Published: 25 Jan 13 17:01 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/45824/20130125/
A Swedish ISP outraged by the prospect of computer and iPad owners being forced to pay TV licence fees is offering clients a "TV Stopper" to block online content from state broadcaster SVT.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Three people were wounded during an armed robbery on a jewellery store in Ängelholm, southern Sweden on Saturday, with the robbers escaping on a yellow moped. READ () »
The Sörmland County Council in central Sweden 'accidentally' hired a convicted criminal who had served a long prison sentence for threatening to blow up oil storage tanks and had to pay 1million kronor in severance pay to get rid of him. READ () »
Panic broke out at a Gothenburg school on Friday evening as one man was wounded in a shooting which could be linked to a violent robbery that took place in the area on the same day. READ () »
A 15-year-old girl has admitted to setting up the Instagram account that caused hundreds of teenagers to riot in Gothenburg last year, but her 16-year-old friend has denied involvement. READ () »
Ice hockey World Championships co-hosts Sweden and Finland continue their long-standing rivalry on Saturday with a place in the gold medal match at stake. READ () »
The president of the Stockholm School of Economics, one of Sweden's most prestigious universities, has been forced out in response to a scandal over his hiring of a high-ranking official who'd been convicted of insider trading. READ () »
Sweden tops a list of countries that risk suffering a housing market crash, Germany's Commerzbank has warned, citing the slackening off of Swedish property prices as a harbinger of a potential downswing. READ () »
Sweden's once flourishing pharmaceutical testing industry has been decimated in recent years, suffering an 85-percent drop according to new figures that industry experts describe as "deeply troubling". READ () »
| 18/05 | LCI CoordinatorAker Advantage | Bærum/Tranby |
| 18/05 | Tender Lead Subsea 7656Aker Advantage | Ågotnes |
| 17/05 | Account Executive - Sweden- Sofware Sales | Stockholm |
| 17/05 | Authorization Engineer | Västerås |
| 17/05 | Backend infrastructure Team Lead | Stockholm |
| 17/05 | Baxter Home Hemodialysis ? HHD Field Service EngineerBaxter Medical AB | Östergötland |
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
Be British, be sincere and be bold »
"Sweden is a veritable smorgåsbord for UK business. I see our work as a bit like a kind of dragon’s den for both for larger and smaller British companies. It is about matching the UK companies, not with cash, but with Swedish market opportunities." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
In this case, SVT's CEO Eva Hamilton has completely overstretched and tried to manipulate an unfair law in an effort to squeeze money out of people who probably are not consuming her product. Instead of producing better product, they are scheming. If Jan Karlung would like to have the law voided in terms of his product I understand that. Better yet, he could try to use his platform to begin a greater conversation of the validity of this TV fee in general. I do not know his business, but he could cause SVT to cave on his issue very quickly and get a lot of free publicity at the same time. The last thing Eve Hamilton and SVT want is their business model challenged in the light of today's competitive television market.
I'm not about to pay for something that I don't use. I'm not paying.
I use my TV for watching videos and I am considering replacing it with a projector or a smaller LCD player.
I rather pay for products of "Discovery Channel" or "Jon Stewart Show", rather than boring blabbing of Stockholm snots.
One could make the argument that if people bought a TV, then they are probably going to watch some of the local TV stations for news at least, but this does NOT apply to an iPad.
As others have posted, one should have the option to sign in to the SVT streaming service, where permission is only granted to registered payers of the tax, or to persons willing to pay a temporary user fee.
Time for a T (vee) party. No taxation without utilization.
SVT needs your money to organize the stupid Eurovision contest to choose the candidate every year. And how are these Swedish hosts and presenters going to survive without your money? Do you want them to find a normal job with a normal salary? Please!
You cannot have your cake and eat it! Stingy people
This is the price you pay for living a higly mobile disposable society. If you can afford these such and such then pay for the lifestyle choice.
Besides the taxes do something good, helps development of culture and adfree programming.
It may not be perfect but show me where is?
This is not a tax. This is a fee. Fees are not progressive. Fees are supposed to be paid when you use a service.
But a mandatory fee, to everybody, is basically a hidden and unfair tax.
I whish somebody have resources to take this to Brussels.
The decision by the Swedish government and almost every other government in Europe is yes it is necessary/worthwhile. (No good running to Brussels)
The next question is how it should be funded.
1. A fee ( levied on all those with equipment able to receive it and charged per household).
2. A mandatory media tax on every individual over 18.
The tax seems the fairest way to me, although it would leave many households paying considerably more.
3. ?
I believe that it is valuable to have media channels that are independent of political and business influence.
Swedish politicians have been a head before their Norwegian colleages, but not
in this case. Now there is some consideration going on to to follow Sweden in this
respect.
Personally I never watch TV, only downloading Thai TV for my wife via my PC.
I will never pay even a Norwegian krone to the Norwegian state TV, NRK.
The coming system to pay according to your income feels to me also undemocratic.
Why not code the transmitters as the private TV channels, so people may pay for
the one we want to watch? That is always turned down in the discussion.
The real question about the TV license comes down to one question. Are Swedes getting value commensurate with what they are paying?
What do you do in this country? You can't "write to your congressman." Do you just grab your ankles and ask someone to pass the vaseline? Where is SVT headquartered so me and my posse can go make a stink?
SVT has unmasked its real intentions: If it would be their interest to get paid from those people, who want to watch SVT, then there are many examples in the web, where you need to create an account, pay a fee and then are able to log in if you want to see movies, tv, etc. It could be so easy: Everybody who wants to see SVT needs to create an account, pay the licence fee and then can watch as long and as often as he wants within the paid period.
But: The true intention of SVT is simply greed - collecting as much money as possible from everyone in Sweden, independently, if somebody ever will watch SVT or not.