Published: 8 Mar 11 11:16 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/32464/20110308/
The housewife is becoming a threat to European growth, according to Birgitta Ohlsson, Sweden’s EU Minister.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A male Swedish nurse has donned a dress to protest the lack of shorts at a hospital in southern Sweden, saying he had to fight the small battles for gender equality in the workplace. READ () »
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is prepared to spend another five years inside the Ecuadorean embassy in London, but one Swedish lawyer said on Tuesday that the decision would not affect the Swedish case. READ () »
A public transport strike appears likely to kick off on Wednesday night after unions and state-transport heads failed to agree on workers' pay and conditions after three days of discussions. READ () »
Almost 2,000 puppies are smuggled illegally to Sweden every year, new statistics reveal, putting Sweden at risk of rabies while endangering the life and health of the trendy dogs. READ () »
A Swedish train driver has been criticized for using the loudspeaker to warn passengers about a beggar on board a Stockholm commuter train, and encouraging them to save their money and rip up the beggar's papers. READ () »
A travelling community has moved on after Stockholm University exchange students were forced out of their accommodation over safety concerns, with police claiming the situation is nothing new. READ () »
Stockholm City Police have decided not to issue Princess Madeleine a fine for driving in the bus lane a few days before her high-profile wedding, after confusion about her rights to use the lane. READ () »
The Swedish Justice Ombudsman will not look at a case in western Sweden where a man was paid damages for not being given an internship after he refused to shake a female boss's hand for religious reasons. READ () »
| 18/06 | Accounting SpecialistHays | Katowice, SLA |
| 18/06 | Agency General Manager ? Scandinavia | Göteborg |
| 18/06 | C++ Developer | Stockholm |
| 18/06 | Chemical Plant ManagerThe Valspar | Hendrik Ido Ambacht (NL) |
| 18/06 | Cloud ArchitectCapgemini Sverige AB | Malmö, SKÅ |
| 18/06 | Compliance Manager - NordicsAce European Group Ltd | Stockholm |
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
This weeks results..week 24/25 »
"A weekend full of surprises and LFC football. Results look like this: Div 5 Men won 4-2, K1 lost 5-0, K2 won 2-1, Vets lost 3-2, R1 lost 4-1. Korpen Ladies play Monday night and on the 26th the Div5 Men close the first half season with the last match before the summer kicks in. /LFC " READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
On an economic note: surely what the minister had said would only be true if we had full employment and a lack of workers. Given that there's already an oversupply of labour, an increase of 30% will simply drive wages down due to competition.
Really, what about just considering life and attention towards children more important than the bare money? Is a children seen just as a replacement for old men and women in the system, just a "spare part"?
To me it seems just ridiculous that we're trading our children's future with money. We're already parking them in the dagis and schools or in front of a TV because we don't have time for them, what's next?
unless there is non-government work, this utterly dumb comment from a minister, paid for by the tax payers and, yes is part of the gdp, belongs in a bar after midnight twhen everyone is to drunk to pay any attention.
the question is: where will the new non-governemnt jobs come from and how will they be created.
i thought i had seen a lot and heard a lot but this is a gold medal winner.
I find it amazing how little politicians know about economics. Kind of scary considering they are the ones making decisions that hugely affect the economy. It seems like this ignorance crosses borders 99% of the time.
My opinion is that we ought to devote more resources toward getting parents to stay home and raising kids into solid adults rather than getting more parents out of the homes. Many problem kids in school have two working parents; the kids feel rudderless and the parents are too tired to do anything about it.
In the end, Birgitta Ohlsson is a politician, aka not a real worker. And her husband is a PhD and lecturer of Law at Stockholm University, which is a much cushier and less taxing "job" than housewife. I mean the man has spent the majority of his life studying and talking about law. Sorry, but neither of these two clowns qualify as real workers in my book. Maybe this woman ought to find real jobs (with real wages) for herself and her husband and then she can speak up about the need to get mothers out of the home.
So I greatly appreciate my wife for her part in helping keeping the family clean, fed and happy to be together.
The social planners are apoplectic over this situation for several reasons: First, and foremost, in the socialist utopian state everyone will find fulfillment through work rather than through the mundane task of raising children. Social planners cannot begin to understand that some people might find great joy in staying at home.(In any case, shouldn't it be the choice of the individual rather than the state?) And, of course, a core truth of the modern socialist world is that men and women are equivalent, interchangeable worker units. What happens to modern socialism if women elect to stay at home, and as a result more men are in the work place?
