companies to emerge in Sweden not fewer. But the lingering socialist mentality in this country is preventing new successes like Ikea.