A far-right that vaunts anti-immigration, Islamophobia and the welfare state has taken hold in Nordic countries, playing on the fears of societies that are less and less blond and blue eyed, AFP's Marc Preel writes.
While his acts are beyond conventional politics, self-confessed Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring
Breivik, a man proud of his Viking roots, has been influenced by the far-right ideology that has risen over the last 15 years.
Behring Breivik told Monday's closed-door court hearing that he wanted his attacks that killed 76 to send a strong signal to the left-wing Norwegian government to stop "the deconstruction of Nordic culture and the mass importing of Muslims."
"Breivik is of course alone in his extremism, in his crimes," the head of Oslo's anti-racism centre Kari Helene Partapuoli told AFP.
"But it's also interesting to see that he evolved in a certain socio-political context, that this shooting spree is not a coincidence. He hasn't come from a vacuum."
The populist right-wing Norwegian Progress Party "has been very talented at steering the public debate" including by stigmatising Muslims and foreigners, she says.
There were almost no non-Europeans communities in Nordic countries until the 1970s and 80s, but since then they have become home to hundreds of thousands who fled conflict zones such as the former Yugoslavia, Somalia or Kurdistan.
Sweden has for instance welcomed more refugees from Iraq after the 2003 US-led invasion than all the big European nations combined, according to the Swedish Migration Authority.
In Oslo, the most common first name given to babies in 2010 was Mohammed.
The proportion of people born abroad is now over 10 percent in Sweden and Norway and around eight percent in Denmark. In Oslo that rises to 27 percent
and over 80 percent in certain Swedish suburbs, according to official estimates.
Having started in Denmark at the end of the 1990s, the rise of the populist and anti-immigration right seemed to be unstoppable.
"But the feeling of xenophobia didn't increase, on the contrary it sometimes went down, it's more like a crafty political use has been made of it," said Ulf Bjereld, political scientist at Sweden's Gothenburg University.
The Norwegian Progress Party, of which Behring Breivik was a member for several years until he left because he found it too moderate, has become the second biggest party with 23 percent of the vote in the last elections.
The party's leader Siv Jensen has made "rampant Islamisation" one of her favourite bugbears.
In Denmark, a minority liberal-conservative government has since 2001 needed the support in parliament of the Danish People's Party, giving the right-wing group an ideal launchpad for its ideas.
The Swedish Democrats party (slogan: "Keep Sweden Swedish") got into parliament in September, causing a political earthquake that was repeated seven months later in Finland when the "True Finns" got 19 percent of the vote.
The Nordic far-right is now so entrenched in the political establishment that experts say the "extreme" label is no longer suitable.
"They're established, they're now part of the mainstream," Anders Hellström, a Swedish specialist in nationalist and populist movements, told AFP recently.
However, the radical fringe of the extreme right is "scattered, without real structure," said French Scandinavia expert Cyril Coulet.
"In Norway, there are people linked to social networks, small groups of skinheads who carry out attacks on foreigners, like elsewhere in Scandinavia," he said.A far-right that vaunts anti-immigration, Islamophobia and the welfare state has taken hold in Nordic countries, playing on the fears of societies that are less and less blond and blue eyed, AFP's Marc Preel writes.
While his acts are beyond conventional politics, self-confessed Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik, a man proud of his Viking roots, has been influenced by the far-right ideology that has risen over the last 15 years.
Behring Breivik told Monday's closed-door court hearing that he wanted his attacks that killed 76 to send a strong signal to the left-wing Norwegian government to stop "the deconstruction of Nordic culture and the mass importing of Muslims."
"Breivik is of course alone in his extremism, in his crimes," the head of Oslo's anti-racism centre Kari Helene Partapuoli told AFP.
"But it's also interesting to see that he evolved in a certain socio-political context, that this shooting spree is not a coincidence. He hasn't come from a vacuum."
