Telia bosses in musical bribe probe

The chief executive of TeliaSonera, Anders Igel, is being threatened with prosecution for bribery by Swedish authorities after he invited 200 business leaders and civil servants to the Abba musical Mamma Mia in Stockholm.

Igel has been questioned by police about the April event along with Marie Ehrling, head of the company’s Swedish operations.

The event, which also included a buffet dinner, was reported by Swedish police chief Stefan Strömberg, who was himself a guest of TeliaSonera’s.

Strömberg contacted chief prosecutor Christer van der Kwast, who started an investigation.

The company insists that the event was just normal corporate hospitality, and that it has done nothing wrong.

The Finnish chairman of TeliaSonera told Dagens Nyheter that the investigation seemed “pretty unreal” from a Finnish perspective.

“This is the kind of thing that just about all companies do – taking care of customers,” said Tom von Weymarn.

“I can’t see any substance in the case.”

According to an expert at the Stockholm School of Economics, the event could be seen as a bribe if it had the “wow effect”.

Hans de Geer, a professor in company ethics, told news agency TT that in order for the event not to be seen as a bribe, it would have to be shown that it was used for developing a relationship with a client, and “not as a perk for work contacts.”


Sweden slips in global corruption rankings

Sweden has dropped from third to fourth in an annual ranking comparing the levels of perceived corruption around the world.

Sweden slips in global corruption rankings
How corrupt is Sweden? Photo: Fredrik Sandberg/TT

Its Scandinavian neighbour Denmark shared first place with New Zealand in this year's Corruption Perception Index (CPI), released by anti-corruption campaign group Transparency International on Wednesday and ranking how corrupted countries were seen to be in 2016.

Both Denmark and New Zealand were given a score of 90 on the 0 to 100 scale (highly corrupt to very clean), followed closely by Finland and Sweden, which scored 89 and 88 respectively.

While still in the top-five of 176 countries, Sweden found itself pushed down one notch from last year and the group's Sweden office warned that this was no time to be complacent.

“Sweden's good performance in the 2016 index does not mean that we are spared from corruption in the public sector,” Ulla Andrén, chairwoman of Transparency International Sweden, said in a statement.

“Over the past year we have unfortunately seen how core values have wavered considerably. Leading figures have turned out to lack an ethical compass and corrupt behaviour has damaged trust in various public institutions.”

READ ALSO: Why Denmark is world's least corrupt country

Major Swedish institutions were rocked by scandals last year, including claims of cronyism and cover-ups at the state auditor Riksrevisionen and tax agency Skatteverket. Some of the country's largest businesses, such as Telia and Ericsson, have also faced allegations of illicit payouts.

“We believe that everything colloquially referred to as cronyism is corruption,” Lotta Rydström, executive secretary of Transparency International Sweden, told The Local.

“Transparency International's definition of corruption is wider than just bribes: 'Corruption is abuse of entrusted power for personal gain', which includes nepotism, buddy contracts and so on.”

“I would probably also say that several bribe-related incidents in the business world have shown that Sweden is not as spared (from corruption) as many think,” she said.

Rydström warned that the corruption index does not cover local and regional councils, where much of the political decisions are made in Sweden. Municipalities and county councils make up around 70 percent of public administration in the country.

“A high rating does not mean that we can beat our chest and say we are still almost the best student in the classroom. Good can get better and there is plenty to work on. Public procurement, municipal auditing and whistleblower protection are some of the issues we are working on.”

As a whole, Transparency International said that no nation in the world – Sweden included – is doing enough to fight corruption.

“There are no drastic changes in Europe and Central Asia in the Corruption Perceptions Index 2016, with only a few exceptions. However, this does not mean that the region is immune from corruption. The stagnation does not indicate that the fight against corruption has improved, but quite the opposite,” it wrote in the report.