With reference to Naipaul’s latest about which much concern has been variously expressed in this public domain
the USA -Africa Dialogue Series
http://groups.google.com/group/usaafricadialogue/browse_thread/thread/365b59d7fa34e681
This is addressed to our doyen of African Literature and some of the like-minded:
Professor Harrow & Co,
I’m seeking some more direction from you.
At this very moment I’m strangely reminded of Ulli Beier of whom I heard an anthropologist joke that he was leaving Nigeria for Papua New Guinea, which he described as “ another area of darkness”
Some people see and have seen Naipaul and Rushdie as the Wild West’s literary attack dogs who in fiction and non-fiction peer into our backwardness, to wage war on cherished religious and cultural values and the life lived outside of the pale of Western Civilisation, the Western Civilisation of which when asked, Mahatma Gandhi said “I think it would be a good idea.”
I erroneously referred to “Among the Believers” as post -Salman Rushdie, because it has been around for so long; perhaps it even paved the way for “ The Satanic Verses” and enjoyed even greater popularity after Rushdie’s controversial novel.
We all agree that V.S. Naipaul is an engaging writer, perhaps a great writer, one that we do not neglect and some of us seem to be forced to read, just because he visits some of our natural habitats. Is that not so?
The Nobel Prize committee awarded Sir Vidiadhar Surajprasad Naipaul the Nobel Prize in Literature for largesse of spirit, not for being a racist or for being “one of the great racist writers of our time “ but “for having united perceptive narrative and incorruptible scrutiny in works that compel us to see the presence of suppressed histories”.
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/2001/naipaul.html
After the award he has not rested on his laurels but suitably encouraged and rewarded has continued in the same vein, turning his lights on and exposing other areas of darkness with even greater intensity ( insensitivity?) and gained an even greater audience.
Can he also be accused of rank dishonesty in his “Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions among the Converted Peoples”?
I got a copy of his “ Half a life” from his Swedish literary agent for Christmas, 2001 or 2 .She was at the Noble Banquet and may have a soft heart for him and seems to to think that he’s a nice bloke.
That’s women for you, can have a soft spot for every kind of scoundrel. Beauty and the Beast.
But does the Selection committee of the Swedish Academy need to have their heads examined ? Do they see the “racism” that you see in the unrepentant Naipaul – or do you think that conscious as he is, he is simply unaware of it ? Was it a mistake to award him the Nobel Prize and should we tolerate the Swedish Academy awarding such prizes to writers such as Sir Vidia or should the prize be withdrawn now or even posthumously?
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUK257&q=Nobel+Prize+%3A+Naipaul