(edit title) Are White Males Becoming Increasingly Violent? Sure Seems Multi-Culturalism Is Making It So Options

[Jamtjim]

I'm not really into suing myself, nor even the threat of it. Personally, if Fraudie writes something defamatory about me (or indeed writes about anything), then this is pretty much as good as a cast iron guarantee that the opposite is indeed the truth.

(Cue Trow posting true things about me with a "which according to you cannot be true" type remark)

[byke]

Wish I hadn't had my botty smacked by the owner a few years back and had my ability to change names on threads revoked. Otherwise I would have changed the title to "Are White Van Drivers Becoming Increasingly Violent?" / just for giggles as this thread is old and boring.

[*Trowbridge H. Ford*]

Right, Snoopy!, of course, you wouldn't want any court case where your efforts to connect me to 'Jihad Jane' because of what I said about Lars Vilks, and suggested I might do when he again offered his rants against Islam to come out.

[Jamtjim]

Haha... No no Fraudie, despite your harebrained idea to get yourself sued in order to raise your crackpot ideas, the ruth is that nobody is going to spend more money on suing you than they are ever likely to recoup following your conviction.

In any case as we have already illustrated, a defamation by you is as good as a compliment!

[skogsbo]

Wish I hadn't had my botty smacked by the owner a few years back and had my ability to change names on threads revoked. Otherwise I would have changed the title to "A ... (show full quote)

Wish I hadn't had my botty smacked by the owner a few years back and had my ability to change names on threads revoked. Otherwise I would have changed the title to "Are White Van Drivers Becoming Increasingly Violent?" / just for giggles as this thread is old and boring. ... (hide full quote)

Not,

"are whales becoming increasingly violent?", "it sure seems haarp is making it so"

[Yorkshireman]

According to this latest news today, apparently it is the women in Sweden that are becoming more violent!!!!

http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/kvinnor-...are_7409364.svd


Is this yet another Trow-Myth Busted!

[The Nine]

Right, Snoopy!, of course, you wouldn't want any court case where your efforts to connect me to 'Jihad Jane' because of what I said about Lars Vilks, and sugge ... (show full quote)

Right, Snoopy!, of course, you wouldn't want any court case where your efforts to connect me to 'Jihad Jane' because of what I said about Lars Vilks, and suggested I might do when he again offered his rants against Islam to come out. ... (hide full quote)

Trow, middle America has just suffered the driest 2 months on record. People who have farmed land for 50 years have said it has never been this bad. Crops ruined, well holes dry, irrigation useless, animals dehydrated and dying. Obama has just announced 30 Million in relief aid for one state alone, so people don't starve.

So, my question to you is this. You say that HAARP is responsible for causing floods in numerous countries that the U.S wants to break, or destabilize, by use of this medium. So, if the U.S can create mad rain and floods by use of HAARP, why don't they programme it to pour a little water on the homeland and save peoples livelihoods and save them selves loads of aid money (they cannot really afford) to helping them?

Surely that is a simple and easy question to answer? If you can make the sky pour to destroy, you can make it pour to help your own?

And spare me the usual shit of accusing me of trolling or trying to trip you up. It is a pertinent question. If you have the power to manipulate the weather, surely you can use that how you wish? Why would the U.S let so many of their own suffr hardship when they could 'apparently' stop it happening?

[*Trowbridge H. Ford*]

Oh, it is easy to explain but hard to change.

HAARP is a very good mechanism for changing weather - e.g., turning tropical storms into cyclones, theatened or actual hurricanes into tornados and floods, etc.

The trouble is that it is much better at changing the weather over water, and directing it toward some desired target - e. g., Malaysia having the storms heading towards Indonesia heated up so there will be torrential rains over the islands which will cut down on the smoke coming its way from the burning rain forest, or directing them to hit places like China, North Korea, and even Japan with a deadly typhoon. America can't miss with this deadly instrument of war, though the Phillipines, Vietnam, and Taiwan might not be too happy with the collateral damage.

It's a far more unpredictable mission when one modifies weather over land, though not that it matters much with an emeny who you really don't care what happens to where. The best examples of this are the floods and droughts that the USA has hit Pakistan and Russia with.

It's a far different matter when you use HAARP capability to change your own weather - you really don't have a very good idea of what will happen where.

For example, when the USA tried to cause rain in Missouri in May 2011, it got the deadly tornedo - what Obama blamed on Chinese HAARP! There must have been flooding somewhere else, mostly likely somewhere in the Northeast.

That experience apparently made the USA much more hesitant to try it now, though it seems to have used it in the Midwest with some success, but Texas is still dry as a bone.

In short, HÁARP weather modification over land, especially your own, is a real hit-or-miss proposition.

[Jamtjim]

HAARP is a very good mechanism for changing weather - e.g., turning tropical storms into cyclones, theatened or actual hurricanes into tornados and floods, etc.

Nope, HAARP has no effect on the weather at all. All it does is research into aurora. Your nutbag conspiracy hypothesis has been thoroughly debunked on the other thread.

The trouble is that it is much better at changing the weather over water, and directing it toward some desired target - e. g., Malaysia having the storms heading towards Indonesia heated up so there will be torrential rains over the islands which will cut down on the smoke coming its way from the burning rain forest, or directing them to hit places like China, North Korea, and even Japan with a deadly typhoon. America can't miss with this deadly instrument of war, though the Phillipines, Vietnam, and Taiwan might not be too happy with the collateral damage.

HAARP has nothing to do with these natural weather events, as has been shown on the other thread.

It's a far different matter when you use HAARP capability to change your own weather - you really don't have a very good idea of what will happen where.

HAARP does not and cannot change the weather. You really don't have a good idea of what reality is!

For example, when the USA tried to cause rain in Missouri in May 2011, it got the deadly tornedo - what Obama blamed on Chinese HAARP! laugh.gif There must have been flooding somewhere else, mostly likely somewhere in the Northeast.

More of the normal nonsense from the Fraud.

In short, HÁARP weather modification over land, especially your own, is a real hit-or-miss proposition.

But mainly miss as it doesn't happen!

[*Trowbridge H. Ford*]

[Svensksmith]

He was my favorite Marx brother.