The populist right-wing Norwegian Progress Party "has been very talented at steering the public debate" including by stigmatising Muslims and foreigners, she says.
There were almost no non-Europeans communities in Nordic countries until the 1970s and 80s, but since then they have become home to hundreds of thousands who fled conflict zones such as the former Yugoslavia, Somalia or Kurdistan.
Sweden has for instance welcomed more refugees from Iraq after the 2003 US-led invasion than all the big European nations combined, according to the Swedish Migration Authority.
In Oslo, the most common first name given to babies in 2010 was Mohammed.
The proportion of people born abroad is now over 10 percent in Sweden and Norway and around eight percent in Denmark. In Oslo that rises to 27 percent
and over 80 percent in certain Swedish suburbs, according to official estimates.
Having started in Denmark at the end of the 1990s, the rise of the populist and anti-immigration right seemed to be unstoppable.
"But the feeling of xenophobia didn't increase, on the contrary it sometimes went down, it's more like a crafty political use has been made of it," said Ulf Bjereld, political scientist at Sweden's Gothenburg University.
The Norwegian Progress Party, of which Behring Breivik was a member for several years until he left because he found it too moderate, has become the second biggest party with 23 percent of the vote in the last elections.
The party's leader Siv Jensen has made "rampant Islamisation" one of her favourite bugbears.
In Denmark, a minority liberal-conservative government has since 2001 needed the support in parliament of the Danish People's Party, giving the right-wing group an ideal launchpad for its ideas.
The Swedish Democrats party (slogan: "Keep Sweden Swedish") got into parliament in September, causing a political earthquake that was repeated seven months later in Finland when the "True Finns" got 19 percent of the vote.
The Nordic far-right is now so entrenched in the political establishment that experts say the "extreme" label is no longer suitable.
"They're established, they're now part of the mainstream," Anders Hellström, a Swedish specialist in nationalist and populist movements, told AFP recently.
However, the radical fringe of the extreme right is "scattered, without real structure," said French Scandinavia expert Cyril Coulet.
"In Norway, there are people linked to social networks, small groups of skinheads who carry out attacks on foreigners, like elsewhere in Scandinavia," he said.
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
I think you will find that Siv Jensen is a woman!
Uppsala university used to have a Human Eugenics department that was fully funded by the government until 1976.
Then people wonder were the racism came from???????????
great point Nemeisis the political party is not relevant either, both left and right have the same agenda to shaft the world!
you can vote for two flavours of rapists anywhere in the world!
Excellent points! Fully agree on both of them, this sort of stuff is the source of what you see being acted out at the mment.
Let me put it another way... How many SD voters are National Socialists when you scrap away the sugar coating?
Nemasis made a good point... The Social Democrats were in power for a long period from 1917 all the way up to the 90s, it was them that allowed sterilisation in the name of keeping the nordic race pure. Who put those people in power?
I belive its been shown that a large number of Sweden Democrat voters are unsatified Social Democat voters who jump ship for a more nationalist line.
So lets get something clear, too all the Social Democrats that preach "alla är lika", but deep down believe their swedish culture and values are better than everyone elses...
Your really National Socialists, eg a NAZIs and no better than the psycho they are now locking up.
I understand that you are angry and we have every right to be so, but 2 wrongs do not make a right.
The only way we will defeat the psychos is with reason, and the LAW.
Now this guy will probably spend the rest of his life in prison as he is a danger to society.
Social Hypocrisy, your facts are wrong about S governing in Sweden for that long until the 90's.
This guy in Norway is sick in the head. He was probably sick before he espoused himself to skinhead beliefs.
Posts on here that tie mainstream peace-loving Christians to skinheads are woefully ignorant. People should be more careful about lumping various groups in with one another. First, it is unfair and inaccurate, and second, it is dangerous to hate monger in that manner. It is irreponsible and ignorant to tie evangelical/fundamentalist Christians to hate groups like Islamic jihadists or radical skinheads. You can find anecdotal cases of individuals within any group to use as examples to smear that group, but that is neither honest nor accurate for the group as a whole.
