Published: 12 Jul 12 10:31 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/41978/20120712/
A local woman and Christian Democrat youth leader has protested the removal of a sexually-suggestive food stand advertisement in southern Sweden by taking to the streets with red lips and painted nails to deliver her own sausages.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A 15-year-old girl has admitted to setting up the Instagram account that caused hundreds of teenagers to riot in Gothenburg last year, but her 16-year-old friend has denied involvement. READ () »
Ice hockey World Championships co-hosts Sweden and Finland continue their long-standing rivalry on Saturday with a place in the gold medal match at stake. READ () »
The president of the Stockholm School of Economics, one of Sweden's most prestigious universities, has been forced out in response to a scandal over his hiring of a high-ranking official who'd been convicted of insider trading. READ () »
Sweden tops a list of countries that risk suffering a housing market crash, Germany's Commerzbank has warned, citing the slackening off of Swedish property prices as a harbinger of a potential downswing. READ () »
Sweden's once flourishing pharmaceutical testing industry has been decimated in recent years, suffering an 85-percent drop according to new figures that industry experts describe as "deeply troubling". READ () »
With Denmark tipped to win this year's Eurovision final, The Local's Patrick Reilly caught up with a few Danes who'd crossed the divide to be in Malmö for Saturday night's final. READ () »
Christopher O'Neill has asked Sweden not to grant him royal status, meaning Swedish Princess Madeleine's future spouse will technically become neither a prince nor a Swede. READ () »
For this week's mystery location, we challenge you to guess one of the ten biggest cities in the country from just nine clues. Can't be that hard... right? READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Be British, be sincere and be bold »
"Sweden is a veritable smorgåsbord for UK business. I see our work as a bit like a kind of dragon’s den for both for larger and smaller British companies. It is about matching the UK companies, not with cash, but with Swedish market opportunities." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
I 1000% agree with her on why
""wasting" tax money by employing a gender expert."
They should get rid of the gender expert, who's nothing but a scam artist. The gender expert needs to get laid.
this has nothing to do with gender equality (I realize the average swedish feminist would disagree).
"sausage" sucking should take place in the bedroom, not in the streets.
Actually I find quite disturbing the discrepancy between the sexualized environment we live in and the high number of people being single (I do realize this is a subjective view, maybe someone have figures on swedish singles vs couples ? )
Sometimes I wonder if it's not better living in a less progressive society, where the man can still get a shag, than living with "half naked" women all around, whom you can't touch.
@klubbnika: it's a woman on the picture because men enjoy a woman sucking a sausage. a woman don't find a sausage-sucking man appealing. if they were, you would see those kind of advertisement.
Simrishamn must quickly employ more gender experts to satisfy their gender needs. Doctors should be sacked, and local libraries closed, to ensure the community is properly tooled up.
By the way, what is the collective noun for gender experts? I suggest a bulge, but I'm open to better offers.
""sausage" sucking should take place in the bedroom, not in the streets"
Is that actually a fact? This rule should apply to EVERYTHING then. Naked place is also in the bedroom. Let's remove all suggestive ads for cremes, cosmetics, sun protection, vacations, perfumes.
Let's remove ANY suggestion of sexuality from the streets. I mean LITERALLY!
Why would women walk around with mini skirts? What are they suggesting by that? How about high heels? Why would they like people to think that they have longer legs? How about females who allow to themselves to show the form of their suggestive breasts under the shirts???
I have a brilliant idea. Let's wrap all the women in black bags. We could even call it something. Short and catchy. How about burba? Or burpa... something in that area.
Let's ban lipstick and eyeliners. Why would females suggest stuff by applying them? Oh. Let's go with the above and put a bag that would cover their faces! Otherwise, when a normal man sees a woman eating a banana on the street, it would be OBVIOUS that she is making a suggestion! God, I think I am on the right and unexplored previously track here! Just do not steal my start-up idea here.
