Published: 20 Sep 12 17:27 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/43356/20120920/
With the clock ticking on the lease for her current home in Stockholm, US-native and parent Rebecca Ahlfeldt reflects on how Sweden needs to improve the housing situation for visiting students, researchers and other skilled workers.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
A Swedish man became the first person in the country to be convicted of genocide, as he was sentenced to life in prison on Thursday for participating in the 1994 massacre of Tutsis in Rwanda. READ () »
Pirate Bay founder Gottfrid Svartholm Warg was sentenced on Thursday to two years in prison for data breaches, aggravated fraud, and attempted aggravated fraud, in what was Sweden's biggest ever hacking trial. READ () »
As one of Sweden's most talented up-and-coming photojournalists, Alexander Mahmoud, 22, faces his toughest challenge yet. Not only losing weight, but photographing himself along the way. Our Swede of the Week tells us about the warts-and-all project 73 Percent Fat. READ () »
Swedish veteran Henrik Larsson pulled on his boots and rekindled past glories in a fleeting appearance on Wednesday for local Helsingborg side Högaborg, the division two outfit where his glittering career began. READ () »
After the birth of his two bonny baby girls, former Londoner Paul Connolly swoons over Swedish healthcare's 'just the right side of hands off' approach that left him feeling safe despite his wife's swollen elephant trotters and high blood pressure. READ () »
Midsummer Eve is the most dangerous day to be out on the roads in Sweden, with 60 traffic accidents last year. To make sure everyone reaches the maypole in one piece, the Transport Administration has issued traffic advice. READ () »
A local Moderate Party politician has called for the installation of undercover spies to patrol retirement homes to ensure that staff do their jobs, in the wake of a slew of recent scandals. READ () »
Men are twice as likely as women to drown, according to a new study, with middle-aged men with alcohol in their bodies posing the greatest risk. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Kentucky’s Bourbon Royalty Visits Sweden »
"He's not a celebrity in Sweden, but everyone in Kentucky knows the name Fred Noe. Even more people know the name of his great-grandfather, Jim Beam." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
Basically means that those renting out bostadsrätter will no longer be obliged to subsidise their tenants' rent.
One step to formalising a very informal and insecure market.
You could go live in Märsta or Södertälje, but that 3 hours a day of commuting eats a majority of the quality of life that Sweden promises.
I really wish TL would just knock your ignorant "articles" on the head.
@liaquath_amms: You're acting like Stockholm is the only city in the world where people are flocking to.
Apparently people are unable to be critical-minded. Stop making excuses and ask yourself why this is only a problem in Sweden.
And in terms of small-town discount, dream on, once you get outside of the very heart of Stockholm and Göteborg, the rents are pretty much the same nationwide, ie. rapidly rising. It is still much cheaper here than London, Paris, NYC, Hong Kong, etc, but combine the incredible shortage with the fact that a small town in Sweden is NOT Paris or NYC, well, the situation is actually not that good at all, especially for new arrivals that are not of the 'refugee' camp.
Now the moaners have arrived on this website, and they're not all Swedes it seems. If you move to another country (in this case Sweden), you should fit in with how things are there, not moan about them and say how great it is "back home". If it's so bloody great back home, bugger off back there!
Nobody seems to have considered that one of Sweden's biggest problems is that everyone is moving to the cities, leaving just about everywhere in the countryside with desperate problems. If you make housing in Stockholm cheap and abundant, how will that help? The answer is that it won't. It'll make life easier and/or cheaper for you and a few thousand more, and screw it up for hundreds of thousands dotted around the country, mostly out in the sticks. I can't for the life of me see how that is good for the country as a whole.
And, before you ask, I live in Örebro, a growing city with its own housing problems, admittedly nowhere near Stockholm's of course. But the fact that everyone within 50km wants to move here isn't helping a LOT of smaller municipalities and communities. Cheaper housing will help me (I rent), but I don't want it.
Try looking at the big picture for once! Then, in the name of God, STOP MOANING!
- home owner associations will not allow most people to rent out their apartments
- rents are controlled by the government so if you do get the right to rent out your flat then you are not able to even recover a fraction of your costs (avgift + ranta + amortisation +necessary maintenance +bils + ...)
So basically this removes the whole buy to let market which exists everywhere else in the world.
As a result the rental market has no long term supply of rental properties...
I know this system is aimed at protecting tenants, but in fact it has the opposite effect.
deregulate the rental market, make it possible to buy to let, and there will be apartments available for rent in the city... plenty of them!
I dont know how this would help students :)
We were checking Uppsala Hem, Rikshem, and all the other rental agencies every day for nearly a year before we caved in and signed a short lease on a dump in a questionable neighborhood for 6600 sek per month! We were very lucky that my wife's parents have a guest house on their property and we were able to live there for 9-10 months while we searched for our own housing.
I had never seen or heard of anything like this in other "highly developed" countries. There isn't a city in the US that I couldn't move to on Monday and have living arrangements on Tuesday. I think one of the problems is that Swedes just accept it kind of like they just accept the Systembolaget. When I complain about it to my wife, she just gives me one of those responses like, "Well, we just haven't been signed up with the housing agencies long enough to be high on the list."
I do wish that the author had delved in to possible solutions to this housing disaster instead of just pointing out the obvious that there is a big problem. Some interesting solutions in the reply thread. I'd like to see some more. I think frenchviking is on the right track with his ideas.
