Swedish journalists hijacked on Twitter

Several well-known journalists in Sweden have had their identities falsely used on Twitter to broadcast a slew of racist remarks.

Swedish journalists hijacked on Twitter

The social media highjackings took place Friday when someone initiated accounts on the micro-blog Twitter and used identities similar to those of well-known Swedish journalists, according to Sveriges Television (SVT).

Among those affected include TV4’s Lena Sundström, magazine Expos Alexander Bengtsson and Aftonbladet editor Jan Helin.

The alter-ego posts, or tweets, exhume xenophobic and racist banter, such as “Do you want a job as an editorial writer at Aftonbladet? Unfortunately, we only hire white ethnic Swedes and hypocrites,” reported SVT.

Other tweets tended to be more explicit in their racial content making reference to Islam and suicide bombers.

“Twitter is an amazing medium that provides a lot of opportunities, but there is a dark backside when it is abused like this,” Helin told SVT.

Twitter hijacking is not an uncommon assault. Hijackers use the same name, image and title to mimic those they wish to scorch and slander.

For example, Jan Helin’s alter ego employed both the same image and title, Editor of Aftonbladet, but the only difference between the two on-line identities is an underscore between his first and last names.

The real Twitter accounts of the journalists appear as #LenaSundstrom, #AlexBengtsson and #JanHelin.

Although the tweet contents were erased Friday, the highjacked accounts were still present Saturday morning.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.


Swedish student to face trial after anti-deportation protest that stopped flight

The Swedish student who livestreamed her onboard protest against the deportation of an Afghan asylum seeker will go on trial on Monday.

Swedish student to face trial after anti-deportation protest that stopped flight
Elin Ersson. File photo: Björn Larsson Rosvall/TT

Elin Ersson will appear at Gothenburg District Court, charged with violating Sweden’s Aviation Act.

Ersson protested in July last year against the Swedish government's policy of deporting some rejected asylum seekers to Afghanistan by boarding an Istanbul-bound flight that carried an Afghan man who was to be returned home after being denied asylum.

With a ticket for the flight that was purchased by the activist group 'Sittstrejken i Göteborg', the activist boarded the aircraft and then refused to sit down until the Afghan man was let off. Flights are not allowed to take off until all passengers are safely in their seats.

Ersson livestreamed her protest on Facebook, where it was viewed over five million times.

Eventually, Ersson was told that the man would be let off the plane and she was also removed by airport security.

According to the prosecutor in the trial, which will take place Monday, Ersson acknowledges her actions in the incident but said her objections were based on her morals and argues that she did not act illegally as the plane was not in the air at the time of her protest.

“I believe that she is guilty of a crime which I can prove and which she will not admit. The court will therefore determine this,” prosecutor James von Reis told TT when charges were brought against the student.

In an interview with the news agency in July last year, Ersson was asked how she sees the view that her actions can be considered criminal.

“The key issue for me is that the man who was to be deported is human and deserves to live. In Sweden we do not have the death penalty, but deportation to a country which is at war can mean death,” she said.

The trial is expected to be completed within one day and Ersson’s defence has sent supplementary evidence to the court.

That consists of a legal statement by Dennis Martinsson, a lawyer in criminal law at Stockholm University. In the 13-page statement, Martinsson argues that the Aviation Act is phrased in a way which makes it questionable whether it is applicable to what Ersson did.

According to the legal expert, the relevant paragraph only applies to requests made by the aircraft’s commanding officer. Investigation of the incident found that Ersson was instructed to take her seat by “cabin crew on board”.

Further, the law states that criminal liability applies to passengers who do not comply with instructions “during a flight”, a description which Martinsson argues cannot be applied to an aircraft on the ground waiting to depart.

There is no precedent in interpretation of the law, he also writes according to TT’s summary.

The extent to which those arguments will affect the outcome of Monday’s case remains to be seen.

The penalty for violation of the Aviation Act is a fine or imprisonment for a maximum of six months.