For members


How could the Sweden Democrats change life for foreigners in Sweden?

Votes are still being counted, but it's now looking more likely than not that the far-right Sweden Democrats will now win the influence they have been pushing for ever since they entered parliament in 2010. How could they change life for foreigners in Sweden?

How could the Sweden Democrats change life for foreigners in Sweden?
Sweden Democrat party leader Jimmie Åkesson holds a rally in the major square in Gävle. Photo: Henrik Montgomery/TT

Will the Sweden Democrats join the governing coalition? 

The party’s leader Jimmie Åkesson was absolutely clear in his speech just after midnight that that is his first choice. 

“If there’s a change in government, we are going to have a central position in the new government. Our ambition is to be part of the government. Our ambitious is majority government. That’s what we see as best for Sweden now.” 

This would mean following the strategy of their Norwegian equivalent, the Progress Party, which joined a coalition with Norway’s Conservative Party, rather than that of their Danish counterpart, the Danish People’s Party, which chose to wield power from the outside. 

Moderate leader Ulf Kristersson reiterated in a TV4 debate before the election, however, that he was planning for the latter. “It will be a börgerlig [centre-right] government, with börgerlig parties,” he said

In our guide to bloc politics, Nicholas Aylott, assistant professor at Södertörn University, however ranks both options as “possible”.

Particularly if the Sweden Democrats win significantly more votes than the Moderate Party, it might be hard for the party’s leader Jimmie Åkesson to explain a decision not to demand ministerial posts, and also hard for Kristersson to deny them. 

Either way, the party has said it will insist on the other parties signing a common policy document, setting out the priorities for the government, similar to the January Agreement under which the Centre and Liberal parties backed the Social Democrats at the start of 2019. 

This makes it certain that Sweden Democrat policies will form a significant part of a right-wing government’s programme. 

How could a right-wing government change the debate climate in Sweden? 

In Denmark, the years in which the Danish People’s Party had a kingmaker role in parliament saw a dramatic change in the terms of public debate, with increasingly hostile rhetoric around Muslims and Islam. Islamophobia and anti-immigrant sentiment, meanwhile, became more prevalent among the general population. 

Sweden is a consensus culture, and a right-wing government could slowly shift the åsiktskorridor, or opinion corridor, pushing the process which has seen parties on both sides in this election employ tougher language around crime and immigration to greater extremes.

It is possible that this change in the debate climate will be more muted than was the case in Denmark, as Swedish culture tends to be more moderate. 

How could a Sweden Democrat-backed government change life for people who want to come to Sweden? 


The party, in its proposal for “Sweden’s future migration policy”, is calling for Sweden to have “the lowest immigration in Europe”. This is taken directly from the Danish People’s Party, which after it won influence in 2001 drove through a new immigration policy in Denmark that it quite rightly boasted was “Europe’s strictest”.

In the immigration policy document, the party lists 30 ways it believes Sweden could tighten its asylum legislation while still meeting the minimum EU requirements. 

These include: 

  • Bringing in a law making asylum seekers responsible for providing evidence of their need for asylum
  • Making it possible for Sweden to refuse asylum to those who “create the reasons for asylum” after they have left their home country. This is the proposal that has created the most controversy, as many refugees who flee their countries due to their sexual orientation only come out publicly after they have left.
  • Making it possible for Sweden to deny subsidiary protection, a weaker version of protection given to those who fall short of refugee status, to those who have been convicted of serious crimes, and to be able to deport people given asylum who then commit crimes in Sweden.
  • Limiting family reunion so that dependents of those granted asylum get a maximum of one year’s residence in Sweden at a time
  • Defining ‘family’ in the strictest way allowed by EU when it comes to family reunion
  • Stopping family reunion for children over the age of 21
  • Stopping family reunion on the basis of relationships formed after an asylum seeker left their home country
  • Having the highest possible maintenance requirement for people applying for residency or family reunion, including health insurance and housing.  
  • Removing the right to family reunion for those with subsidiary protection
  • Making asylum seekers pay for their own lawyer if they have sufficient means to do so
  • Giving Sweden the possibility to send asylum seekers to a third country nearer their homeland 
  • Bringing in a stipulation that people can be denied asylum if they have passed through a safe EU country en route to Sweden 

When it comes to labour migrants, the party wants to:

  • Bring in a minimum salary threshold and also prevent work permits being given out for professions where there is no skills shortage. 

This is similar to what the Social Democrats are proposing, although the party’s leader Jimmie Åkesson told The Local in an interview that his party did not want unions to have a say. 

How could a Sweden Democrat-backed government change life for foreigners already in Sweden? 

When it comes to asylum seekers and refugees already in Sweden, the party also plans to make life harder. 