There are only 164,000 Muslims living in Norway (of all nationalities), about 3.4% of the population, so talk of an Islamization of Norway is BS.
The two largest immigrant groups in Norway are Poles and the Swedes, so using the "born-abroad " statistic is misleading. My oldest son is half British and half Swedish, was born on Gotland, yet he is also counted in the immigrant statistics in Sweden.
The name Mohammed was also the most common name in the UK for new-born babies in 2010, as there are several spelling variants that are counted seperately. What does that prove?...only that Muslims have a much narrower range of names to choose from. Nearly every second Muslim male is given Mohammed as either a first or second name.
Every single mass murderer, mass rapist and serial killer in Swedish and Norwegian history has had a Scandinavian heritage, either by ethnicity, birth or upbringing. There is not a single Muslim among them.
It's a myth to claim that "The biggest threat to the security of EU citizens is Muslim terrorism". In the EU's Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (2010), it states that in 2009 there were "294 failed, foiled, or successfully executed attacks" in six European countries. This was down almost one-third from the total in 2008 and down by almost one-half from the total in 2007. How many of these attacks were carried out by Muslims? Just one.
Above all, the recent statement on the SD website namely..."Det har under dagen uppmärksammats att en lokal företrädare för partiet har skrivit om massmorden i Norge på sin blogg. Av texten kan det tolkas som att det är massinvandringspolitiken och skapandet av det mångkulturella samhället som ligger bakom att massmorden kunnat ske. SD delar inte den analysen och tar kraftfullt avstånd från alla försök att använda massmorden i den politiska debatten."
...is a lie. Erik Hellsborn was merely articulating what the vast majority of these xenophobes and bigots actually think.
No debate on immigration policy with child killers, mass murderers or their sympathizers!!!
Kissing 70+ kids is an 'act beyond conventional politics' now is it ? are you kidding me?
not terrorism? Murder? that's just beyond unacceptable!
would such softened language be used if he was named Mohammed? I think not
There are some historical differences between western European countries; as it has mentioned, non-European communities didn't exist in Nordic countries until 70s and 80s, and the fact is that Nordic countries didn't have direct connection with developing countries (colonialism).
You see immigration in Europe has a kind of structure, mostly base on the immigration of the people from the previous colonies of the west Europe to the main European countries, Britain, France, and most of Western Europe is in this category. There are cultural, linguistic, economical connections between the people from previous colonies and the main countries, even their racism, discrimination and hate of each others has a special historical character. Then there is another category like Germany and German speaking countries, where have a long time experience of importing non-European as guest-worker after WWII (like Turks). Scandinavian countries also mostly used guest-workers with some differences. For example in the case of Sweden, the workers mostly were from Europe; however, in Norway, the Pakistanis have lived and worked for much longer time.
In general, Scandinavian societies have been much less (actually hardly) of a mix society, and to speak about tolerance in such societies may not be correct. Tolerance can be evaluated in a mixed society, not a homogenous one. Now that many Scandinavian countries are no longer homogenous, you can evaluate tolerance and you see that Scandinavian actually don't have tolerance to non-European communities. There are many ways to explain the reason, but no place to write it in here.
MarshaLynn, you are wrong. The Nazis sent socialists and communists to the concentration camps and killed loads. The German socialists who were told to leave Spain after having fought for the democratically elected government in the Spanish Civil War had only death to come back to as they were targetted directly by the Nazis.
Yes it is true that the Nazis murded socialist and communistsin concentration camps,they killed also more than 20 millions of Russians and other huge number innocent civilians all over Europe, but they killed 6 millions Jews,the Jews had no choise but to die they could not say we are not communists , they could not say we want to convert because it did not helped them , the Jews were considered the Evil of the world and the only solution for them was the final solution: babies,children old person ,every one who was a Jew was destinated to be killed,by the way the Jipsies had the same sort of the Jews the Nazies killed about 3 millions Jipsies
Sorry ,I maybe did not get it well from your answer to Marshalynn,any way you are right about the hatness of the Nazies to the left parties and communists.
