(edit title) Was It Obama's Surprise Present For Putin's Party? Note the Rantings of a Loony Conspiracy Theorist Options

[Jamtjim]

Trow, it is not a published article by the Russian president. It is a hoax from a discredited conspiracy website who lack the competence even to get the month right but which you have uncritically accepted as being true because you just can't accept that your nutty hypotheses completely fail to mesh with reality.

It is the same with your "personal" message from Clinton which was in reality a standardised response signed by autopen, the default White House response when a nutter sends their drivel to them. Get over it, Clinton never even heard of you, nor Panetta. You were and remain a total irrelevance and certainly not the target of an assassination attempt.

This is the real world Trowbridge, not the Bond-esque one you fantasise about with yourself as the central hero character. You are no more than a dishonest Internet freak who never pays his debts.

Now pay up your losing wager, be a good boy!

[mångk]

Just gives you an idea of where Jamtjim is coming from when he dismisses a published article by the Russian President on its international relations, especially with Washingto ... (show full quote)

Just gives you an idea of where Jamtjim is coming from when he dismisses a published article by the Russian President on its international relations, especially with Washington, as something either I again invented, like my card from President Clinton or the letter from my publisher Barry Rose, or simply bonkers by the world leader who can determine much of their substance. ... (hide full quote)

Trow,

I must confess I have not read the alleged article. I did however read the disclaimer from the site at the bottom.

That particular site seeks to avoid all responsibility for not only the content by shifting all responsibility to those that own copyright, but has also copied the article from elsewhere without consent from the copyright owner and has made no attempt whatsoever to validate in any way that the stated copyright owner is indeed the author of said article.

Last I heard the claimed author & copyright owner did not work for the claimed originating newspaper in any shape or form.

Given that you are relying on the content, and before I even bother to read it, can you please provide some degree of proof that the claimed author and copyright owner is indeed that person. Perhaps a direct link to the originating newspapers original publishment containing the article?

Edited to correct some spelling to the right language!

[*Trowbridge H. Ford*]

Now the sabotaged Sukhoi airliner crash is heating up on the American side as officials in the LA area have finally found the body of Burbank FBI agent Steve Ivens.

Ivens went missing the day after the crash was reported on May 10th, and he was concerned about the surprise killing of air line consultant Peter Adler in the crash. Adler was then working for Indonesian carrier Sriwijaga, and carried on most of his activities out of Burbank's airport where plane sales were arranged by companies like AVJet, and Hollywood people arranged flights and charters.

Ivens went missing the next morming, and for 80 days the authorities came up with nothing. Ivens, like the GCHQ's Gurdun Loftus, went apparently to meet a secret source about the sabotaged flight, only to discover that he too had met up with his killers who tortured him about what he knew, and was worried about. Then they finally disposed of his body near the Catholic Church he attened where it was found by two hikers.

Of course, the authorities always treated his disappearance as a suspected suicide - like Gareth Williams murder - but it seems just a convenient cover up so that his body could no longer reveal how and when he died. Ivens was happily married, and the couple just had an infant daughter.

Ivens was apparently disturbed by his likeable acquaintance Adler being killed under most suspicious circumstances, and was determined to find out more.

I am determined to find out why he was murdered, and possibly by whom.

In the meantime, I shall not be spending any more time on this site, as it is just a waste of time, dominated by deep disinformers who are determined that nothing will be discovered about our ruling neo-nazis.

[Jamtjim]

Now the sabotaged Sukhoi airliner crash is heating up on the American side as officials in the LA area have finally found the body of Burbank FBI agent Steve Ivens.

Except that the two events have absolutely nothing to do with each other. This is more of Fraudie basking in the death and suffering of other people. In addition Fraudie, there is still no evidence of the aircraft being sabotaged despite you writing as if it were and established fact not unfounded speculation by a forum crackpot.

Ivens went missing the day after the crash was reported on May 10th, and he was concerned about the surprise killing of air line consultant Peter Adler in the crash.

No he wasn't, once again there is absolutely nothing to indicate this... more fraud from the Fantasy Ford.

Ivens went missing the next moring, and for 80 days the authorities came up with nothing. Ivens, like the GCHQ's Gurdun Loftus, went apparently to meet a secret source about the sabotaged flight, only to discover that he too had met up with his killers who tortured him about what he knew, and was worried about. Then they finally disposed of his body near the Catholic Chruch he attened where it was found by two hikers.

There is absolutely nothing to indicate that he was tortured. It seems you just made this bit up because in your sick mind it is fun. You really are a nasty piece of work Trowbridge, getting you kicks out of making up nonsense without a care as to what the relatives would think in the unlikely event that they read your garbage!

Of course, the authorities always treated his disappearance as a suspected suicide - like Gareth Williams murder - but it seems just a convenient cover up so that his body could no longer reveal how and when he died. Ivens was happily married, and the couple just had an infant daughter.

They would treat his disappearance as a suspected suicide because there is nothing to indicate anything nefarious about it. He was also know to be suffering from depression at the time. Now what is the most likely thing to have happened?

I am determined to find out why he was murdered, and possibly by whom.

Translation: "I will make up even more speculative nonsense about a subject I know absolutely nothing about."

In the meantime, I shall not be spending any more time on this site, as it is just a waste of time, dominated by deep disinformers who are determined that nothing will be discovered about our ruling neo-nazis.

Really? It that a promise or yet another Trow lie? I agree that perhaps it is better you leave; despite the undoubted fun it has been routinely debunking you and exposing you as a fraud, you have become even more deranged of late. These new conspiracy ravings well exceeding what is tasteful and decent.

See ya Fraudie. I'd like to say it has been nice knowing you, but we both know that not to be true!

[*Trowbridge H. Ford*]

For my latest thoughts on these evolving conspiracies, see my comments on this link:

http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/201...owing/#comments