Published: 4 Aug 12 11:39 CET | Print version
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/42424/20120804/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's defense lawyer said on Friday that his client, seeking asylum in Ecuador, was in a state of limbo because of secrecy from the United States over the charges it may pursue.
What do you think? Leave your comment below.
As white-collar union Saco slammed Sweden's systems for helping well-educated foreigners into the labour market, The Local spoke to researcher Josefin Edström about the disconnect between foreign professionals and Swedish employers. READ () »
This year's Beckmans fashion graduates unleashed a dramatic clash of collections in Stockholm this week. It may have been dazzlingly hot outside in the sunshine, but on the catwalk things got a little dark. READ () »
For this week's secret location picture gallery quiz, we head to a city that's among the top 20 in terms of population size. Can you guess which one it is in nine clues? READ () »
Sweden's Princess Madeleine is "less nervous than she thought" about her impending walk down the aisle at Stockholm's Storkyrkan church to wed US financier Chris O'Neill. READ () »
Swedes are having less sex than ever before, a new survey has revealed, and their libidos appear to have waned too, prompting researchers to warn that "desire disorders" may be keeping Swedes from getting intimate. READ () »
A man has been arrested on the suspicion of murdering a 20-year-old woman who vanished three weeks ago in northern Sweden, and whose suspected body parts were uncovered on Monday. READ () »
At least two schools, a police station, and 15 cars were set ablaze in Stockholm on Thursday night as riots in the suburbs of the Swedish capital continued for the fifth straight night. READ () »
With one 18-year-old remanded in custody after four nights of rioting in Stockholm, Sweden's Integration Minister Erik Ullenhag said the rioters are a small minority, and did not represent a clash between young people in the suburbs and society. READ () »
More news from Germany at thelocal.de
More news from France at thelocal.fr
More news from Norway at thelocal.no
More news from Switzerland at thelocal.ch
Register now for:
> Free use of noticeboard
> Special discounts
> Weekly news roundup
> Unlimited use of discuss
"A week full to the brim with LFC football…. Div 5 LFC match against Nåjdens FK has been moved. This is due to the Svenska Cupen final: 26 May, 17.00 kick off, Nationalarenan Friends Arena, Solna. Next match is on Tuesday (see below). ………………………………………………………… Friday: Div5 Ladies: Rotebro IS FF – Långholmen FC (Skinnaråsens IP) KO: 16.15 ………………………………………………………… Saturday: Vets: Långholmen FC – IFK..." READ »
Your comments about this article:
The comments below have not been moderated in advance and are not produced by The Local unless clearly stated. Readers are responsible for the content of their own comments. Comments that breach our terms and conditions will be removed.
If charges are brought by a grand jury, they will be well identified and Mr. Assange will have ample time to prepare a defense.
Anyways, Assanges concerns of pending legal action in American doesn't justify avoiding his legal obligations in Sweden.
he hasn't even been charged yet. Why would he need to even come to Sweden if the charges are indeed baseless. And they are. They have have had ample time to question him. There is a statute of limitations with any accusation and I believe the reason why they aren't questioning him is because they know they have no case..
Assange is only predicting on what might happen to him, akin to a person
predicting that they will find 1 million dollars on the ground. Sweden will not violate their commitment to EAW for Assange, irrelevant of Assanges baseless claims.
The Swedish government association to the desire to prosecute Assange is that of their commitment to the EAW and laws that govern the enforcement of the laws of Sweden.
Assange's predicament is due to his refusal to surrender to Swedish authorities under their terms. Anyone else would have been treated exactly the same as Assange has.
Swedish prosecutors wants to prosecute Assange.
If the accused believes that the accusations are baseless, then they need to defend themselves.
The is a unique mechanism in the statute of limitations. "The running of the statute may be suspended for any period the accused is absent from the state..." So Assange better get into Sweden quick.
The only plausible reason as to why Assange has to yet to be charged is his refusal to return to Sweden and be charged. Prosecutors try to avoid charging a person in absentia. It is can be considered a violation of the accused rights to be present to hear and understand the charges against them.
Julian Assange seems convinced that he is so special that laws need to be different for him.
Prov 28:1 - The wicked run away when no one is chasing them, but the godly are as bold as lions.
It is in fact much harder to extradite from UK to the US, than it is from Sweden. In the UK it will take many years, and there will be plenty of court cases who can fail. In Sweden it will go fast, and it will not destroy Sweden reputation. The people who think Sweden is shithole will still think so, and the ones who think Sweden is amazing will not change their mind. Swedes will say "oh well, that is a shame" and forget about it, like other things Sweden has done.
Aasange do not want life in prison in America. That is why he is not going to Sweden.
Also, a dictator kicked out Sweden. So what? Who cares?
["...So what? Who cares?"
I can see you have stated your mind about Sweden and the Swedes. So what? Who Cares?
She knows damn well that Sweden will not extradite anyone to another country that will not agree to guarantee that the death penalty is off the table.
In Canada, we always make sure that the death penalty will be not be carried out on anyone we extradite to the U.S. They have ALWAYS honored our position EVERY TIME we have asked.
