Published: 30 Sep 11 12:19 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/36458/20110930/
Brazil's defense minister has said that the country has an "urgent´" need of new combat aircraft, reigniting renewed speculation about a multi-billion-dollar deal potentially involving Swedish Saab's Gripen NG.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
Swedish consumers are feeling less optimistic about the economy, with a down-turn also visible in the mood of the manufacturing industry, Sweden's National Institute for Economic Research said on Friday. READ () »
This year's Beckmans fashion graduates unleashed a dramatic clash of collections in Stockholm this week. It may have been dazzlingly hot outside in the sunshine, but on the catwalk things got a little dark. READ () »
The white-collar union Saco has lambasted Sweden's Employment Agency for its failure to help well-educated, foreign-born job seekers, whose unemployment rate is more than three times the average for people born in Sweden. READ () »
Fifteen percent of refugees in Sweden who enrolled in the new establishment system the past two years have gone on to find jobs, new figures show, leading some observers to worry that the low success rate will place a burden on the benefits system. READ () »
Sweden's central bank has appointed two new board members plucked from banking and academia to replace two outgoing members, one of whom was an outspoken critic of the Riksbank's commitment to the government's inflation goal. READ () »
Swedish telecom giant Ericsson has buckled under the pressure of European competition and will turn off the switch on a cable production plant in Sweden, leaving 350 employees without jobs. READ () »
While Sweden has a reputation for having one of the most painful tax bills in the world, a new report ranks Sweden 20th when comparing the tax burden on salaries when social security payments and salary brackets are taken into account. READ () »
Swedish telecom equipment maker Ericsson is suspected of having bribed ministers in Romania in connection with being awarded a contract for the country's emergency number and is now under investigation in the United States. READ () »
Sweden's largest business confederation has gone out guns blazing, criticizing politicians for not facing up to the challenges of "a lost year for Swedish exports" in 2012. READ () »
A Stockholm hospital saved from closure by private health care providers has been hailed by the Economist as one of modern's Sweden public-private success stories. READ () »
| 25/05 | Director of Product, Apps | Stockholm |
| 25/05 | Director of Product, Hardware | Stockholm |
| 25/05 | Director of Product, Platform | Stockholm |
| 25/05 | International Brand Manager | Malmö |
| 25/05 | Lead Product Designer - Spotify Apps/Partner Solutions | Stockholm |
| 25/05 | Major Account Manager Sweden | Stockholm |
| 25/05 | Medical Director (Respiratory) | Sverige |
| 25/05 | Principal / Senior Business Consultant | Stockholm |
| 25/05 | Project Manager | Hässleholm |
| 25/05 | Project Manager | Stockholm |
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
For what reason would Sweden let Brazil "take over" the Gripen project, just like that? When it comes to military equipment I don't think common market rules can apply that easily.
Economics of scale. A Brazilian takeover or coopting would guarantee a bright future for the Gripen. For example, the next generation Gripen with the superhornet engine would be built for sure. Everyone knows that swedens defenceneeds are too small to be the anchor customer for Gripen. Everyone stands to gain if Brazil deems that this is what Brazil wants.
Whose idea was it for a tiny country to enter the highly compeitive fighter jet industry anyway?
You make a cocksure assertion and then in the next sentence let on that you know absolutely nothing about the subject at hand? Funny.
Brazil bring alot of knowhow from their aerotech industry as well. And production and market potential. Its not like Brazil would swallow it up, they would be dependent on Linköping and SAAB for the forseeable future. But a partnership would definately serve both SAAB and sweden.
sweden is simply too small now after the end of the cold war to be a base for a fighter platform. There is too much politics involved in arms purchases to begin with and even more with a flagship product such as a fighter jet. Thats what it looks like to me anyway.
I think coopting with Brazil in this would benefit that very reason. Right now sweden is too small to support the platform. And it would be a shame to just let it die. It is a brilliant design.
sweden would benefit from keeping the productionline open. And Brazil would benefit from the very generous technology-sharing deal that is being discussed. As long as sweden maintains production capacity, it is not a problem if Gripen in some respects move to Brazil.
If Brazil wants to be the only south american country to produce and develop jet fighters this is the best route for Brazil, in my opinion. India tried it on their own and its a cautionary tale. Im sure india will get there in the end but 20 years later and at a much steeper price than what is possible to Brazil right now.
Yes, you're right.
Grippen has recovered all its massive development costs, sold hundreds of planes, and Saab's only problem is building enough of them to satisfy demand. Meanwhile, Boeing and Dassault quake in fear at the awesome sales machine that is Saab.
It's a good job we have you around to keep us straight on these things.
"See Norway's blunder."
Yep and now it actually feels pretty good when gotten the chance to laugh at them - remembering how they demonstratively were sawing the Gripen by the ankles. ;-)
I don't think that is an issue with the Rafale, plus France has had a cooperation with Brazil for a long time.
Instead of parroting ignorant journalist drivel, why dont you make an informed and thoughtful critique of the 1982 descicion, with the benefit of hindsight? Noone could know that the cold war would end back then. And no other platform was acceptable to the bas 90 system. Look at finland who had to buy a horrendously expensive aircraftcarrier design instead of the gripen?
The gripen project is as successfull as such a project can be. It is by far the most bang for your buck you can get these days. This is achived by avoiding designcreep and by using an unpresidented ratio of off the shelf components.
Sales, well, its sold to Czech republic, Hungary, Thailand, South Africa and the Empire Test Pilots' School. It is a probable choice in Switzerland and a contender in Brazil and India and a candidate for numerous others. If anything, the JAS 39 looks like the f-16 of todays world? With the F-35 project being in the state it is in it is not unlikely that some of the participants will opt out and go for Gripen instead.
Yes, the swedish state overbought to keep the project afloat. That might be right or wrong, but it can be hardly be described as a crazy descicion.
Fact, as Jostein has said, the JAS39 has got the most bang for your buck, and is the aircraft that fits the RFQ parameters best, but that amounts to about 10% of the decision to purchase.
If meeting a a spec and price was the only basis for decision, then SAAB would have sold the Viggen to India 30 years ago. The whole thing is a about geo politics and political sphere of influence. The bits that very few people get to see or know about.
If you want to know what really goes on in the world of aircraft sales, buy my book when I write it in a couple of years. ( Only problem I have is finding a safe place to live afterwards)
it's a known fact what goes on, not only in aircraft sales. not sure you need to fear for stating the obvious in printed format. Many others have done so in the past.