Published: 16 Sep 12 16:14 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/43262/20120916/
The firm holding the image rights to the children's books about Pippi Longstocking has reversed its decision to ban the use of a picture of Pippi's monkey Mr Nilsson in a three-year-old child's obituary.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Parents and volunteers have been patrolling the streets of Stockholm's immigrant-heavy suburbs to help quell riots that have raged for almost a week, serving as a successful deterrent to troublemakers and winning praise from police. READ () »
Police are hunting a 40-year-old man after a woman was found dead in a suburb of Stockholm on Saturday. READ () »
Two cars collided on a road between Trollhättan and Vänersborg in western Sweden on Friday afternoon due to an elk having chosen the unusual spot to give birth to a calf. READ () »
Express delivery firm DHL has been criticised for having handed over a load of alcohol ordered from Germany to a 10-year-old boy in southern Sweden who was home alone at the time. READ () »
A sixth straight night of unrest blighted several Stockholm suburbs on Friday night, spreading briefly to the city of Örebro, 160 kilometres to the west. READ () »
With international media swooping on the Stockholm riots from every angle, The Local's Oliver Gee explains why Stockholm is not burning, and how the story has been blown out of proportion. READ () »
After five nights of rioting throughout the outskirts of Stockholm, many in Sweden and elsewhere are trying to make sense of it all. The Local spoke to a mix of commentators and local politicians to get their views. READ () »
As white-collar union Saco slammed Sweden for not helping well-educated foreigners into the labour market, The Local spoke to researcher Josefin Edström about the disconnect between foreign professionals and Swedish employers. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
"BANG!!!! BANG!!!! BANG!!! In the midst of the Stanley Cup’s Eastern Conference semifinals series, every Bostonian knows it is all about Bruins ice hockey. Oh right. I am in Sweden, home of the 2013 International Ice Hockey Federation GOLD Champions. And there is certainly no doubt ice hockey fever has taken over Sweden. A lot of Swedes,..." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
There is an easy solution for this nonsense—just give the intellectual property holder the right to decide who to pursue. In all other instances, the laws revert to some generous fair use model. Of course, this will never happen because it would cut off a lucrative legal sideline. Here in USA, the Patent Office was one of the first things the new government set up—and yet today it may be further from useful than it ever has been. Too bad because protecting the legitimate interests of producers of intellectual property is actually a social good.
Unless the family of the deceased child was about to mass produce 'little johnny's memorial cookies' with that image on it, it is hard to see how their brand needed defending in this particular case of a single obituary photo. The foundation should have been honoured that this terminally ill boy took comfort and/or enjoyed the pleasant distraction afforded by the stuffed toy of the Astrid Lindren character.
Your legal imperitave interpretation and proposed solution may in fact be correct, but for my part I would not escalate this to a legal-macro-economics interpretation, but rather chalk it up to Swedish hypersensitivity that is out of place with regard to the social and emotional IQ of ordinary people.
There are many examples of this hypersensitivity. In addition to posters being ripped down because one cartoon character was black in colour, even when surrounded by grossly distorted 'white' characters in the same film, the taxpayers of Uppsala had to pay for the removal of crosswalk signs for the simple reason that the silhouette of the woman crossing the road was slightly too attractive. Sweden's univeristies have unleashed a bunch of gender equality and social sensitivity 'experts' who have lost their ability to view the world with common sense.
I am quite certain that correctness—political and otherwise—runs amok in Sweden. But this case is about patent and copyright law and has almost nothing to do with correctness.
And nobody said it had to make sense because in many of these cases, it doesn't.
The legal machinations that unleashed the ban on the image are nicely explained by IP and copyright law, but the real controversy (for me) began when the grand daughter of Astrid Lindgren, who should have known better, initially stuck by the decision of the foundation, or equivalently the foundation's legal team, and I perceive her attitude to be consistent with a peculiar Swedish hypersensitivity to images, which can be summed up as: an inherent assumption that the worst possible interpretation or imaginable consequence of the publication of a particular image is the one that matters most, for decision making purposes, even when the worst imaginable consequence (suddenly plummeting book sales?) is way out of whack with what any normal person would think or feel or consider to be reasonable. Another possible cultural element that could have led the grand daughter to her incorrect initial decision to stand by her legal team, might be a rigid Germanic tendency (also present here in Sweden) to stay organized and to follow the rule book, even when the rule book stinks.
To contrast Swedish and American culture, I would for example be shocked if say the grandson of Walt Disney (if he has or ever had that authority) would have initially stuck by his legal team if some Disney lawyer had forbidden a couple from publishing an obituary photo of their recently deceased 3 year old child, because in that photo the child was happily hugging a stuffed Disney toy.