The obvious solution to the problem is to make families poorer. That can be accomplished easily by increasing taxes, a favorite socialist trick. With less money, women will be forced to return to the workplace, and socialists everywhere will be able to breathe a sigh of relief.
They either use their degrees, or they do not, which in the latter case begs the question of why did they pursue formal and advanced degrees?
This is a two-edged sword, in that when women stay at home to raise their children they supposedly cause the GDP to drop; yet conversely when they work and they don't have children and the population drops to unacceptable the GDP drops.
Who caused this state of afrairs, and why?
What are the majority of educated people going to do, not use their educations? What are the over half of the PhDs going to do, not use their advanced post-graduate degrees?
Who is going to have the children that are needed to sustain the population of native Swedes in Sweden?
Whether the minister is a politician and her husband is a Professor teaching law is immaterial and irrelevant. She has to say something to fulfill her duties, whether real or contrived. She really doesn't matter.
What matters is the situation of Swedish women, and the future of Sweden.
Women who choose to stay at home and to have and raise children are admirable people. Women who choose to work and still have children and to raise them until the children are in school, are equally admirable.
Those who work and have children and ship them off to day cares have misplaced priorities. Children need their parents.
Children do not need the more and better that comes with money.
Materialism has no comparison to a happy home with happy children who are tended to by contented mothers.
Let the government take care of the GDP.
Nobody (and not Birgitta Ohlsson for sure) says that women need to be forced to work. The point is that many women stay at home not for their free choice, that I fully respect, but just because they have no other option given the lack of assistance for children and old people.
We should also remember that we are talking about Europe, not Sweden only. In many countries, the level of assistance given to family is much lower than in the Nordics.
@StockholmSam: and what are the real jobs? not politicians, not university lecturers... so what? just blue collars? or only workers in the private sectors? maybe just you? please explain because I do not see anything wrong in being a politician or a lecture as far as professions are done seriously and with commitment.
I do not know if you are a husband, wife, mother or father. Let me ask you this question:
If you were a parent, who would you want to raise your children? An educated mother with a PhD, or an overwhelmed person in daycare taking care of 20(or is it 30?) children? I would prefer the mother with the PhD any, and every, day of the week.
I think the answer is obvious to everyone but the social planners. The great socialist experiment has its limitations and weaknesses. The concept that the State is the omnipresent, perfect parent is flawed. My bet is that women are choosing to stay at home, difficult as it may be for you to accept.
The socialist planners have a problem with women staying at home and rasing their kids. This means that their children are not eligible for state indoctrination in their early years of life.
What the social planners fail to realize, is that having children and taking time off to raise them, is a long term investment which usually pays of in the long run.
What the western countries need, is lots of healthy and well raised kids.
Not single women investing all their time and reproductive ability on the labor market. This will just spell disaster in the long run.
Here's a newsflash for Birgitta: Old women outnumber old men, so it would be a Jurassic Park filled mostly by old women.
You might wonder why she didn't say that.
You old fashioned men, come back when you actually have a point and when your brains have been improved by education.
Working parents should also be applauded.
Raising kids is great but not always easy. Child tax credit should be increased.
Many people can't find jobs here anyways regardless of their education, so why shouldn't mom or dad stay home? If there's a budget and some common sense in place, I would think most couples would be able to afford to have a parent stay home here. You get a child allowance, you don't have to worry about health insurance and outside of major cities housing doesn't cost much in Sweden. As long as people didn't expect the newest and best of everything it shouldn't be much problem. Many stay at home moms / dads have little businesses on the side and often there's less stress at home. It's not all bad.
Just as a last point, I can't stand when so called women's groups give stay at home moms hell. Isn't the whole point of women's right is that a woman should be able to choose what she wants to do with her life without facing judgement?
As long as she (or he) makes the choice to stay home and take care of the children and household it should be okay and respected. It doesn't have to mean that they're sacrificing their career or doing less with their lives. Many careers offer flexible hours and part-time work and many women (and men) start working full-time or almost full-time again after their children enter school.
What kind of freedom do women have, when society is just substituting one set of expectations for another? Let a woman stay home if she wants, work if she wants, and have the freedom to decide what's best for her child--and let the socio-economic chips fall where they may.