Why Sweden’s quest for carbon neutrality may be flawed

Why Sweden's quest for carbon neutrality may be flawed
Wind turbines at the island of Mariahamn between Sweden and Finland. Photo: AFP
Known for ecological advances and a relatively light carbon footprint among industrialised nations, Sweden wants to be the first that is carbon neutral by 2045. But the Swedish model has its limits.

Carbon tax

Sweden is at the forefront of selective waste sorting, recycling and renewable energy.

The sparsely populated country of about 10.3 million people experiences long nights and cold temperatures during winter months but produces electricity largely free of fossil fuels by combining nuclear power with renewable, mainly hydroelectric, energy.

In 1991, the Nordic country took an early step to a greener transition by introducing a tax on carbon. Nearly 30 years later, emissions — which were already lower than the EU average — have fallen by 26 percent.

Sweden also benefits from forests that cover two thirds of its land, and many rivers as sources of energy.

In 2018, Sweden was the EU's biggest per capita consumer of renewable energy, with 54.6 percent of total consumption coming from renewables, compared with an EU average of 18.9 percent.

(article continues below)

See also on The Local:

Land of overconsumption

“In Sweden, we live as if we have 4.2 planets,” Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg said scoldingly over the summer.

Annual greenhouse gas emissions based on consumption amount to about nine tonnes per person, according to the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.

This is nine times more than required to meet the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping temperature levels “well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.”

 

According to calculations by the organisation Global Footprint Network, if the world's population consumed like a Swede, the “Overshoot Day” — when humanity has consumed all the natural resources that can be renewed in a year — would have been April 3.

Globally, this day fell on July 29 last year.

Biodiversity at risk

While largely covered by forests, most are designated “production-forests,” meaning they are intended for forestry industries.

Ecologists warn that this threatens biodiversity and according to the Swedish Species Information Centre, one in 10 species living in the country's forests are on their “red list.”

A look at the aquatic environment meanwhile shows that hydroelectric dams prevent migratory fish from reaching spawning grounds.

As for the Baltic, a mostly enclosed and shallow sea, and one of the most fragile on earth, it is exposed in particular to excessive amounts of fertiliser from agricultural wastewater.


Member comments

The Local is not responsible for content posted by users.

  1. Why EU don’t down the tax for E85 fuel to zero? Is the concern the ambient or the money? This van help decrease the C02 emission very fast, don’t need to wait for the eletric cars. Ow, I forgot, the electrical energy cam be produced ínside EU…

Become a Member to leave a comment.Or login here.