Published: 1 Mar 11 10:49 CET | Print version
Updated: 1 Mar 11 14:42 CET
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/32330/20110301/
Sweden's economy easily beat expectations to post record growth in the fourth quarter while 2010 as a whole turned out to be the strongest year since 1970, the national statistics agency said Tuesday.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
The white-collar union Saco has lambasted Sweden's Employment Agency for its failure to help well-educated, foreign-born job seekers, whose unemployment rate is more than three times the average for people born in Sweden. READ () »
Fifteen percent of refugees in Sweden who enrolled in the new establishment system the past two years have gone on to find jobs, new figures show, leading some observers to worry that the low success rate will place a burden on the benefits system. READ () »
Sweden's central bank has appointed two new board members plucked from banking and academia to replace two outgoing members, one of whom was an outspoken critic of the Riksbank's commitment to the government's inflation goal. READ () »
Swedish telecom giant Ericsson has buckled under the pressure of European competition and will turn off the switch on a cable production plant in Sweden, leaving 350 employees without jobs. READ () »
While Sweden has a reputation for having one of the most painful tax bills in the world, a new report ranks Sweden 20th when comparing the tax burden on salaries when social security payments and salary brackets are taken into account. READ () »
Swedish telecom equipment maker Ericsson is suspected of having bribed ministers in Romania in connection with being awarded a contract for the country's emergency number and is now under investigation in the United States. READ () »
Sweden's largest business confederation has gone out guns blazing, criticizing politicians for not facing up to the challenges of "a lost year for Swedish exports" in 2012. READ () »
A Stockholm hospital saved from closure by private health care providers has been hailed by the Economist as one of modern's Sweden public-private success stories. READ () »
Swedish clothing giant H&M is looking into the possibility of sourcing its production to South America, Central America, and even Africa, chief executive Karl-Johan Persson said on Monday. READ () »
Gas pipeline firm Nord Stream will hold an information meeting on the Baltic island of Gotland on Monday to introduce a proposal to extend its controversial gas pipeline project. READ () »
| 23/05 | 301751 | Stockholm |
| 23/05 | Account Executive | Sverige |
| 23/05 | Account Executive/Office ManagerToolbox Marketing | Stockholm, STHM |
| 23/05 | Accounting Manager (m/f) | Stockholm |
| 23/05 | Application Owner AXNet Entertainment | Stockholm |
| 23/05 | Area sales ManagerGemalto | Stockholm, STHM |
| 23/05 | Baxter is recruiting an HR Adviser, temp position 6-12 monthsExperis Sverige | STHM |
| 23/05 | BI Solution Unit Lead | Sverige |
| 23/05 | Country Manager High Performance Door Solutions business area | Halmstad |
| 23/05 | E.ON are looking for a Regional Category Manager ElnätExperis Sverige | SKÅ |
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
Also has one of Europe's unemployment rates.
Just does not add up, someone is telling porky's.
Add in the factor that the Koronor is much stronger against other currencies and the growth rate looks even better. At least it's positive news.
Tell that to all the people without jobs.
"If that is really the case, which I doubt, then were are the jobs that level of growth would have created?"
Why should you doubt it, is it that you think we economists are morons?
If you look at the aftermath of every economic downturn, companies that survive firstly try to get increased productivity from the workforce that they have rather than employ more workers and secondly they replace human workers with technology. This means that for a period when the overall economy is climbing back to pre-crisis levels, they are not taking on any new workers.
The unemployment level only decreases when companies feel confident that the economy as a whole is stable again and they want to increase output. I would suggest that there will be no significant reduction in the level of unemployment for 2 to 3 years more. And that will only happen as long as there is general stability in the world markets, which at the moment does not look very likely.
If ever there was a question begging for an answer that they don't want to hear, then the above is in the top 10 of not to ask. Maybe, when economists are paid based on the accuracy of their predictions will we get more considered views, instead of the "herd of sheep" mentality....and remember, I didn't say all economists, but I would a sizeable number, especially the ones we see in the media.
However, your explanation regarding the lag in unemployment decreasing is true.
Once the recovery is truly on its way, I expect Governments around the globe to prosecute board members and others of bailed out financial institutions, auditors who mislead investors with their sign-offs of their company's accounts, corrupt real estate agents, corrupt politicians etc. I won't hold my breath!
my quote about morons was a reference to the statement that Nemesis made on another thread
quote
"As for economists. Those are the morons who created neo-liberalism which has destroyed entire sections of our societies and communities"
Just another one of her sweeping statements with no foundation.
They keep following the same mantra untill something goes wrong.
The cause of the financial crisis of a few years ago was that spending and consuming even if you don't have the money are good for the economy, just like population growth is good for the economy.
This all works fine if resources are available and if things like environment and ethics are not taken into account.
Now what the world needs is an economy based on limiting the wasting of resources (meaning that overconsumption should decrease), this does not fit with the current ideas about economy......also because there is a lot at stake.
I am sure that in 50 years a guy that designs a new model (in say 2020) which is later adapted by everybody that takes this into account wil get the nobel prize....but the sad thing is that someone could have figured that out in 1990 as well.
Of course, there is more than one way to earn your money, especially in America, where it appears if you have the determination etc, you have a better chance of achieving your goals than in some other countries. However, lots of the younger generation are being brainwashed into thinking that they can take their clothes off, or go on to Pop Idol and hey presto, you will be famous and successful. Very few achieve such success.
The biggest problem is the people at the very top earning huge amounts of money, but not actually achieving anything other than the ability to move money at the right time to make a profit. The likes of Bill Gates, Warren Buffett etc are the real heroes as they have earnt their wealth and are committing large amounts of their billions to charitable causes.
The whole political system in the US, and Europe etc is corrupt. US politicians being funded by large corporations to of course influence in their favour. The EU has not ad its accounts signed off for over 10 yrs, UK MPs ...even very rich ones, scrounging every last penny they can get out of the expenses........while they seem to have nlimited budgets while the real world have to ive within austerity measures. Nothing will change until the masses force a change of attitude......just as they have done in Africa and the Middle East. The difference is...most people are comfortable with their live and as long as they have a LCD TV, iPhone etc, then they can't be bothered ad ignore the real truth.
I totally agree provided that the eternal pessimists will stop exporting their pessimism!
Much talk about high unemployment here in Sweden, yet according to The Economist statistics, Sweden is below the average in the EU.
The time has long passed when one should look to someone else for providing employment. If you want a job, create one yourself and in the process create your own business.
If you don't think you have the skills, then why should an employer think you have?
If you don't think you have the skills, invest your time in training or learning them yourself.
Just out of interest, in how many scenarios are workers working overtime as opposed to allowing for more employees to be employed?