I have always loved animals. When I was a child I even cried when my grandmother wanted to wear one of her fur coats or when my father wanted to order lobster at the restaurant. I mean, how awful is it to choose your food when it is still alive and throw it then into boiling water just to get an exclusive meal?
Today I fortunately don’t cry anymore when someone eats lobster or wears a fur coat but it still makes me angry when I read that fur is one of this season’s biggest trends, in particular when everybody pretends to be so incredibly eco friendly these days.
Being eco friendly is hip in Sweden but I think for most people it is rather a trend than a life style. On the one hand, green products have never been as popular as they are now and more and more people become vegetarians but on the other hand people start wearing fur again. In the latest issue of Swedish Glamour, Maria Soxbo discusses the comeback of fur. She writes that there are four opinions among Swedish fashionistas:
- Never ever! Not even fake fur! (34 percent)
- No real fur but fake fur is OK (47 percent)
- If it is vintage it is OK. It would be a shame to throw away such an exclusive piece! (11 percent)
- Fur is chic and warm! Love it! (8 percent)
After being such a drama queen when I was a child you might guess that I do not belong to the last two groups. However, I have to say that I don’t have any problems with fake fur.
I am getting angry when fur lovers argue that the material shouldn’t be considered so critically since we also wear leather, which is totally accepted. I think leather is a different story as there are very few materials that can substitute it when it comes to shoes for instance.
Especially in Sweden where the winter is harsh you are glad if you have some warm leather boots that protect your feet from snow and ice. As a shoe nerd, I have many fake leather shoes, which are great during summer, but useless as soon as it is getting colder. I haven’t found any material that is as effective as leather. Please let me know if you know better.
The vintage argument sounds like a bad excuse to me. I mean, does it make any difference if the animal died 30 or one year ago?
Even Karl Lagerfeld, king of political incorrectness, has only included fake fur in the Chanel a/w 2010/11 collection. The pieces are not really my cup of tea as the Chewbacca look is not exactly my style but I like the message: fake fur can be exclusive and chic (although if it probably wasn’t Karl Lagerfeld’s intention to say that)!
I don’t want to tell you what is right or wrong and believe me I won’t cry if you don’t agree with me, but seriously, do we still need to torture animals just to get a nice piece of clothing? There are other materials that are as warm and chic as fur so I think it is definitely not worth anymore to buy fur.

































































