Measures include: 

  • Annulling Sweden’s law on permanent residency for asylum seekers. It’s unclear exactly what this would mean, but on the face of it, it would mean that anyone coming to Sweden for asylum would need to renew their temporary residency for as long as they remain in Sweden
  • Limiting welfare payments to those granted subsidiary protection (alternativ skyddstatus)
  • Increasing the possibility under Swedish law to keep asylum seekers in detention
  • Means-testing benefits for refugees so that only those without their own funds receive benefits  
  • Make it possible for the state to make refugees pay back any benefits they have received once they have established themselves 

When it comes to criminal justice, the party has proposals for a range of new laws that single out foreigners, including: 

  • Investigating deporting foreigners who have an “anti-social lifestyle” 
  • Deporting foreign citizens who commit crimes 

How likely is it that these changes to immigration law will be brought in under a Moderate-led government? 

Very likely.

In the Moderates’ manifesto, they also say they want to tighten Swedish asylum law to the most restrictive level allowed under EU law, and say they aim to reduce asylum in Sweden to “Danish or Norwegian levels”. 

After the Sweden Democrats announced their immigration proposals, the Liberal Party said it disagreed with several proposed changes, particularly the one on “the asylum seeker creating the reason for asylum after leaving their home country”, as this would make it very difficult for LGBT asylum seekers. 

There would be a fight, but many, or indeed most, of the Sweden Democrats’ proposals would probably become Swedish law. 

To what extent could the Sweden Democrats undermine democracy and the rule of law? 

Sweden’s former prime minister Stefan Löfven argued that the party was a threat to democracy in a recent opinion piece in Dagens Nyheter.

He pointed to the party’s calls for a reduction in Sweden’s national subsidies to newspapers and other media, their attacks on journalists, their calls for cuts to spending on culture, their calls to remove books in foreign languages from libraries, and discrimination against non-Swedish citizens. 

The Sweden Democrats are in favour of cuts to the public service broadcasters SVT and SR, limiting them to a tighter public information role, and perhaps also combining SVT, SR, and educational broadcaster UR into a single organisation. 

Several senior party figures have also raised the possibility of election irregularities on Sunday, which some on the left have warned is an early sign that they might question the result, as President Donald Trump did in the US after losing the 2020 election. 

Judging by what has happened in Denmark and Norway when far-right parties gain political power, however, Sweden’s democracy should not be threatened.  

Could the Sweden Democrats act as a brake on the Moderates’ economic and welfare policies? 

The Sweden Democrats’ leader Jimmie Åkesson describes his party as economically on the left, and has threatened that if the Moderates seek to make cuts or otherwise limit Sweden’s A-Kassa system of social insurance, he will withdraw his party’s support and go into opposition. 

The party has also called for dental care to be subsidised to the same extent as other medical treatments, a policy shared with the Left Party. 

If they can get their immigration policies through, the Sweden Democrats are likely to offer the Moderates concessions over tax cuts and welfare spending. 

But they will require at least some symbolic victories in the economic sphere — perhaps on A-kassa — so that it can prevent the Social Democrats from winning back working-class voters by accusing it of selling out voters’ welfare to the economic right.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.


Sweden’s right-wing parties agree to bring back Norlén as Speaker 

The four parties backing Moderate leader Ulf Kristersson as prime minister on Sunday announced that they had agreed to keep the current Speaker, Andreas Norlén in place, when the role is put to a vote as parliament opens on Monday.

Sweden's right-wing parties agree to bring back Norlén as Speaker 

The parties won a three-seat majority over the bloc led by the incumbent Social Democrats in Sweden’s general election on September 11th, and are currently in the middle of negotiating how they will form Sweden’s next government. 

Sweden’s parliament meets at 11am for the official installation of the 349 MPs for this mandate period. The votes for the Speaker and three Deputy Speakers are the first item on the agenda, after which the parties each select their parliamentary leaders and then vote on who should chair each of the parliamentary committees. 

READ ALSO: What happens next as parliament reopens? 

In a joint press release announcing the decision, the parties also agreed that the Sweden Democrats would be given eight of the 16 chairmanships the bloc will have of parliamentary committees in the next parliament, and that MPs for all four parties would back Julia Kronlid, the Sweden Democrats’ Second Deputy Leader, as the second deputy Speaker, serving under Norlén. 

In the press release, the parties said that Norlén had over the last four years shown that he has “the necessary personal qualities and qualifications which the role requires”. 

The decision to retain Norlén, who presided over the 134 days of talks and parliamentary votes that led to the January Agreement in 2019, was praised by Social Democrat leader Magdalena Andersson. 

Norlén, she said in a statement, had “managed his responsibilities well over the past four years and been a good representative of Sweden’s Riksdag.” 

The decision to appoint Kronlid was opposed by both the Left Party and the Green Party, who said that she supported tightening abortion legislation, and did not believe in evolution.

The Green Party’s joint leader Märta Stenevi said that her party “did not have confidence in Julia Kronlid”, pointing to an interview she gave in 2014 when she said she did not believe that humans were descended from apes.

The party has proposed its finance spokesperson Janine Alm Ericson as a rival candidate. 

The Left Party said it was planning to vote for the Centre Party’s candidate for the post second deputy Speaker in the hope of blocking Kronlid as a candidate.