Your examples about nakedness and bananas miss my point. it's not about nakedness: it's about sex.
a woman (or a man, this is not about gender) eating a banana is no issue, a woman blowing a banana is.
same thing for nakedness, for example, a woman breast feeding, or maybe tanning naked on a beach would be no issue.
I hope my examples gives a clear picture of what I'm trying to say.
your second idea as I understand it, is a slightly different issue. it's about "social cohesion" or "social standard", which is obviously relative to the society we live in. while the view of a woman in a burka in Sweden is quite unpleasant to me , a woman with a thong showing and without bra would be seen as a prostitute in most countries. So it's all about our social standard (individual and those of our society).
but you can hardly deny that this picture is of sexual nature.
I think that you are confused and this is you who misses my point. So I will drop the sarcasm.
Sexuality is an attraction, as food and money. It is what DRIVES us to do stuff. Religon made sexuality unpure, as it did WOMEN unpure by definition a long time ago. Beautiful women were burned by Inquisition for the bare fact that they were "too inviting" for diabolic thoughts.
Women are unpure creature with a status between a donkey and a man in sharia and some african christian countries BECAUSE of religious views.
The entire point is that there is an extremely thin line between sucking and eating, as between eating and showing mouth in general. A commercial that SUGGESTS sucking, kissing and drying lips with a tongue is not unpure if you live in a modern society and not in middle ages that some countries are still stuck in.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with suggestions of sexual nature, as long as you do not actually show porn because paradoxally, female (and male) sexuality is a sign of FREEDOM, while puritanic hiding of the existence of sexual attraction is a first sign of slavery, unacceptance and condemnation. It is not for nothing the symbol of freedom for women was BURNING the bra, instead of wrapping themselves in more clothes.
So agreeing, that there should be a clear definition of porn (children protection only), SUGGESTIONS of sex should be encouraged.
I'm stil unsure of what you're saying.
is it: #1 we leave in a free society, so the sexual attraction between two people should not be condemned.
or are you saying, #2 sex is a sign of freedom, therefore we should live in a sexualized environmnent.
I think most people in the West would agree with #1, but I have my doubts about #2.
Moreover why this distiction with pornography? why is it bad according to you, and why would that be less of a sign of freedom than non-porn sex?
Also why a distinction between suggestion of sex and plain sex? I am not talking about flirting, I'm talking about blowing a banana for example, why would it be more acceptable to fake a blowjob than actually doing it?
If I should not be offended by someone simulating a blowjob in public, then I should not be by the actual performance.
And if someone is offended by seeing two strangers having sex in front of him, he would be by the view of the suggestion of the sexual act (again the banana)... which brings us back to what I was saying about "social standards and cohesion".
and to conclude more lightly:
"Sometime my sister, she show her vazhïn to my brother Bilo and say "You will never get this you will never get it la la la la la la." He behind his cage. He cries, he cries and everybody laughs. She goes "You never get this." But one time he break cage and he "get this" and then we all laugh. High five!"
First of all - high five on your last paragraph. "Yeees. I like"
Secondly - what is a "sexualized environment"? The commercials with food create "nutritional environment", commercials with cars create "vehicular environment"? I really do not get why light erotica is different.
In regards to difference between suggestive sex and porn. (Since as you mention, apparently it is equally offensive for you).
In this case, a famous gesture of douchebags of a double-gun shot at you (combined with a smile and an exclamation of "Hey, you, you dawg!") should be as offensive and chocking for you and your children as observing homicide with splashes of blood and brain on a sidewalk.
Or the difference between a racist joke about KKK and ACTUALLY observing a lynch. Or displaying perfume as an attractive drug for the opposite gender vs ACTUALLY adding rape drug to someone's drink.
Get the parallel? Shall I get deeper into explanation about porn and erotic suggestions?
Listening to you, one should ban every display of erotic nature from push-up bras to Madonna herself.
The funny thing is that "sexualization" of females is usually opposed by women, who can get male attention only through hate and despise.
Also, the Christian Democrat counter protester came all the way from Uppsala to Simrishamn just to fight for a random hot dog stand's right to use this picture? That's weird. Really weird.