SHARE
COPY LINK

JULIAN ASSANGE

Do you understand Pamela Anderson’s poem about Sweden?

Activist and former Baywatch star Pamela Anderson has penned a 1500-word poem/letter to Sweden, which is either beat poetry genius or an incoherent stream-of-consciousness rant.

Do you understand Pamela Anderson's poem about Sweden?
Pamela Anderson on a separate episode of Scandinavian talkshow Skavlan, in 2014. Photo: Henrik Montgomery/TT

It is honestly hard to tell.

It starts off by praising Sweden: “Sweden is a beautiful and progressive country.”

Then it segues into urging Swedish fashion chain H&M to become 100 percent animal friendly, discussing the modern dating culture, female empowerment, setting an example for young men, Donald Trump, her new book, chivalry, her parents, her new book, orgasms, overpopulation, vegans, Julian Assange and much more. Much, much more.

You can read the whole thing yourself here, but here's just one of the stanzas:

In general –

My feelings about super progressive countries –

and culture –

Are

that the good out weigh the bad –

of course –

but,

We should also be sensitive to any potential down side

The poem, entitled “Skavlan, Sweden”, was published days before her appearance on popular Swedish-Norwegian talkshow Skavlan, on which she discussed her rumoured courtship with Julian Assange.

“Let's see what happens when he's free,” Anderson, who visits Assange frequently, told talkshow host Fredrik Skavlan when asked it the pair were romantically involved.

“But I spend probably more time with him than with any other man, socially, which is very odd.”

“He's very sexy,” she added.

Wikileaks founder Assange has been staying at the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012 to avoid prosecution in Sweden for alleged rape. Anderson has confirmed that she visits him regularly, and has in fact written several other poems about the Australian, all in the same poetry slam style.

In the poem she urges Sweden not to pursue the allegations against Assange:

Sweden must feels a tremendous responsibility to America 

to give him up?

Which is a shame.

And:

I have faith that Sweden might begin to think 'progressively'

and not cave to the US

like most other countries do-

This is a good opportunity to show Sweden’s strength

and healthy

individualism

The world is watching.

She then moves on to talking about Swedish environmentalism and describes her wish that its views on climate change and vegetarianism “would rub off on” US president Donald Trump.

Anderson, 49, has become known as an outspoken animal rights activist, following her career as Playboy model and actress famous from 90s television series Baywatch. The Skavlan talkshow was shot in London.

POETRY: Should Pamela Anderson have won the Nobel Prize instead of Bob Dylan?

For members

OPINION & ANALYSIS

OPINION: Sweden must demand that Julian Assange go free

Given Sweden’s involvement in the Assange case, the government’s continued silence over his impending extradition to the US is indefensible, says David Crouch

OPINION: Sweden must demand that Julian Assange go free

I have no personal fondness for Julian Assange. I cannot forgive him for not condemning the torrent of abuse and slander suffered by the two Swedish women who, in 2010, accused him of sexual assault. His treatment of them has been shameful. Assange has continued to protest his innocence and has not expressed any regret for what happened

But that was then and this is now. At stake is something much bigger than the fate of one man and two women. And the Swedish government bears a clear share of responsibility for the outcome. 

Sweden’s prosecutors dropped the sexual assault investigation against Assange in 2017. For more than three years, he has been held in a maximum security prison in London while he has fought extradition to the United States on espionage charges. In April, a British court finally approved the extradition and referred the matter to the Home Secretary, Priti Patel. 

Today (June 17), Patel gave the green light for extradition; Assange has 14 days to appeal. 

Extradition would be a colossal blow against media freedom. Journalists would fear to investigate US military and surveillance operations around the world. Assange himself faces a lifetime in jail for publishing classified documents about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, including evidence of war crimes

Many Swedish free speech organisations recognise this. “The information obtained thanks to Julian Assange and Wikileaks is of great public interest. In a democracy, whistleblowers must be protected, not taken to court to become pawns in a political game,” says the Swedish Journalists’ Association. A large number of press freedom and human right organisations have echoed these words, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and Index on Censorship, to name but a few.

“Should Assange be extradited to the US, it could have serious consequences for investigative journalism,” says the Swedish branch of Reporters without Borders. “Through the indictment of Assange, the US is also sending a signal to all journalists who want to examine the actions of the US military and security services abroad, or US arms deals for that matter. This also applies to Swedish journalists.”

Last month, the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights, Dunja Mijatović, called on Patel not to extradite Assange, saying it would have “a chilling effect on media freedom”.  Anna Ardin, one of the women who brought the original accusations of sexual assault, describes the accusations against Assange for espionage as “helt galet” (completely crazy). 

Given Sweden’s involvement in the Assange case, the continued silence from Rosenbad, the seat of government offices in Stockholm, is indefensible. 

For the seven years in which Assange took refuge in the Ecuadorean embassy in London, he said consistently and repeatedly that he was prepared to face justice in Sweden, but feared extradition to the United States and therefore required a guarantee that this would not happen. His treatment in the UK is proof that his fears were justified. 

As early as September 2012, The Local quoted Amnesty International on this matter: “If the Swedish authorities are able to confirm publicly that Assange will not eventually find himself on a plane to the USA if he submits himself to the authority of the Swedish courts then this will … it will break the current impasse and second it will mean the women who have levelled accusations of sexual assault are not denied justice.”

And yet, throughout, Sweden’s Ministry of Justice kept quiet. Instead, the Swedish Prosecution Authority stated repeatedly: “Every extradition case is to be judged on its own individual merits. For that reason the Swedish government cannot provide a guarantee in advance that Julian Assange would not be subject to further extradition to the USA.”

In 2016, a United Nations panel decided that Sweden had violated the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It called on the Swedish authorities to end Assange’s “deprivation of liberty”, respect his freedom of movement and offer him compensation. Again, the government itself remained silent, although Sweden’s director-general for legal affairs said that it disagreed with the panel.

Freedom of speech is one of the four “fundamental laws” that make up the Swedish constitution. There can be no excuse now for Morgan Johansson, Justice Minister, not to speak out in defence of Assange’s role as a whistleblower and journalist. 

Imagine if Assange had revealed Russian war crimes in Ukraine and was being held in Moscow’s high security prison? Every Western leader would be up in arms. 

Assange’s wife Stella Moris has Swedish citizenship. Her life, and that of their two children, will be destroyed if her husband, their father, is sent to rot in a US jail.

At this point in time, when Sweden’s independence in global affairs is in doubt owing to pressure from Turkey over its application to join Nato, it is even more vital for the government to break its silence and help bring the persecution of Julian Assange to an end. 

David Crouch covered Julian Assange’s campaign in the Swedish courts for The Guardian newspaper and is among 1900 journalists to have signed a statement in his defence. He is a freelance journalist and a lecturer in journalism at Gothenburg University.

SHOW COMMENTS