( If I were We SWEDEN, I would be all of us…..
Subjectively: I love America.
But I don’t like Obama and Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize speech.
The profound arrogance of the man and his utter contempt for us all and for the Muslim people who he pretended to be reaching out to, in Cairo, not so long ago, before doubling the US troop levels in Afghanistan!
Check the entries for Thursday 10th & Friday 11th of December 2009
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/
One brother to another: ( Cornel West sounds….
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Cornel+West&search_type=&aq=f
I saw it all so clearly as Barack delivered his magnum opus on TV from Oslo and now I can’t unsee what I saw deep into him as a person – I saw him, “like I see through the water
that runs down my drain”:
http://www.bobdylan.com/#/songs/masters-war
Just after it was announced that he had won the Peace Prize he had this to say:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/09/obama-nobel-speech-video_n_315324.html
At Oslo, the text:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/12/barack-obama-nobel-peace-prize-speech-text.html
At Oslo this is as he said it : watch:
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/obama-lecture.html
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Obama%27s+Nobel+Peace+Prize+Speech+December+10%2C+2009+%28Part+1&search_type=&aq=f
When I saw Obama speaking last night, I finally got to understand what an English friend meant, when he said that he saw Jiddu Krishnamurti’s face consumed with such deep hatred as he delivered one of his talks in Switzerland. What I saw in Obama was not hatred, but self-assured arrogance and contempt for those who were listening to what they imagine is the prince of peace’ powers of persuasive oratory to make what is wrong, right. What was he trying to do – to justify the choice of the Noble Peace committee – and to whom was he addressing those idealistic and empty and sometimes contradictory philosophical platitudes with a body-talk and facial expressions that reflected arrogance and certitude but neither compassion nor compunction, or apology about the mega civilian deaths, not even for a brief moment. Brash and cocky he was and cocksure and arrogant throughout as he rambled on from one generalized profundity to another but studiously side -stepping and entirely avoiding the germane issue of the wars he is waging and what the troops of which he is commander-in-chief are doing in Afghanistan and Iraq. One can only imagine that John McCain or Bill Clinton or indeed George W. Bush himself would have been infinitely more humble, more human, a little more relaxed, more charming ( he wasn’t at all) and more humbled by such a prize. He was busy being the profound American statesman, lecturing as a visionary at the Nobel Peace Academy of Oslo
http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1R2GGLL_enSE351&=&q=Obama+refuses+King+of+Norway
As Zbigniew Brzezinski had once observed, it was not the Taliban that took down the Twin Towers eight years ago and as Ted Health also once observed in the British House of Commons – when Mrs Thatcher and Mr. Ronald Reagan had bombed Colonel Muammer al- Qadhafi - whilst they were still at it, why hadn’t they bombed the ideological and the known financial and logistic headquarters of the IRA in Chicago and Philadelphia?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
Now they’re busy keeping the idea of USAma Bin Ladin alive for a credulous public gaze, to enable them to go out on another wild goose chase looking for him. Last time he resurrected was to help George Bush win a second term in office
Needless to say Mr. Obama does not breathe a word of any early withdrawal from Afghanistan and it was on such a premise, based on his earlier talk that the Peace Prize award was probably predicated. He is now doing and saying the exact opposite of his pre-election rhetoric and today John McCain stands out as more honest and more forthright than Mr. Obama who is probably practicing the doctrines of “Taqiyya “and “Kitman” which he could have learned as a Muslim youngster in Indonesia or later, as part of US foreign policy strategy, that “The first thing to be sacrificed during war is truth.”
Well I have good news for him. I assure Mr. Obama that Iran is much better at that game than he could possibly hope to be during his presidency. True, the war that Iraq imposed on Iran came to an end because the Iranians ran out of ammunition, yet Iran was never completely isolated whilst Ali Akbar Velayati was foreign minister.
Heaven help us all – and the only reservations I have about Mr. Obama’s war speech in Oslo, is that it could be but a preamble for justifying war against Iran - if he is indeed brave enough to take such a decision, having already said that he will do everything in his power to prevent Iran going nuclear.
Perhaps if I had read his speech instead of watching him deliver it , it would have made a great difference, but the effrontery he delivered and the pompous rhetorical tone of its delivery ! Where was the humility? Who was he talking to – apart from the idiots in the Nobel Peace Prize Committee in Oslo? Who and what was he representing? WHO was he talking to ? Certainly not to the Almighty and certainly not to us in that his usually raspy voice which sounds so much like the voice of the Accuser. Is that how he’s going to justify genocide or homicide to Rev. Jeremiah Wright or plead for mercy in his imagined “ judgment hall of Christ ” ?
His idiot Norwegians in the Noble Peace Prize Committee of Oslo had probably hoped that the Prize would mellow down his aggressive US ancestral war hand going back to Korea and Vietnam. Well he had the opportunity but has now blown it
away
“Extraordinary effort to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between people” my foot! When has he/did he ever – after all these days in office, ever call for a peace conference with the Taliban?
He can’t defeat the Taliban, because all Afghans including the US puppets are TALIBAN – as long as there is the foreign presence of US and NATO troops or Russians in their God-given Land. It’s easy for Taliban to change uniform and become Afghan national security today and revert to being Taliban tomorrow……. Similarly it would be an even greater mistake to invade Iran….Mr. Obama.
Then a few days ago, later, announcing the surge he raised false hopes about starting troop withdrawals in 18 months time. Now forever – or as John McCain had said previously , as long as it takes seems more like it:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1R2GGLL_enSE351&q=US+to+stay+in+Afghanistan
It was the wrong tone and a speech that was deeply flawed in many respects, some of which I shall point out a little further on, in a later posting, as in their entirety even the most obvious ones that stick you in the eye, and the hypocrisies are too numerous to take up here, now. We know that he is known to be a smart alec, but who does he think he was lecturing for all of thirty seven minutes, when he should have just grabbed his prize and disappeared from view – maybe taken Airforce One direct to Kabul. He must have been addressing himself, primarily, wholly addressing himself, from himself to his self, his alter ego and not to the dimwits who saw it fit to award this new, born-again neo-con their Peace Prize.
And now, lets wait for him to start pontificating about Jerusalem , where he prayed to the Almighty with a white kippah on his head and wrote this note which he stuck into the Wailing wall :
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D924TL4G0&show_article=1
The same Hussein Obama who now wants to give half of Jerusalem to the Arabs?
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rlz=1R2GGLL_enSE351&q=OBama+wants+to+give+Jerusalem+to+Arabs
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/
Makes you wonder, how would he like to be remembered?
http://bookofodds.com/Relationships-Society/Articles/A0377-The-Nobel-Prize-Who-Gets-It-Who-Keeps-It
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/nobel-prize-history.html
Report abuse »