Undertakers count cost of drunken coffin spillage

A Swedish firm of funeral directors has agreed to pay 15,000 kronor to two sisters after their father's coffin was tipped without grace into an open grave by pallbearers unsteady on their feet.

The sisters sued the firm after the funeral, which took place in February 2008, left them appalled and claiming that a number of the undertakers were clearly drunk while in charge of the coffin.

The undertakers had been close to dropping the man’s coffin on a number of occasions during the service but the ungraceful dumping of their father into his final resting place proved the final straw for the mourning siblings.

As the pallbearers approached the grave they are reported to have lost their grip which resulted in a heavy fall into the ground with the coffin landing on its side.

“Both daughters were in shock and ran away in tears from the cemetery,” their lawyer Michael Abejon wrote in their submission to Södertörn District Court.

“They didn’t dare to look in the grave as they were convinced the coffin had opened and their dead father had fallen out.”

The sisters who both spent time on sick leave after the traumatic funeral, will now each receive 7,500 kronor after settling their differences with the funeral directors. The sisters had originally claimed 20,000 kronor each in compensation.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.


Tax cheats eligible for damages: Supreme Court

Serious tax evaders could be released from prison, see their convictions quashed and be eligible to receive damages from the state, according to a judgement by the Swedish Supreme Court on Tuesday.

Tax cheats eligible for damages: Supreme Court

The move follows an earlier Supreme Court decision in June, which ruled anyone who has already been issued a fine for tax evasion cannot then be prosecuted for the same offence.

In Sweden, fines and prosecution are tried by two separate procedures, a system that has been prohibited by both the European Convention and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights since 2009.

Tuesday’s ruling added that the prohibition of this so-called dual punishment in Sweden would apply retroactively, as of February 2009.

Leif Gustafsson, a lawyer who has had several clients imprisoned for tax evasion offences, was pleased with the outcome.

“It was predicted and for a lawyer, it is satisfactory,” he told news agency TT.

Anne Ramberg, general secretary of The Swedish Bar Association (Advokatsamfundet) also welcomed the ruling.

“It is important that the Supreme Court has clarified this. This is another example where legislation should have been drafted in,” she said, adding that the government and parliament should have aligned Swedish law with the European Court back in 2009.

“If legislators are not doing their job then the Supreme Court must do it for them.”

However, the decision has been labelled a “spectacular scandal” for the government by Morgan Johansson, Social Democrat MP and spokesperson on justice and legal policy.

“This was the worst thing that could have happened. It means serious criminals, even those linked to organized crime, can have their convictions overturned and in the worse case can be both released from prison and receive damages.”

Since the initial June ruling, thirty people are reported to have appealed to have convictions quashed according to the Dagens Nyheter (DN) daily. A further 12 people have been released from jail until further notice.

The Local/cd

Follow The Local on Twitter