It took two days in Paris.
It took seven (7) years to find an apartment to rent in Stockholm.
Stockholm apparently is quite an attractive place to live since so many people try to move there so my guess is that they who allready live there (and occupy all those nice apartments you would like to get your hands on) also thinks it´s nice to live in Stockholm and therefor have no interest what so ever to move out.
But of course if prices and rents go up thanks to the deregulation then they might be forced to move.
So supply won´t change and demand won´t change, the only thing that will change is who will live there. Ordinary people out, big wallet people in!
And how exactly is this an improvement? You will have the same amount of people complaining but now it will be somebody else and not you! Much better!
The only way to solve the problem is to increase supply (or to find a way to make life in Stockholm so unpleasant that demand goes down) and since "central Stockholm" just stretches so far in any direction before it stops being "central" the only solution is to build upwards. But apparently that is not an option. Why?
@wendist - you think stockholm is big. sydney is a tad over double the size of stockholm. the state of nsw is twice the size of sweden with the same population.
It can't be difficult to find out who lives where and then ditch the primary contact holders who abuse the system - this would free up swathes of legal rental property and possibly put the rents into the hands of associations who might then build more flats.
The queing system is set up to favour native Swedes who have been able to wait for the apartment 5-10 years. So this is especially unfair against highly-skilled foreigners.
@engagebrain The "secondary/tertiary" rental system is at the heart of the problem. Before I came to Sweden I have not even heard of the term. In Finland for instance everybody (95%) primary rents. Helsinki has its share of problems in housing (price) but as far as I know availability is not a problem. It seems to be incredibly stressful to have to juggle the 2nd/3rd rental contracts and the unofficial-type relationships that follow. I own an apartment in Turku/Åbo and rent it out. It works fine.
@JulieLou40, @Borilla, @liaquath_amms, @RobinHood: Like in any country there are many kinds of jobs that can only be done in Stockholm and other big cities. For instance research and so on. There should be no rental ques in Stockholm. Let the markets decide the price. And then build more. I don't understand the mentality at all, and I am from Finland. Maybe you like the que because it lets you keep a more expensive apartment in Stockholm than you could otherwise be able to have.
Masses of people could work virtually from home, anywhere in Sweden. Research for one area, certainly doesn't need to be even in the country it's relevant too. Employers need to changed in this respect and that is where the state needs to step in.
'm going to repeat our experience--just for you:
It took us one day to find an apartment to rent in New York.
It took two days in Paris.
It took seven (7) years to find an apartment to rent in Stockholm.
The only other place I know of that had a housing shortage like that of Stockholm was Moscow--back in the good old pre-1989 Soviet days.
By September, I still didn't have anything, but I figured it would be a bit easier once I get here. Man was I wrong.
I spent another five months from hotel to hotel, friends, and even slept in a church for a few days, and some emergency housing, which were TENTS in Polacksbacken.
I sept New Year's eve literally on the streets.
Only in February, at the end of my powers, I managed to get a place to stay. I was literally set on leaving the very next day. After five months living like a homless person, I had enough of it.
I'm soon finishing my master and on top of the fact that it's nearly impossible to get a job after graduation here, it's even harder to get a place to stay.
I'm leaving. Thanks for the free university. Have fun.
When I came to Sweden as a student for the first time, I of course did not have enough waiting days to even get a basic corridor room, which would have been the appropriate type of accommodation for a young single adult. Years later I could easily get a corridor room, however now I am a doctoral student and living with a partner and therefore, I would need a two-room apartment or at least a single room with a kitchen. But for those rooms I still don't have enough credit days after 3 years! In addition, everyone who has ever lived in one of the student accommodation places in Stockholm knows that there a lot of people living there that are students only on paper (by prolonging their thesis work, taking the exact amount of classes to qualify while not being enrolled in any program, etc.). I think what I am basically saying here is that an allocation based on time (waiting days) is not necessarily better than an allocation based on needs (which is not easy either).
For example, in a year I will have enough days to probably rent a 3- or 4-room student apartment, that is probably originally designed to accommodate a family, however the low rent will provide a incentive for me to rent this apartment with my partner and obviously hold the contract for as long as possible. So only because my doctoral student status is allowing me to still be considered for student housing, I will be able to rent an apartment that is probably designed for the needs of students with kids. This is the basic problem: the incentives in the Swedish rental market are set in such a way to create this inefficient and unjust rental market. Therefore, I do not understand some of the previous commentators that seem to take a critique of systematic inefficiencies within the Swedish system as some kind of personal attack on Sweden or Swedish people in general (seems to be a problem on The Local in general).
The incentive structure is wrong, in that it creates an inefficient and unjust housing market. While it hurts me to say this it seems that a liberalization of the rental market is the only way out.
A freely operating supply and demand mechanism isn't done just for the heck of it. It has a function: maximizing the interests of buyers and sellers alike.
Now you have politically favored party members sitting in central apartments at well below market value, while regular Swedish citizens are forced to live like students or partake in the black market. This, in a supposedly Western country. Sweden isn't Western, despite its industrialized trappings.
The European University Institute (EUI) calculates that to make a 5% return on investment, a developer would need to set rents 70% higher than allowed by the Rent Tribunal.
If you can only rent a property to someone at a loss, then there is going to be very limited supply of properties to rent.
As usual government intervention has the opposite effect of intended.