Advertisement

Politics Members only

'Total deadlock': No end in sight to Sweden's parliamentary pairing chaos

TT/Emma Löfgren
TT/Emma Löfgren - news@thelocal.se
'Total deadlock': No end in sight to Sweden's parliamentary pairing chaos
The Social Democrat group leader, Lena Hallengren, speaks to journalists in parliament. Photo: Jonas Ekströmer/TT
Add The Local as a preferred source

Another meeting of parliamentary group leaders to discuss the broken-down 'pairing' agreement ended without any solution in place.

Become a member or log in to continue reading

More

Comments (4)

Join the conversation in our comments section below. Share your own views and experience and if you have a question or suggestion for our journalists then email us at news@thelocal.se.
Please keep comments civil, constructive and on topic – and make sure to read our terms of use before getting involved.

Please log in to leave a comment.

All comments 4
Sort by
Mark Borgen
There is a very simple way to end this entire conversation. I think that what the SD have done in the last several months may well backfire on them. Since they did not honor the system with the number of votes that were cast recently, my opinion is that there should be a swift and balancing action taken. I do not think that the SD should be denied the two extra votes that were cast. Those votes should stand. The correction right now should be to give two more votes to all the other parties that can now be cast. The SD took two extra votes and it is only fair that the other 7 parties should be allowed two more votes. I wonder what the out come of the vote would be if you allowed for another 14 votes to be cast? Who could I suggest this to? I have a very strong opinion about fairness at all levels. This may be part of the source of my one, guiding principle in life……”If it isn’t working for all of us, it isn’t really working for any of us.”
nature
Why are liberals are not giving comments on anything? Is anyone noticing a pattern? They are never available to comment on any issue to any newspaper. I guess they’re facing a moral dilemma in their internal meetings, but maintaining an external facade supporting SD. This applies to other tidö parties as well. They say the vote need not be retaken, fine. But as a follow up, why is anyone not questioning, “So, you support what SD did?” and push for a straight answer? Can anyone at the Local do this please if you ever get a chance?

See Also