The Local is not responsible for content posted by users.
This discussion forum closed permanently on 25th February 2021.
2 Pages V   1 2 >   Reply to this topic

How many has Sweden vaccinated

What is today's excuse?

Essingen55
post 12.Jan.2021, 05:25 PM
Post #1
Joined: 12.Dec.2013

Almost 80,000....pretty pathetic really isn't it.

"It's the fault of the regions...." Anders Tegnell
"It's the fault of the regions...." Anders Tegnell
"It's the fault of the regions...." Anders Tegnell
"It's the fault of the regions...." Anders Tegnell

God, if you thought the UK's press meetings were bad, has anyone tried listening to these.
Go to the top of the page
+
Grommet
post 12.Jan.2021, 05:48 PM
Post #2
Joined: 10.May.2020

QUOTE (Essingen55 @ 12.Jan.2021, 06:25 PM) *
Almost 80,000...pretty pathetic really isn't it."It's the fault of the regions..." Anders Tegnell"It's the fault of the regions..." Anders Tegn ... (show full quote)

Nothing new. This was also said by what's her face, Lena Hallengren, in around April, when Sweden started looking, really, really bad.

Swedes are robotically formulaic.
Go to the top of the page
+
*Guest*
post 12.Jan.2021, 06:19 PM
Post #3


I'd blame the volume of vaccine given to sweden. It's not like there are millions of doses sitting on shelves waiting. The eu screwed up giving the contracts according to which nation it wanted to favour, not the ones most likely to produce a vaccine in any great volume rapidly. With 500m people to supply, it has failed.
Go to the top of the page
+
Essingen55
post 12.Jan.2021, 07:03 PM
Post #4
Joined: 12.Dec.2013

QUOTE
It's not like there are millions of doses sitting on shelves waiting.


They have used slightly less than half of the number of doses available due to the fact that the regions have ignored the FHM's "recommendation" to use all the doses for first doses. I think that generally the regions now don't take a lot of notice of FHM, which isn't really surprising.

QUOTE
With 500m people to supply, it has failed.


Exactly so. One of the first visible benefits of Brexit wouldn't you say?
Go to the top of the page
+
*Guest*
post 12.Jan.2021, 07:48 PM
Post #5


QUOTE (Essingen55 @ 12.Jan.2021, 07:03 PM) *
They have used slightly less than half of the number of doses available due to the fact that the regions have ignored the FHM's "recommendation" to use all the d ... (show full quote)

With 1200+ dead today I won't be rushing to hail the uk policy a success just yet.
Go to the top of the page
+
TheExpatEagle
post 12.Jan.2021, 07:53 PM
Post #6
Joined: 23.Aug.2016

QUOTE (Grommet @ 12.Jan.2021, 05:48 PM) *
Nothing new. This was also said by what's her face, Lena Hallengren, in around April, when Sweden started looking, really, really bad.. Swedes are robotically formulaic.


Wow, so Lena Hallengren was saying that before the vaccine has been created, approved and distributed?

You are a robot and a moron.
Go to the top of the page
+
TheExpatEagle
post 12.Jan.2021, 07:55 PM
Post #7
Joined: 23.Aug.2016


It's more than a little fishy that the UK were the first to order the Moderna vaccine yet we're being told we can't have our order whereas countries that ordered after us are getting vaccines.

They absolutely deny they are cashing in despite Israel paying $62 per dose and the UK $18 per dose... Nothing at all to do with money. I believe them.
Go to the top of the page
+
Essingen55
post 12.Jan.2021, 08:54 PM
Post #8
Joined: 12.Dec.2013

QUOTE
With 1200+ dead today I won't be rushing to hail the uk policy a success just yet.


Indeed. The statistics coming out of the UK are indeed terrible, but their success in securing vaccine doses and getting them into arms is bordering on impressive.
Go to the top of the page
+
Martin565
post 12.Jan.2021, 08:56 PM
Post #9
Joined: 4.Oct.2017

Go to the top of the page
+
*Guest*
post 12.Jan.2021, 08:58 PM
Post #10


QUOTE (Essingen55 @ 12.Jan.2021, 08:54 PM) *
Indeed. The statistics coming out of the UK are indeed terrible, but their success in securing vaccine doses and getting them into arms is bordering on impressive.

The best analogy I heard was, it's like the arsonist putting a fireman's suit to play the hero, after first causing the problem.
Go to the top of the page
+
*Guest*
post 12.Jan.2021, 09:01 PM
Post #11


Go to the top of the page
+
Martin565
post 12.Jan.2021, 09:04 PM
Post #12
Joined: 4.Oct.2017

QUOTE (Skogsbo1 @ 12.Jan.2021, 09:01 PM) *
Vaccines don't stop anybody catching anything. They give your immune system a massive head start to fight it, before you even feel any ill effects or symptoms. They say ev ... (show full quote)


I know how they work, neither do prior anti bodies but they say the might not stop you catching a heavy load of it and passing it on
Go to the top of the page
+
Grommet
post 13.Jan.2021, 04:47 AM
Post #13
Joined: 10.May.2020

QUOTE (TheExpatEagle @ 12.Jan.2021, 08:53 PM) *
Wow, so Lena Hallengren was saying that before the vaccine has been created, approved and distributed?. You are a robot and a moron.

No fucktard, she was talking about how the kommunes were not following the "recommendations" and that they were responsible for the out-of-control-spread, not her and not Tegnell, at that time.

It's a real wonder how you can still live without choking on your own slobber. The energy required to splain everything to you constantly, well, it's tiring.

Maybe time to get back to your podcast, bean. I think there are 20 followers now, waiting to hear all your garbled thoughts.
Go to the top of the page
+
Essingen55
post 13.Jan.2021, 09:40 AM
Post #14
Joined: 12.Dec.2013

QUOTE
No fucktard, she was talking about how the kommunes were not following the "recommendations" and that they were responsible for the out-of-control-spread, not her and not Tegnell, at that time.


You are correct of course. For the FHM it has always been someone else's fault...the regions, immigrants, people not following the recommendations. And yet if you go back, and review what they said at the beginning, it is 100% obvious that they were wrong on major issues...such as asymptomatic transmission. And how do they justify this now? By saying that it was a completely new disease that nobody knew anything about. Except that they did, it's just that FHM chose to ignore the existing scientific evidence and go with their own hunches.
Go to the top of the page
+
Martin565
post 13.Jan.2021, 10:08 AM
Post #15
Joined: 4.Oct.2017

Go to the top of the page
+

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topic
4 User(s) are reading this topic (4 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members: