Published: 15 Aug 11 09:12 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/35546/20110815/
Ahmed Agiza, who was flown out of Sweden to Egypt by the CIA in 2001 where he was imprisoned until last week, has claimed that Sweden needs to take responsibility for what happened to him.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Parents and volunteers have been patrolling the streets of Stockholm's immigrant-heavy suburbs to help quell riots that have raged for almost a week, serving as a successful deterrent to troublemakers and winning praise from police. READ () »
Police are hunting a 40-year-old man after a woman was found dead in a suburb of Stockholm on Saturday. READ () »
Two cars collided on a road between Trollhättan and Vänersborg in western Sweden on Friday afternoon due to an elk having chosen the unusual spot to give birth to a calf. READ () »
Express delivery firm DHL has been criticised for having handed over a load of alcohol ordered from Germany to a 10-year-old boy in southern Sweden who was home alone at the time. READ () »
A sixth straight night of unrest blighted several Stockholm suburbs on Friday night, spreading briefly to the city of Örebro, 160 kilometres to the west. READ () »
With international media swooping on the Stockholm riots from every angle, The Local's Oliver Gee explains why Stockholm is not burning, and how the story has been blown out of proportion. READ () »
After five nights of rioting throughout the outskirts of Stockholm, many in Sweden and elsewhere are trying to make sense of it all. The Local spoke to a mix of commentators and local politicians to get their views. READ () »
As white-collar union Saco slammed Sweden for not helping well-educated foreigners into the labour market, The Local spoke to researcher Josefin Edström about the disconnect between foreign professionals and Swedish employers. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
"A week full to the brim with LFC football…. Div 5 LFC match against Nåjdens FK has been moved. This is due to the Svenska Cupen final: 26 May, 17.00 kick off, Nationalarenan Friends Arena, Solna. Next match is on Tuesday (see below). ………………………………………………………… Friday: Div5 Ladies: Rotebro IS FF – Långholmen FC (Skinnaråsens IP) KO: 16.15 ………………………………………………………… Saturday: Vets: Långholmen FC – IFK..." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
" he not be asked about the circumstances surrounding his 2001 forced deportation." This seems a bit fishy. If someone has nothing to hide, they have no reason not to speak freely. I was very much on his side till I read this,
Seems like he thinks the sympathisers may not be so sympathetic if they hear the whole story. My mother use to say " Be careful how you choose your friends. You are judged by the company you keep." Maybe he should have picked his friends more wisely, but, if he wants the world to hear his story, he should have the guts to tell them the WHOLE story and not just pick the cherries out of the cake, that paint him with a halo.
He has been denied residency in Sweden.
So, how long had he been in Sweden prior to he deportation to Egypt?
Why must Swedish Taxpayers pay for the behaviour of his own,Egyptian, government?
Why does he not also bring his case against Mubarrak who is on trial at this time?
Note That he has not once denied his terror connection
Whatever the pretext or whatever the information is, one can never hold and torture someone on the pretext of national and international security. This is the very basics of western civilizations, if we let this freedom go away today, tomorrow it will hurt us and we will basically create draconian states.
@Keith#5083 and @tgolan, have you ever thought that the compensation from Swedish state may have put the conditions on paper that he would not be allowed to talk about the circumstances when he was arrested in 2011.
So you mean he accepted "hush money"? If so, then what is he shouting about now?
I also think that to suggest that democratic countries can enforce silence on foreign nationals when they are elsewhere in the world is a little too 'iranian' for me to agree.
Three million kronor isn't enough. There should be a public enquiry, and the people responsible for the decision to hand him over to the US should explain themselves, and face appropriate punishment and humiliation for their cowardice. A public apology from the politicians who approved the decision ten years ago on behalf of themselves, and one from the current administration, on behalf of Sweden might be appropriate too.
The rule of law in a supposedly civilized country broke down under a little bit of pressure from a foreign power. No wonder Julian Assange is a little worried about his safety if this is what happens in Sweden.
But of course, we MUST get them all to come to Sweden and live off the Swedish taxpayers for the rest of their lives while continuing preaching hatred and supporting terrorism.
" I am not a threat -- I am not a terrorist " he says.
Aren`t they all innocent ?
If he is the nice man he claims to be , let him prove it by thanking the country that has taken care of his wife and 6 children while he was away . He can do that by taking his family home to Egypt where he is free today.
Exactly. There has to be something to it and the fact he won't discuss it makes it even more suspect. But just give him money like they did with the drug dealer in Stockholm who was mugged and his illegial street drugs stolen. Then he was reímbursed by the Swedish taxpayers(via the Swedish government) for the going street rate value of the drugs. (it happened!)
Not saying this man is a terrorist, but there has to be SOME reason.... and his silence on the matter speaks volumes. If he was innocent, there is no reason not to talk about it. ´If he isn't protecting himslf, he is protecting his buddies.