You only have to glance at these forums to see where the racism stems from. If moderate "normal" people can spout such incendiary "go home" rubbish, then what do you think the white supremacists are thinking???
Animals like him love to get themselves noticed or "famous" Don't give that sick F. the satisfaction.
Maybe Nordic counties have never had to deal with people from other cultures?
TL remarks that there were almost no non-europeans in Nordic countries before the 70s . Is it possible to tolerate something that you are not exposed to ?
Just because Muhammed is the most used name in Oslo does not prove tolerance ; it proves that muslims still prefer original muslim/ arabic names for their kids while other call theirs anything . The same is the case in USA , Canada and UK .
While a Pakistan muslim who lives in UK names his son Muhamed and his daughter Amina , Beckam will name his , Brooklyn , or Rockie , instead of John or Mary .
I live in Sweden and I am Swedish. Currently I live in Stockholm. I was born in the decade when S lost the elections, no, not in the 90's by the way.
your soul belong to devil
The following is what happened during the WWII:
1932 After a landslide victory Per Albin Hansson forms a government.During the major reforms are introduced, including unemployment benefits, improved retirement pensions, holidays, dental care, public works to combat unemployment.
1939 The second World War, broad national government. The Social Democrats prepare a peace programme of their own aimed at full employment, just redistribution and improved standard of living.
1946 Per Albin Hansson dies and is succeeded by Tage Erlander as Prime Minister and party leader.
This is what happened after 1976;
1976 The Social Democrats lose the election after 44 years of continuous government and a non-socialist coalition is formed, led by Torbjörn Fälldin from the Center party. During the following six years the coalition collapsed no fewer than three times.
1980 The referendum on nuclear power. The alternative of a long-term phasing out of the industry proposed by Social Democrats and Liberals wins a simple majority of the votes.
1982 Social Democrats win the election, and Olof Palme forms the new government.
The struggle with economic crisis and unemployment is the most important task for the government. Collective wage earners' investment funds are introduced after a hard political struggle, only to be dismantled in 1991.
In 1991 The Social Democrats lose the election and a government consisting of four nonsocialist parties is formed, led by Carl Bildt from the Moderate party.
1994 The Social Democrats win the election. More jobs and reconstruction of government finances are given the highest priority.
And during the war, Streja, but not Estrella,
1939 The second World War, broad national government. The Social Democrats prepare a peace programme of their own aimed at full employment, just redistribution and improved standard of living.
1946 Per Albin Hansson dies and is succeeded by Tage Erlander as Prime Minister and party leader.
Got it? or shall I give you a lecture one more time. You choose.
You were wrong about S being in power up until 1990. By the way, the elections were in 1991.
MY party? I am not a member of S.
You do not even know how to read correctly, so here I go again:
In 1991 The Social Democrats lose the election and a government consisting of four nonsocialist parties is formed, led by Carl Bildt from the Moderate party.
The above paragraph, Mrs. Ninky, is quite clear. The S where in power up until 1990. It is a well known fact that the first year of a government and the last one, do not count. Everybody is preparing what to do.
And, who cares about your party? For my part, you can be a follower of Gudrun Shyman or of Gloria Steinem. It is the same. Personally, with intellects such as yours, I would not recommend you to any of the existing political parties; no even to the Swedish Democrats.
The last year doesn't count? LOL! Nice try.
I don't need you to recommend me anywhere.
That would not have left much time for any government before 1994 in Sweden. I'll let you figure it out yourself.
I repeat-
Why does the news continue to plaster this sick meglamaniacs picture? That is what he just Loves. Black out his smug face and do not use his name and just refer to him as that sick, twisted son of a B. who ruthlessly murdered innocent citizens.
