Published: 14 May 12 10:19 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/40818/20120514/
One of the founders of Swedish file share site The Pirate Bay is turning to the European Court of Human Rights in the hopes of having his guilty verdict overturned, claiming his conviction violates his freedom of speech.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Gas pipeline firm Nord Stream will hold an information meeting on the Baltic island of Gotland on Monday to introduce a proposal to extend its controversial gas pipeline project. READ () »
The Swedish royal family gathered in the Royal Chapel in Stockholm on Sunday for the publication of the banns of marriage ahead of the wedding of Princess Madeleine and her fiancé Christopher O'Neill. READ () »
Sweden's Green Party is on the rise while support for the Christian Democrats is at the lowest in nearly a decade, according to the latest voter poll. READ () »
A man was detained Sunday morning on suspicion of involvement in a violent jewellery store heist which left three people with gunshot wounds. READ () »
A fire that started on Friday afternoon in a peat bog in southern Sweden has closed down highway traffic and could take weeks to put out, according to local rescue services. READ () »
Emmelie De Forest of Denmark takes over from Sweden's Loreen as the Eurovision Song Contest champion, capping a spectacle that kept Malmö and the rest of Europe cheering on Saturday night. READ () »
The 2013 Eurovision Song Contest Final is live in Malmö, southern Sweden. The Local brings you all the latest news, reactions, and details surrounding Europe's biggest pop music spectacle. READ () »
Sweden will be playing for gold in the ice hockey World Championships after dispatching longstanding rivals and co-hosts Finland with a 3-0 win on Saturday. READ () »
| 18/05 | C++ Developer | Stockholm |
| 18/05 | LCI CoordinatorAker Advantage | Bærum/Tranby |
| 18/05 | Lead Product Designer | Stockholm |
| 18/05 | Lead Product Designer - Artist Experience | Stockholm |
| 18/05 | Lead Product Designer - Mobile | Stockholm |
| 18/05 | Senior Alliance Manager -Wireless Telco | Solna |
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Be British, be sincere and be bold »
"Sweden is a veritable smorgåsbord for UK business. I see our work as a bit like a kind of dragon’s den for both for larger and smaller British companies. It is about matching the UK companies, not with cash, but with Swedish market opportunities." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
But this whole case does yet again put the swedish judicial system into question, regards to how they have handled this case and the sentences they have passed.
Technology has clearly surpassed a multi million kronor industry.
And led to judgements that put the swedish legal system into shame, in an attempt to appease a market that has clearly failed to address the changing times of technology.
This idea of using a legal system to set a precedence at the cost of liberty and value of such key institutions in a democracy within the EU in an attempt to help a market that has dragged its heals over such changes is a farce.
Maybe we should charge those who reported such or brought the case to court as an accessory to the crime for simply mentioning it.
I really hope the EU do step in an overturn this.
Shame on you Sweden.
Any pretense that the Pirate Bay founders were setting up their sharing facility to only share material that could be distributed with the permission of the copyright holders is a colossal farce. The Pirate Bay founders knew full well what crimes they were enabling, and simply did not care. Now that they have been held to account, they are unwilling to face the consequences.
The only aspect of the judgement against them that I disagree with is the size of the financial penalty, unless they made that sort of sum in advertising on their site, or through some sort of revenue stream. In that case, pay up. If not, then it is an insult to all the murder victims of Sweden, when the families or orphans only receive 50,000 to 200,000 SEK in compensation from the murderer, while those guilty of theft are handed a 30 million SEK fine. In this regard, shame on you Sweden. Otherwise, Sweden has no reason to be ashamed here.
Should CNN or any other news agency held in the same account for reporting or referring to crimes and profiting from such through advertising?
If CNN is merely reporting a crime, rather than committing a crime, then CNN should not find itself in legal trouble.
But if CNN enables a crime, by telling its viewers that it has set up a website to enable people to distribute copyrighted material without the explicit permission of the copyright holders, then CNN is guilty of a crime, in the same way that the driver of the getaway car after a robbery is an accessory to the crime, even if he made no money himself.
It is prudent of all business owners to attempt to keep up with technology to prevent theft, but there is a still greater civic responsibility is on individuals not to commit theft in the first place. The consumer has the option not to buy something if he/she feels it is too expensive. Music on demand is a convenience, not a necessity, like air or water.
As the fraction of companies that produce software or digital content becomes an increasingly large part of the modern world's GDP, the prevention of theft of digital material will become increasingly important. The Pirate Bay founders, who set up their site years after Napster lost its own court battle in the US, should have known better.
Putting this in short lets prosecute all those who sell weapons (legally) for the murders done by somebody else. They are also an accessory to that crime aren't they.
The list might very well include Google and other websites for the same reason as they can "help" one with all kinds of crime imaginable.
The law of most lands is that it is legal to sell guns under the assumption that these will be used for hunting or target shooting, but it is illegal to murder people.
Likewise it is legal to have internet connections and computers for a variety of uses, but illegal to use these for the theft or illegal distribution of books, movies, or music, or to metaphorically 'drive the getaway car' by setting up a site expressely designed to allow thieves to exchange and distribute stolen goods on a massive international scale. Of course the individuals who distribute their music, movies and books are also guilty, just more difficult to catch.
Gun control is a controversial issue, and one could in fact blame governments for taking insufficient precautions with regard to gun sales or storage, but for whatever reasons governments have been far more firm with regard to the theft of digital material, and they have made that known to everyone.
In this case criminal intent was a key part of the judgement against Pirate Bay. Pirate Bay did not set up some site to rescue lost puppies, and then discover to their surprise that people were using it to steal digital content. They knew what they were doing, and went out of their way to try to place servers in locations where they could sidestep the law (such as areal devices), and so at the end of the day they are not innocent of violations under international trade treaties, even if they are heros among many consumers of digital media.
America brought Napster, an American company, to trial, and shut them down. The Pirate Bay was not only enabling the theft of American produced digital content, but also the digital content produced by artists in Sweden and 100 other nations. And it's not like the Pirate Bay was employing 100's of Swedes who all lost their jobs when the Pirate Bay was shut down, and even if that was the case, their jobs would have been illegitemate to begin with.
As far as I am aware Google does not maintain a public website where people from all around the world are invited to upload and download unlimited amounts of copyrighted digital content for free. Google has worked to create a digital library of books whose copyright has expired, but that is not illegal.
If Google or Yahoo do have sites that enable people to upload content for the whole world to download, then they have an obligation to withdraw copyrighted material. YouTube must operate under similar legal restrictions.