Terrorism, kidnapping, false imprisonment and torture are serious crimes. Such criminals must be prosecuted, convicted and punished. Mr Agiza was convicted of terrorism in an Egyptian military court. As the regime that convicted him has been overthrown, partly for chronic corruption in its legal system, and "evidence" used against him was extracted under horrible torture, and the US has asked for Mr Agiza to be released, I think we can assume the conviction was unsafe, and Mr Agiza is not, and never was, a terrorist. If any of the knowledgeable posters here have evidence that Mr Agiza was/is in fact a terrorist, they must inform the authorities immediately so a new prosecution can be bought. Withholding evidence in these matters is a very serious crime. If they do not, I think it might be best for them if they refrain from further comment. Sweden does have a libel law, and these posters are not necessarily protected by non de plumes. Sleep well jacquelinee, tgolan, kublai and jes, I am sure Mr Agiza won't sue you for every crown you have. Almost!
Now we turn to kidnapping, false imprisonment and torture. These terrible crimes against Mr Agiza have yet to be investigated and prosecuted, but it seems the Swedish and US governments have been caught red handed, Metaphorically and literally; Mr Agiza certainly bled profusely during his torture. Perhaps that is why the Swedish government have slipped him three million Crowns and hope he will disappear - in the nicest possible way - not the way they made him disappear ten years ago.
1. It was not the Swedish government that 'tortured', convicted and imprisoned him.
2. Despite the current fashion to disbelieve anything our ELECTED governments tell us, it is not unreasonable for the average citizen to feel that there must have been some indications/evidence from the CIA - adequate to satisfy a Swedish Government- that this man was or could possibly be involved in some form of terrorist activity.
3. The application of 'western standards' of juris prudence seem to be open to regular abuse from persons unaccustomed to these standards in their own country.
He is now a free man. As someone has pointed out his family has been cared for here in Sweden (despite him being convicted, whether rightly or wrongly is irrelevant to this point). He has already received a sum of compensation presumably for an error in the technical handling of his 'deportation'. He is not, for whatever reason unknown to the general public, considered a suitable candidate for residency in Sweden.
So I have two questions remaining - who among the posters here would also be highly critical of an elected government in this democracy had a man who might be or could be considered to be a potential risk, been overlooked and had detonated a bomb in Stockholm killing 50 people?
At what point do we expect our 'officials' to be so psychically gifted as to be able to see every eventuality that may arise?
Now listen carefully. It was illegal for Sweden to detain a man without due cause, and then to deliver him up to a foreign power to be smuggled out of the country on a black flight. All the events that followed; his torture, his fake trial, his imprisonment, his permanent disabilities etc, are down to Sweden. Sweden owes him bigtime!
If, as many here seem to believe, this man is a terrorist, he must be arrested and properly tried. If, he has committed crimes in another country, that country must apply to Sweden for him to be extradited.
That, my redneck trolls, is how the rule of law works in a civilised country. Now off to North Korea with the lot of you. You will all be very happy there, I'm sure. Bring toilet paper and ten years supply of food.
okay , three million is a lot of money ; but is it more important for Agiza to get someone from CIA or SAPO to say : " Agiza is not a terrorist ... Agiza was wrongly deported --- Agiza is the nicest , most innocent man that has ever spent 10 years in an Egyptian jail..." ?
I could almost totally agree with you...except for that little phrase "It was illegal for Sweden to detain a man without due cause".
Without that 'due cause' phrase your logic seems indisputable, though I am not so sure that him being sent back to his own country could be 'blamed' on Sweden.
Is it also illegal for Sweden to refuse residence to a person 'without due cause'? Does anyone, everyone have an automatic right to reside in Sweden? If it is so illegal, then perhaps he would be willing to fight the residency refusal by presenting adequate evidence to dispute the grounds for the refusal.
The alleged torture and wrongful imprisonment did not occur in a Swedish jail. His claims should be more rightly directed at the Egyptian government.But,probably, no such right of redress exists there, so we'll blame Sweden - who clearly believed there was 'due cause' for his original detention but will probably pay.up if enough of a fuss is made!
The rule of the enforcement of law exists were there is 'due cause' in a civilised country. I am sorry if this man feels that the standards for applying the term 'due cause' are not as he would wish.
As I understand it there was a 'legal process´' in Egypt before this man was sentenced and imprisoned. The fact that the 'Egyptian legal process' may leave a lot to be desired compared with western standards is a whole other discussion.
Whilst I am in agreement that western legal standards were 'compromised' by the exceptional circumstances arising from terrorist activities I am still unable to avoid that phrase 'without due cause'.
Perhaps Ayman al-Zawahiri, who seems expert at conjuring up so called 'causes' could enlighten me.