Animals like him love to get themselves noticed or "famous" Don't give that sick F. the satisfaction.
demonising and condenming the truthful ,patriotic stand taken by Jimmy Akesson
and his Sweden Democrat.Why must he be demonised and condenmed.?Why.?
echo you!...is that what you asking?
right?
Welcome to the club. TL is very funny. They have certain words in their server that are taboo, but if you write bs, f... or whatever or you invent a word that sounds like the f. word you want to write. TL is helpless.
But, TL proves one more time what freedom of speech means in Sweden. Everything has to be politally correct, otherwise, you are kaput.
You know what there just might be something in that !!!
LOL, A "sionist" movement?
Who on the hell except muslims are not anti-jihadist?
I don't know what does anti -Jihad movment mean.
The Zionistic movment was established in 1889 in the first Zionistic organisation in Basel by a joung Austrian Jewish lawyer called:Theodor Herzl,the goal was the building of a Jewish state in Palestine and is proceeded by Balfur Declaration ,purching aavaible land which were bought from their owner and ending by the UN vote from 29/11/47 on the establishment of Israel .
We handel the Jihad and Hamas and Hizbala terrorists trough agents of the Mossad abroad and our security forces inland,
we certainly do not need or use crazy people like the neo nazi Breivik
Religion is not a bad thing,
using the God's name to do evil things to other people -believers or not believers and it is not important their faith-is very very bad and not acceptable!
I am against any use of the religion -Muslem ,Christian or Jewish to kill or to hit other people-who is doing it is a criminal for me and must finish in jail.
On the same time a person who believe in God and does not bother other people has to be respected and not bothered by the others.
This way of thinking is called tollerance
Breivik is a TERRORIST as well as his ideas and organizations and parties he represents! He is Maison- Satanist who made a few plastic surgeries to look less Jewish and more European.
Now he became a celebrity a hero for his fans and got plenty of publicity and time to write his new books to promote his Islamophobic ideas.
Political Correctness is the failure to speak or recognize the obvious or to act thereon because someone may become uncomfortable or have his feelings hurt or, especially to a politician, he may lose a vote. Of course PC is cowardice or deceit.
"keep your friends close but keep your enemies even closer" as the old saying goes.
Yes. PC is also a powerful form of censorship, It is a method used by social tyrants and politicians to control and dictate public speech and thought Some left-wingers are so dumb that they think PC a positive term.
See"Newspeak" (George Orwell's 1984 novel about totalitarian speech)
Or see // ourcivilisation dot com slash pc.htm
The most famous criminal who wrote and spoke about how Jews look like was Adolph Hitler,
It looks like that you share with him some common ideas about Jews.
i know politicians look after their own rear ends to the highest degree but they should, and only they, take full responsibility for what happens, not blame it on someone and exclaim their deep regret.
Of course, this comparison implies that politically, the Nordic countries have evolved more slowly than the U.S. This implication is sound. While America undergoes rapid cycles of ascendant socialism (FDR, Truman, LBJ, Carter, Obama) offset by ascendant classical liberalism (Reagan, Gingrich, the Tea Party) and centrism (Eisenhauer, JFK, Nixon, Ford, Clinton, Bush Senior & Junior), the Social Democrats and their left wing allies have ruled Sweden for the majority of the past 80 years.
Socialism is Sweden's backbone but multiculturalism is not. Hence, the Nordic far-right is a reaction to multiculturalism and the EU and the threats they pose to the Nordic welfare state and the Nordic way of life. In contrast, America's far-right opposes socialism itself, which has been realized in the rapid expansion and centralization of political power in the federal government at the expense of the 50 states, the thousands of local governments, and every individual citizen.
In view of the foregoing facts, those who equate the Nordic far-right with the American far-right or the Tea Party movement display their pathetic ignorance and ill-will.