She is simply playing the same pathetic game as her son and his lawyer.
So let's get real here, and knock off the bullsxxt!
(Much like the Soviet Union and China practice.)
The Obama administration now has a well-established record for "preemptive arrests" of various types of activists; has waged a war on whistleblowers -- including invoking the Espionage Act against US citizens -- more times than all previous US presidents combined.
Wikileaks' Assange has much to fear from them, especially as at least 13 US ambassadors had to be replaced as they were found to be persona non grata in the host countries thanks to those Wikileaked cables which exposed how they were working on behalf of American-based multinationals against the interests of those host countries.
In response to that the NDAA was brought out, specifically "preemptive arrests." The inclusion of that law was used to try to demonstrate that Assange's concerns are some how founded. The obvious question is why would US try to get Assange through proxy? They have an obvious law that would make the process easier, where all they would have to do is issue an arrest warrant for Assange. That is no need to trump up charges. All that would be needed would be suspicions related those contained in the NDAA, and an arrest warrant. That is even thought the NDAA was signed in late 2011.
All in all, that does not diminish the fact that Assange has gotten due process and is still expect to be held accountable. The grand jury is nothing but an investigation into the whether or not Assange or Wikileaks have committed criminal offense. Assange's lack of understand is no reason to feel helpless, he should educate himself on about it.
In which case surely it's EASIER for them to get him from Sweden because, if other Brits are on the same thought-waves as my friends and family are, Britain doesn't agree that he's committed any crimes like the USA seem to think, and therefore wouldn't agree to the extradition, whereas Sweden seem to agree that he's a criminal from the US' point of view, especially as they see him as a criminal here too.
Does that make sense? I'm just wondering what other people think of this, surely I can't be the only one to have thought if this idea.
Complete and utter crock of bullsxxt.
Laughable.
Your assertion about Canada and the death penalty is not entirely correct. In the interests of journalistic accuracy, read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Ng
To my surprise you are right.
I was always under the impression that Canada enforced the agreement of no death penalty in that case.
We did not ask for it like i thought.
I stand correct on that point.
However, i still stand behind my other point, that they always honor the request when asked for.
If Sweden agreed to extradite Assange, and stipulated no death penalty, America would indeed honor it if they agreed.
I doubt very much they would seek the death penalty for Assange anyway.
In the Manning case, the soldier who was arrested in May 2010 in Iraq on suspicion of having passed classified material ... It was the largest set of restricted documents ever leaked to the public, a capital offense, the prosecutors are on record saying they will not seek the death penalty in his case.
That is the point. America will honor a request made by other government when surrendering fugitives. The prosecutor will have to make the request for punishment, however their might be some cases where the court over rules.
@Opaline
Each extradition request for individual is considered based on the merits of the crimes and issues related to the punishments for the crimes included. Those decisions are made through the courts.
Sweden as a nation public view on Assange varies, with no clear consensus.
There is a need to stop conflating Assange's publication of the cables with the relationship he had with two Swedish women. This misunderstand of what a grand jury is also does not help.
The grand jury in America is trying to determine what laws Assange and Wikileaks have committed in the obtaining and publishing of government information. The prosecutor is Sweden want to prosecute Assange for the sexual molestation of two Swedish women.
"That is the point. America will honor a request made by other government when surrendering fugitives. The prosecutor will have to make the request for punishment, however their might be some cases where the court over rules."
In those cases where the court over rules, wouldn't that decision have been made before the extradition is complete, as in the case of Ng?
Huge chunk of all inmates in Europe and US - from Al Qaida members to Neo Nazis, Russian mafia and Chinese contrabandists can be paid off to murder him and all the fingers will ALWAYS be pointed at the US government. Especially by the left wing socialists, who are into conspiracy theories more than the medieval europeans into witch stories.
So the dances around the legal questions are just for the show. It is all just to prolong his already miserable life. If he has left 1% of survival will, he will demand to place him in a federal high security prison in a single cell in US.
America will honor requests made by Canada and other countries. Canada never made any request of clemency for Ng. They haven't made any request for Canadian citizen Ronald Smith. The only reason it is known about him is because of ACLU fighting for him. Anyways, Ng is not a Canadian citizen.
Upon further investigation it seems that the government merely asked if extraditing a fugitive to a country that had the capital punishment was a violation of their rights. United States v. Burns makes it a violation of their rights.
The cases that I am referring to are those in America. That would be bad grammar on my behave. Also, it should have been written differently to be more clear.
Prosecutors might request leniency for a suspect in a crime. This could be because of the suspects cooperation with the prosecutors or another reason. Anil Kumar who was is accused of insider trading is one example. Then there is Brent Beckley of Absolute Poker.
Here is an article on Canada's position that you may find pertinent.
"http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?p=46015647#post46015647"
Excerpt,
"Atif Rafay and Sebastian Burns were not surrendered to the United States until the state of Washington agreed to take the death penalty off the table. Britain, France and Australia have done the same with extradition requests made by the USA as well."
That is the same case thanks for all the information. I wish Assange smartens up and defends himself in Sweden.